Can't help you with the manual but I just wanted to say that the 1051 was one of my favorites. Loved the PLLs. I worked on an upgrade for Stewart Warner back in the early 80s. As part of a prototype I put two Z-80 systems in the space between the front panel and the main gear. Part of its purpose was to interface to the 1553 bus. I also implemented a DDS in TTL for fine tuning. I still like tube front ends for mil radios for ruggedness. But you can't sell it because of wear out issues. The Navy didn't buy in to the prototype. Collins beat us. The code for the processors was written in Forth. The Navy "code inspector" said it was some of the best written code he had seen in several years. We also could complete a design cycle - including code - in a month. The Collins boys had a team 10X as large as ours (we had 3). And it took them 6 months to complete a design cycle using "C". I was project manager and lead engineer. I was mostly hardware but I did some software and rode heard on the coders. Forth was my idea. I also put a Z-80 inside the companion 1KW transmitter. The RF inside the transmitter was a few volts per inch. I used a sealed box and a  lot of feed through filters. It worked the first time.  I also worked with the gear in Navy ETA school. And went on to become a Nuke so I didn't see that radio gear again until about 15 years later.   Simon Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at a profit.

Forth forever!!! Don L M. Simon > Can't help you with the manual but I just wanted to say that the 1051 > was one of my favorites. Loved the PLLs. I worked on an upgrade for > Stewart Warner back in the early 80s. As part of a prototype I put two > Z-80 systems in the space between the front panel and the main gear. > Part of its purpose was to interface to the 1553 bus. I also implemented > a DDS in TTL for fine tuning. I still like tube front ends for mil > radios for ruggedness. But you can't sell it because of wear out issues. > > > The Navy didn't buy in to the prototype. Collins beat us. The code for > the processors was written in Forth. The Navy "code inspector" said it > was some of the best written code he had seen in several years. We also > could complete a design cycle - including code - in a month. The Collins > boys had a team 10X as large as ours (we had 3). And it took them 6 > months to complete a design cycle using "C". I was project manager and > lead engineer. I was mostly hardware but I did some software and rode > heard on the coders. Forth was my idea. > > > I also put a Z-80 inside the companion 1KW transmitter. The RF inside > the transmitter was a few volts per inch. I used a sealed box and a  lot > of feed through filters. It worked the first time.  > > I also worked with the gear in Navy ETA school. And went on to become a > Nuke so I didn't see that radio gear again until about 15 years later. > >   > Simon > > > Engineering is the art of making what you want from what you can get at > a profit. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > > -- "Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind." De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century. "If you don't know what it is, don't poke it." Ghost in the Shell Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL Six Mile Systems LLP 17850 Six Mile Road POB 134 Huson, MT, 59846 VOX 406-626-4304 www.lightningforensics.com www.sixmilesystems.com

Another FORTH fan here. Originally written to control radio telescopes -- hardware was changing all the time so the language was by definition designed to be extensible. Want to add a function? Define it, give it a name and bingo... Sometimes less __IS__ Moore. > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com > [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Don Latham > Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 23:19 > To: M. Simon; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Wanted - AN/URQ-10 manual > > Forth forever!!! > Don L > M. Simon > > Can't help you with the manual but I just wanted to say > that the 1051 > > was one of my favorites. Loved the PLLs. I worked on an upgrade for > > Stewart Warner back in the early 80s. As part of a > prototype I put two > > Z-80 systems in the space between the front panel and the main gear. > > Part of its purpose was to interface to the 1553 bus. I > also implemented > > a DDS in TTL for fine tuning. I still like tube front ends for mil > > radios for ruggedness. But you can't sell it because of > wear out issues. > > > > > > The Navy didn't buy in to the prototype. Collins beat us. > The code for > > the processors was written in Forth. The Navy "code > inspector" said it > > was some of the best written code he had seen in several > years. We also > > could complete a design cycle - including code - in a > month. The Collins > > boys had a team 10X as large as ours (we had 3). And it took them 6 > > months to complete a design cycle using "C". I was project > manager and > > lead engineer. I was mostly hardware but I did some > software and rode > > heard on the coders. Forth was my idea. > > > > > > I also put a Z-80 inside the companion 1KW transmitter. The > RF inside > > the transmitter was a few volts per inch. I used a sealed > box and a  lot > > of feed through filters. It worked the first time.  > > > > I also worked with the gear in Navy ETA school. And went on > to become a > > Nuke so I didn't see that radio gear again until about 15 > years later. > > > >   > > Simon > > > > > > Engineering is the art of making what you want from what > you can get at > > a profit. > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > > > > > -- > "Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument > are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind." > De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century. > "If you don't know what it is, don't poke it." > Ghost in the Shell > > > Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL > Six Mile Systems LLP > 17850 Six Mile Road > POB 134 > Huson, MT, 59846 > VOX 406-626-4304 > www.lightningforensics.com > www.sixmilesystems.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.

Goodness FORTH and a R1051. Who would have thought. I am a big fan of forth also. Loved the way you could extend the dictionary. Plus it ran like a bat out of heck fast. Like you I went through ETA school as the second class to be trained on the 1051. At $27,000 each did not think I would ever own one. I do have a operational 1051 purchased many years after leaving the service from Fair Radio and a RT-918 all operational. Though the RT918 was a serious $25 basket case from the air force. DDS for the 1051. I have often thought about that. Today they are so cheap that you could build a composite unit or 3 or so separate ones for the translatersyn. What will drive me to do that is the pesky aging crystals that I have already had to deal with on the RT918. To keep this in a time-nuts spirit, they all run on the RB reference or the GPS reference. See back to time-nuts. Regards Paul WB8TSL On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 3:32 AM, DaveH <info@blackmountainforge.com> wrote: > Another FORTH fan here. > > Originally written to control radio telescopes -- hardware was changing all > the time so the language was by definition designed to be extensible. Want > to add a function? Define it, give it a name and bingo... > > Sometimes less __IS__ Moore. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com > > [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Don Latham > > Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2012 23:19 > > To: M. Simon; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Wanted - AN/URQ-10 manual > > > > Forth forever!!! > > Don L > > M. Simon > > > Can't help you with the manual but I just wanted to say > > that the 1051 > > > was one of my favorites. Loved the PLLs. I worked on an upgrade for > > > Stewart Warner back in the early 80s. As part of a > > prototype I put two > > > Z-80 systems in the space between the front panel and the main gear. > > > Part of its purpose was to interface to the 1553 bus. I > > also implemented > > > a DDS in TTL for fine tuning. I still like tube front ends for mil > > > radios for ruggedness. But you can't sell it because of > > wear out issues. > > > > > > > > > The Navy didn't buy in to the prototype. Collins beat us. > > The code for > > > the processors was written in Forth. The Navy "code > > inspector" said it > > > was some of the best written code he had seen in several > > years. We also > > > could complete a design cycle - including code - in a > > month. The Collins > > > boys had a team 10X as large as ours (we had 3). And it took them 6 > > > months to complete a design cycle using "C". I was project > > manager and > > > lead engineer. I was mostly hardware but I did some > > software and rode > > > heard on the coders. Forth was my idea. > > > > > > > > > I also put a Z-80 inside the companion 1KW transmitter. The > > RF inside > > > the transmitter was a few volts per inch. I used a sealed > > box and a lot > > > of feed through filters. It worked the first time. > > > > > > I also worked with the gear in Navy ETA school. And went on > > to become a > > > Nuke so I didn't see that radio gear again until about 15 > > years later. > > > > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > > Engineering is the art of making what you want from what > > you can get at > > > a profit. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > > To unsubscribe, go to > > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > > and follow the instructions there. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > "Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument > > are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind." > > De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century. > > "If you don't know what it is, don't poke it." > > Ghost in the Shell > > > > > > Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL > > Six Mile Systems LLP > > 17850 Six Mile Road > > POB 134 > > Huson, MT, 59846 > > VOX 406-626-4304 > > www.lightningforensics.com > > www.sixmilesystems.com > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >