time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Auto-fail-over switch

JB
Jeff Blaine
Tue, Feb 5, 2019 2:26 AM

Wondered if anyone had seen some sort of gadget that would look to see
if there was a 10 Mhz signal and switch a relay (or provide some other
output) in the absence?  I would like to cook up some sort of fail over
switch without having to do much actual work. :)

73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com

Wondered if anyone had seen some sort of gadget that would look to see if there was a 10 Mhz signal and switch a relay (or provide some other output) in the absence?  I would like to cook up some sort of fail over switch without having to do much actual work. :) 73/jeff/ac0c alpha-charlie-zero-charlie www.ac0c.com
GL
Glenn Little WB4UIV
Tue, Feb 5, 2019 3:44 AM

source --- amplifier --- relay coil.

When source is present the amplified is detected and drives a relay coil
to keep it energized.
When source fails, relay opens switching to backup source.
When source is again active, relay closes reverting back to primary source.
A 10 MHz xtal or other 10 MHz filter in series with amplifier input will
ensure that amplifier will respond to source going off frequency.

Glenn

On 2/4/2019 9:26 PM, Jeff Blaine wrote:

Wondered if anyone had seen some sort of gadget that would look to see
if there was a 10 Mhz signal and switch a relay (or provide some other
output) in the absence?  I would like to cook up some sort of fail
over switch without having to do much actual work. :)

73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.

--

Glenn Little                ARRL Technical Specialist  QCWA  LM 28417
Amateur Callsign:  WB4UIV            wb4uiv@arrl.net    AMSAT LM 2178
QTH:  Goose Creek, SC USA (EM92xx)  USSVI LM  NRA LM  SBE ARRL TAPR
"It is not the class of license that the Amateur holds but the class
of the Amateur that holds the license"

source --- amplifier --- relay coil. When source is present the amplified is detected and drives a relay coil to keep it energized. When source fails, relay opens switching to backup source. When source is again active, relay closes reverting back to primary source. A 10 MHz xtal or other 10 MHz filter in series with amplifier input will ensure that amplifier will respond to source going off frequency. Glenn On 2/4/2019 9:26 PM, Jeff Blaine wrote: > Wondered if anyone had seen some sort of gadget that would look to see > if there was a 10 Mhz signal and switch a relay (or provide some other > output) in the absence?  I would like to cook up some sort of fail > over switch without having to do much actual work. :) > > 73/jeff/ac0c > alpha-charlie-zero-charlie > www.ac0c.com > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com > and follow the instructions there. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Glenn Little ARRL Technical Specialist QCWA LM 28417 Amateur Callsign: WB4UIV wb4uiv@arrl.net AMSAT LM 2178 QTH: Goose Creek, SC USA (EM92xx) USSVI LM NRA LM SBE ARRL TAPR "It is not the class of license that the Amateur holds but the class of the Amateur that holds the license"
TS
Tim Shoppa
Tue, Feb 5, 2019 3:45 AM

Do you have any phase continuity requirements?  Do you need to failover if the input is 9MHz or 9.999999MHz instead of 10MHz? If not then any carrier-operated relay will do it.

Tim N3QE

On Feb 4, 2019, at 9:26 PM, Jeff Blaine KeepWalking188@ac0c.com wrote:

Wondered if anyone had seen some sort of gadget that would look to see if there was a 10 Mhz signal and switch a relay (or provide some other output) in the absence?  I would like to cook up some sort of fail over switch without having to do much actual work. :)

73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.

Do you have any phase continuity requirements? Do you need to failover if the input is 9MHz or 9.999999MHz instead of 10MHz? If not then any carrier-operated relay will do it. Tim N3QE > On Feb 4, 2019, at 9:26 PM, Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com> wrote: > > Wondered if anyone had seen some sort of gadget that would look to see if there was a 10 Mhz signal and switch a relay (or provide some other output) in the absence? I would like to cook up some sort of fail over switch without having to do much actual work. :) > > 73/jeff/ac0c > alpha-charlie-zero-charlie > www.ac0c.com > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com > and follow the instructions there.
BK
Bob kb8tq
Tue, Feb 5, 2019 2:17 PM

Hi

The thing you will (rarely) find out there are devices that act like a GPSDO only the input is
10 MHz, or 1 pps or something else entirely (T1 , E1 …). They watch a set of inputs and
(based on a list of rules) decide what is the best source to use. The output 10 MHz gets
locked to that until something better comes along or it goes away.

If all your “stuff” needs a continuous 10 MHz, this is the sort of box you would want to have.
It keeps your radio on the air, your frequency counter counting, and all those breadboards
doing whatever it is they do.

Since they aren’t real common, finding one is a bit of a chore. Finding one with inputs
(and outputs) that are useful to you is a bit harder still. Figuring out the programming interface
to set up rules that make sense to you ….usually not very easy at all.

Regardless of how you do it, isolation is an issue. Having a 10 MHz standard line with a very
close in spur is not a real good thing. It can mess up a lot of stuff and it passes through the
cleanup loops in most gear. Is 120 db far enough down? I’ve certainly seen problems from
stuff at that level at a small offset …. Simply having a switch with this or that db isolation is
just a starting point. Grounding and shielding are very much on the “to do” list as well.

Lots of fun !!!

Bob

On Feb 4, 2019, at 9:26 PM, Jeff Blaine KeepWalking188@ac0c.com wrote:

Wondered if anyone had seen some sort of gadget that would look to see if there was a 10 Mhz signal and switch a relay (or provide some other output) in the absence?  I would like to cook up some sort of fail over switch without having to do much actual work. :)

73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.

Hi The thing you will (rarely) find out there are devices that act like a GPSDO only the input is 10 MHz, or 1 pps or something else entirely (T1 , E1 …). They watch a set of inputs and (based on a list of rules) decide what is the best source to use. The output 10 MHz gets locked to that until something better comes along or it goes away. If all your “stuff” needs a continuous 10 MHz, this is the sort of box you would want to have. It keeps your radio on the air, your frequency counter counting, and all those breadboards doing whatever it is they do. Since they aren’t real common, finding one is a bit of a chore. Finding one with inputs (and outputs) that are useful to you is a bit harder still. Figuring out the programming interface to set up rules that make sense to you ….usually not very easy at all. Regardless of how you do it, isolation is an issue. Having a 10 MHz standard line with a very close in spur is not a real good thing. It can mess up a lot of stuff and it passes through the cleanup loops in most gear. Is 120 db far enough down? I’ve certainly seen problems from stuff at that level at a small offset …. Simply having a switch with this or that db isolation is just a starting point. Grounding and shielding are very much on the “to do” list as well. Lots of fun !!! Bob > On Feb 4, 2019, at 9:26 PM, Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com> wrote: > > Wondered if anyone had seen some sort of gadget that would look to see if there was a 10 Mhz signal and switch a relay (or provide some other output) in the absence? I would like to cook up some sort of fail over switch without having to do much actual work. :) > > 73/jeff/ac0c > alpha-charlie-zero-charlie > www.ac0c.com > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com > and follow the instructions there.
MG
Mark Goldberg
Tue, Feb 5, 2019 4:59 PM

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019, 8:00 AM Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

Regardless of how you do it, isolation is an issue. Having a 10 MHz
standard line with a very
close in spur is not a real good thing. It can mess up a lot of stuff and
it passes through the
cleanup loops in most gear. Is 120 db far enough down? I’ve certainly seen
problems from
stuff at that level at a small offset …. Simply having a switch with this
or that db isolation is
just a starting point. Grounding and shielding are very much on the “to
do” list as well.

I was going to mention that. I modified my Perseus SDR to use an external
oscillator and just removing some SMT resistors to disconnect the original
oscillator output was insufficient. Still coupled in a spur from the
original oscillator and bad close in phase noise. I had to disable the
original oscillator by removing power. I didn't spend the time to try to do
that automatically. Maintaining phase continuity in the changeover would
also be hard.

Do you have any examples of something small that does this well?

Regards,

Mark

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019, 8:00 AM Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org wrote: > Regardless of how you do it, isolation is an issue. Having a 10 MHz > standard line with a very > close in spur is not a real good thing. It can mess up a lot of stuff and > it passes through the > cleanup loops in most gear. Is 120 db far enough down? I’ve certainly seen > problems from > stuff at that level at a small offset …. Simply having a switch with this > or that db isolation is > just a starting point. Grounding and shielding are very much on the “to > do” list as well. > I was going to mention that. I modified my Perseus SDR to use an external oscillator and just removing some SMT resistors to disconnect the original oscillator output was insufficient. Still coupled in a spur from the original oscillator and bad close in phase noise. I had to disable the original oscillator by removing power. I didn't spend the time to try to do that automatically. Maintaining phase continuity in the changeover would also be hard. Do you have any examples of something small that does this well? Regards, Mark >
BK
Bob kb8tq
Tue, Feb 5, 2019 7:09 PM

Hi

On Feb 5, 2019, at 11:59 AM, Mark Goldberg marklgoldberg@gmail.com wrote:

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019, 8:00 AM Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

Regardless of how you do it, isolation is an issue. Having a 10 MHz
standard line with a very
close in spur is not a real good thing. It can mess up a lot of stuff and
it passes through the
cleanup loops in most gear. Is 120 db far enough down? I’ve certainly seen
problems from
stuff at that level at a small offset …. Simply having a switch with this
or that db isolation is
just a starting point. Grounding and shielding are very much on the “to
do” list as well.

I was going to mention that. I modified my Perseus SDR to use an external
oscillator and just removing some SMT resistors to disconnect the original
oscillator output was insufficient. Still coupled in a spur from the
original oscillator and bad close in phase noise. I had to disable the
original oscillator by removing power. I didn't spend the time to try to do
that automatically. Maintaining phase continuity in the changeover would
also be hard.

Do you have any examples of something small that does this well?

Nothing that I have seen on the surplus market. Some of the things companies I’ve worked for over the
years did a pretty good job ( at least to the specs the customer requested …).

Bob

Regards,

Mark


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.

Hi > On Feb 5, 2019, at 11:59 AM, Mark Goldberg <marklgoldberg@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019, 8:00 AM Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org wrote: > >> Regardless of how you do it, isolation is an issue. Having a 10 MHz >> standard line with a very >> close in spur is not a real good thing. It can mess up a lot of stuff and >> it passes through the >> cleanup loops in most gear. Is 120 db far enough down? I’ve certainly seen >> problems from >> stuff at that level at a small offset …. Simply having a switch with this >> or that db isolation is >> just a starting point. Grounding and shielding are very much on the “to >> do” list as well. >> > > I was going to mention that. I modified my Perseus SDR to use an external > oscillator and just removing some SMT resistors to disconnect the original > oscillator output was insufficient. Still coupled in a spur from the > original oscillator and bad close in phase noise. I had to disable the > original oscillator by removing power. I didn't spend the time to try to do > that automatically. Maintaining phase continuity in the changeover would > also be hard. > > Do you have any examples of something small that does this well? Nothing that I have seen on the surplus market. Some of the things companies I’ve worked for over the years did a pretty good job ( at least to the specs the customer requested …). Bob > > Regards, > > Mark > > >> > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com > and follow the instructions there.
JA
John Ackermann N8UR
Tue, Feb 5, 2019 8:19 PM

There is a plug-in circuit built for the HPSDR radios that detects
presence of an external 10 MHz and when it's present shuts off power to
the onboard oscillator.  It would probably be easy to adapt to other
environments.  It's at http://www.k9ivb.net/Hermes/index.htm

John

On 2/5/19 2:09 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote:

Hi

On Feb 5, 2019, at 11:59 AM, Mark Goldberg marklgoldberg@gmail.com wrote:

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019, 8:00 AM Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

Regardless of how you do it, isolation is an issue. Having a 10 MHz
standard line with a very
close in spur is not a real good thing. It can mess up a lot of stuff and
it passes through the
cleanup loops in most gear. Is 120 db far enough down? I’ve certainly seen
problems from
stuff at that level at a small offset …. Simply having a switch with this
or that db isolation is
just a starting point. Grounding and shielding are very much on the “to
do” list as well.

I was going to mention that. I modified my Perseus SDR to use an external
oscillator and just removing some SMT resistors to disconnect the original
oscillator output was insufficient. Still coupled in a spur from the
original oscillator and bad close in phase noise. I had to disable the
original oscillator by removing power. I didn't spend the time to try to do
that automatically. Maintaining phase continuity in the changeover would
also be hard.

Do you have any examples of something small that does this well?

Nothing that I have seen on the surplus market. Some of the things companies I’ve worked for over the
years did a pretty good job ( at least to the specs the customer requested …).

Bob

Regards,

Mark


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com
and follow the instructions there.

There is a plug-in circuit built for the HPSDR radios that detects presence of an external 10 MHz and when it's present shuts off power to the onboard oscillator. It would probably be easy to adapt to other environments. It's at http://www.k9ivb.net/Hermes/index.htm John ---- On 2/5/19 2:09 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote: > Hi > > >> On Feb 5, 2019, at 11:59 AM, Mark Goldberg <marklgoldberg@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019, 8:00 AM Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org wrote: >> >>> Regardless of how you do it, isolation is an issue. Having a 10 MHz >>> standard line with a very >>> close in spur is not a real good thing. It can mess up a lot of stuff and >>> it passes through the >>> cleanup loops in most gear. Is 120 db far enough down? I’ve certainly seen >>> problems from >>> stuff at that level at a small offset …. Simply having a switch with this >>> or that db isolation is >>> just a starting point. Grounding and shielding are very much on the “to >>> do” list as well. >>> >> >> I was going to mention that. I modified my Perseus SDR to use an external >> oscillator and just removing some SMT resistors to disconnect the original >> oscillator output was insufficient. Still coupled in a spur from the >> original oscillator and bad close in phase noise. I had to disable the >> original oscillator by removing power. I didn't spend the time to try to do >> that automatically. Maintaining phase continuity in the changeover would >> also be hard. >> >> Do you have any examples of something small that does this well? > > Nothing that I have seen on the surplus market. Some of the things companies I’ve worked for over the > years did a pretty good job ( at least to the specs the customer requested …). > > Bob > >> >> Regards, >> >> Mark >> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com >> and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com > and follow the instructions there. >