MM
Magnus Melin
Thu, Dec 7, 2017 9:02 AM
Traditionally add-ons have been set to be compatible by default, i.e. not
needed an action from the add-on author to continue to function when
Thunderbird does a major version update. Many times the add-ons haven't really
worked and caused strange bug reports. For Thunderbird 59 it doesn't make
sense to keep the compatible by default scheme. If the add-on hasn't been
updated, it very likely will cause problems - and that's not in anybody's best
interest.
So let's change the scheme to not-compatible by default. Comments?
-Magnus
Traditionally add-ons have been set to be compatible by default, i.e. not
needed an action from the add-on author to continue to function when
Thunderbird does a major version update. Many times the add-ons haven't really
worked and caused strange bug reports. For Thunderbird 59 it doesn't make
sense to keep the compatible by default scheme. If the add-on hasn't been
updated, it very likely will cause problems - and that's not in anybody's best
interest.
So let's change the scheme to not-compatible by default. Comments?
-Magnus
MH
Matt Harris
Thu, Dec 7, 2017 9:37 PM
On 07-Dec-17 7:32 PM, Magnus Melin wrote:
Traditionally add-ons have been set to be compatible by default, i.e.
not needed an action from the add-on author to continue to function
when Thunderbird does a major version update. Many times the add-ons
haven't really worked and caused strange bug reports. For Thunderbird
59 it doesn't make sense to keep the compatible by default scheme. If
the add-on hasn't been updated, it very likely will cause problems -
and that's not in anybody's best interest.
So let's change the scheme to not-compatible by default. Comments?
-Magnus
I would support that, I would be happier if we provided a back out for
the update if the user wants it following the notification that
compatibility is unlikely without an update so these ones have been
marked incompatible and disabled.
Support is full up following updates of users that want to "roll back"
the latest update. This is normally due to problems with application
firewalls and security software, or add-ons. But I think we have to
bite the bullet and actually offer a one click let me out of here
option. Regardless of the reason, or how silly it is we are in the
business of offering products to users and they have expectations. One
of them is that they can revert to yesterday when they were comfortable
in their ignorance. Perhaps opt them out of automatic updates for a week
or two. Then their anti virus will have caught up and they will be
happy campers that we fixed the bad release.
Matt
On 07-Dec-17 7:32 PM, Magnus Melin wrote:
> Traditionally add-ons have been set to be compatible by default, i.e.
> not needed an action from the add-on author to continue to function
> when Thunderbird does a major version update. Many times the add-ons
> haven't really worked and caused strange bug reports. For Thunderbird
> 59 it doesn't make sense to keep the compatible by default scheme. If
> the add-on hasn't been updated, it very likely will cause problems -
> and that's not in anybody's best interest.
>
> So let's change the scheme to not-compatible by default. Comments?
>
> -Magnus
>
I would support that, I would be happier if we provided a back out for
the update if the user wants it following the notification that
compatibility is unlikely without an update so these ones have been
marked incompatible and disabled.
Support is full up following updates of users that want to "roll back"
the latest update. This is normally due to problems with application
firewalls and security software, or add-ons. But I think we have to
bite the bullet and actually offer a one click let me out of here
option. Regardless of the reason, or how silly it is we are in the
business of offering products to users and they have expectations. One
of them is that they can revert to yesterday when they were comfortable
in their ignorance. Perhaps opt them out of automatic updates for a week
or two. Then their anti virus will have caught up and they will be
happy campers that we fixed the bad release.
Matt
PB
Patrick Brunschwig
Fri, Dec 8, 2017 7:32 AM
On 07.12.17 10:02, Magnus Melin wrote:
Traditionally add-ons have been set to be compatible by default, i.e.
not needed an action from the add-on author to continue to function when
Thunderbird does a major version update. Many times the add-ons haven't
really worked and caused strange bug reports. For Thunderbird 59 it
doesn't make sense to keep the compatible by default scheme. If the
add-on hasn't been updated, it very likely will cause problems - and
that's not in anybody's best interest.
So let's change the scheme to not-compatible by default. Comments?
I think that's a required step. It's better to disable incompatible
add-ons than to have add-ons that are broken and possibly disturb
functionality in Thunderbird (and other add-ons).
-Patrick
On 07.12.17 10:02, Magnus Melin wrote:
> Traditionally add-ons have been set to be compatible by default, i.e.
> not needed an action from the add-on author to continue to function when
> Thunderbird does a major version update. Many times the add-ons haven't
> really worked and caused strange bug reports. For Thunderbird 59 it
> doesn't make sense to keep the compatible by default scheme. If the
> add-on hasn't been updated, it very likely will cause problems - and
> that's not in anybody's best interest.
>
> So let's change the scheme to not-compatible by default. Comments?
I think that's a required step. It's better to disable incompatible
add-ons than to have add-ons that are broken and possibly disturb
functionality in Thunderbird (and other add-ons).
-Patrick
MM
Magnus Melin
Tue, Apr 3, 2018 7:45 PM
Traditionally add-ons have been set to be compatible by default, i.e.
not needed an action from the add-on author to continue to function
when Thunderbird does a major version update. Many times the add-ons
haven't really worked and caused strange bug reports. For Thunderbird
59 it doesn't make sense to keep the compatible by default scheme. If
the add-on hasn't been updated, it very likely will cause problems -
and that's not in anybody's best interest.
So let's change the scheme to not-compatible by default. Comments?
-Magnus
Maildev mailing list
Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
Going to do it in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1451097
-Magnus
On 07-12-2017 11:02, Magnus Melin wrote:
> Traditionally add-ons have been set to be compatible by default, i.e.
> not needed an action from the add-on author to continue to function
> when Thunderbird does a major version update. Many times the add-ons
> haven't really worked and caused strange bug reports. For Thunderbird
> 59 it doesn't make sense to keep the compatible by default scheme. If
> the add-on hasn't been updated, it very likely will cause problems -
> and that's not in anybody's best interest.
>
> So let's change the scheme to not-compatible by default. Comments?
>
> -Magnus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Maildev mailing list
> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
>
OE
Onno Ekker
Tue, Apr 3, 2018 9:13 PM
Does this mean add-on authors physically need to change their add-ons (e.g. update maxVersion in install.rdf) or only mark it compatible on amo?
Onno
On 07-12-2017 11:02, Magnus Melin wrote:
Traditionally add-ons have been set to be compatible by default, i.e. not needed an action from the add-on author to continue to function when Thunderbird does a major version update. Many times the add-ons haven't really worked and caused strange bug reports. For Thunderbird 59 it doesn't make sense to keep the compatible by default scheme. If the add-on hasn't been updated, it very likely will cause problems - and that's not in anybody's best interest.
So let's change the scheme to not-compatible by default. Comments?
-Magnus
Maildev mailing list
Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
Does this mean add-on authors physically need to change their add-ons (e.g. update maxVersion in install.rdf) or only mark it compatible on amo?
Onno
> On 3 Apr 2018, at 21:45, Magnus Melin <mkmelin+mozilla@iki.fi> wrote:
>
> Going to do it in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1451097
>
> -Magnus
>
>> On 07-12-2017 11:02, Magnus Melin wrote:
>> Traditionally add-ons have been set to be compatible by default, i.e. not needed an action from the add-on author to continue to function when Thunderbird does a major version update. Many times the add-ons haven't really worked and caused strange bug reports. For Thunderbird 59 it doesn't make sense to keep the compatible by default scheme. If the add-on hasn't been updated, it very likely will cause problems - and that's not in anybody's best interest.
>>
>> So let's change the scheme to not-compatible by default. Comments?
>>
>> -Magnus
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Maildev mailing list
>> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
>> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Maildev mailing list
> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
JK
Jörg Knobloch
Thu, Apr 5, 2018 9:27 AM
On 03/04/2018 23:13, Onno Ekker wrote:
only mark it compatible on amo?
I re-uploaded three add-ons to AMO last night since I couldn't find a
"mark as compatible" button.
Jörg.
On 03/04/2018 23:13, Onno Ekker wrote:
> only mark it compatible on amo?
I re-uploaded three add-ons to AMO last night since I couldn't find a
"mark as compatible" button.
Jörg.
MM
Magnus Melin
Thu, Apr 5, 2018 7:34 PM
If the add-on is on AMO you just need to mark it compatible.
To do that, go to AMO to the add-ons page, then Manage Status &
Versions, then under Listed versions, click the link for a version and
set its compatible versions.
-Magnus
On 04-04-2018 00:13, Onno Ekker wrote:
Does this mean add-on authors physically need to change their add-ons (e.g. update maxVersion in install.rdf) or only mark it compatible on amo?
Onno
On 07-12-2017 11:02, Magnus Melin wrote:
Traditionally add-ons have been set to be compatible by default, i.e. not needed an action from the add-on author to continue to function when Thunderbird does a major version update. Many times the add-ons haven't really worked and caused strange bug reports. For Thunderbird 59 it doesn't make sense to keep the compatible by default scheme. If the add-on hasn't been updated, it very likely will cause problems - and that's not in anybody's best interest.
So let's change the scheme to not-compatible by default. Comments?
-Magnus
Maildev mailing list
Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
If the add-on is on AMO you just need to mark it compatible.
To do that, go to AMO to the add-ons page, then Manage Status &
Versions, then under Listed versions, click the link for a version and
set its compatible versions.
-Magnus
On 04-04-2018 00:13, Onno Ekker wrote:
> Does this mean add-on authors physically need to change their add-ons (e.g. update maxVersion in install.rdf) or only mark it compatible on amo?
>
> Onno
>
>> On 3 Apr 2018, at 21:45, Magnus Melin <mkmelin+mozilla@iki.fi> wrote:
>>
>> Going to do it in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1451097
>>
>> -Magnus
>>
>>> On 07-12-2017 11:02, Magnus Melin wrote:
>>> Traditionally add-ons have been set to be compatible by default, i.e. not needed an action from the add-on author to continue to function when Thunderbird does a major version update. Many times the add-ons haven't really worked and caused strange bug reports. For Thunderbird 59 it doesn't make sense to keep the compatible by default scheme. If the add-on hasn't been updated, it very likely will cause problems - and that's not in anybody's best interest.
>>>
>>> So let's change the scheme to not-compatible by default. Comments?
>>>
>>> -Magnus
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Maildev mailing list
>>> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
>>> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
>> _______________________________________________
>> Maildev mailing list
>> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
>> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Maildev mailing list
>> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
>> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
WM
Wayne Mery
Fri, Apr 6, 2018 3:44 PM
So that is only available to *author *of the addon ?
On 4/5/2018 3:34 PM, Magnus Melin wrote:
If the add-on is on AMO you just need to mark it compatible.
To do that, go to AMO to the add-ons page, then Manage Status &
Versions, then under Listed versions, click the link for a version and
set its compatible versions.
-Magnus
On 04-04-2018 00:13, Onno Ekker wrote:
Does this mean add-on authors physically need to change their add-ons (e.g. update maxVersion in install.rdf) or only mark it compatible on amo?
Onno
On 3 Apr 2018, at 21:45, Magnus Melinmkmelin+mozilla@iki.fi wrote:
Going to do it inhttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1451097
-Magnus
On 07-12-2017 11:02, Magnus Melin wrote:
Traditionally add-ons have been set to be compatible by default, i.e. not needed an action from the add-on author to continue to function when Thunderbird does a major version update. Many times the add-ons haven't really worked and caused strange bug reports. For Thunderbird 59 it doesn't make sense to keep the compatible by default scheme. If the add-on hasn't been updated, it very likely will cause problems - and that's not in anybody's best interest.
So let's change the scheme to not-compatible by default. Comments?
-Magnus
Maildev mailing list
Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
So that is only available to *author *of the addon ?
On 4/5/2018 3:34 PM, Magnus Melin wrote:
>
> If the add-on is on AMO you just need to mark it compatible.
>
> To do that, go to AMO to the add-ons page, then Manage Status &
> Versions, then under Listed versions, click the link for a version and
> set its compatible versions.
>
> -Magnus
>
> On 04-04-2018 00:13, Onno Ekker wrote:
>> Does this mean add-on authors physically need to change their add-ons (e.g. update maxVersion in install.rdf) or only mark it compatible on amo?
>>
>> Onno
>>
>>> On 3 Apr 2018, at 21:45, Magnus Melin<mkmelin+mozilla@iki.fi> wrote:
>>>
>>> Going to do it inhttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1451097
>>>
>>> -Magnus
>>>
>>>> On 07-12-2017 11:02, Magnus Melin wrote:
>>>> Traditionally add-ons have been set to be compatible by default, i.e. not needed an action from the add-on author to continue to function when Thunderbird does a major version update. Many times the add-ons haven't really worked and caused strange bug reports. For Thunderbird 59 it doesn't make sense to keep the compatible by default scheme. If the add-on hasn't been updated, it very likely will cause problems - and that's not in anybody's best interest.
>>>>
>>>> So let's change the scheme to not-compatible by default. Comments?
>>>>
>>>> -Magnus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Maildev mailing list
>>>> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
>>>> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Maildev mailing list
>>> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
>>> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Maildev mailing list
>>> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
>>> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Maildev mailing list
> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
PK
Philipp Kewisch
Fri, Apr 6, 2018 5:33 PM
Yes, this is the downside to doing it at all, unmaintained addons that still work would show up as not compatible. The user can change the install.rdf, but that is cumbersome.
It also may mean we would need to reinstate the compatibility bumps on each release, which was a fair amount of work.
Philipp
On 6. Apr 2018, at 5:44 PM, Wayne Mery vseerror@lehigh.edu wrote:
So that is only available to author of the addon ?
On 4/5/2018 3:34 PM, Magnus Melin wrote:
If the add-on is on AMO you just need to mark it compatible.
To do that, go to AMO to the add-ons page, then Manage Status & Versions, then under Listed versions, click the link for a version and set its compatible versions.
-Magnus
On 04-04-2018 00:13, Onno Ekker wrote:
Does this mean add-on authors physically need to change their add-ons (e.g. update maxVersion in install.rdf) or only mark it compatible on amo?
Onno
Yes, this is the downside to doing it at all, unmaintained addons that still work would show up as not compatible. The user can change the install.rdf, but that is cumbersome.
It also may mean we would need to reinstate the compatibility bumps on each release, which was a fair amount of work.
Philipp
> On 6. Apr 2018, at 5:44 PM, Wayne Mery <vseerror@lehigh.edu> wrote:
>
> So that is only available to author of the addon ?
>
>
>> On 4/5/2018 3:34 PM, Magnus Melin wrote:
>> If the add-on is on AMO you just need to mark it compatible.
>> To do that, go to AMO to the add-ons page, then Manage Status & Versions, then under Listed versions, click the link for a version and set its compatible versions.
>>
>> -Magnus
>>> On 04-04-2018 00:13, Onno Ekker wrote:
>>> Does this mean add-on authors physically need to change their add-ons (e.g. update maxVersion in install.rdf) or only mark it compatible on amo?
>>>
>>> Onno
>>>
>>>>> On 3 Apr 2018, at 21:45, Magnus Melin <mkmelin+mozilla@iki.fi> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Going to do it in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1451097
>>>>>
>>>>> -Magnus
>>>>>
>>>>> On 07-12-2017 11:02, Magnus Melin wrote:
>>>>> Traditionally add-ons have been set to be compatible by default, i.e. not needed an action from the add-on author to continue to function when Thunderbird does a major version update. Many times the add-ons haven't really worked and caused strange bug reports. For Thunderbird 59 it doesn't make sense to keep the compatible by default scheme. If the add-on hasn't been updated, it very likely will cause problems - and that's not in anybody's best interest.
>>>>>
>>>>> So let's change the scheme to not-compatible by default. Comments?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Magnus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Maildev mailing list
>>>>> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
>>>>> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Maildev mailing list
>>>> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
>>>> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Maildev mailing list
>>>> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
>>>> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Maildev mailing list
>> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
>> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Maildev mailing list
> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
MM
Magnus Melin
Fri, Apr 6, 2018 6:35 PM
If the user knows the add-ons are ok, he can always set the
extensions.strictCompatibility pref to false, and things would work like
before. To the extent the add-on is not broken. No need to change the
install.rdf
-Magnus
On 06-04-2018 20:33, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
Yes, this is the downside to doing it at all, unmaintained addons that
still work would show up as not compatible. The user can change the
install.rdf, but that is cumbersome.
It also may mean we would need to reinstate the compatibility bumps on
each release, which was a fair amount of work.
Philipp
On 6. Apr 2018, at 5:44 PM, Wayne Mery <vseerror@lehigh.edu
mailto:vseerror@lehigh.edu> wrote:
So that is only available to *author *of the addon ?
On 4/5/2018 3:34 PM, Magnus Melin wrote:
If the add-on is on AMO you just need to mark it compatible.
To do that, go to AMO to the add-ons page, then Manage Status &
Versions, then under Listed versions, click the link for a version
and set its compatible versions.
-Magnus
On 04-04-2018 00:13, Onno Ekker wrote:
Does this mean add-on authors physically need to change their add-ons (e.g. update maxVersion in install.rdf) or only mark it compatible on amo?
Onno
On 3 Apr 2018, at 21:45, Magnus Melinmkmelin+mozilla@iki.fi wrote:
Going to do it inhttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1451097
-Magnus
On 07-12-2017 11:02, Magnus Melin wrote:
Traditionally add-ons have been set to be compatible by default, i.e. not needed an action from the add-on author to continue to function when Thunderbird does a major version update. Many times the add-ons haven't really worked and caused strange bug reports. For Thunderbird 59 it doesn't make sense to keep the compatible by default scheme. If the add-on hasn't been updated, it very likely will cause problems - and that's not in anybody's best interest.
So let's change the scheme to not-compatible by default. Comments?
-Magnus
Maildev mailing list
Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
If the user knows the add-ons are ok, he can always set the
extensions.strictCompatibility pref to false, and things would work like
before. To the extent the add-on is not broken. No need to change the
install.rdf
-Magnus
On 06-04-2018 20:33, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
> Yes, this is the downside to doing it at all, unmaintained addons that
> still work would show up as not compatible. The user can change the
> install.rdf, but that is cumbersome.
>
> It also may mean we would need to reinstate the compatibility bumps on
> each release, which was a fair amount of work.
>
> Philipp
>
> On 6. Apr 2018, at 5:44 PM, Wayne Mery <vseerror@lehigh.edu
> <mailto:vseerror@lehigh.edu>> wrote:
>
>> So that is only available to *author *of the addon ?
>>
>>
>> On 4/5/2018 3:34 PM, Magnus Melin wrote:
>>>
>>> If the add-on is on AMO you just need to mark it compatible.
>>>
>>> To do that, go to AMO to the add-ons page, then Manage Status &
>>> Versions, then under Listed versions, click the link for a version
>>> and set its compatible versions.
>>>
>>> -Magnus
>>>
>>> On 04-04-2018 00:13, Onno Ekker wrote:
>>>> Does this mean add-on authors physically need to change their add-ons (e.g. update maxVersion in install.rdf) or only mark it compatible on amo?
>>>>
>>>> Onno
>>>>
>>>>> On 3 Apr 2018, at 21:45, Magnus Melin<mkmelin+mozilla@iki.fi> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Going to do it inhttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1451097
>>>>>
>>>>> -Magnus
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 07-12-2017 11:02, Magnus Melin wrote:
>>>>>> Traditionally add-ons have been set to be compatible by default, i.e. not needed an action from the add-on author to continue to function when Thunderbird does a major version update. Many times the add-ons haven't really worked and caused strange bug reports. For Thunderbird 59 it doesn't make sense to keep the compatible by default scheme. If the add-on hasn't been updated, it very likely will cause problems - and that's not in anybody's best interest.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So let's change the scheme to not-compatible by default. Comments?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Magnus
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Maildev mailing list
>>>>>> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
>>>>>> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Maildev mailing list
>>>>> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
>>>>> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Maildev mailing list
>>>>> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
>>>>> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Maildev mailing list
>>> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
>>> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Maildev mailing list
>> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net <mailto:Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net>
>> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net