time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: Composite sky GPS - with an added digression

HM
Hal Murray
Sat, Jul 1, 2023 11:03 PM

Jim Lux said:

Non ideal antennas make the grating lobes wiggle or be wavy along their long
axis. Of course what YOU care about are the nulls (and to a lesser  extent
the phase smoothness as you traverse the pattern).  I've looked a lot of
these kind of models and your saving grace is that the nulls are deep only
when the signals from the antennas are equal strength, which doesn't really
happen much.

In the case of interest, the signal strength will be strongly unbalanced.

It would be interesting to plot the signal strength as a satellite goes from
one receiver to the other.  You could make several plots with the antennas
pointed up at different angles so the field of view would overlap more or less.

What do I need to combine a pair of antennas?

--
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.

Jim Lux said: > Non ideal antennas make the grating lobes wiggle or be wavy along their long > axis. Of course what YOU care about are the nulls (and to a lesser extent > the phase smoothness as you traverse the pattern).  I've looked a lot of > these kind of models and your saving grace is that the nulls are deep only > when the signals from the antennas are equal strength, which doesn't really > happen much. In the case of interest, the signal strength will be strongly unbalanced. It would be interesting to plot the signal strength as a satellite goes from one receiver to the other. You could make several plots with the antennas pointed up at different angles so the field of view would overlap more or less. What do I need to combine a pair of antennas? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.
LJ
Lux, Jim
Sun, Jul 2, 2023 3:50 PM

On 7/1/23 4:03 PM, Hal Murray via time-nuts wrote:

Jim Lux said:

Non ideal antennas make the grating lobes wiggle or be wavy along their long
axis. Of course what YOU care about are the nulls (and to a lesser  extent
the phase smoothness as you traverse the pattern).  I've looked a lot of
these kind of models and your saving grace is that the nulls are deep only
when the signals from the antennas are equal strength, which doesn't really
happen much.

In the case of interest, the signal strength will be strongly unbalanced.

It would be interesting to plot the signal strength as a satellite goes from
one receiver to the other.  You could make several plots with the antennas
pointed up at different angles so the field of view would overlap more or less.

What do I need to combine a pair of antennas?

Did some sample plots in a subsequent post.

You'd need a power combiner - which is just a splitter used in reverse.
Depending on signal levels and whether there are LNAs on the antennas,
it could be as simple as just hooking the antennas up in parallel.

If you're an all passive system, then something like a Minicircuits
ZX10-2-25 (or any of a dozen or more) would do. With a dB hit from the
loss through the combiner.

https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=ZX10-2-25-S%2B

On 7/1/23 4:03 PM, Hal Murray via time-nuts wrote: > Jim Lux said: >> Non ideal antennas make the grating lobes wiggle or be wavy along their long >> axis. Of course what YOU care about are the nulls (and to a lesser extent >> the phase smoothness as you traverse the pattern).  I've looked a lot of >> these kind of models and your saving grace is that the nulls are deep only >> when the signals from the antennas are equal strength, which doesn't really >> happen much. > In the case of interest, the signal strength will be strongly unbalanced. > > It would be interesting to plot the signal strength as a satellite goes from > one receiver to the other. You could make several plots with the antennas > pointed up at different angles so the field of view would overlap more or less. > > What do I need to combine a pair of antennas? > > > Did some sample plots in a subsequent post. You'd need a power combiner - which is just a splitter used in reverse. Depending on signal levels and whether there are LNAs on the antennas, it could be as simple as just hooking the antennas up in parallel. If you're an all passive system, then something like a Minicircuits ZX10-2-25 (or any of a dozen or more) would do. With a dB hit from the loss through the combiner. https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=ZX10-2-25-S%2B
BC
Bob Camp
Sun, Jul 2, 2023 4:03 PM

Hi

If you are just trying an experiment, there are cable TV splitters from
places like Lowes or Home Depot that go up to 2 GHz. You do need to
look at the label on the part to be sure, they don’t all go past 1 GHz.

Bob

On Jul 2, 2023, at 11:50 AM, Lux, Jim via time-nuts time-nuts@lists.febo.com wrote:

On 7/1/23 4:03 PM, Hal Murray via time-nuts wrote:

Jim Lux said:

Non ideal antennas make the grating lobes wiggle or be wavy along their long
axis. Of course what YOU care about are the nulls (and to a lesser  extent
the phase smoothness as you traverse the pattern).  I've looked a lot of
these kind of models and your saving grace is that the nulls are deep only
when the signals from the antennas are equal strength, which doesn't really
happen much.

In the case of interest, the signal strength will be strongly unbalanced.

It would be interesting to plot the signal strength as a satellite goes from
one receiver to the other.  You could make several plots with the antennas
pointed up at different angles so the field of view would overlap more or less.

What do I need to combine a pair of antennas?

Did some sample plots in a subsequent post.

You'd need a power combiner - which is just a splitter used in reverse. Depending on signal levels and whether there are LNAs on the antennas, it could be as simple as just hooking the antennas up in parallel.

If you're an all passive system, then something like a Minicircuits ZX10-2-25 (or any of a dozen or more) would do. With a dB hit from the loss through the combiner.

https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=ZX10-2-25-S%2B


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com

Hi If you are just trying an experiment, there are cable TV splitters from places like Lowes or Home Depot that go up to 2 GHz. You do need to look at the label on the part to be sure, they don’t all go past 1 GHz. Bob > On Jul 2, 2023, at 11:50 AM, Lux, Jim via time-nuts <time-nuts@lists.febo.com> wrote: > > On 7/1/23 4:03 PM, Hal Murray via time-nuts wrote: >> Jim Lux said: >>> Non ideal antennas make the grating lobes wiggle or be wavy along their long >>> axis. Of course what YOU care about are the nulls (and to a lesser extent >>> the phase smoothness as you traverse the pattern). I've looked a lot of >>> these kind of models and your saving grace is that the nulls are deep only >>> when the signals from the antennas are equal strength, which doesn't really >>> happen much. >> In the case of interest, the signal strength will be strongly unbalanced. >> >> It would be interesting to plot the signal strength as a satellite goes from >> one receiver to the other. You could make several plots with the antennas >> pointed up at different angles so the field of view would overlap more or less. >> >> What do I need to combine a pair of antennas? >> >> >> > Did some sample plots in a subsequent post. > > You'd need a power combiner - which is just a splitter used in reverse. Depending on signal levels and whether there are LNAs on the antennas, it could be as simple as just hooking the antennas up in parallel. > > If you're an all passive system, then something like a Minicircuits ZX10-2-25 (or any of a dozen or more) would do. With a dB hit from the loss through the combiner. > > https://www.minicircuits.com/WebStore/dashboard.html?model=ZX10-2-25-S%2B > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
GE
glen english LIST
Sun, Jul 9, 2023 12:21 AM

On GPS with RAW data output  - I'll use three receivers and calculate
fix external with raw data.

 I've bought 30 pcs of

https://www.skytraq.com.tw/homesite/PX1122C_DS.pdf

has all the raw data. $8.70 in quantity. Taiwan origin receiver
company,  Intention is to use three together. we'll see.

buy up to 100qu from their webstore navspark.

They also have a recv with precision pps and programmable timing outputs
and 10 MHz etc programmable

https://navspark.mybigcommerce.com/content/PX1100T_DS.pdf

Skytraq - I have used their Venus838 chips in production product for
years. the stuff works.

They've also got a range of L5 capabable devices now.

On 3/07/2023 1:50 am, Lux, Jim via time-nuts wrote:

On 7/1/23 4:03 PM, Hal Murray via time-nuts wrot

On GPS with RAW data output  - I'll use three receivers and calculate fix external with raw data.  I've bought 30 pcs of https://www.skytraq.com.tw/homesite/PX1122C_DS.pdf has all the raw data. $8.70 in quantity. Taiwan origin receiver company,  Intention is to use three together. we'll see. buy up to 100qu from their webstore navspark. They also have a recv with precision pps and programmable timing outputs and 10 MHz etc programmable https://navspark.mybigcommerce.com/content/PX1100T_DS.pdf Skytraq - I have used their Venus838 chips in production product for years. the stuff works. They've also got a range of L5 capabable devices now. On 3/07/2023 1:50 am, Lux, Jim via time-nuts wrote: > On 7/1/23 4:03 PM, Hal Murray via time-nuts wrot