trawlers@lists.trawlering.com

TRAWLERS & TRAWLERING LIST

View all threads

Re: Manatee vs KK42

JC
james_conner@email.msn.com
Thu, Aug 6, 1998 10:53 PM

This was hull #25. Up untill hull 70 (I believe) the 42 had a glassed over
wooden superstructure that required attention. Otherwise a small crack could
turn into a big problem. Decks were built the same way except they put
thosands og little holes in the glass (to install teak decks).

Brightwork isn't a problem. Wife does that! ha ha....  We painted brows,
doors, and a few other pieces of wood... Improved looks of the boat in
general, made it look more like the latter years.
JimC
-----Original Message-----
From: David Courtney courda@axionet.com
To: trawler-world-list@samurai.com trawler-world-list@samurai.com
Date: Thursday, August 06, 1998 5:16 PM
Subject: Manatee vs KK42

Jim
When you refer to the KK42 being a fair bit of work, are you referring to
bright work?
David.

This was hull #25. Up untill hull 70 (I believe) the 42 had a glassed over wooden superstructure that required attention. Otherwise a small crack could turn into a big problem. Decks were built the same way except they put thosands og little holes in the glass (to install teak decks). Brightwork isn't a problem. Wife does that! ha ha.... We painted brows, doors, and a few other pieces of wood... Improved looks of the boat in general, made it look more like the latter years. JimC -----Original Message----- From: David Courtney <courda@axionet.com> To: trawler-world-list@samurai.com <trawler-world-list@samurai.com> Date: Thursday, August 06, 1998 5:16 PM Subject: Manatee vs KK42 >Jim >When you refer to the KK42 being a fair bit of work, are you referring to >bright work? >David. >