SP
Short, practical, relevant Weekly Dvar
Fri, Jun 14, 2024 2:35 PM
Welcome to the short, practical Lelamed Weekly Dvar and Daily Aliyah. As
always, you can Order The Daily Aliyah
https://mosaicapress.com/product/the-daily-aliyah/ and receive your hard
copy of these daily practical and relevant Torah thoughts (all proceeds go
to Daily Giving), or join this Whatsapp group
https://chat.whatsapp.com/G35Ne4mpYsm3RLPDPnPSKC to receive one per day.
I hope you find this meaningful...
The Torah describes the restitution to be made for any wrongdoing and ends
with a general statement: “A man’s holy things shall belong to him;
whatever a man gives to the Kohen will be his” (5:10). However, the
statement is vague because it doesn’t specify who the “his” is referring
to. If it belongs to the Kohen, that seems obvious, and if it belongs to
the donor, how is that possible if he gave it to the Kohen?
Oznayim LaTorah points out that “will be his” is in the future tense, which
suggests that the subject is the donor, and explains that the Torah is
insightfully observing that giving others, even when required to do so,
creates a giving impression that benefits the giver. Although the object is
transferred to the Kohen, the act of giving is the donor’s forever. If
required giving creates such lasting goodness, how much more valuable is
voluntary kindness to others?
Shlomo Ressler
Quotation of the week:
"It's not how much we give but how much love we put into giving."
Welcome to the short, practical Lelamed Weekly Dvar and Daily Aliyah. As
always, you can Order The Daily Aliyah
<https://mosaicapress.com/product/the-daily-aliyah/> and receive your hard
copy of these daily practical and relevant Torah thoughts (all proceeds go
to Daily Giving), or join this Whatsapp group
<https://chat.whatsapp.com/G35Ne4mpYsm3RLPDPnPSKC> to receive one per day.
I hope you find this meaningful...
_______________________________________________
The Torah describes the restitution to be made for any wrongdoing and ends
with a general statement: “A man’s holy things shall belong to him;
whatever a man gives to the Kohen will be his” (5:10). However, the
statement is vague because it doesn’t specify who the “his” is referring
to. If it belongs to the Kohen, that seems obvious, and if it belongs to
the donor, how is that possible if he gave it to the Kohen?
Oznayim LaTorah points out that “will be his” is in the future tense, which
suggests that the subject is the donor, and explains that the Torah is
insightfully observing that giving others, even when required to do so,
creates a giving impression that benefits the giver. Although the object is
transferred to the Kohen, the act of giving is the donor’s forever. If
required giving creates such lasting goodness, how much more valuable is
voluntary kindness to others?
Shlomo Ressler
_____________________________________________
Quotation of the week:
"It's not how much we give but how much love we put into giving."