List: discuss@lists.openscad.org
From: doug moen
Re: [OpenSCAD] libigl: anyone poked at it for CGAL (partial) replacement?
Fri, Nov 27, 2015 1:42 PM
On Thursday, 26 November 2015, Tim Hawkins wrote:
> It does claim to be multithreaded, which i can belive as voxel operations
> are easy to partition, i dont claim to have any expertice in this, my
> graphics abilities are limited to 2d, i used to write postscript
> rasterisation engines, which render down to a trapezoid list which is