time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

GPS Antenna Grounding/Lightning protection.

SM
Scott McGrath
Tue, Jun 19, 2018 2:56 PM

The 18” inch requirement is partially for damage resistance and partially to ensure adequate soil moisture for conductivity.

Content by Scott
Typos by Siri

On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:50 AM, jimlux jimlux@earthlink.net wrote:

On 6/18/18 6:39 PM, Glenn Little WB4UIV wrote:

To do the grounding correctly, all connections exterior to the building are to be welded.
The cable to ground rod welds are to be 18 inches below grade.
The exterior cable is to be number 2 copper or larger.
To bond numerous ground systems together, a number 2 copper cable is to be buried at 18 inches and welded to each ground system.
If using eight foot ground rods, a ground rod is to be driven every 16 feet along the connecting cable and the cable welded to the rod.

It helps to know why some requirements exist - I suspect the 18" burial requirement is to avoid accidentally digging it up or damaging it. I can't think of an electrical reason for it.

A lot of work, but, cheaper, in the long run, than continuing to repair/replace equipment.

It depends

Unless you're doing geodetic or precision timing work with a 2 or 3 band GPS, replacement GPS antennas are cheap.
I'd worry about the receiver and related equipment, but the antenna itself might be sacrificial.

As always, there's a risk/budget tradeoff


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

The 18” inch requirement is partially for damage resistance and partially to ensure adequate soil moisture for conductivity. Content by Scott Typos by Siri On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:50 AM, jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote: On 6/18/18 6:39 PM, Glenn Little WB4UIV wrote: > To do the grounding correctly, all connections exterior to the building are to be welded. > The cable to ground rod welds are to be 18 inches below grade. > The exterior cable is to be number 2 copper or larger. > To bond numerous ground systems together, a number 2 copper cable is to be buried at 18 inches and welded to each ground system. > If using eight foot ground rods, a ground rod is to be driven every 16 feet along the connecting cable and the cable welded to the rod. It helps to know *why* some requirements exist - I suspect the 18" burial requirement is to avoid accidentally digging it up or damaging it. I can't think of an electrical reason for it. > A lot of work, but, cheaper, in the long run, than continuing to repair/replace equipment. It depends Unless you're doing geodetic or precision timing work with a 2 or 3 band GPS, replacement GPS antennas are cheap. I'd worry about the receiver and related equipment, but the antenna itself might be sacrificial. As always, there's a risk/budget tradeoff _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
BK
Bob kb8tq
Tue, Jun 19, 2018 3:19 PM

Hi

18” down in a swamp likely is plenty for conductivity. 18” down in a sandy desert (or on an ice sheet) may be way
short in terms of conductivity :) The real answer to any of this is “that depends”. (Yes, the ice sheet grounding
problem is from a real case that shows up in some class notes from way back ….).

Some locations get multiple  hits on a weekly basis in the summer. Other locations get a close strike once every
few decades. What makes economic sense for one probably does not make sense for the other…. A “full up”
protection setup can easily run into hundreds of thousands of dollars. I’d much rather spend that kind of money
on a Maser … or two …. or three :) …. this is TimeNuts after all ….

Bob

On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:56 AM, Scott McGrath scmcgrath@gmail.com wrote:

The 18” inch requirement is partially for damage resistance and partially to ensure adequate soil moisture for conductivity.

Content by Scott
Typos by Siri

On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:50 AM, jimlux jimlux@earthlink.net wrote:

On 6/18/18 6:39 PM, Glenn Little WB4UIV wrote:

To do the grounding correctly, all connections exterior to the building are to be welded.
The cable to ground rod welds are to be 18 inches below grade.
The exterior cable is to be number 2 copper or larger.
To bond numerous ground systems together, a number 2 copper cable is to be buried at 18 inches and welded to each ground system.
If using eight foot ground rods, a ground rod is to be driven every 16 feet along the connecting cable and the cable welded to the rod.

It helps to know why some requirements exist - I suspect the 18" burial requirement is to avoid accidentally digging it up or damaging it. I can't think of an electrical reason for it.

A lot of work, but, cheaper, in the long run, than continuing to repair/replace equipment.

It depends

Unless you're doing geodetic or precision timing work with a 2 or 3 band GPS, replacement GPS antennas are cheap.
I'd worry about the receiver and related equipment, but the antenna itself might be sacrificial.

As always, there's a risk/budget tradeoff


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi 18” down in a swamp likely is plenty for conductivity. 18” down in a sandy desert (or on an ice sheet) may be way short in terms of conductivity :) The real answer to any of this is “that depends”. (Yes, the ice sheet grounding problem is from a real case that shows up in some class notes from way back ….). Some locations get multiple hits on a weekly basis in the summer. Other locations get a close strike once every few decades. What makes economic sense for one probably does not make sense for the other…. A “full up” protection setup can easily run into hundreds of thousands of dollars. I’d much rather spend that kind of money on a Maser … or two …. or three :) …. this is TimeNuts after all …. Bob > On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:56 AM, Scott McGrath <scmcgrath@gmail.com> wrote: > > The 18” inch requirement is partially for damage resistance and partially to ensure adequate soil moisture for conductivity. > > Content by Scott > Typos by Siri > > On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:50 AM, jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote: > > On 6/18/18 6:39 PM, Glenn Little WB4UIV wrote: > >> To do the grounding correctly, all connections exterior to the building are to be welded. >> The cable to ground rod welds are to be 18 inches below grade. >> The exterior cable is to be number 2 copper or larger. >> To bond numerous ground systems together, a number 2 copper cable is to be buried at 18 inches and welded to each ground system. >> If using eight foot ground rods, a ground rod is to be driven every 16 feet along the connecting cable and the cable welded to the rod. > > > It helps to know *why* some requirements exist - I suspect the 18" burial requirement is to avoid accidentally digging it up or damaging it. I can't think of an electrical reason for it. > > >> A lot of work, but, cheaper, in the long run, than continuing to repair/replace equipment. > > It depends > > Unless you're doing geodetic or precision timing work with a 2 or 3 band GPS, replacement GPS antennas are cheap. > I'd worry about the receiver and related equipment, but the antenna itself might be sacrificial. > > As always, there's a risk/budget tradeoff > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
SM
Scott McGrath
Tue, Jun 19, 2018 4:01 PM

Probably the easiest and most economical grounding system is the halo ground with antenna grounds bonded to the halo and the house ground bonded to the halo as well.

The halo conductor sizing is governed by local codes,  But really what you are doing ensuring that the entire structure and earth around it is at the same potential so a nearby strike does not cause ground currents to flow.

A direct strike is probably going to fry anything it hits because of the gigajoules of energy concentrated within the discharge

But a proper ground system also ‘bleeds off’ the potential difference thereby preventing discharge

Content by Scott
Typos by Siri

On Jun 19, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

Hi

18” down in a swamp likely is plenty for conductivity. 18” down in a sandy desert (or on an ice sheet) may be way
short in terms of conductivity :) The real answer to any of this is “that depends”. (Yes, the ice sheet grounding
problem is from a real case that shows up in some class notes from way back ….).

Some locations get multiple  hits on a weekly basis in the summer. Other locations get a close strike once every
few decades. What makes economic sense for one probably does not make sense for the other…. A “full up”
protection setup can easily run into hundreds of thousands of dollars. I’d much rather spend that kind of money
on a Maser … or two …. or three :) …. this is TimeNuts after all ….

Bob

On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:56 AM, Scott McGrath scmcgrath@gmail.com wrote:

The 18” inch requirement is partially for damage resistance and partially to ensure adequate soil moisture for conductivity.

Content by Scott
Typos by Siri

On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:50 AM, jimlux jimlux@earthlink.net wrote:

On 6/18/18 6:39 PM, Glenn Little WB4UIV wrote:

To do the grounding correctly, all connections exterior to the building are to be welded.
The cable to ground rod welds are to be 18 inches below grade.
The exterior cable is to be number 2 copper or larger.
To bond numerous ground systems together, a number 2 copper cable is to be buried at 18 inches and welded to each ground system.
If using eight foot ground rods, a ground rod is to be driven every 16 feet along the connecting cable and the cable welded to the rod.

It helps to know why some requirements exist - I suspect the 18" burial requirement is to avoid accidentally digging it up or damaging it. I can't think of an electrical reason for it.

A lot of work, but, cheaper, in the long run, than continuing to repair/replace equipment.

It depends

Unless you're doing geodetic or precision timing work with a 2 or 3 band GPS, replacement GPS antennas are cheap.
I'd worry about the receiver and related equipment, but the antenna itself might be sacrificial.

As always, there's a risk/budget tradeoff


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Probably the easiest and most economical grounding system is the halo ground with antenna grounds bonded to the halo and the house ground bonded to the halo as well. The halo conductor sizing is governed by local codes, But really what you are doing ensuring that the entire structure and earth around it is at the same potential so a nearby strike does not cause ground currents to flow. A direct strike is probably going to fry anything it hits because of the gigajoules of energy concentrated within the discharge But a proper ground system also ‘bleeds off’ the potential difference thereby preventing discharge Content by Scott Typos by Siri On Jun 19, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: Hi 18” down in a swamp likely is plenty for conductivity. 18” down in a sandy desert (or on an ice sheet) may be way short in terms of conductivity :) The real answer to any of this is “that depends”. (Yes, the ice sheet grounding problem is from a real case that shows up in some class notes from way back ….). Some locations get multiple hits on a weekly basis in the summer. Other locations get a close strike once every few decades. What makes economic sense for one probably does not make sense for the other…. A “full up” protection setup can easily run into hundreds of thousands of dollars. I’d much rather spend that kind of money on a Maser … or two …. or three :) …. this is TimeNuts after all …. Bob > On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:56 AM, Scott McGrath <scmcgrath@gmail.com> wrote: > > The 18” inch requirement is partially for damage resistance and partially to ensure adequate soil moisture for conductivity. > > Content by Scott > Typos by Siri > > On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:50 AM, jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote: > > On 6/18/18 6:39 PM, Glenn Little WB4UIV wrote: > >> To do the grounding correctly, all connections exterior to the building are to be welded. >> The cable to ground rod welds are to be 18 inches below grade. >> The exterior cable is to be number 2 copper or larger. >> To bond numerous ground systems together, a number 2 copper cable is to be buried at 18 inches and welded to each ground system. >> If using eight foot ground rods, a ground rod is to be driven every 16 feet along the connecting cable and the cable welded to the rod. > > > It helps to know *why* some requirements exist - I suspect the 18" burial requirement is to avoid accidentally digging it up or damaging it. I can't think of an electrical reason for it. > > >> A lot of work, but, cheaper, in the long run, than continuing to repair/replace equipment. > > It depends > > Unless you're doing geodetic or precision timing work with a 2 or 3 band GPS, replacement GPS antennas are cheap. > I'd worry about the receiver and related equipment, but the antenna itself might be sacrificial. > > As always, there's a risk/budget tradeoff > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
VH
Van Horn, David
Tue, Jun 19, 2018 4:22 PM

About that "cone of protection"
http://lightningsafety.com/nlsi_pls/cone-of-protection-myth.html

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts time-nuts-bounces@lists.febo.com On Behalf Of Bill Hawkins
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 3:16 PM
To: oz@ozindfw.net; 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS Antenna Grounding/Lightning protection.

Oz has some useful observations.

I've worked on a 50 foot ocean-going fishing party boat that had a 10 foot aluminum mast on top of the wheel house. That will be the shortest path to ground on the open sea. The best you can do is to connect a 4"
wide copper strap from the mast to the keel, with as few bends as possible and none greater than 45 degrees. This seems to work.

I've also worked at a blasting cap plant where 50 foot masts were erected at both ends of an earth-covered powder magazine. They provide a "cone of protection" that prevents a direct hit on the magazine. The mast grounds were measured quarterly with a hand-cranked device specifically made for ground resistance. It had to be less than 100 milliohms.

But if you really want protection from a direct hit, you must disconnect the tower device(s) before the storm hits. The coaxial cable must have only one ground point. The other end should be far from a metallic ground. You'll probably lose any electronics in the antenna, but there are far more expensive things in your lab.

You will also have to deal with the electromagnetic pulse, so all of your equipment, including the computers, must have a common ground point. This provides a ground plane that can change potential relative to the Earth without inducing potentials between devices. Every connection to/from the ground plane must have a surge arrestor. If the risk of nearby direct hits is high enough, isolate the ground plane from all external connections before the storm. You'll need battery backup on the ground plane for all temperature controlled ovens and crystal oscillators. Maybe the Cs and Rb packages also need to keep running.

It would help to move away from Florida, or high hilltops.

Bill Hawkins

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@lists.febo.com] On Behalf Of Oz-in-DFW
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 2:25 PM
To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS Antenna Grounding/Lightning protection.

Not sure I have much to specific offer, other than some observations.

  1. A path to ground is only a small part of the story.  What's really
    important is the ground reference of all equipment to all other
    equipment. The huge currents and substantial risetimes can cause
    large voltage spikes across even large conductors (>8 AWG.) You want
    everything to stay at the same voltage reference, and you'd really
    like to keep that close enough to ground to prevent arcs from that
    equipment to ground and other equipment.
  2. Long wire runs of even large gauge wire are inductors and can be of
    little value during an event.
  3. No matter what you do, it's unlikely you can do anything within
    economical reason to survive a direct strike and the 10's to 100's
    of kiloamps involved. The real question is how close of a near miss
    can you survive.
  4. Most of the non-telecom smoking fails I've seen have been power line
    transients. If you took a direct tower hit it's more likely than not
    that your RG-6 would now be plating on a tower leg. An old tower can
    be a pretty poor ground for the microseconds (or sometimes
    milliseconds when you consider return strokes) it takes the
    corrosion in the leg joints to flashover and fuse, or resistance
    heat and weld.
  5. The large currents of a direct strike have predictable but less than
    obvious physical effects like conductor shortening (if they don't
    fuse,) and other significant forces caused by magnetic attraction of
    conductors. One failure case I saw years ago collapsed the conduit
    around a ground conductor. Made no sense until we discovered that
    the conduit was the actual ground path. I'll see if I can find the
    pictures.
  6. Even near misses can induce huge currents (kiloamps) on their own,
    particularly in long vertical cable runs.  I've seen solder joints
    in small empty copper water pipes melt and reflow from a strike a
    100 feet away.
  7. The best coax lightning suppression units I have seen are
    essentially 1/4 wave grounded stubs. These are common is cell site
    installations (and the top /AND/ bottom of the lines.) These are
    always at DC ground and the coax is a the weak point (and ultimately
    the fuse.)  I've seen them surplus and at hamfests and some cover
    GPS freqs.
  8. A near strike will induce some really impressive voltages on
    Ethernet cable runs. Most residential buildings are
    electromagnetically transparent and the protection on most Ethernet
    interfaces is oriented toward ESD.

Oz (in DFW)

On 6/18/2018 1:29 PM, Dan Kemppainen wrote:

Hi,

I have (or had, I guess) a GPS antenna on a tower that took a
lightning hit yesterday.

You can tell it's going to be a bad day when you walk into your shop,
and smell burnt electronics. Still have to troubleshoot exactly what
got hit, but the GPSDO was flashing no GPS signal, the 5V supply for
the antenna to the GPS splitter was dead, the data logging computer
had rebooted and the data logging computer monitor was dead. Other
network hardware was dead also.

This is a bit surprising since the tower itself is grounded with 4
ground rods and bonded to a 150 foot deep well casing near by. The
antenna is on the end of 250 ft run of RG6. The GPS antenna cable
shield has a grounding block bonded to two ground rods driven down
below the basement foundation where it enters the house. I'm guessing
the surge ran the coax into the splitter, then through everything
connected to it, despite the grounding block.

So, I'm wondering if there are better surge protectors for lightning
protection? Maybe something that actually protect the center conductor

also? Hopefully something that will pass GPS signal reasonably and let

DC power through. If so, can you recommend some starting points? Other

suggestions also welcome.

Also, If you are considering upgrading your own lightning protection,
hopefully this will be some inspiration to get started. As I said
earlier, it's a bad day when you smell burnt electronics in the shop.

Thanks,
Dan


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe, go
to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
mailto:oz@ozindfw.net
Oz
POB 93167
Southlake, TX 76092 (Near DFW Airport)


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

About that "cone of protection" http://lightningsafety.com/nlsi_pls/cone-of-protection-myth.html -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts <time-nuts-bounces@lists.febo.com> On Behalf Of Bill Hawkins Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 3:16 PM To: oz@ozindfw.net; 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement' <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS Antenna Grounding/Lightning protection. Oz has some useful observations. I've worked on a 50 foot ocean-going fishing party boat that had a 10 foot aluminum mast on top of the wheel house. That will be the shortest path to ground on the open sea. The best you can do is to connect a 4" wide copper strap from the mast to the keel, with as few bends as possible and none greater than 45 degrees. This seems to work. I've also worked at a blasting cap plant where 50 foot masts were erected at both ends of an earth-covered powder magazine. They provide a "cone of protection" that prevents a direct hit on the magazine. The mast grounds were measured quarterly with a hand-cranked device specifically made for ground resistance. It had to be less than 100 milliohms. But if you really want protection from a direct hit, you must disconnect the tower device(s) before the storm hits. The coaxial cable must have only one ground point. The other end should be far from a metallic ground. You'll probably lose any electronics in the antenna, but there are far more expensive things in your lab. You will also have to deal with the electromagnetic pulse, so all of your equipment, including the computers, must have a common ground point. This provides a ground plane that can change potential relative to the Earth without inducing potentials between devices. Every connection to/from the ground plane must have a surge arrestor. If the risk of nearby direct hits is high enough, isolate the ground plane from all external connections before the storm. You'll need battery backup on the ground plane for all temperature controlled ovens and crystal oscillators. Maybe the Cs and Rb packages also need to keep running. It would help to move away from Florida, or high hilltops. Bill Hawkins -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@lists.febo.com] On Behalf Of Oz-in-DFW Sent: Monday, June 18, 2018 2:25 PM To: time-nuts@lists.febo.com Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPS Antenna Grounding/Lightning protection. Not sure I have much to specific offer, other than some observations. 1. A path to ground is only a small part of the story.  What's really important is the ground reference of all equipment to all other equipment. The huge currents and substantial risetimes can cause large voltage spikes across even large conductors (>8 AWG.) You want everything to stay at the same voltage reference, and you'd really like to keep that close enough to ground to prevent arcs from that equipment to ground and other equipment. 2. Long wire runs of even large gauge wire are inductors and can be of little value during an event. 3. No matter what you do, it's unlikely you can do anything within economical reason to survive a direct strike and the 10's to 100's of kiloamps involved. The real question is how close of a near miss can you survive. 4. Most of the non-telecom smoking fails I've seen have been power line transients. If you took a direct tower hit it's more likely than not that your RG-6 would now be plating on a tower leg. An old tower can be a pretty poor ground for the microseconds (or sometimes milliseconds when you consider return strokes) it takes the corrosion in the leg joints to flashover and fuse, or resistance heat and weld. 5. The large currents of a direct strike have predictable but less than obvious physical effects like conductor shortening (if they don't fuse,) and other significant forces caused by magnetic attraction of conductors. One failure case I saw years ago collapsed the conduit around a ground conductor. Made no sense until we discovered that the conduit was the actual ground path. I'll see if I can find the pictures. 6. Even near misses can induce huge currents (kiloamps) on their own, particularly in long vertical cable runs.  I've seen solder joints in small empty copper water pipes melt and reflow from a strike a 100 feet away. 7. The best coax lightning suppression units I have seen are essentially 1/4 wave grounded stubs. These are common is cell site installations (and the top /AND/ bottom of the lines.) These are always at DC ground and the coax is a the weak point (and ultimately the fuse.)  I've seen them surplus and at hamfests and some cover GPS freqs. 8. A near strike will induce some really impressive voltages on Ethernet cable runs. Most residential buildings are electromagnetically transparent and the protection on most Ethernet interfaces is oriented toward ESD. Oz (in DFW) On 6/18/2018 1:29 PM, Dan Kemppainen wrote: > Hi, > > I have (or had, I guess) a GPS antenna on a tower that took a > lightning hit yesterday. > > You can tell it's going to be a bad day when you walk into your shop, > and smell burnt electronics. Still have to troubleshoot exactly what > got hit, but the GPSDO was flashing no GPS signal, the 5V supply for > the antenna to the GPS splitter was dead, the data logging computer > had rebooted and the data logging computer monitor was dead. Other > network hardware was dead also. > > This is a bit surprising since the tower itself is grounded with 4 > ground rods and bonded to a 150 foot deep well casing near by. The > antenna is on the end of 250 ft run of RG6. The GPS antenna cable > shield has a grounding block bonded to two ground rods driven down > below the basement foundation where it enters the house. I'm guessing > the surge ran the coax into the splitter, then through everything > connected to it, despite the grounding block. > > So, I'm wondering if there are better surge protectors for lightning > protection? Maybe something that actually protect the center conductor > also? Hopefully something that will pass GPS signal reasonably and let > DC power through. If so, can you recommend some starting points? Other > suggestions also welcome. > > > Also, If you are considering upgrading your own lightning protection, > hopefully this will be some inspiration to get started. As I said > earlier, it's a bad day when you smell burnt electronics in the shop. > > Thanks, > Dan > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe, go > to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. -- mailto:oz@ozindfw.net Oz POB 93167 Southlake, TX 76092 (Near DFW Airport) _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
BK
Bob kb8tq
Tue, Jun 19, 2018 7:55 PM

Hi

If indeed a proper ground system could be depended on to “bleed off” and prevent discharge things
would be much simpler. Indeed I’ve been on towers and decided to exit that location as the bleed
process became audible. It very much does happen. It simply is not a 100% sort of thing.

Bob

On Jun 19, 2018, at 12:01 PM, Scott McGrath scmcgrath@gmail.com wrote:

Probably the easiest and most economical grounding system is the halo ground with antenna grounds bonded to the halo and the house ground bonded to the halo as well.

The halo conductor sizing is governed by local codes,  But really what you are doing ensuring that the entire structure and earth around it is at the same potential so a nearby strike does not cause ground currents to flow.

A direct strike is probably going to fry anything it hits because of the gigajoules of energy concentrated within the discharge

But a proper ground system also ‘bleeds off’ the potential difference thereby preventing discharge

Content by Scott
Typos by Siri

On Jun 19, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

Hi

18” down in a swamp likely is plenty for conductivity. 18” down in a sandy desert (or on an ice sheet) may be way
short in terms of conductivity :) The real answer to any of this is “that depends”. (Yes, the ice sheet grounding
problem is from a real case that shows up in some class notes from way back ….).

Some locations get multiple  hits on a weekly basis in the summer. Other locations get a close strike once every
few decades. What makes economic sense for one probably does not make sense for the other…. A “full up”
protection setup can easily run into hundreds of thousands of dollars. I’d much rather spend that kind of money
on a Maser … or two …. or three :) …. this is TimeNuts after all ….

Bob

On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:56 AM, Scott McGrath scmcgrath@gmail.com wrote:

The 18” inch requirement is partially for damage resistance and partially to ensure adequate soil moisture for conductivity.

Content by Scott
Typos by Siri

On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:50 AM, jimlux jimlux@earthlink.net wrote:

On 6/18/18 6:39 PM, Glenn Little WB4UIV wrote:

To do the grounding correctly, all connections exterior to the building are to be welded.
The cable to ground rod welds are to be 18 inches below grade.
The exterior cable is to be number 2 copper or larger.
To bond numerous ground systems together, a number 2 copper cable is to be buried at 18 inches and welded to each ground system.
If using eight foot ground rods, a ground rod is to be driven every 16 feet along the connecting cable and the cable welded to the rod.

It helps to know why some requirements exist - I suspect the 18" burial requirement is to avoid accidentally digging it up or damaging it. I can't think of an electrical reason for it.

A lot of work, but, cheaper, in the long run, than continuing to repair/replace equipment.

It depends

Unless you're doing geodetic or precision timing work with a 2 or 3 band GPS, replacement GPS antennas are cheap.
I'd worry about the receiver and related equipment, but the antenna itself might be sacrificial.

As always, there's a risk/budget tradeoff


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi If indeed a proper ground system *could* be depended on to “bleed off” and prevent discharge things would be *much* simpler. Indeed I’ve been on towers and decided to exit that location as the bleed process became audible. It very much does happen. It simply is not a 100% sort of thing. Bob > On Jun 19, 2018, at 12:01 PM, Scott McGrath <scmcgrath@gmail.com> wrote: > > Probably the easiest and most economical grounding system is the halo ground with antenna grounds bonded to the halo and the house ground bonded to the halo as well. > > The halo conductor sizing is governed by local codes, But really what you are doing ensuring that the entire structure and earth around it is at the same potential so a nearby strike does not cause ground currents to flow. > > A direct strike is probably going to fry anything it hits because of the gigajoules of energy concentrated within the discharge > > But a proper ground system also ‘bleeds off’ the potential difference thereby preventing discharge > > Content by Scott > Typos by Siri > > On Jun 19, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: > > Hi > > 18” down in a swamp likely is plenty for conductivity. 18” down in a sandy desert (or on an ice sheet) may be way > short in terms of conductivity :) The real answer to any of this is “that depends”. (Yes, the ice sheet grounding > problem is from a real case that shows up in some class notes from way back ….). > > Some locations get multiple hits on a weekly basis in the summer. Other locations get a close strike once every > few decades. What makes economic sense for one probably does not make sense for the other…. A “full up” > protection setup can easily run into hundreds of thousands of dollars. I’d much rather spend that kind of money > on a Maser … or two …. or three :) …. this is TimeNuts after all …. > > Bob > > > >> On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:56 AM, Scott McGrath <scmcgrath@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The 18” inch requirement is partially for damage resistance and partially to ensure adequate soil moisture for conductivity. >> >> Content by Scott >> Typos by Siri >> >> On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:50 AM, jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote: >> >> On 6/18/18 6:39 PM, Glenn Little WB4UIV wrote: >> >>> To do the grounding correctly, all connections exterior to the building are to be welded. >>> The cable to ground rod welds are to be 18 inches below grade. >>> The exterior cable is to be number 2 copper or larger. >>> To bond numerous ground systems together, a number 2 copper cable is to be buried at 18 inches and welded to each ground system. >>> If using eight foot ground rods, a ground rod is to be driven every 16 feet along the connecting cable and the cable welded to the rod. >> >> >> It helps to know *why* some requirements exist - I suspect the 18" burial requirement is to avoid accidentally digging it up or damaging it. I can't think of an electrical reason for it. >> >> >>> A lot of work, but, cheaper, in the long run, than continuing to repair/replace equipment. >> >> It depends >> >> Unless you're doing geodetic or precision timing work with a 2 or 3 band GPS, replacement GPS antennas are cheap. >> I'd worry about the receiver and related equipment, but the antenna itself might be sacrificial. >> >> As always, there's a risk/budget tradeoff >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
D
djl
Tue, Jun 19, 2018 9:12 PM

First, I recommend the following:
http://www.arrl.org/shop/Grounding-and-Bonding-for-the-Radio-Amateur/
well worth the price.
second, bleeding off does not prevent discharge. Many such systems are
garbage or worse. "bleeding off" is corona discharge from sharp points
submitted to a large electric field, such as under or near a
thunderstorm. It's gonna happen.
I think what's meant here by a halo system is a conductor dug in to a
shallow trench? If so, Scott is correct.
next, most of the time, damage is done by induced currents rather than
direct hit by the stroke terminus. These can be eased by proper power
treatment and good single point grounds. I personally do not trust MOV
ground protectors. They are only good for a certain, unknown, number of
hits, and are useless after that. There is no way to tell if the limit
has been reached.  Surge protection on AC power needs doing only at the
main breaker box from each side of the 220 to ground.
and, if you are on a tower and hear the sizzling noise of corona, get
down pronto.
Hope this helps.
Don

On 2018-06-19 12:55, Bob kb8tq wrote:

Hi

If indeed a proper ground system could be depended on to “bleed off”
and prevent discharge things
would be much simpler. Indeed I’ve been on towers and decided to
exit that location as the bleed
process became audible. It very much does happen. It simply is not a
100% sort of thing.

Bob

On Jun 19, 2018, at 12:01 PM, Scott McGrath scmcgrath@gmail.com
wrote:

Probably the easiest and most economical grounding system is the halo
ground with antenna grounds bonded to the halo and the house ground
bonded to the halo as well.

The halo conductor sizing is governed by local codes,  But really
what you are doing ensuring that the entire structure and earth around
it is at the same potential so a nearby strike does not cause ground
currents to flow.

A direct strike is probably going to fry anything it hits because of
the gigajoules of energy concentrated within the discharge

But a proper ground system also ‘bleeds off’ the potential difference
thereby preventing discharge

Content by Scott
Typos by Siri

On Jun 19, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

Hi

18” down in a swamp likely is plenty for conductivity. 18” down in a
sandy desert (or on an ice sheet) may be way
short in terms of conductivity :) The real answer to any of this is
“that depends”. (Yes, the ice sheet grounding
problem is from a real case that shows up in some class notes from way
back ….).

Some locations get multiple  hits on a weekly basis in the summer.
Other locations get a close strike once every
few decades. What makes economic sense for one probably does not make
sense for the other…. A “full up”
protection setup can easily run into hundreds of thousands of dollars.
I’d much rather spend that kind of money
on a Maser … or two …. or three :) …. this is TimeNuts after all ….

Bob

On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:56 AM, Scott McGrath scmcgrath@gmail.com
wrote:

The 18” inch requirement is partially for damage resistance and
partially to ensure adequate soil moisture for conductivity.

Content by Scott
Typos by Siri

On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:50 AM, jimlux jimlux@earthlink.net wrote:

On 6/18/18 6:39 PM, Glenn Little WB4UIV wrote:

To do the grounding correctly, all connections exterior to the
building are to be welded.
The cable to ground rod welds are to be 18 inches below grade.
The exterior cable is to be number 2 copper or larger.
To bond numerous ground systems together, a number 2 copper cable is
to be buried at 18 inches and welded to each ground system.
If using eight foot ground rods, a ground rod is to be driven every
16 feet along the connecting cable and the cable welded to the rod.

It helps to know why some requirements exist - I suspect the 18"
burial requirement is to avoid accidentally digging it up or damaging
it. I can't think of an electrical reason for it.

A lot of work, but, cheaper, in the long run, than continuing to
repair/replace equipment.

It depends

Unless you're doing geodetic or precision timing work with a 2 or 3
band GPS, replacement GPS antennas are cheap.
I'd worry about the receiver and related equipment, but the antenna
itself might be sacrificial.

As always, there's a risk/budget tradeoff


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
Dr. Don Latham
PO Box 404, Frenchtown, MT, 59834
VOX: 406-626-4304

First, I recommend the following: http://www.arrl.org/shop/Grounding-and-Bonding-for-the-Radio-Amateur/ well worth the price. second, bleeding off does not prevent discharge. Many such systems are garbage or worse. "bleeding off" is corona discharge from sharp points submitted to a large electric field, such as under or near a thunderstorm. It's gonna happen. I think what's meant here by a halo system is a conductor dug in to a shallow trench? If so, Scott is correct. next, most of the time, damage is done by induced currents rather than direct hit by the stroke terminus. These can be eased by proper power treatment and good single point grounds. I personally do not trust MOV ground protectors. They are only good for a certain, unknown, number of hits, and are useless after that. There is no way to tell if the limit has been reached. Surge protection on AC power needs doing only at the main breaker box from each side of the 220 to ground. and, if you are on a tower and hear the sizzling noise of corona, get down pronto. Hope this helps. Don On 2018-06-19 12:55, Bob kb8tq wrote: > Hi > > If indeed a proper ground system *could* be depended on to “bleed off” > and prevent discharge things > would be *much* simpler. Indeed I’ve been on towers and decided to > exit that location as the bleed > process became audible. It very much does happen. It simply is not a > 100% sort of thing. > > Bob > >> On Jun 19, 2018, at 12:01 PM, Scott McGrath <scmcgrath@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Probably the easiest and most economical grounding system is the halo >> ground with antenna grounds bonded to the halo and the house ground >> bonded to the halo as well. >> >> The halo conductor sizing is governed by local codes, But really >> what you are doing ensuring that the entire structure and earth around >> it is at the same potential so a nearby strike does not cause ground >> currents to flow. >> >> A direct strike is probably going to fry anything it hits because of >> the gigajoules of energy concentrated within the discharge >> >> But a proper ground system also ‘bleeds off’ the potential difference >> thereby preventing discharge >> >> Content by Scott >> Typos by Siri >> >> On Jun 19, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> 18” down in a swamp likely is plenty for conductivity. 18” down in a >> sandy desert (or on an ice sheet) may be way >> short in terms of conductivity :) The real answer to any of this is >> “that depends”. (Yes, the ice sheet grounding >> problem is from a real case that shows up in some class notes from way >> back ….). >> >> Some locations get multiple hits on a weekly basis in the summer. >> Other locations get a close strike once every >> few decades. What makes economic sense for one probably does not make >> sense for the other…. A “full up” >> protection setup can easily run into hundreds of thousands of dollars. >> I’d much rather spend that kind of money >> on a Maser … or two …. or three :) …. this is TimeNuts after all …. >> >> Bob >> >> >> >>> On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:56 AM, Scott McGrath <scmcgrath@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> The 18” inch requirement is partially for damage resistance and >>> partially to ensure adequate soil moisture for conductivity. >>> >>> Content by Scott >>> Typos by Siri >>> >>> On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:50 AM, jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote: >>> >>> On 6/18/18 6:39 PM, Glenn Little WB4UIV wrote: >>> >>>> To do the grounding correctly, all connections exterior to the >>>> building are to be welded. >>>> The cable to ground rod welds are to be 18 inches below grade. >>>> The exterior cable is to be number 2 copper or larger. >>>> To bond numerous ground systems together, a number 2 copper cable is >>>> to be buried at 18 inches and welded to each ground system. >>>> If using eight foot ground rods, a ground rod is to be driven every >>>> 16 feet along the connecting cable and the cable welded to the rod. >>> >>> >>> It helps to know *why* some requirements exist - I suspect the 18" >>> burial requirement is to avoid accidentally digging it up or damaging >>> it. I can't think of an electrical reason for it. >>> >>> >>>> A lot of work, but, cheaper, in the long run, than continuing to >>>> repair/replace equipment. >>> >>> It depends >>> >>> Unless you're doing geodetic or precision timing work with a 2 or 3 >>> band GPS, replacement GPS antennas are cheap. >>> I'd worry about the receiver and related equipment, but the antenna >>> itself might be sacrificial. >>> >>> As always, there's a risk/budget tradeoff >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to >>> https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to >>> https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. -- Dr. Don Latham PO Box 404, Frenchtown, MT, 59834 VOX: 406-626-4304
SM
Scott McGrath
Tue, Jun 19, 2018 10:51 PM

If you see St Elmos fire ‘corona discharge bleed process is working as expected

Content by Scott
Typos by Siri

On Jun 19, 2018, at 3:55 PM, Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

Hi

If indeed a proper ground system could be depended on to “bleed off” and prevent discharge things
would be much simpler. Indeed I’ve been on towers and decided to exit that location as the bleed
process became audible. It very much does happen. It simply is not a 100% sort of thing.

Bob

On Jun 19, 2018, at 12:01 PM, Scott McGrath scmcgrath@gmail.com wrote:

Probably the easiest and most economical grounding system is the halo ground with antenna grounds bonded to the halo and the house ground bonded to the halo as well.

The halo conductor sizing is governed by local codes,  But really what you are doing ensuring that the entire structure and earth around it is at the same potential so a nearby strike does not cause ground currents to flow.

A direct strike is probably going to fry anything it hits because of the gigajoules of energy concentrated within the discharge

But a proper ground system also ‘bleeds off’ the potential difference thereby preventing discharge

Content by Scott
Typos by Siri

On Jun 19, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

Hi

18” down in a swamp likely is plenty for conductivity. 18” down in a sandy desert (or on an ice sheet) may be way
short in terms of conductivity :) The real answer to any of this is “that depends”. (Yes, the ice sheet grounding
problem is from a real case that shows up in some class notes from way back ….).

Some locations get multiple  hits on a weekly basis in the summer. Other locations get a close strike once every
few decades. What makes economic sense for one probably does not make sense for the other…. A “full up”
protection setup can easily run into hundreds of thousands of dollars. I’d much rather spend that kind of money
on a Maser … or two …. or three :) …. this is TimeNuts after all ….

Bob

On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:56 AM, Scott McGrath scmcgrath@gmail.com wrote:

The 18” inch requirement is partially for damage resistance and partially to ensure adequate soil moisture for conductivity.

Content by Scott
Typos by Siri

On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:50 AM, jimlux jimlux@earthlink.net wrote:

On 6/18/18 6:39 PM, Glenn Little WB4UIV wrote:

To do the grounding correctly, all connections exterior to the building are to be welded.
The cable to ground rod welds are to be 18 inches below grade.
The exterior cable is to be number 2 copper or larger.
To bond numerous ground systems together, a number 2 copper cable is to be buried at 18 inches and welded to each ground system.
If using eight foot ground rods, a ground rod is to be driven every 16 feet along the connecting cable and the cable welded to the rod.

It helps to know why some requirements exist - I suspect the 18" burial requirement is to avoid accidentally digging it up or damaging it. I can't think of an electrical reason for it.

A lot of work, but, cheaper, in the long run, than continuing to repair/replace equipment.

It depends

Unless you're doing geodetic or precision timing work with a 2 or 3 band GPS, replacement GPS antennas are cheap.
I'd worry about the receiver and related equipment, but the antenna itself might be sacrificial.

As always, there's a risk/budget tradeoff


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

If you see St Elmos fire ‘corona discharge bleed process is working as expected Content by Scott Typos by Siri On Jun 19, 2018, at 3:55 PM, Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: Hi If indeed a proper ground system *could* be depended on to “bleed off” and prevent discharge things would be *much* simpler. Indeed I’ve been on towers and decided to exit that location as the bleed process became audible. It very much does happen. It simply is not a 100% sort of thing. Bob > On Jun 19, 2018, at 12:01 PM, Scott McGrath <scmcgrath@gmail.com> wrote: > > Probably the easiest and most economical grounding system is the halo ground with antenna grounds bonded to the halo and the house ground bonded to the halo as well. > > The halo conductor sizing is governed by local codes, But really what you are doing ensuring that the entire structure and earth around it is at the same potential so a nearby strike does not cause ground currents to flow. > > A direct strike is probably going to fry anything it hits because of the gigajoules of energy concentrated within the discharge > > But a proper ground system also ‘bleeds off’ the potential difference thereby preventing discharge > > Content by Scott > Typos by Siri > > On Jun 19, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: > > Hi > > 18” down in a swamp likely is plenty for conductivity. 18” down in a sandy desert (or on an ice sheet) may be way > short in terms of conductivity :) The real answer to any of this is “that depends”. (Yes, the ice sheet grounding > problem is from a real case that shows up in some class notes from way back ….). > > Some locations get multiple hits on a weekly basis in the summer. Other locations get a close strike once every > few decades. What makes economic sense for one probably does not make sense for the other…. A “full up” > protection setup can easily run into hundreds of thousands of dollars. I’d much rather spend that kind of money > on a Maser … or two …. or three :) …. this is TimeNuts after all …. > > Bob > > > >> On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:56 AM, Scott McGrath <scmcgrath@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The 18” inch requirement is partially for damage resistance and partially to ensure adequate soil moisture for conductivity. >> >> Content by Scott >> Typos by Siri >> >> On Jun 19, 2018, at 10:50 AM, jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote: >> >> On 6/18/18 6:39 PM, Glenn Little WB4UIV wrote: >> >>> To do the grounding correctly, all connections exterior to the building are to be welded. >>> The cable to ground rod welds are to be 18 inches below grade. >>> The exterior cable is to be number 2 copper or larger. >>> To bond numerous ground systems together, a number 2 copper cable is to be buried at 18 inches and welded to each ground system. >>> If using eight foot ground rods, a ground rod is to be driven every 16 feet along the connecting cable and the cable welded to the rod. >> >> >> It helps to know *why* some requirements exist - I suspect the 18" burial requirement is to avoid accidentally digging it up or damaging it. I can't think of an electrical reason for it. >> >> >>> A lot of work, but, cheaper, in the long run, than continuing to repair/replace equipment. >> >> It depends >> >> Unless you're doing geodetic or precision timing work with a 2 or 3 band GPS, replacement GPS antennas are cheap. >> I'd worry about the receiver and related equipment, but the antenna itself might be sacrificial. >> >> As always, there's a risk/budget tradeoff >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
BH
Bill Hawkins
Wed, Jun 20, 2018 3:56 AM

Seems to me that lightning protection for timenuts who put things on
masts keeps this from being completely off topic.

People who store explosives in earthen bunkers have learned from many
years of experience how far away bunkers have to be spaced so than an
explosion in one bunker won't affect others. That same body of
experience came up with the cone of protection.

It is not a myth.

Note that lightningsafety.com sells lightning protection. The scrolling
set of pictures on the home page shows a picture of four masts
protecting a rocket launch site.

Bill Hawkins

P.S. Lightning can enter a home in other ways. A neighbor had a direct
hit to a tree 15 feet from the house. After generating enough steam in a
2 foot diameter tree to split the length of it, a side strike hit an
outdoor light and did considerable damage in the house. The tree was not
the highest thing around. That same strike produced an EMP that took out
one of my two GPS antennas, about 100 feet away. The time from flash to
BANG was about 100 milliseconds. No, I didn't measure it - I experienced
it.

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@lists.febo.com] On Behalf Of
Van Horn, David
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 11:22 AM

About that "cone of protection"
http://lightningsafety.com/nlsi_pls/cone-of-protection-myth.html

Seems to me that lightning protection for timenuts who put things on masts keeps this from being completely off topic. People who store explosives in earthen bunkers have learned from many years of experience how far away bunkers have to be spaced so than an explosion in one bunker won't affect others. That same body of experience came up with the cone of protection. It is not a myth. Note that lightningsafety.com sells lightning protection. The scrolling set of pictures on the home page shows a picture of four masts protecting a rocket launch site. Bill Hawkins P.S. Lightning can enter a home in other ways. A neighbor had a direct hit to a tree 15 feet from the house. After generating enough steam in a 2 foot diameter tree to split the length of it, a side strike hit an outdoor light and did considerable damage in the house. The tree was not the highest thing around. That same strike produced an EMP that took out one of my two GPS antennas, about 100 feet away. The time from flash to BANG was about 100 milliseconds. No, I didn't measure it - I experienced it. -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@lists.febo.com] On Behalf Of Van Horn, David Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 11:22 AM About that "cone of protection" http://lightningsafety.com/nlsi_pls/cone-of-protection-myth.html
O
Oz-in-DFW
Wed, Jun 20, 2018 10:45 PM

The "Cone of Protection" is a thumbrule.  It's not a myth, but it's also
not an absolute law of nature. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy to some
degree because it drives component design guidelines. 

Bunker spacing is also a thumbrule, based on a lot of horrible
experience. It's also a function of many variables and differing
requirements, largely the explosive involved.  It's also self-fulfilling
prophecy because it enters into design guidelines for explosives
packaging. There's a multitude of reasons those bricks are in a foil
bag. This is one of them.

I'm not a lightning protection expert, but I do a bit of work where I
have to be concerned about it. I look at that thumbrule, but I'm also a
belt and suspenders guy and apply many others. And I build shipping gear
as if it's going to South Africa (much worse that Florida.)

Back to my original statement early in this thread (rope?) "No matter
what you do, it's unlikely you can do anything within economical reason
to survive a direct strike and the 10's to 100's of kiloamps involved.
The real question is how close of a near miss can you survive." for a
small business/residential install, as a minimum I would:

  1. Make sure your tower is grounded.
  2. Make sure your tower is electrically sound (a good electrical
    conductor - all sections are well connected electrically. this is
    */NOT /*a given with used or old tower.) If you are going to clamp
    copper straps to the tower or antennas, use some stainless shim
    stock as a barrier.
  3. Mount your antenna(s) with grounding as specified by the manufacturer.
  4. Use a lightning/drip loop at the top of the tower as a absolute
    minimum.  Better to use a real suppressor, preferably of the 1/4
    wave stub type.
  5. Ground the coax shield to the tower at the top and the bottom.
  6. If you have control lines (power, rotator controls, etc.) use
    shielded cable, ground, and suppress as with coax.
  7. Use a master ground bar entry into your building, and make sure you
    have effective lightning suppression on /everything/ that enters
    the building: Coax, AC power, phone lines, ethernets, hopes, wishes,
    etc.
  8. Make sure the master ground bar is well grounded to the tower.  See
    https://www.solacity.com/docs/Polyphaser/Coaxial%20cable%20entry%20panels%20and%20coax%20grounding.PDF 
    Commercial installs are copper bus bar.  I use it where I can, but I
    also have ham installs that use unistrut and copper strap.  In an
    ideal world this is next to the electrical service panel and ground
    there with suppressors on the AC lines into the building. The world
    is rarely ideal. 
  9. I /try/ to bury at least 8 AWG ground wire around the building, but
    I'm usually lucky to get it between the AC panel,  coax entry, and
    tower.  One time I used scrap 1/2" copper water pipe. 
  10. Get a good suppressor on the input feed to the AC panel. The /vast/
    majority of failures I've seen come in the AC line. Or phone line if
    you still have copper.
  11. Make sure your grounds really are.  A six foot 14 AWG wire is not a
    ground, even for a cable TV entry block. Use wide braid, strap, or
    welding cable size wire. And be careful how you route it.  There is
    a lot of literature on this alone. don't run it across the attic  ;-)
  12. If you want the buried stuff to last, look at some form of cathodic
    protection.

Of course you can do all of this and take losses from a hit, or none of
it and never see a problem.  This is, as the Polyphaser paper mentions,
insurance.

Oz

Shutting up now, sir.

On 6/19/2018 10:56 PM, Bill Hawkins wrote:

Seems to me that lightning protection for timenuts who put things on
masts keeps this from being completely off topic.

People who store explosives in earthen bunkers have learned from many
years of experience how far away bunkers have to be spaced so than an
explosion in one bunker won't affect others. That same body of
experience came up with the cone of protection.

It is not a myth.

Note that lightningsafety.com sells lightning protection. The scrolling
set of pictures on the home page shows a picture of four masts
protecting a rocket launch site.

Bill Hawkins

P.S. Lightning can enter a home in other ways. A neighbor had a direct
hit to a tree 15 feet from the house. After generating enough steam in a
2 foot diameter tree to split the length of it, a side strike hit an
outdoor light and did considerable damage in the house. The tree was not
the highest thing around. That same strike produced an EMP that took out
one of my two GPS antennas, about 100 feet away. The time from flash to
BANG was about 100 milliseconds. No, I didn't measure it - I experienced
it.

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@lists.febo.com] On Behalf Of
Van Horn, David
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 11:22 AM

About that "cone of protection"
http://lightningsafety.com/nlsi_pls/cone-of-protection-myth.html

--
mailto:oz@ozindfw.net
Oz
POB 93167
Southlake, TX 76092 (Near DFW Airport)

The "Cone of Protection" is a thumbrule.  It's not a myth, but it's also not an absolute law of nature. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy to some degree because it drives component design guidelines.  Bunker spacing is also a thumbrule, based on a lot of horrible experience. It's also a function of many variables and differing requirements, largely the explosive involved.  It's also self-fulfilling prophecy because it enters into design guidelines for explosives packaging. There's a multitude of reasons those bricks are in a foil bag. This is one of them. I'm not a lightning protection expert, but I do a bit of work where I have to be concerned about it. I look at that thumbrule, but I'm also a belt and suspenders guy and apply many others. And I build shipping gear as if it's going to South Africa (much worse that Florida.) Back to my original statement early in this thread (rope?) "No matter what you do, it's unlikely you can do anything within economical reason to survive a direct strike and the 10's to 100's of kiloamps involved. The real question is how close of a near miss can you survive." for a small business/residential install, as a minimum I would: 1. Make sure your tower is grounded. 2. Make sure your tower is electrically sound (a good electrical conductor - all sections are well connected electrically. this is */NOT /*a given with used or old tower.) If you are going to clamp copper straps to the tower or antennas, use some stainless shim stock as a barrier. 3. Mount your antenna(s) with grounding as specified by the manufacturer. 4. Use a lightning/drip loop at the top of the tower as a absolute minimum.  Better to use a real suppressor, preferably of the 1/4 wave stub type. 5. Ground the coax shield to the tower at the top and the bottom. 6. If you have control lines (power, rotator controls, etc.) use shielded cable, ground, and suppress as with coax. 7. Use a master ground bar entry into your building, and make sure you have effective lightning suppression on */everything/* that enters the building: Coax, AC power, phone lines, ethernets, hopes, wishes, etc. 8. Make sure the master ground bar is well grounded to the tower.  See https://www.solacity.com/docs/Polyphaser/Coaxial%20cable%20entry%20panels%20and%20coax%20grounding.PDF  Commercial installs are copper bus bar.  I use it where I can, but I also have ham installs that use unistrut and copper strap.  In an ideal world this is next to the electrical service panel and ground there with suppressors on the AC lines into the building. The world is rarely ideal.  9. I /try/ to bury at least 8 AWG ground wire around the building, but I'm usually lucky to get it between the AC panel,  coax entry, and tower.  One time I used scrap 1/2" copper water pipe.  10. Get a good suppressor on the input feed to the AC panel. The /vast/ majority of failures I've seen come in the AC line. Or phone line if you still have copper. 11. Make sure your grounds really are.  A six foot 14 AWG wire is not a ground, even for a cable TV entry block. Use wide braid, strap, or welding cable size wire. And be careful how you route it.  There is a lot of literature on this alone. don't run it across the attic  ;-) 12. If you want the buried stuff to last, look at some form of cathodic protection. Of course you can do all of this and take losses from a hit, or none of it and never see a problem.  This is, as the Polyphaser paper mentions, insurance. Oz Shutting up now, sir. On 6/19/2018 10:56 PM, Bill Hawkins wrote: > Seems to me that lightning protection for timenuts who put things on > masts keeps this from being completely off topic. > > People who store explosives in earthen bunkers have learned from many > years of experience how far away bunkers have to be spaced so than an > explosion in one bunker won't affect others. That same body of > experience came up with the cone of protection. > > It is not a myth. > > Note that lightningsafety.com sells lightning protection. The scrolling > set of pictures on the home page shows a picture of four masts > protecting a rocket launch site. > > Bill Hawkins > > P.S. Lightning can enter a home in other ways. A neighbor had a direct > hit to a tree 15 feet from the house. After generating enough steam in a > 2 foot diameter tree to split the length of it, a side strike hit an > outdoor light and did considerable damage in the house. The tree was not > the highest thing around. That same strike produced an EMP that took out > one of my two GPS antennas, about 100 feet away. The time from flash to > BANG was about 100 milliseconds. No, I didn't measure it - I experienced > it. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@lists.febo.com] On Behalf Of > Van Horn, David > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 11:22 AM > > About that "cone of protection" > http://lightningsafety.com/nlsi_pls/cone-of-protection-myth.html > > > -- mailto:oz@ozindfw.net Oz POB 93167 Southlake, TX 76092 (Near DFW Airport)
SM
Scott McGrath
Thu, Jun 21, 2018 12:22 AM

Part of the problem is lightning protection is not sexy,  its not like getting a 5071A or a H-maser,  But it DOES provide a measure of insurance for those sexy items

Content by Scott
Typos by Siri

On Jun 20, 2018, at 6:45 PM, Oz-in-DFW lists@ozindfw.net wrote:

The "Cone of Protection" is a thumbrule.  It's not a myth, but it's also
not an absolute law of nature. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy to some
degree because it drives component design guidelines.

Bunker spacing is also a thumbrule, based on a lot of horrible
experience. It's also a function of many variables and differing
requirements, largely the explosive involved.  It's also self-fulfilling
prophecy because it enters into design guidelines for explosives
packaging. There's a multitude of reasons those bricks are in a foil
bag. This is one of them.

I'm not a lightning protection expert, but I do a bit of work where I
have to be concerned about it. I look at that thumbrule, but I'm also a
belt and suspenders guy and apply many others. And I build shipping gear
as if it's going to South Africa (much worse that Florida.)

Back to my original statement early in this thread (rope?) "No matter
what you do, it's unlikely you can do anything within economical reason
to survive a direct strike and the 10's to 100's of kiloamps involved.
The real question is how close of a near miss can you survive." for a
small business/residential install, as a minimum I would:

  1. Make sure your tower is grounded.
  2. Make sure your tower is electrically sound (a good electrical
    conductor - all sections are well connected electrically. this is
    */NOT /*a given with used or old tower.) If you are going to clamp
    copper straps to the tower or antennas, use some stainless shim
    stock as a barrier.
  3. Mount your antenna(s) with grounding as specified by the manufacturer.
  4. Use a lightning/drip loop at the top of the tower as a absolute
    minimum.  Better to use a real suppressor, preferably of the 1/4
    wave stub type.
  5. Ground the coax shield to the tower at the top and the bottom.
  6. If you have control lines (power, rotator controls, etc.) use
    shielded cable, ground, and suppress as with coax.
  7. Use a master ground bar entry into your building, and make sure you
    have effective lightning suppression on /everything/ that enters
    the building: Coax, AC power, phone lines, ethernets, hopes, wishes,
    etc.
  8. Make sure the master ground bar is well grounded to the tower.  See
    https://www.solacity.com/docs/Polyphaser/Coaxial%20cable%20entry%20panels%20and%20coax%20grounding.PDF
    Commercial installs are copper bus bar.  I use it where I can, but I
    also have ham installs that use unistrut and copper strap.  In an
    ideal world this is next to the electrical service panel and ground
    there with suppressors on the AC lines into the building. The world
    is rarely ideal.
  9. I /try/ to bury at least 8 AWG ground wire around the building, but
    I'm usually lucky to get it between the AC panel,  coax entry, and
    tower.  One time I used scrap 1/2" copper water pipe.
  10. Get a good suppressor on the input feed to the AC panel. The /vast/
    majority of failures I've seen come in the AC line. Or phone line if
    you still have copper.
  11. Make sure your grounds really are.  A six foot 14 AWG wire is not a
    ground, even for a cable TV entry block. Use wide braid, strap, or
    welding cable size wire. And be careful how you route it.  There is
    a lot of literature on this alone. don't run it across the attic  ;-)
  12. If you want the buried stuff to last, look at some form of cathodic
    protection.

Of course you can do all of this and take losses from a hit, or none of
it and never see a problem.  This is, as the Polyphaser paper mentions,
insurance.

Oz

Shutting up now, sir.

On 6/19/2018 10:56 PM, Bill Hawkins wrote:
Seems to me that lightning protection for timenuts who put things on
masts keeps this from being completely off topic.

People who store explosives in earthen bunkers have learned from many
years of experience how far away bunkers have to be spaced so than an
explosion in one bunker won't affect others. That same body of
experience came up with the cone of protection.

It is not a myth.

Note that lightningsafety.com sells lightning protection. The scrolling
set of pictures on the home page shows a picture of four masts
protecting a rocket launch site.

Bill Hawkins

P.S. Lightning can enter a home in other ways. A neighbor had a direct
hit to a tree 15 feet from the house. After generating enough steam in a
2 foot diameter tree to split the length of it, a side strike hit an
outdoor light and did considerable damage in the house. The tree was not
the highest thing around. That same strike produced an EMP that took out
one of my two GPS antennas, about 100 feet away. The time from flash to
BANG was about 100 milliseconds. No, I didn't measure it - I experienced
it.

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@lists.febo.com] On Behalf Of
Van Horn, David
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 11:22 AM

About that "cone of protection"
http://lightningsafety.com/nlsi_pls/cone-of-protection-myth.html

--
mailto:oz@ozindfw.net
Oz
POB 93167
Southlake, TX 76092 (Near DFW Airport)


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Part of the problem is lightning protection is not sexy, its not like getting a 5071A or a H-maser, But it DOES provide a measure of insurance for those sexy items Content by Scott Typos by Siri On Jun 20, 2018, at 6:45 PM, Oz-in-DFW <lists@ozindfw.net> wrote: The "Cone of Protection" is a thumbrule. It's not a myth, but it's also not an absolute law of nature. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy to some degree because it drives component design guidelines. Bunker spacing is also a thumbrule, based on a lot of horrible experience. It's also a function of many variables and differing requirements, largely the explosive involved. It's also self-fulfilling prophecy because it enters into design guidelines for explosives packaging. There's a multitude of reasons those bricks are in a foil bag. This is one of them. I'm not a lightning protection expert, but I do a bit of work where I have to be concerned about it. I look at that thumbrule, but I'm also a belt and suspenders guy and apply many others. And I build shipping gear as if it's going to South Africa (much worse that Florida.) Back to my original statement early in this thread (rope?) "No matter what you do, it's unlikely you can do anything within economical reason to survive a direct strike and the 10's to 100's of kiloamps involved. The real question is how close of a near miss can you survive." for a small business/residential install, as a minimum I would: 1. Make sure your tower is grounded. 2. Make sure your tower is electrically sound (a good electrical conductor - all sections are well connected electrically. this is */NOT /*a given with used or old tower.) If you are going to clamp copper straps to the tower or antennas, use some stainless shim stock as a barrier. 3. Mount your antenna(s) with grounding as specified by the manufacturer. 4. Use a lightning/drip loop at the top of the tower as a absolute minimum. Better to use a real suppressor, preferably of the 1/4 wave stub type. 5. Ground the coax shield to the tower at the top and the bottom. 6. If you have control lines (power, rotator controls, etc.) use shielded cable, ground, and suppress as with coax. 7. Use a master ground bar entry into your building, and make sure you have effective lightning suppression on */everything/* that enters the building: Coax, AC power, phone lines, ethernets, hopes, wishes, etc. 8. Make sure the master ground bar is well grounded to the tower. See https://www.solacity.com/docs/Polyphaser/Coaxial%20cable%20entry%20panels%20and%20coax%20grounding.PDF Commercial installs are copper bus bar. I use it where I can, but I also have ham installs that use unistrut and copper strap. In an ideal world this is next to the electrical service panel and ground there with suppressors on the AC lines into the building. The world is rarely ideal. 9. I /try/ to bury at least 8 AWG ground wire around the building, but I'm usually lucky to get it between the AC panel, coax entry, and tower. One time I used scrap 1/2" copper water pipe. 10. Get a good suppressor on the input feed to the AC panel. The /vast/ majority of failures I've seen come in the AC line. Or phone line if you still have copper. 11. Make sure your grounds really are. A six foot 14 AWG wire is not a ground, even for a cable TV entry block. Use wide braid, strap, or welding cable size wire. And be careful how you route it. There is a lot of literature on this alone. don't run it across the attic ;-) 12. If you want the buried stuff to last, look at some form of cathodic protection. Of course you can do all of this and take losses from a hit, or none of it and never see a problem. This is, as the Polyphaser paper mentions, insurance. Oz Shutting up now, sir. > On 6/19/2018 10:56 PM, Bill Hawkins wrote: > Seems to me that lightning protection for timenuts who put things on > masts keeps this from being completely off topic. > > People who store explosives in earthen bunkers have learned from many > years of experience how far away bunkers have to be spaced so than an > explosion in one bunker won't affect others. That same body of > experience came up with the cone of protection. > > It is not a myth. > > Note that lightningsafety.com sells lightning protection. The scrolling > set of pictures on the home page shows a picture of four masts > protecting a rocket launch site. > > Bill Hawkins > > P.S. Lightning can enter a home in other ways. A neighbor had a direct > hit to a tree 15 feet from the house. After generating enough steam in a > 2 foot diameter tree to split the length of it, a side strike hit an > outdoor light and did considerable damage in the house. The tree was not > the highest thing around. That same strike produced an EMP that took out > one of my two GPS antennas, about 100 feet away. The time from flash to > BANG was about 100 milliseconds. No, I didn't measure it - I experienced > it. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@lists.febo.com] On Behalf Of > Van Horn, David > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2018 11:22 AM > > About that "cone of protection" > http://lightningsafety.com/nlsi_pls/cone-of-protection-myth.html > > > -- mailto:oz@ozindfw.net Oz POB 93167 Southlake, TX 76092 (Near DFW Airport) _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://lists.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.