trawlers@lists.trawlering.com

TRAWLERS & TRAWLERING LIST

View all threads

TWL: Seasickness Failures

M
mikem@yachtsdelivered.com
Mon, Sep 24, 2001 8:38 PM

I had 2 more failures to cure or prevent seasickness amongst crew on the
last trip.
Since there were 3 of us, that means the other 2 weren't always fit for duty.

There is little doubt in my mind that both individuals (males about 50-60
years old) were "prone" to seasickness. That said, I tried meclizine and
dramamine on them and they both had trouble.
First observation: in each case I think at least one of the drugs was
marginally effective. But, since they would not keep on the medication and
experiment with the dosage, they eventually were seasick, at least some of
the time.

I conclude that if they would have stuck with it they might have beaten it.
This would seem to be more of an attitude problem than a pharmicological
problem, but it won't make much difference to them as I doubt either one
can be induced to try anything else.

It would help if I could find another drug to use on these resistant types
that they would actually consent to use, but I have doubts about that ever
coming to pass. My final conclusion is that the failures to cure have
almost always been amongst those who resist following instructions and it
may require a psychiatric exam to determine the why. (perhaps, if one were
to die,  an autopsy might shed light on this???, come to think of it, why
wait!).

( as usual I will post this to www.curingseasickness.com, pretty soon).

Capt. Mike Maurice
Near Portland Oregon.

I had 2 more failures to cure or prevent seasickness amongst crew on the last trip. Since there were 3 of us, that means the other 2 weren't always fit for duty. There is little doubt in my mind that both individuals (males about 50-60 years old) were "prone" to seasickness. That said, I tried meclizine and dramamine on them and they both had trouble. First observation: in each case I think at least one of the drugs was marginally effective. But, since they would not keep on the medication and experiment with the dosage, they eventually were seasick, at least some of the time. I conclude that if they would have stuck with it they might have beaten it. This would seem to be more of an attitude problem than a pharmicological problem, but it won't make much difference to them as I doubt either one can be induced to try anything else. It would help if I could find another drug to use on these resistant types that they would actually consent to use, but I have doubts about that ever coming to pass. My final conclusion is that the failures to cure have almost always been amongst those who resist following instructions and it may require a psychiatric exam to determine the why. (perhaps, if one were to die, an autopsy might shed light on this???, come to think of it, why wait!). ( as usual I will post this to www.curingseasickness.com, pretty soon). Capt. Mike Maurice Near Portland Oregon.
B
bk@attglobal.net
Tue, Sep 25, 2001 1:27 AM

Mike, you are a seasoned pro and this advise does not absolutely apply to
you, but more to "the others". I will add that I am boatless and have what
many would describe as limited experience...

All that considered, my experience is:

  1. The medication must start before the illness. It is a lot easier to start
    it while on the hard (even a few days in advance, if possible), then reduce
    later as sea legs develop. Once you are "behind the curve" it takes a while
    to catch up

  2. OR... 1b: Most feel sick before they leave the dock. I think this is due
    to boarding and stocking during high heat, and due to inhaling diesal fumes
    at the dock prior to departure. Nonetheless....  there is nothing like the
    smell of fresh diesel in the morning in my opinion!!!

My own experience is that after I am on the water for a few days, what
bothers me is.. being on the hard!!! I remember being afloat in the BVI for
3 days, doing fine on land after that until we sat for lunch. Suddenly, I
was in poor shape on the hard and had to walk in circles to eat my food.
After I was back on the water I was fine again!!!

bk

I had 2 more failures to cure or prevent seasickness amongst crew on the
last trip.
Since there were 3 of us, that means the other 2 weren't always
fit for duty.

There is little doubt in my mind that both individuals (males
about 50-60
years old) were "prone" to seasickness. That said, I tried meclizine and
dramamine on them and they both had trouble.
First observation: in each case I think at least one of the drugs was
marginally effective. But, since they would not keep on the
medication and
experiment with the dosage, they eventually were seasick, at
least some of
the time.

I conclude that if they would have stuck with it they might have
beaten it.
This would seem to be more of an attitude problem than a pharmicological
problem, but it won't make much difference to them as I doubt either one
can be induced to try anything else.

It would help if I could find another drug to use on these
resistant types
that they would actually consent to use, but I have doubts about
that ever
coming to pass. My final conclusion is that the failures to cure have
almost always been amongst those who resist following
instructions and it
may require a psychiatric exam to determine the why. (perhaps,
if one were
to die,  an autopsy might shed light on this???, come to think
of it, why
wait!).

( as usual I will post this to www.curingseasickness.com, pretty soon).

Capt. Mike Maurice
Near Portland Oregon.

Mike, you are a seasoned pro and this advise does not absolutely apply to you, but more to "the others". I will add that I am boatless and have what many would describe as limited experience... All that considered, my experience is: 1) The medication must start before the illness. It is a lot easier to start it while on the hard (even a few days in advance, if possible), then reduce later as sea legs develop. Once you are "behind the curve" it takes a while to catch up 2) OR... 1b: Most feel sick before they leave the dock. I think this is due to boarding and stocking during high heat, and due to inhaling diesal fumes at the dock prior to departure. Nonetheless.... there is nothing like the smell of fresh diesel in the morning in my opinion!!! My own experience is that after I am on the water for a few days, what bothers me is.. being on the hard!!! I remember being afloat in the BVI for 3 days, doing fine on land after that until we sat for lunch. Suddenly, I was in poor shape on the hard and had to walk in circles to eat my food. After I was back on the water I was fine again!!! bk >> I had 2 more failures to cure or prevent seasickness amongst crew on the >> last trip. >> Since there were 3 of us, that means the other 2 weren't always >> fit for duty. >> >> There is little doubt in my mind that both individuals (males >> about 50-60 >> years old) were "prone" to seasickness. That said, I tried meclizine and >> dramamine on them and they both had trouble. >> First observation: in each case I think at least one of the drugs was >> marginally effective. But, since they would not keep on the >> medication and >> experiment with the dosage, they eventually were seasick, at >> least some of >> the time. >> >> I conclude that if they would have stuck with it they might have >> beaten it. >> This would seem to be more of an attitude problem than a pharmicological >> problem, but it won't make much difference to them as I doubt either one >> can be induced to try anything else. >> >> It would help if I could find another drug to use on these >> resistant types >> that they would actually consent to use, but I have doubts about >> that ever >> coming to pass. My final conclusion is that the failures to cure have >> almost always been amongst those who resist following >> instructions and it >> may require a psychiatric exam to determine the why. (perhaps, >> if one were >> to die, an autopsy might shed light on this???, come to think >> of it, why >> wait!). >> >> ( as usual I will post this to www.curingseasickness.com, pretty soon). >> >> >> Capt. Mike Maurice >> Near Portland Oregon. >>
M
mikem@yachtsdelivered.com
Tue, Sep 25, 2001 3:14 AM

At 12:20 AM 9/25/01, you wrote:

condition was deteriorating so rapidly.  Patch fixed it in about 3 hours.

Aside from those who react badly to scopalamine or having conditions making
it unwise it would seem like the obvious treatment.  You have another
opinion?

Jim

Scopalamine is a prescription item.
It is a serious hallucinogen.  I am inclined to use over the counter stuff
where possible.

Capt. Mike Maurice
Near Portland Oregon.

At 12:20 AM 9/25/01, you wrote: >condition was deteriorating so rapidly. Patch fixed it in about 3 hours. > >Aside from those who react badly to scopalamine or having conditions making >it unwise it would seem like the obvious treatment. You have another >opinion? > >Jim Scopalamine is a prescription item. It is a serious hallucinogen. I am inclined to use over the counter stuff where possible. Capt. Mike Maurice Near Portland Oregon.
C
capnrich@cnw.com
Tue, Sep 25, 2001 4:20 AM

This would seem to be more of an attitude problem than a pharmicological

It is well established that those who are in the early stages of seasickness
and left on their own, will NOT do just about anything / everything that is
advised to help the condition. The attitude is part of the syndrome.
(Although, I would agree that some folks are pretty contrary even in a
parking lot.) So it is not the fault of the medicine. I suspect the real
reason that meds taken at least an hour before needed work so much better is
that at that point the people are still agreeable to taking them.

I have had one person who against direct order refused
air/light/water/horizon/medicine and was so upsetting to others that I
banished them from the bridge and closed the door on them.

But I am not a good judge as I have not (yet) even had a twinge. Fear yes,
sick no.
Richard

>This would seem to be more of an attitude problem than a pharmicological It is well established that those who are in the early stages of seasickness and left on their own, will NOT do just about anything / everything that is advised to help the condition. The attitude is part of the syndrome. (Although, I would agree that some folks are pretty contrary even in a parking lot.) So it is not the fault of the medicine. I suspect the real reason that meds taken at least an hour before needed work so much better is that at that point the people are still agreeable to taking them. I have had one person who against direct order refused air/light/water/horizon/medicine and was so upsetting to others that I banished them from the bridge and closed the door on them. But I am not a good judge as I have not (yet) even had a twinge. Fear yes, sick no. Richard
JD
jim_donohue@computer.org
Tue, Sep 25, 2001 4:20 AM

You apparently are not fond of scop patches...which I have found to be far
and away the best preventative and palative.  I have only a dozen or so
instances where I know the details but I have yet to have a failure or a
serious side effect.

First wife got motion sick on airplanes, cars and docks.  Managed 100 foot
anchorage in Catalina with a patch.  Well credentialed captain of HC 38 went
bad after a day of bad seas out of LA going south.  In two more days we were
to the point of having to run for a  port from well at sea because his
condition was deteriorating so rapidly.  Patch fixed it in about 3 hours.

Aside from those who react badly to scopalamine or having conditions making
it unwise it would seem like the obvious treatment.  You have another
opinion?

Jim

Mike M says in part:

I had 2 more failures to cure or prevent seasickness amongst crew on the
last trip.
I conclude that if they would have stuck with it they might have
beaten it.
This would seem to be more of an attitude problem than a pharmicological
problem, but it won't make much difference to them as I doubt either one
can be induced to try anything else.

It would help if I could find another drug to use on these
resistant types
that they would actually consent to use, but I have doubts about
that ever
coming to pass. My final conclusion is that the failures to cure have
almost always been amongst those who resist following instructions and it
may require a psychiatric exam to determine the why. (perhaps, if
one were
to die,  an autopsy might shed light on this???, come to think of it, why
wait!).

( as usual I will post this to www.curingseasickness.com, pretty soon).

Capt. Mike Maurice
Near Portland Oregon.

You apparently are not fond of scop patches...which I have found to be far and away the best preventative and palative. I have only a dozen or so instances where I know the details but I have yet to have a failure or a serious side effect. First wife got motion sick on airplanes, cars and docks. Managed 100 foot anchorage in Catalina with a patch. Well credentialed captain of HC 38 went bad after a day of bad seas out of LA going south. In two more days we were to the point of having to run for a port from well at sea because his condition was deteriorating so rapidly. Patch fixed it in about 3 hours. Aside from those who react badly to scopalamine or having conditions making it unwise it would seem like the obvious treatment. You have another opinion? Jim Mike M says in part: > > I had 2 more failures to cure or prevent seasickness amongst crew on the > last trip. > I conclude that if they would have stuck with it they might have > beaten it. > This would seem to be more of an attitude problem than a pharmicological > problem, but it won't make much difference to them as I doubt either one > can be induced to try anything else. > > It would help if I could find another drug to use on these > resistant types > that they would actually consent to use, but I have doubts about > that ever > coming to pass. My final conclusion is that the failures to cure have > almost always been amongst those who resist following instructions and it > may require a psychiatric exam to determine the why. (perhaps, if > one were > to die, an autopsy might shed light on this???, come to think of it, why > wait!). > > ( as usual I will post this to www.curingseasickness.com, pretty soon). > > > Capt. Mike Maurice > Near Portland Oregon. > >
C
capnrich@cnw.com
Tue, Sep 25, 2001 6:32 AM

Scop patch did not work on our navigator who essentially dehydrated himself
into uselessness. This is the only example I am familiar with.
Richard

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Donohue" jim_donohue@computer.org
To: "Michael Maurice" mikem@yachtsdelivered.com;
trawler-world-list@samurai.com
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:20 PM
Subject: TWL: RE: Seasickness Failures

You apparently are not fond of scop patches...which I have found to be far
and away the best preventative and palative.  I have only a dozen or so
instances where I know the details but I have yet to have a failure or a
serious side effect.

First wife got motion sick on airplanes, cars and docks.  Managed 100 foot
anchorage in Catalina with a patch.  Well credentialed captain of HC 38

went

bad after a day of bad seas out of LA going south.  In two more days we

were

to the point of having to run for a  port from well at sea because his
condition was deteriorating so rapidly.  Patch fixed it in about 3 hours.

Aside from those who react badly to scopalamine or having conditions

making

it unwise it would seem like the obvious treatment.  You have another
opinion?

Jim

Mike M says in part:

I had 2 more failures to cure or prevent seasickness amongst crew on the
last trip.
I conclude that if they would have stuck with it they might have
beaten it.
This would seem to be more of an attitude problem than a pharmicological
problem, but it won't make much difference to them as I doubt either one
can be induced to try anything else.

It would help if I could find another drug to use on these
resistant types
that they would actually consent to use, but I have doubts about
that ever
coming to pass. My final conclusion is that the failures to cure have
almost always been amongst those who resist following instructions and

it

may require a psychiatric exam to determine the why. (perhaps, if
one were
to die,  an autopsy might shed light on this???, come to think of it,

why

wait!).

( as usual I will post this to www.curingseasickness.com, pretty soon).

Capt. Mike Maurice
Near Portland Oregon.

Scop patch did not work on our navigator who essentially dehydrated himself into uselessness. This is the only example I am familiar with. Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Donohue" <jim_donohue@computer.org> To: "Michael Maurice" <mikem@yachtsdelivered.com>; <trawler-world-list@samurai.com> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 9:20 PM Subject: TWL: RE: Seasickness Failures > You apparently are not fond of scop patches...which I have found to be far > and away the best preventative and palative. I have only a dozen or so > instances where I know the details but I have yet to have a failure or a > serious side effect. > > First wife got motion sick on airplanes, cars and docks. Managed 100 foot > anchorage in Catalina with a patch. Well credentialed captain of HC 38 went > bad after a day of bad seas out of LA going south. In two more days we were > to the point of having to run for a port from well at sea because his > condition was deteriorating so rapidly. Patch fixed it in about 3 hours. > > Aside from those who react badly to scopalamine or having conditions making > it unwise it would seem like the obvious treatment. You have another > opinion? > > Jim > > Mike M says in part: > > > > I had 2 more failures to cure or prevent seasickness amongst crew on the > > last trip. > > I conclude that if they would have stuck with it they might have > > beaten it. > > This would seem to be more of an attitude problem than a pharmicological > > problem, but it won't make much difference to them as I doubt either one > > can be induced to try anything else. > > > > It would help if I could find another drug to use on these > > resistant types > > that they would actually consent to use, but I have doubts about > > that ever > > coming to pass. My final conclusion is that the failures to cure have > > almost always been amongst those who resist following instructions and it > > may require a psychiatric exam to determine the why. (perhaps, if > > one were > > to die, an autopsy might shed light on this???, come to think of it, why > > wait!). > > > > ( as usual I will post this to www.curingseasickness.com, pretty soon). > > > > > > Capt. Mike Maurice > > Near Portland Oregon. > > > > > >
A
alexh@olypen.com
Tue, Sep 25, 2001 7:09 AM

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Maurice" mikem@yachtsdelivered.com

, since they would not keep on the medication and
experiment with the dosage, they eventually were seasick, at least some of
the time.

I conclude that if they would have stuck with it they might have beaten

it.

This would seem to be more of an attitude problem than a pharmicological
problem, but it won't make much difference to them as I doubt either one
can be induced to try anything else.

Hi Mike,

Have you experimented with ginger? I've had good results with it in the past
(Admittedly with limited opportunities). One advantage is that, since it's
not technically a medicine your shipmates shouldn't have any preconceived
notions about side effects. Ginger is available in several forms; capsules,
candied, etc. One TWListee even reported some success with ginger ale!

I'm told there have been clinical studies showing that ginger is effective
in combating "morning sickness" nausea in pregnant women but I'm pretty sure
that the motion sickness evidence is anecdotal.

Holistically yours,

Alex

----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Maurice" <mikem@yachtsdelivered.com> > , since they would not keep on the medication and > experiment with the dosage, they eventually were seasick, at least some of > the time. > > I conclude that if they would have stuck with it they might have beaten it. > This would seem to be more of an attitude problem than a pharmicological > problem, but it won't make much difference to them as I doubt either one > can be induced to try anything else. > Hi Mike, Have you experimented with ginger? I've had good results with it in the past (Admittedly with limited opportunities). One advantage is that, since it's not technically a medicine your shipmates shouldn't have any preconceived notions about side effects. Ginger is available in several forms; capsules, candied, etc. One TWListee even reported some success with ginger ale! I'm told there have been clinical studies showing that ginger is effective in combating "morning sickness" nausea in pregnant women but I'm pretty sure that the motion sickness evidence is anecdotal. Holistically yours, Alex
M
mikem@yachtsdelivered.com
Tue, Sep 25, 2001 1:59 PM

At 03:09 AM 9/25/01, you wrote:

Have you experimented with ginger? I've had good results with it in the past
(Admittedly with limited opportunities). One advantage is that, since it's
not technically a medicine your shipmates shouldn't have any preconceived

I have seen a medical study that indicates ginger may help relax the
pyloric valve at the bottom of the stomach. If this is so, it may explain
why it would benefit someone seasick.

Seasickness is not ONE thing. It is several and various people may require
different remedies to get relief.

Capt. Mike Maurice
Near Portland Oregon.

At 03:09 AM 9/25/01, you wrote: >Have you experimented with ginger? I've had good results with it in the past >(Admittedly with limited opportunities). One advantage is that, since it's >not technically a medicine your shipmates shouldn't have any preconceived I have seen a medical study that indicates ginger may help relax the pyloric valve at the bottom of the stomach. If this is so, it may explain why it would benefit someone seasick. Seasickness is not ONE thing. It is several and various people may require different remedies to get relief. Capt. Mike Maurice Near Portland Oregon.
Z
zeekstah@ktc.com
Tue, Sep 25, 2001 4:46 PM

It would help if I could find another drug to use on these resistant types
that they would actually consent to use, but I have doubts about that ever
coming to pass. My final conclusion is that the failures to cure have
almost always been amongst those who resist following instructions and it
may require a psychiatric exam to determine the why. (perhaps, if one were
to die,  an autopsy might shed light on this???, come to think of it, why
wait!).

( as usual I will post this to www.curingseasickness.com, pretty soon).

Capt. Mike Maurice
Near Portland Oregon.

Put some candied ginger in your medical kit next time. Have them eat it
straight.

Zeke Anderson
Kerrville TX

> It would help if I could find another drug to use on these resistant types > that they would actually consent to use, but I have doubts about that ever > coming to pass. My final conclusion is that the failures to cure have > almost always been amongst those who resist following instructions and it > may require a psychiatric exam to determine the why. (perhaps, if one were > to die, an autopsy might shed light on this???, come to think of it, why > wait!). > > ( as usual I will post this to www.curingseasickness.com, pretty soon). > > > Capt. Mike Maurice > Near Portland Oregon. > Put some candied ginger in your medical kit next time. Have them eat it straight. Zeke Anderson Kerrville TX
R
rossflem@serv.net
Tue, Sep 25, 2001 5:14 PM

On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:09:12 -0700, "Alex Hirsekorn"
alexh@olypen.com wrote:

Have you experimented with ginger?

[snip]

One TWListee even reported some success with ginger ale!

Typical ginger ale (Canada Dry, etc.) is very weak.  See if you can
find a strong ginger beer (really it is non-alcaholic).  Both Reed's
and Cock & Bull are good brands.  In the Puget Sound area Reed's can
usually be found at QFC supermarkets and PCC COOP's.  I try to keep
some aboard but I find that it tends to disappear quickly, especially
when mixed with rum.


Ross Fleming        rossflem@serv.net
Seattle, WA

On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:09:12 -0700, "Alex Hirsekorn" <alexh@olypen.com> wrote: >Have you experimented with ginger? [snip] > One TWListee even reported some success with ginger ale! Typical ginger ale (Canada Dry, etc.) is very weak. See if you can find a strong ginger beer (really it is non-alcaholic). Both Reed's and Cock & Bull are good brands. In the Puget Sound area Reed's can usually be found at QFC supermarkets and PCC COOP's. I try to keep some aboard but I find that it tends to disappear quickly, especially when mixed with rum. ___________________________________________________ Ross Fleming rossflem@serv.net Seattle, WA