E
EWKehren@aol.com
Sat, Dec 5, 2015 8:28 PM
At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
coupling. Is there a better alternative?
Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
coupling. Is there a better alternative?
Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
BC
Bob Camp
Sat, Dec 5, 2015 9:36 PM
Hi
Don’t worry about it. You will be under 1 db.
Bob
On Dec 5, 2015, at 3:28 PM, Bert Kehren via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com wrote:
At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
coupling. Is there a better alternative?
Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi
Don’t worry about it. You will be under 1 db.
Bob
> On Dec 5, 2015, at 3:28 PM, Bert Kehren via time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com> wrote:
>
> At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
> have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
> loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
> coupling. Is there a better alternative?
> Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
MD
Magnus Danielson
Sat, Dec 5, 2015 9:48 PM
Bert,
Extending the RG-6U using N-connectors should not be giving you more
than 0.20 dB, probably less. Considering that you have have 6.12 dB per
100 feet in RG-6U at 1 GHz (should be about 8 dB @ 1.575 GHz), so it
will be more. Using N-connectors to extend the cable-stretch isn't going
to be a major issue, it may be the cable length that could present an issue.
I've been fighting these issues, and used too long cable at hand (RG-58
is a terrible choice but was lying around at the time). I use LMR-400
these days, giving me about 5.1 dB per 100 feet.
If cable and connector damping causes you harm, then consider installing
an additional LNA inline with the antenna.
Hope it sort itself out for you.
Cheers,
Magnus
On 12/05/2015 09:28 PM, Bert Kehren via time-nuts wrote:
At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
coupling. Is there a better alternative?
Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Bert,
Extending the RG-6U using N-connectors should not be giving you more
than 0.20 dB, probably less. Considering that you have have 6.12 dB per
100 feet in RG-6U at 1 GHz (should be about 8 dB @ 1.575 GHz), so it
will be more. Using N-connectors to extend the cable-stretch isn't going
to be a major issue, it may be the cable length that could present an issue.
I've been fighting these issues, and used too long cable at hand (RG-58
is a terrible choice but was lying around at the time). I use LMR-400
these days, giving me about 5.1 dB per 100 feet.
If cable and connector damping causes you harm, then consider installing
an additional LNA inline with the antenna.
Hope it sort itself out for you.
Cheers,
Magnus
On 12/05/2015 09:28 PM, Bert Kehren via time-nuts wrote:
> At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
> have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
> loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
> coupling. Is there a better alternative?
> Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
PS
paul swed
Sat, Dec 5, 2015 10:05 PM
Bert did not find much that I would trust. But the FM-FM should be about
3/4db from the various posts I have seen.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Bert Kehren via time-nuts <
time-nuts@febo.com> wrote:
At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
coupling. Is there a better alternative?
Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Bert did not find much that I would trust. But the FM-FM should be about
3/4db from the various posts I have seen.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Bert Kehren via time-nuts <
time-nuts@febo.com> wrote:
> At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
> have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
> loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
> coupling. Is there a better alternative?
> Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
JL
Jim Lux
Sat, Dec 5, 2015 10:09 PM
On 12/5/15 12:28 PM, Bert Kehren via time-nuts wrote:
At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
coupling. Is there a better alternative?
The couplings have almost no loss. The data sheet will say something
like <0.05 dB, but that's because that's what the measurement
uncertainty is.
On 12/5/15 12:28 PM, Bert Kehren via time-nuts wrote:
> At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
> have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
> loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
> coupling. Is there a better alternative?
The couplings have almost no loss. The data sheet will say something
like <0.05 dB, but that's because that's what the measurement
uncertainty is.
AP
Alex Pummer
Sat, Dec 5, 2015 10:20 PM
if you have a good TDR -- you need very short 50 to 20 pico-sec. rise
time -- you could play with cable to cable, but but not having such TDR
the connector is a relative bullet prof solution
73
KJ6UHN
Alex
On 12/5/2015 1:36 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi
Don’t worry about it. You will be under 1 db.
Bob
On Dec 5, 2015, at 3:28 PM, Bert Kehren via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com wrote:
At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
coupling. Is there a better alternative?
Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
if you have a good TDR -- you need very short 50 to 20 pico-sec. rise
time -- you could play with cable to cable, but but not having such TDR
the connector is a relative bullet prof solution
73
KJ6UHN
Alex
On 12/5/2015 1:36 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
> Don’t worry about it. You will be under 1 db.
>
> Bob
>
>
>
>> On Dec 5, 2015, at 3:28 PM, Bert Kehren via time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com> wrote:
>>
>> At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
>> have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
>> loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
>> coupling. Is there a better alternative?
>> Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7227 / Virus Database: 4477/11119 - Release Date: 12/05/15
IS
Ian Stirling
Sun, Dec 6, 2015 1:53 AM
On 12/05/2015 03:28 PM, Bert Kehren via time-nuts wrote:
have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
loss associated with them.
My GPS aerial came with the Nortel box from the auction site.
It is connected to my RFTG-u Ref 1 using RG-6. It has standard
F video connectors at each end with an F-BNC adapter at the aerial
and F-TNC at the RFTG. I did not have to measure the losses at the
connectors and adapters. RG-6 produces a 1.4 VSWR compared to 50 ohm
cable. That is just fine.
Ian, G4ICV, AB2GR
On 12/05/2015 03:28 PM, Bert Kehren via time-nuts wrote:
> have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
> loss associated with them.
My GPS aerial came with the Nortel box from the auction site.
It is connected to my RFTG-u Ref 1 using RG-6. It has standard
F video connectors at each end with an F-BNC adapter at the aerial
and F-TNC at the RFTG. I did not have to measure the losses at the
connectors and adapters. RG-6 produces a 1.4 VSWR compared to 50 ohm
cable. That is just fine.
Ian, G4ICV, AB2GR
--
B
billriches
Sun, Dec 6, 2015 2:42 AM
We do splices all the time with RG11 and RG6 using F type connectors and a
barrel connector to join the two. This is for cable tv systems. Connectors
are cheap - if you don't have any flag down your friendly fios or comcast
truck and he will surely part with a few. The problem is you need the
correct crimp tool if they are snap and seal or a variant. The cable guy
may be able to lend you a tool.
73,
Bill, WA2DVU
Cape May
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of paul swed
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2015 5:06 PM
To: ewkehren; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] RG 6 U couplings
Bert did not find much that I would trust. But the FM-FM should be about
3/4db from the various posts I have seen.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Bert Kehren via time-nuts <
time-nuts@febo.com> wrote:
At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge.
May have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings
and the loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a
female, female coupling. Is there a better alternative?
Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
We do splices all the time with RG11 and RG6 using F type connectors and a
barrel connector to join the two. This is for cable tv systems. Connectors
are cheap - if you don't have any flag down your friendly fios or comcast
truck and he will surely part with a few. The problem is you need the
correct crimp tool if they are snap and seal or a variant. The cable guy
may be able to lend you a tool.
73,
Bill, WA2DVU
Cape May
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of paul swed
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2015 5:06 PM
To: ewkehren; Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] RG 6 U couplings
Bert did not find much that I would trust. But the FM-FM should be about
3/4db from the various posts I have seen.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Bert Kehren via time-nuts <
time-nuts@febo.com> wrote:
> At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge.
> May have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings
> and the loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a
> female, female coupling. Is there a better alternative?
> Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
AT
Arnold Tibus
Sun, Dec 6, 2015 4:38 AM
Hi Bert and the group,
I can highly recommend the so called compression F-connectors.
There are a lot of brands out, but my personal favorite is the
Waterproof CX3 Quickmount
from Corning Cabelcon, because they have very good rf and mechanical data.
They are not only weatherproof and corrosion resistant (NiTin-alloy), but
they are really watertight (tested 8h at 30m) and accept a quite high
pull strength of up to typical 480N.
The RF shielding and impedance data are also very good.
For outside I use successful since years a black polyethylen insulated
cable
which is really weatherproof and UV resistant and triple shielded with
tinned copper
braid (I don't like aluminum braid because the low mech. performance).
Just for overview information (I have no relation to this company!):
http://www.cabelcon.dk/download/CX3Folder_May2012.pdf
One may find similar connectors made by other companies.
The only 'negative' point is the need of a compression tool.
So I think this would be a very good solution for repair and connection
in general of RG6 and similar types also for GPS use.
Kind regards
Arnold, DK2WT
Am 05.12.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Bert Kehren via time-nuts:
At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
coupling. Is there a better alternative?
Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi Bert and the group,
I can highly recommend the so called compression F-connectors.
There are a lot of brands out, but my personal favorite is the
Waterproof CX3 Quickmount
from Corning Cabelcon, because they have very good rf and mechanical data.
They are not only weatherproof and corrosion resistant (NiTin-alloy), but
they are really watertight (tested 8h at 30m) and accept a quite high
pull strength of up to typical 480N.
The RF shielding and impedance data are also very good.
For outside I use successful since years a black polyethylen insulated
cable
which is really weatherproof and UV resistant and triple shielded with
tinned copper
braid (I don't like aluminum braid because the low mech. performance).
Just for overview information (I have no relation to this company!):
http://www.cabelcon.dk/download/CX3Folder_May2012.pdf
One may find similar connectors made by other companies.
The only 'negative' point is the need of a compression tool.
So I think this would be a very good solution for repair and connection
in general of RG6 and similar types also for GPS use.
Kind regards
Arnold, DK2WT
Am 05.12.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Bert Kehren via time-nuts:
> At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
> have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
> loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
> coupling. Is there a better alternative?
> Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
DJ
David J Taylor
Sun, Dec 6, 2015 6:58 AM
Bert,
Extending the RG-6U using N-connectors should not be giving you more
than 0.20 dB, probably less. Considering that you have have 6.12 dB per
100 feet in RG-6U at 1 GHz (should be about 8 dB @ 1.575 GHz), so it
will be more. Using N-connectors to extend the cable-stretch isn't going
to be a major issue, it may be the cable length that could present an issue.
[]
Cheers,
Magnus
From: Bert Kehren via time-nuts
Thank you all for the information, worse case I look at 70 feet with two
couplings all in an inaccessible attic. The cable is quality but vintage
1989. Part of an extensive cable TV wiring. So far nine with two I am not
able
to locate the other end.The way they are installed I am not able yet to use
one of them to pull a new one in.
Twenty years ago I probably would have risked crawling in there. Don't want
to fall 16 feet at age 73.
Bert Kehren Palm City .
Magnus,
RG-6U is 75-ohm cable and uses type F connectors (horrible!). Any F-N
adapters and the impedance mismatch would surely introduce more loss than a
simple Female-Female F connector.
Bert,
If the cable is that old, 1989, I would consider replacing it with a more
recently purchased cable, which will not have deteriorated, and may have
lower loss. I appreciate that may not be possible in your case.
Cheers,
David
SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
Email: david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk
Twitter: @gm8arv
Bert,
Extending the RG-6U using N-connectors should not be giving you more
than 0.20 dB, probably less. Considering that you have have 6.12 dB per
100 feet in RG-6U at 1 GHz (should be about 8 dB @ 1.575 GHz), so it
will be more. Using N-connectors to extend the cable-stretch isn't going
to be a major issue, it may be the cable length that could present an issue.
[]
Cheers,
Magnus
=============================
From: Bert Kehren via time-nuts
Thank you all for the information, worse case I look at 70 feet with two
couplings all in an inaccessible attic. The cable is quality but vintage
1989. Part of an extensive cable TV wiring. So far nine with two I am not
able
to locate the other end.The way they are installed I am not able yet to use
one of them to pull a new one in.
Twenty years ago I probably would have risked crawling in there. Don't want
to fall 16 feet at age 73.
Bert Kehren Palm City .
============================
Magnus,
RG-6U is 75-ohm cable and uses type F connectors (horrible!). Any F-N
adapters and the impedance mismatch would surely introduce more loss than a
simple Female-Female F connector.
Bert,
If the cable is that old, 1989, I would consider replacing it with a more
recently purchased cable, which will not have deteriorated, and may have
lower loss. I appreciate that may not be possible in your case.
Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
Email: david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk
Twitter: @gm8arv
BC
Bob Camp
Sun, Dec 6, 2015 12:44 PM
Hi
I agree 100% with the recommendation of compression connectors and of the
CX3 in particular. The only thing I would add is that they require a proper tool
to “compress” them. I have found that some of the tools are pretty brand specific.
You may need to match the tool to the connector.
Bob
On Dec 5, 2015, at 11:38 PM, Arnold Tibus arnold.tibus@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Bert and the group,
I can highly recommend the so called compression F-connectors.
There are a lot of brands out, but my personal favorite is the
Waterproof CX3 Quickmount
from Corning Cabelcon, because they have very good rf and mechanical data.
They are not only weatherproof and corrosion resistant (NiTin-alloy), but
they are really watertight (tested 8h at 30m) and accept a quite high
pull strength of up to typical 480N.
The RF shielding and impedance data are also very good.
For outside I use successful since years a black polyethylen insulated
cable
which is really weatherproof and UV resistant and triple shielded with
tinned copper
braid (I don't like aluminum braid because the low mech. performance).
Just for overview information (I have no relation to this company!):
http://www.cabelcon.dk/download/CX3Folder_May2012.pdf
One may find similar connectors made by other companies.
The only 'negative' point is the need of a compression tool.
So I think this would be a very good solution for repair and connection
in general of RG6 and similar types also for GPS use.
Kind regards
Arnold, DK2WT
Am 05.12.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Bert Kehren via time-nuts:
At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
coupling. Is there a better alternative?
Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi
I agree 100% with the recommendation of compression connectors and of the
CX3 in particular. The only thing I would add is that they require a proper tool
to “compress” them. I have found that some of the tools are pretty brand specific.
You may need to match the tool to the connector.
Bob
> On Dec 5, 2015, at 11:38 PM, Arnold Tibus <arnold.tibus@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Bert and the group,
>
> I can highly recommend the so called compression F-connectors.
> There are a lot of brands out, but my personal favorite is the
> Waterproof CX3 Quickmount
> from Corning Cabelcon, because they have very good rf and mechanical data.
> They are not only weatherproof and corrosion resistant (NiTin-alloy), but
> they are really watertight (tested 8h at 30m) and accept a quite high
> pull strength of up to typical 480N.
> The RF shielding and impedance data are also very good.
>
> For outside I use successful since years a black polyethylen insulated
> cable
> which is really weatherproof and UV resistant and triple shielded with
> tinned copper
> braid (I don't like aluminum braid because the low mech. performance).
>
> Just for overview information (I have no relation to this company!):
> http://www.cabelcon.dk/download/CX3Folder_May2012.pdf
>
> One may find similar connectors made by other companies.
>
> The only 'negative' point is the need of a compression tool.
>
> So I think this would be a very good solution for repair and connection
> in general of RG6 and similar types also for GPS use.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Arnold, DK2WT
>
>
>
> Am 05.12.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Bert Kehren via time-nuts:
>> At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
>> have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
>> loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
>> coupling. Is there a better alternative?
>> Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
AT
Arnold Tibus
Sun, Dec 6, 2015 2:25 PM
Hi Bob,
you are correct with the special compression tool.
I did it mention as a 'negative' point.
Yes, the right tool is obligatory, but the dealers
do have normally these in the list with the connectors,
I am using the correct tool of course.
I also 'misused' these connectors for my ZS6BKW-type antenna.
I connected just the shield of a hi Q SAT cable with PE outer
insulation as areal wire - fixation and contacting via these
connectors. No changes and no damages since 2 years
out in sunhine, rain, ice, snow and heavy storms mounted up on
the hill and 10 m above ground --> 100 % mechanical
and electrical test approved as well for such not nominal use!
Arnold, DK2WT
Am 06.12.2015 um 13:44 schrieb Bob Camp:
Hi
I agree 100% with the recommendation of compression connectors and of the
CX3 in particular. The only thing I would add is that they require a proper tool
to “compress” them. I have found that some of the tools are pretty brand specific.
You may need to match the tool to the connector.
Bob
On Dec 5, 2015, at 11:38 PM, Arnold Tibus arnold.tibus@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Bert and the group,
I can highly recommend the so called compression F-connectors.
There are a lot of brands out, but my personal favorite is the
Waterproof CX3 Quickmount
from Corning Cabelcon, because they have very good rf and mechanical data.
They are not only weatherproof and corrosion resistant (NiTin-alloy), but
they are really watertight (tested 8h at 30m) and accept a quite high
pull strength of up to typical 480N.
The RF shielding and impedance data are also very good.
For outside I use successful since years a black polyethylen insulated
cable
which is really weatherproof and UV resistant and triple shielded with
tinned copper
braid (I don't like aluminum braid because the low mech. performance).
Just for overview information (I have no relation to this company!):
http://www.cabelcon.dk/download/CX3Folder_May2012.pdf
One may find similar connectors made by other companies.
The only 'negative' point is the need of a compression tool.
So I think this would be a very good solution for repair and connection
in general of RG6 and similar types also for GPS use.
Kind regards
Arnold, DK2WT
Am 05.12.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Bert Kehren via time-nuts:
At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
coupling. Is there a better alternative?
Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi Bob,
you are correct with the special compression tool.
I did it mention as a 'negative' point.
Yes, the right tool is obligatory, but the dealers
do have normally these in the list with the connectors,
I am using the correct tool of course.
I also 'misused' these connectors for my ZS6BKW-type antenna.
I connected just the shield of a hi Q SAT cable with PE outer
insulation as areal wire - fixation and contacting via these
connectors. No changes and no damages since 2 years
out in sunhine, rain, ice, snow and heavy storms mounted up on
the hill and 10 m above ground --> 100 % mechanical
and electrical test approved as well for such not nominal use!
Arnold, DK2WT
Am 06.12.2015 um 13:44 schrieb Bob Camp:
> Hi
>
> I agree 100% with the recommendation of compression connectors and of the
> CX3 in particular. The only thing I would add is that they require a proper tool
> to “compress” them. I have found that some of the tools are pretty brand specific.
> You may need to match the tool to the connector.
>
> Bob
>
>> On Dec 5, 2015, at 11:38 PM, Arnold Tibus <arnold.tibus@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bert and the group,
>>
>> I can highly recommend the so called compression F-connectors.
>> There are a lot of brands out, but my personal favorite is the
>> Waterproof CX3 Quickmount
>> from Corning Cabelcon, because they have very good rf and mechanical data.
>> They are not only weatherproof and corrosion resistant (NiTin-alloy), but
>> they are really watertight (tested 8h at 30m) and accept a quite high
>> pull strength of up to typical 480N.
>> The RF shielding and impedance data are also very good.
>>
>> For outside I use successful since years a black polyethylen insulated
>> cable
>> which is really weatherproof and UV resistant and triple shielded with
>> tinned copper
>> braid (I don't like aluminum braid because the low mech. performance).
>>
>> Just for overview information (I have no relation to this company!):
>> http://www.cabelcon.dk/download/CX3Folder_May2012.pdf
>>
>> One may find similar connectors made by other companies.
>>
>> The only 'negative' point is the need of a compression tool.
>>
>> So I think this would be a very good solution for repair and connection
>> in general of RG6 and similar types also for GPS use.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Arnold, DK2WT
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 05.12.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Bert Kehren via time-nuts:
>>> At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
>>> have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
>>> loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
>>> coupling. Is there a better alternative?
>>> Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
MD
Magnus Danielson
Sun, Dec 6, 2015 2:27 PM
David,
You obviously is not working with 75 Ohm N-connectors on a regular basis.
Also, the point was to show that using proper connectors isn't going to
be a major issue in the loss process.
Cheers,
Magnus
On 12/06/2015 07:58 AM, David J Taylor wrote:
Bert,
Extending the RG-6U using N-connectors should not be giving you more
than 0.20 dB, probably less. Considering that you have have 6.12 dB per
100 feet in RG-6U at 1 GHz (should be about 8 dB @ 1.575 GHz), so it
will be more. Using N-connectors to extend the cable-stretch isn't going
to be a major issue, it may be the cable length that could present an
issue.
[]
Cheers,
Magnus
From: Bert Kehren via time-nuts
Thank you all for the information, worse case I look at 70 feet with two
couplings all in an inaccessible attic. The cable is quality but vintage
1989. Part of an extensive cable TV wiring. So far nine with two I am
not able
to locate the other end.The way they are installed I am not able yet to
use
one of them to pull a new one in.
Twenty years ago I probably would have risked crawling in there. Don't want
to fall 16 feet at age 73.
Bert Kehren Palm City .
Magnus,
RG-6U is 75-ohm cable and uses type F connectors (horrible!). Any F-N
adapters and the impedance mismatch would surely introduce more loss
than a simple Female-Female F connector.
Bert,
If the cable is that old, 1989, I would consider replacing it with a
more recently purchased cable, which will not have deteriorated, and may
have lower loss. I appreciate that may not be possible in your case.
Cheers,
David
David,
You obviously is not working with 75 Ohm N-connectors on a regular basis.
Also, the point was to show that using proper connectors isn't going to
be a major issue in the loss process.
Cheers,
Magnus
On 12/06/2015 07:58 AM, David J Taylor wrote:
> Bert,
>
> Extending the RG-6U using N-connectors should not be giving you more
> than 0.20 dB, probably less. Considering that you have have 6.12 dB per
> 100 feet in RG-6U at 1 GHz (should be about 8 dB @ 1.575 GHz), so it
> will be more. Using N-connectors to extend the cable-stretch isn't going
> to be a major issue, it may be the cable length that could present an
> issue.
> []
> Cheers,
> Magnus
> =============================
>
> From: Bert Kehren via time-nuts
>
> Thank you all for the information, worse case I look at 70 feet with two
> couplings all in an inaccessible attic. The cable is quality but vintage
> 1989. Part of an extensive cable TV wiring. So far nine with two I am
> not able
> to locate the other end.The way they are installed I am not able yet to
> use
> one of them to pull a new one in.
> Twenty years ago I probably would have risked crawling in there. Don't want
> to fall 16 feet at age 73.
> Bert Kehren Palm City .
> ============================
>
> Magnus,
>
> RG-6U is 75-ohm cable and uses type F connectors (horrible!). Any F-N
> adapters and the impedance mismatch would surely introduce more loss
> than a simple Female-Female F connector.
>
> Bert,
>
> If the cable is that old, 1989, I would consider replacing it with a
> more recently purchased cable, which will not have deteriorated, and may
> have lower loss. I appreciate that may not be possible in your case.
>
> Cheers,
> David
RS
Rob Sherwood.
Sun, Dec 6, 2015 3:07 PM
I initially had 50 feet of RG-58/U going to my GPS antenna. The loss was likely around 12 dB. That cable eventually failed, and all I had was a 100 foot length of the same type of cable, and surprisingly the GPSDO still worked ok. Recently I purchased a 35 foot length of 3/8th inch hardline with factory-installed N connectors on eBay for $40. The loss should be less then 2 dB. Obviously it works, but I cannot tell that the 10 dB reduced loss from the original cable made any difference. Rob, NC0B
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 6, 2015, at 7:00 AM, "David J Taylor" david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
Bert,
Extending the RG-6U using N-connectors should not be giving you more
than 0.20 dB, probably less. Considering that you have have 6.12 dB per
100 feet in RG-6U at 1 GHz (should be about 8 dB @ 1.575 GHz), so it
will be more. Using N-connectors to extend the cable-stretch isn't going
to be a major issue, it may be the cable length that could present an issue.
[]
Cheers,
Magnus
From: Bert Kehren via time-nuts
Thank you all for the information, worse case I look at 70 feet with two
couplings all in an inaccessible attic. The cable is quality but vintage
1989. Part of an extensive cable TV wiring. So far nine with two I am not able
to locate the other end.The way they are installed I am not able yet to use
one of them to pull a new one in.
Twenty years ago I probably would have risked crawling in there. Don't want
to fall 16 feet at age 73.
Bert Kehren Palm City .
Magnus,
RG-6U is 75-ohm cable and uses type F connectors (horrible!). Any F-N adapters and the impedance mismatch would surely introduce more loss than a simple Female-Female F connector.
Bert,
If the cable is that old, 1989, I would consider replacing it with a more recently purchased cable, which will not have deteriorated, and may have lower loss. I appreciate that may not be possible in your case.
Cheers,
David
SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
Email: david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk
Twitter: @gm8arv
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
--
If this email is spam, report it to
https://support.onlymyemail.com/view/report_spam/ODExMjI6MTgzMTgxMzk0Nzpyb2JAbmMwYi5jb206ZGVsaXZlcmVk
I initially had 50 feet of RG-58/U going to my GPS antenna. The loss was likely around 12 dB. That cable eventually failed, and all I had was a 100 foot length of the same type of cable, and surprisingly the GPSDO still worked ok. Recently I purchased a 35 foot length of 3/8th inch hardline with factory-installed N connectors on eBay for $40. The loss should be less then 2 dB. Obviously it works, but I cannot tell that the 10 dB reduced loss from the original cable made any difference. Rob, NC0B
Sent from my iPad
> On Dec 6, 2015, at 7:00 AM, "David J Taylor" <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
> Bert,
>
> Extending the RG-6U using N-connectors should not be giving you more
> than 0.20 dB, probably less. Considering that you have have 6.12 dB per
> 100 feet in RG-6U at 1 GHz (should be about 8 dB @ 1.575 GHz), so it
> will be more. Using N-connectors to extend the cable-stretch isn't going
> to be a major issue, it may be the cable length that could present an issue.
> []
> Cheers,
> Magnus
> =============================
>
> From: Bert Kehren via time-nuts
>
> Thank you all for the information, worse case I look at 70 feet with two
> couplings all in an inaccessible attic. The cable is quality but vintage
> 1989. Part of an extensive cable TV wiring. So far nine with two I am not able
> to locate the other end.The way they are installed I am not able yet to use
> one of them to pull a new one in.
> Twenty years ago I probably would have risked crawling in there. Don't want
> to fall 16 feet at age 73.
> Bert Kehren Palm City .
> ============================
>
> Magnus,
>
> RG-6U is 75-ohm cable and uses type F connectors (horrible!). Any F-N adapters and the impedance mismatch would surely introduce more loss than a simple Female-Female F connector.
>
> Bert,
>
> If the cable is that old, 1989, I would consider replacing it with a more recently purchased cable, which will not have deteriorated, and may have lower loss. I appreciate that may not be possible in your case.
>
> Cheers,
> David
> --
> SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
> Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
> Email: david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk
> Twitter: @gm8arv
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
>
> --
> If this email is spam, report it to
> https://support.onlymyemail.com/view/report_spam/ODExMjI6MTgzMTgxMzk0Nzpyb2JAbmMwYi5jb206ZGVsaXZlcmVk
>
DJ
David J Taylor
Sun, Dec 6, 2015 3:16 PM
David,
You obviously is not working with 75 Ohm N-connectors on a regular basis.
Also, the point was to show that using proper connectors isn't going to
be a major issue in the loss process.
Cheers,
Magnus
Magnus,
No, I've never seen a 75-ohm N connector, nor an N connector to fit RG-6U
cable. What a sheltered life I've led! But I quite agree that for
receivers, using 75-ohm components in a 50-ohm system (with care) isn't an
issue for an amplified GPS antenna.
Cheers,
David
SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
Email: david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk
Twitter: @gm8arv
David,
You obviously is not working with 75 Ohm N-connectors on a regular basis.
Also, the point was to show that using proper connectors isn't going to
be a major issue in the loss process.
Cheers,
Magnus
====================
Magnus,
No, I've never seen a 75-ohm N connector, nor an N connector to fit RG-6U
cable. What a sheltered life I've led! But I quite agree that for
receivers, using 75-ohm components in a 50-ohm system (with care) isn't an
issue for an amplified GPS antenna.
Cheers,
David
--
SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
Email: david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk
Twitter: @gm8arv
FW
F. W. Bray
Sun, Dec 6, 2015 3:20 PM
For those of us in the U.S., does anyone have suggestions of vendors or brands of quality connectors and installation tools?
Over the years, I worked my way up from cheap wire terminals to PIDG connectors and the correct tools. Rather than repeat the process with F connectors, I'm willing to pay a bit more the first time to do it right.
Fred
KE6CD
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 6, 2015, at 4:44 AM, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
I agree 100% with the recommendation of compression connectors and of the
CX3 in particular. The only thing I would add is that they require a proper tool
to “compress” them. I have found that some of the tools are pretty brand specific.
You may need to match the tool to the connector.
Bob
On Dec 5, 2015, at 11:38 PM, Arnold Tibus arnold.tibus@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Bert and the group,
I can highly recommend the so called compression F-connectors.
There are a lot of brands out, but my personal favorite is the
Waterproof CX3 Quickmount
from Corning Cabelcon, because they have very good rf and mechanical data.
They are not only weatherproof and corrosion resistant (NiTin-alloy), but
they are really watertight (tested 8h at 30m) and accept a quite high
pull strength of up to typical 480N.
The RF shielding and impedance data are also very good.
For outside I use successful since years a black polyethylen insulated
cable
which is really weatherproof and UV resistant and triple shielded with
tinned copper
braid (I don't like aluminum braid because the low mech. performance).
Just for overview information (I have no relation to this company!):
http://www.cabelcon.dk/download/CX3Folder_May2012.pdf
One may find similar connectors made by other companies.
The only 'negative' point is the need of a compression tool.
So I think this would be a very good solution for repair and connection
in general of RG6 and similar types also for GPS use.
Kind regards
Arnold, DK2WT
Am 05.12.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Bert Kehren via time-nuts:
At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
coupling. Is there a better alternative?
Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
For those of us in the U.S., does anyone have suggestions of vendors or brands of quality connectors and installation tools?
Over the years, I worked my way up from cheap wire terminals to PIDG connectors and the correct tools. Rather than repeat the process with F connectors, I'm willing to pay a bit more the first time to do it right.
Fred
KE6CD
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 6, 2015, at 4:44 AM, Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I agree 100% with the recommendation of compression connectors and of the
> CX3 in particular. The only thing I would add is that they require a proper tool
> to “compress” them. I have found that some of the tools are pretty brand specific.
> You may need to match the tool to the connector.
>
> Bob
>
>> On Dec 5, 2015, at 11:38 PM, Arnold Tibus <arnold.tibus@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Bert and the group,
>>
>> I can highly recommend the so called compression F-connectors.
>> There are a lot of brands out, but my personal favorite is the
>> Waterproof CX3 Quickmount
>> from Corning Cabelcon, because they have very good rf and mechanical data.
>> They are not only weatherproof and corrosion resistant (NiTin-alloy), but
>> they are really watertight (tested 8h at 30m) and accept a quite high
>> pull strength of up to typical 480N.
>> The RF shielding and impedance data are also very good.
>>
>> For outside I use successful since years a black polyethylen insulated
>> cable
>> which is really weatherproof and UV resistant and triple shielded with
>> tinned copper
>> braid (I don't like aluminum braid because the low mech. performance).
>>
>> Just for overview information (I have no relation to this company!):
>> http://www.cabelcon.dk/download/CX3Folder_May2012.pdf
>>
>> One may find similar connectors made by other companies.
>>
>> The only 'negative' point is the need of a compression tool.
>>
>> So I think this would be a very good solution for repair and connection
>> in general of RG6 and similar types also for GPS use.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Arnold, DK2WT
>>
>>
>>
>>> Am 05.12.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Bert Kehren via time-nuts:
>>> At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
>>> have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
>>> loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
>>> coupling. Is there a better alternative?
>>> Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
JS
Jim Sanford
Sun, Dec 6, 2015 3:44 PM
I just /happened/ to be in Home Depot this morning, and observed that
they have a complete kit -- connectors and tool for something like $30.
It was in the electrical tools area, if this is any help.
Jim
wb4gcs@amsat.org
//
On 12/6/2015 9:25 AM, Arnold Tibus wrote:
Hi Bob,
you are correct with the special compression tool.
I did it mention as a 'negative' point.
Yes, the right tool is obligatory, but the dealers
do have normally these in the list with the connectors,
I am using the correct tool of course.
I also 'misused' these connectors for my ZS6BKW-type antenna.
I connected just the shield of a hi Q SAT cable with PE outer
insulation as areal wire - fixation and contacting via these
connectors. No changes and no damages since 2 years
out in sunhine, rain, ice, snow and heavy storms mounted up on
the hill and 10 m above ground --> 100 % mechanical
and electrical test approved as well for such not nominal use!
Arnold, DK2WT
Am 06.12.2015 um 13:44 schrieb Bob Camp:
Hi
I agree 100% with the recommendation of compression connectors and of the
CX3 in particular. The only thing I would add is that they require a proper tool
to “compress” them. I have found that some of the tools are pretty brand specific.
You may need to match the tool to the connector.
Bob
On Dec 5, 2015, at 11:38 PM, Arnold Tibus arnold.tibus@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Bert and the group,
I can highly recommend the so called compression F-connectors.
There are a lot of brands out, but my personal favorite is the
Waterproof CX3 Quickmount
from Corning Cabelcon, because they have very good rf and mechanical data.
They are not only weatherproof and corrosion resistant (NiTin-alloy), but
they are really watertight (tested 8h at 30m) and accept a quite high
pull strength of up to typical 480N.
The RF shielding and impedance data are also very good.
For outside I use successful since years a black polyethylen insulated
cable
which is really weatherproof and UV resistant and triple shielded with
tinned copper
braid (I don't like aluminum braid because the low mech. performance).
Just for overview information (I have no relation to this company!):
http://www.cabelcon.dk/download/CX3Folder_May2012.pdf
One may find similar connectors made by other companies.
The only 'negative' point is the need of a compression tool.
So I think this would be a very good solution for repair and connection
in general of RG6 and similar types also for GPS use.
Kind regards
Arnold, DK2WT
Am 05.12.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Bert Kehren via time-nuts:
At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
coupling. Is there a better alternative?
Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
I just /happened/ to be in Home Depot this morning, and observed that
they have a complete kit -- connectors and tool for something like $30.
It was in the electrical tools area, if this is any help.
Jim
wb4gcs@amsat.org
//
On 12/6/2015 9:25 AM, Arnold Tibus wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> you are correct with the special compression tool.
> I did it mention as a 'negative' point.
> Yes, the right tool is obligatory, but the dealers
> do have normally these in the list with the connectors,
> I am using the correct tool of course.
>
> I also 'misused' these connectors for my ZS6BKW-type antenna.
> I connected just the shield of a hi Q SAT cable with PE outer
> insulation as areal wire - fixation and contacting via these
> connectors. No changes and no damages since 2 years
> out in sunhine, rain, ice, snow and heavy storms mounted up on
> the hill and 10 m above ground --> 100 % mechanical
> and electrical test approved as well for such not nominal use!
>
> Arnold, DK2WT
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Am 06.12.2015 um 13:44 schrieb Bob Camp:
>> Hi
>>
>> I agree 100% with the recommendation of compression connectors and of the
>> CX3 in particular. The only thing I would add is that they require a proper tool
>> to “compress” them. I have found that some of the tools are pretty brand specific.
>> You may need to match the tool to the connector.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>> On Dec 5, 2015, at 11:38 PM, Arnold Tibus <arnold.tibus@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Bert and the group,
>>>
>>> I can highly recommend the so called compression F-connectors.
>>> There are a lot of brands out, but my personal favorite is the
>>> Waterproof CX3 Quickmount
>>> from Corning Cabelcon, because they have very good rf and mechanical data.
>>> They are not only weatherproof and corrosion resistant (NiTin-alloy), but
>>> they are really watertight (tested 8h at 30m) and accept a quite high
>>> pull strength of up to typical 480N.
>>> The RF shielding and impedance data are also very good.
>>>
>>> For outside I use successful since years a black polyethylen insulated
>>> cable
>>> which is really weatherproof and UV resistant and triple shielded with
>>> tinned copper
>>> braid (I don't like aluminum braid because the low mech. performance).
>>>
>>> Just for overview information (I have no relation to this company!):
>>> http://www.cabelcon.dk/download/CX3Folder_May2012.pdf
>>>
>>> One may find similar connectors made by other companies.
>>>
>>> The only 'negative' point is the need of a compression tool.
>>>
>>> So I think this would be a very good solution for repair and connection
>>> in general of RG6 and similar types also for GPS use.
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>>
>>> Arnold, DK2WT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 05.12.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Bert Kehren via time-nuts:
>>>> At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
>>>> have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
>>>> loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
>>>> coupling. Is there a better alternative?
>>>> Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
BC
Bob Camp
Sun, Dec 6, 2015 5:30 PM
Hi
I’ve always shopped the auction sites. I buy both the connectors and the tool from
the same guy at the same time. So far that’s worked pretty well. It does take some
time sorting through the “almost as good as” or “better than but not that part number”
type listings. The sellers change fast enough that the guy I bought from a year ago
may be the last person on the planet you would want to use today.
Bob
On Dec 6, 2015, at 10:20 AM, F. W. Bray fwbray@mminternet.com wrote:
For those of us in the U.S., does anyone have suggestions of vendors or brands of quality connectors and installation tools?
Over the years, I worked my way up from cheap wire terminals to PIDG connectors and the correct tools. Rather than repeat the process with F connectors, I'm willing to pay a bit more the first time to do it right.
Fred
KE6CD
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 6, 2015, at 4:44 AM, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
I agree 100% with the recommendation of compression connectors and of the
CX3 in particular. The only thing I would add is that they require a proper tool
to “compress” them. I have found that some of the tools are pretty brand specific.
You may need to match the tool to the connector.
Bob
On Dec 5, 2015, at 11:38 PM, Arnold Tibus arnold.tibus@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Bert and the group,
I can highly recommend the so called compression F-connectors.
There are a lot of brands out, but my personal favorite is the
Waterproof CX3 Quickmount
from Corning Cabelcon, because they have very good rf and mechanical data.
They are not only weatherproof and corrosion resistant (NiTin-alloy), but
they are really watertight (tested 8h at 30m) and accept a quite high
pull strength of up to typical 480N.
The RF shielding and impedance data are also very good.
For outside I use successful since years a black polyethylen insulated
cable
which is really weatherproof and UV resistant and triple shielded with
tinned copper
braid (I don't like aluminum braid because the low mech. performance).
Just for overview information (I have no relation to this company!):
http://www.cabelcon.dk/download/CX3Folder_May2012.pdf
One may find similar connectors made by other companies.
The only 'negative' point is the need of a compression tool.
So I think this would be a very good solution for repair and connection
in general of RG6 and similar types also for GPS use.
Kind regards
Arnold, DK2WT
Am 05.12.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Bert Kehren via time-nuts:
At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
coupling. Is there a better alternative?
Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi
I’ve always shopped the auction sites. I buy both the connectors and the tool from
the same guy at the same time. So far that’s worked pretty well. It does take some
time sorting through the “almost as good as” or “better than but not that part number”
type listings. The sellers change fast enough that the guy I bought from a year ago
may be the last person on the planet you would want to use today.
Bob
> On Dec 6, 2015, at 10:20 AM, F. W. Bray <fwbray@mminternet.com> wrote:
>
> For those of us in the U.S., does anyone have suggestions of vendors or brands of quality connectors and installation tools?
>
> Over the years, I worked my way up from cheap wire terminals to PIDG connectors and the correct tools. Rather than repeat the process with F connectors, I'm willing to pay a bit more the first time to do it right.
>
> Fred
> KE6CD
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Dec 6, 2015, at 4:44 AM, Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I agree 100% with the recommendation of compression connectors and of the
>> CX3 in particular. The only thing I would add is that they require a proper tool
>> to “compress” them. I have found that some of the tools are pretty brand specific.
>> You may need to match the tool to the connector.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>> On Dec 5, 2015, at 11:38 PM, Arnold Tibus <arnold.tibus@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Bert and the group,
>>>
>>> I can highly recommend the so called compression F-connectors.
>>> There are a lot of brands out, but my personal favorite is the
>>> Waterproof CX3 Quickmount
>>> from Corning Cabelcon, because they have very good rf and mechanical data.
>>> They are not only weatherproof and corrosion resistant (NiTin-alloy), but
>>> they are really watertight (tested 8h at 30m) and accept a quite high
>>> pull strength of up to typical 480N.
>>> The RF shielding and impedance data are also very good.
>>>
>>> For outside I use successful since years a black polyethylen insulated
>>> cable
>>> which is really weatherproof and UV resistant and triple shielded with
>>> tinned copper
>>> braid (I don't like aluminum braid because the low mech. performance).
>>>
>>> Just for overview information (I have no relation to this company!):
>>> http://www.cabelcon.dk/download/CX3Folder_May2012.pdf
>>>
>>> One may find similar connectors made by other companies.
>>>
>>> The only 'negative' point is the need of a compression tool.
>>>
>>> So I think this would be a very good solution for repair and connection
>>> in general of RG6 and similar types also for GPS use.
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>>
>>> Arnold, DK2WT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Am 05.12.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Bert Kehren via time-nuts:
>>>> At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
>>>> have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
>>>> loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
>>>> coupling. Is there a better alternative?
>>>> Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
BC
Bob Camp
Sun, Dec 6, 2015 5:39 PM
Hi
Most of these antennas have 25 to 35 db of gain in their preamps. The
noise figure of most receive modules is in the ~ 1 db range. You do not
need much net gain to keep the system running. Anything over about
8 db or so is “gravy”. If you have one of the 35 db antennas, you can have
a lot of coax loss.
Indeed there are receivers out there that have much worse noise figures
on the front end. One quick hint that you have one of these is the 50 db gain
antenna that comes with it.
The bigger issue is not “what works today” but what works a few years down
the road. None of these parts get better with age. Each of them have
degradation mechanism. Having some surplus gain at the start is a rational way
to design a system that will work for a while.
Bob
On Dec 6, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Rob Sherwood. rob@nc0b.com wrote:
I initially had 50 feet of RG-58/U going to my GPS antenna. The loss was likely around 12 dB. That cable eventually failed, and all I had was a 100 foot length of the same type of cable, and surprisingly the GPSDO still worked ok. Recently I purchased a 35 foot length of 3/8th inch hardline with factory-installed N connectors on eBay for $40. The loss should be less then 2 dB. Obviously it works, but I cannot tell that the 10 dB reduced loss from the original cable made any difference. Rob, NC0B
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 6, 2015, at 7:00 AM, "David J Taylor" david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
Bert,
Extending the RG-6U using N-connectors should not be giving you more
than 0.20 dB, probably less. Considering that you have have 6.12 dB per
100 feet in RG-6U at 1 GHz (should be about 8 dB @ 1.575 GHz), so it
will be more. Using N-connectors to extend the cable-stretch isn't going
to be a major issue, it may be the cable length that could present an issue.
[]
Cheers,
Magnus
From: Bert Kehren via time-nuts
Thank you all for the information, worse case I look at 70 feet with two
couplings all in an inaccessible attic. The cable is quality but vintage
1989. Part of an extensive cable TV wiring. So far nine with two I am not able
to locate the other end.The way they are installed I am not able yet to use
one of them to pull a new one in.
Twenty years ago I probably would have risked crawling in there. Don't want
to fall 16 feet at age 73.
Bert Kehren Palm City .
Magnus,
RG-6U is 75-ohm cable and uses type F connectors (horrible!). Any F-N adapters and the impedance mismatch would surely introduce more loss than a simple Female-Female F connector.
Bert,
If the cable is that old, 1989, I would consider replacing it with a more recently purchased cable, which will not have deteriorated, and may have lower loss. I appreciate that may not be possible in your case.
Cheers,
David
SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
Email: david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk
Twitter: @gm8arv
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
--
If this email is spam, report it to
https://support.onlymyemail.com/view/report_spam/ODExMjI6MTgzMTgxMzk0Nzpyb2JAbmMwYi5jb206ZGVsaXZlcmVk
Hi
Most of these antennas have 25 to 35 db of gain in their preamps. The
noise figure of most receive modules is in the ~ 1 db range. You do not
need much net gain to keep the system running. Anything over about
8 db or so is “gravy”. If you have one of the 35 db antennas, you can have
a *lot* of coax loss.
Indeed there *are* receivers out there that have much worse noise figures
on the front end. One quick hint that you have one of these is the 50 db gain
antenna that comes with it.
The bigger issue is not “what works today” but what works a few years down
the road. None of these parts get better with age. Each of them have
degradation mechanism. Having some surplus gain at the start is a rational way
to design a system that will work for a while.
Bob
> On Dec 6, 2015, at 10:07 AM, Rob Sherwood. <rob@nc0b.com> wrote:
>
> I initially had 50 feet of RG-58/U going to my GPS antenna. The loss was likely around 12 dB. That cable eventually failed, and all I had was a 100 foot length of the same type of cable, and surprisingly the GPSDO still worked ok. Recently I purchased a 35 foot length of 3/8th inch hardline with factory-installed N connectors on eBay for $40. The loss should be less then 2 dB. Obviously it works, but I cannot tell that the 10 dB reduced loss from the original cable made any difference. Rob, NC0B
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Dec 6, 2015, at 7:00 AM, "David J Taylor" <david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Bert,
>>
>> Extending the RG-6U using N-connectors should not be giving you more
>> than 0.20 dB, probably less. Considering that you have have 6.12 dB per
>> 100 feet in RG-6U at 1 GHz (should be about 8 dB @ 1.575 GHz), so it
>> will be more. Using N-connectors to extend the cable-stretch isn't going
>> to be a major issue, it may be the cable length that could present an issue.
>> []
>> Cheers,
>> Magnus
>> =============================
>>
>> From: Bert Kehren via time-nuts
>>
>> Thank you all for the information, worse case I look at 70 feet with two
>> couplings all in an inaccessible attic. The cable is quality but vintage
>> 1989. Part of an extensive cable TV wiring. So far nine with two I am not able
>> to locate the other end.The way they are installed I am not able yet to use
>> one of them to pull a new one in.
>> Twenty years ago I probably would have risked crawling in there. Don't want
>> to fall 16 feet at age 73.
>> Bert Kehren Palm City .
>> ============================
>>
>> Magnus,
>>
>> RG-6U is 75-ohm cable and uses type F connectors (horrible!). Any F-N adapters and the impedance mismatch would surely introduce more loss than a simple Female-Female F connector.
>>
>> Bert,
>>
>> If the cable is that old, 1989, I would consider replacing it with a more recently purchased cable, which will not have deteriorated, and may have lower loss. I appreciate that may not be possible in your case.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> David
>> --
>> SatSignal Software - Quality software written to your requirements
>> Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
>> Email: david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk
>> Twitter: @gm8arv
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> If this email is spam, report it to
>> https://support.onlymyemail.com/view/report_spam/ODExMjI6MTgzMTgxMzk0Nzpyb2JAbmMwYi5jb206ZGVsaXZlcmVk
>>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
G
Graham
Sun, Dec 6, 2015 5:49 PM
Also, don't scrimp and cheap out on a cable prep / stripping tool.
I tried a couple of the inexpensive types ($5 to $10 variety), the sort
of worked but were frustrating to use and do a good job.
Best one I have found is the Cable Prep (bran name) CPT-6590 for RG59
and RG6 size cables. They also make other sizes, for example CPT-1100
for RG7 and RG11 size cables.
They are a good quality tool that will last a very long time in a home
lab and make the job much easier.
cheers, Graham ve3gtc
On 2015-12-06 15:20, F. W. Bray wrote:
For those of us in the U.S., does anyone have suggestions of vendors or brands of quality connectors and installation tools?
Over the years, I worked my way up from cheap wire terminals to PIDG connectors and the correct tools. Rather than repeat the process with F connectors, I'm willing to pay a bit more the first time to do it right.
Fred
KE6CD
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 6, 2015, at 4:44 AM, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
I agree 100% with the recommendation of compression connectors and of the
CX3 in particular. The only thing I would add is that they require a proper tool
to “compress” them. I have found that some of the tools are pretty brand specific.
You may need to match the tool to the connector.
Bob
On Dec 5, 2015, at 11:38 PM, Arnold Tibus arnold.tibus@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Bert and the group,
I can highly recommend the so called compression F-connectors.
There are a lot of brands out, but my personal favorite is the
Waterproof CX3 Quickmount
from Corning Cabelcon, because they have very good rf and mechanical data.
They are not only weatherproof and corrosion resistant (NiTin-alloy), but
they are really watertight (tested 8h at 30m) and accept a quite high
pull strength of up to typical 480N.
The RF shielding and impedance data are also very good.
For outside I use successful since years a black polyethylen insulated
cable
which is really weatherproof and UV resistant and triple shielded with
tinned copper
braid (I don't like aluminum braid because the low mech. performance).
Just for overview information (I have no relation to this company!):
http://www.cabelcon.dk/download/CX3Folder_May2012.pdf
One may find similar connectors made by other companies.
The only 'negative' point is the need of a compression tool.
So I think this would be a very good solution for repair and connection
in general of RG6 and similar types also for GPS use.
Kind regards
Arnold, DK2WT
Am 05.12.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Bert Kehren via time-nuts:
At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
coupling. Is there a better alternative?
Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Also, don't scrimp and cheap out on a cable prep / stripping tool.
I tried a couple of the inexpensive types ($5 to $10 variety), the sort
of worked but were frustrating to use and do a good job.
Best one I have found is the Cable Prep (bran name) CPT-6590 for RG59
and RG6 size cables. They also make other sizes, for example CPT-1100
for RG7 and RG11 size cables.
They are a good quality tool that will last a very long time in a home
lab and make the job much easier.
cheers, Graham ve3gtc
On 2015-12-06 15:20, F. W. Bray wrote:
> For those of us in the U.S., does anyone have suggestions of vendors or brands of quality connectors and installation tools?
>
> Over the years, I worked my way up from cheap wire terminals to PIDG connectors and the correct tools. Rather than repeat the process with F connectors, I'm willing to pay a bit more the first time to do it right.
>
> Fred
> KE6CD
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Dec 6, 2015, at 4:44 AM, Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I agree 100% with the recommendation of compression connectors and of the
>> CX3 in particular. The only thing I would add is that they require a proper tool
>> to “compress” them. I have found that some of the tools are pretty brand specific.
>> You may need to match the tool to the connector.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>> On Dec 5, 2015, at 11:38 PM, Arnold Tibus <arnold.tibus@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Bert and the group,
>>>
>>> I can highly recommend the so called compression F-connectors.
>>> There are a lot of brands out, but my personal favorite is the
>>> Waterproof CX3 Quickmount
>>> from Corning Cabelcon, because they have very good rf and mechanical data.
>>> They are not only weatherproof and corrosion resistant (NiTin-alloy), but
>>> they are really watertight (tested 8h at 30m) and accept a quite high
>>> pull strength of up to typical 480N.
>>> The RF shielding and impedance data are also very good.
>>>
>>> For outside I use successful since years a black polyethylen insulated
>>> cable
>>> which is really weatherproof and UV resistant and triple shielded with
>>> tinned copper
>>> braid (I don't like aluminum braid because the low mech. performance).
>>>
>>> Just for overview information (I have no relation to this company!):
>>> http://www.cabelcon.dk/download/CX3Folder_May2012.pdf
>>>
>>> One may find similar connectors made by other companies.
>>>
>>> The only 'negative' point is the need of a compression tool.
>>>
>>> So I think this would be a very good solution for repair and connection
>>> in general of RG6 and similar types also for GPS use.
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>>
>>> Arnold, DK2WT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Am 05.12.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Bert Kehren via time-nuts:
>>>> At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
>>>> have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
>>>> loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
>>>> coupling. Is there a better alternative?
>>>> Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
MS
Mark Spencer
Sun, Dec 6, 2015 6:15 PM
Try not to laugh to hard but the compression connectors and crimper for RG6 style cables I picked up at Home Depot in Canada a few years ago seems to work quite well.
I have used high quality pro tools at work over the years (mostly though I watch other people use them on occasion these days (: ). But the Home Depot one I purchased seems ok to me for home / hobby use.
As noted by others I believe it is important to match the tool to the connectors.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 6, 2015, at 7:20 AM, F. W. Bray fwbray@mminternet.com wrote:
For those of us in the U.S., does anyone have suggestions of vendors or brands of quality connectors and installation tools?
Over the years, I worked my way up from cheap wire terminals to PIDG connectors and the correct tools. Rather than repeat the process with F connectors, I'm willing to pay a bit more the first time to do it right.
Fred
KE6CD
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 6, 2015, at 4:44 AM, Bob Camp kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:
Hi
I agree 100% with the recommendation of compression connectors and of the
CX3 in particular. The only thing I would add is that they require a proper tool
to “compress” them. I have found that some of the tools are pretty brand specific.
You may need to match the tool to the connector.
Bob
On Dec 5, 2015, at 11:38 PM, Arnold Tibus arnold.tibus@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Bert and the group,
I can highly recommend the so called compression F-connectors.
There are a lot of brands out, but my personal favorite is the
Waterproof CX3 Quickmount
from Corning Cabelcon, because they have very good rf and mechanical data.
They are not only weatherproof and corrosion resistant (NiTin-alloy), but
they are really watertight (tested 8h at 30m) and accept a quite high
pull strength of up to typical 480N.
The RF shielding and impedance data are also very good.
For outside I use successful since years a black polyethylen insulated
cable
which is really weatherproof and UV resistant and triple shielded with
tinned copper
braid (I don't like aluminum braid because the low mech. performance).
Just for overview information (I have no relation to this company!):
http://www.cabelcon.dk/download/CX3Folder_May2012.pdf
One may find similar connectors made by other companies.
The only 'negative' point is the need of a compression tool.
So I think this would be a very good solution for repair and connection
in general of RG6 and similar types also for GPS use.
Kind regards
Arnold, DK2WT
Am 05.12.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Bert Kehren via time-nuts:
At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
coupling. Is there a better alternative?
Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Try not to laugh to hard but the compression connectors and crimper for RG6 style cables I picked up at Home Depot in Canada a few years ago seems to work quite well.
I have used high quality pro tools at work over the years (mostly though I watch other people use them on occasion these days (: ). But the Home Depot one I purchased seems ok to me for home / hobby use.
As noted by others I believe it is important to match the tool to the connectors.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 6, 2015, at 7:20 AM, F. W. Bray <fwbray@mminternet.com> wrote:
>
> For those of us in the U.S., does anyone have suggestions of vendors or brands of quality connectors and installation tools?
>
> Over the years, I worked my way up from cheap wire terminals to PIDG connectors and the correct tools. Rather than repeat the process with F connectors, I'm willing to pay a bit more the first time to do it right.
>
> Fred
> KE6CD
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Dec 6, 2015, at 4:44 AM, Bob Camp <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I agree 100% with the recommendation of compression connectors and of the
>> CX3 in particular. The only thing I would add is that they require a proper tool
>> to “compress” them. I have found that some of the tools are pretty brand specific.
>> You may need to match the tool to the connector.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>> On Dec 5, 2015, at 11:38 PM, Arnold Tibus <arnold.tibus@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Bert and the group,
>>>
>>> I can highly recommend the so called compression F-connectors.
>>> There are a lot of brands out, but my personal favorite is the
>>> Waterproof CX3 Quickmount
>>> from Corning Cabelcon, because they have very good rf and mechanical data.
>>> They are not only weatherproof and corrosion resistant (NiTin-alloy), but
>>> they are really watertight (tested 8h at 30m) and accept a quite high
>>> pull strength of up to typical 480N.
>>> The RF shielding and impedance data are also very good.
>>>
>>> For outside I use successful since years a black polyethylen insulated
>>> cable
>>> which is really weatherproof and UV resistant and triple shielded with
>>> tinned copper
>>> braid (I don't like aluminum braid because the low mech. performance).
>>>
>>> Just for overview information (I have no relation to this company!):
>>> http://www.cabelcon.dk/download/CX3Folder_May2012.pdf
>>>
>>> One may find similar connectors made by other companies.
>>>
>>> The only 'negative' point is the need of a compression tool.
>>>
>>> So I think this would be a very good solution for repair and connection
>>> in general of RG6 and similar types also for GPS use.
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>>
>>> Arnold, DK2WT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Am 05.12.2015 um 21:28 schrieb Bert Kehren via time-nuts:
>>>> At my new home the GPS antenna location has turned in to a challenge. May
>>>> have to splice RG 6U. Has any one done measurements on couplings and the
>>>> loss associated with them. Right now I am considering a female, female
>>>> coupling. Is there a better alternative?
>>>> Thanks Bert Kehren Palm City Fl.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
CH
Chuck Harris
Sun, Dec 6, 2015 7:16 PM
I use mostly Quad RG6, and I use the Ideal ratchet crimper and
fittings as are available from Lowes, or Home Despot.
It is important to note that RG58 <> RG6 <> Quad RG6. They are
each different in diameter, loss, and shielding capability.
Each needs a different sized "F" connector, and crimping die.
Fortunately the Ideal crimping die has all three sizes.
-Chuck Harris
F. W. Bray wrote:
For those of us in the U.S., does anyone have suggestions of vendors or brands of
quality connectors and installation tools?
Over the years, I worked my way up from cheap wire terminals to PIDG connectors
and the correct tools. Rather than repeat the process with F connectors, I'm
willing to pay a bit more the first time to do it right.
Fred KE6CD
I use mostly Quad RG6, and I use the Ideal ratchet crimper and
fittings as are available from Lowes, or Home Despot.
It is important to note that RG58 <> RG6 <> Quad RG6. They are
each different in diameter, loss, and shielding capability.
Each needs a different sized "F" connector, and crimping die.
Fortunately the Ideal crimping die has all three sizes.
-Chuck Harris
F. W. Bray wrote:
> For those of us in the U.S., does anyone have suggestions of vendors or brands of
> quality connectors and installation tools?
>
> Over the years, I worked my way up from cheap wire terminals to PIDG connectors
> and the correct tools. Rather than repeat the process with F connectors, I'm
> willing to pay a bit more the first time to do it right.
>
> Fred KE6CD
GL
Glenn Little WB4UIV
Mon, Dec 7, 2015 3:22 AM
If you do use 75 Ohm Type N connectors, do NOT attempt to mate them with
a 50 Ohm connector.
The center pins are different diameters to get the different impedance.
To mate a 50 Ohm Type N male with a 75 Ohm female will guarantee
destruction of the female connector.
I have had to clean up behind someone that dis not know the difference
and took a large downlink dish off line as the spread fingers of the 75
Ohm Type N broke off and shouted the cable and the LNB supply voltage.
There are also 50 and 75 Ohm BNC connectors, but, they achieve the
impedance difference bu use of dielectric,
These connectors can be mated 50 to 75 Ohm with out damage.
Just to warn of the possible damage.
73
Glenn
WB4UIV
On 12/6/2015 10:16 AM, David J Taylor wrote:
David,
You obviously is not working with 75 Ohm N-connectors on a regular basis.
Also, the point was to show that using proper connectors isn't going to
be a major issue in the loss process.
Cheers,
Magnus
Magnus,
No, I've never seen a 75-ohm N connector, nor an N connector to fit
RG-6U cable. What a sheltered life I've led! But I quite agree that
for receivers, using 75-ohm components in a 50-ohm system (with care)
isn't an issue for an amplified GPS antenna.
Cheers,
David
--
Glenn Little ARRL Technical Specialist QCWA LM 28417
Amateur Callsign: WB4UIV wb4uiv@arrl.net AMSAT LM 2178
QTH: Goose Creek, SC USA (EM92xx) USSVI LM NRA LM SBE ARRL TAPR
"It is not the class of license that the Amateur holds but the class
of the Amateur that holds the license"
If you do use 75 Ohm Type N connectors, do NOT attempt to mate them with
a 50 Ohm connector.
The center pins are different diameters to get the different impedance.
To mate a 50 Ohm Type N male with a 75 Ohm female will guarantee
destruction of the female connector.
I have had to clean up behind someone that dis not know the difference
and took a large downlink dish off line as the spread fingers of the 75
Ohm Type N broke off and shouted the cable and the LNB supply voltage.
There are also 50 and 75 Ohm BNC connectors, but, they achieve the
impedance difference bu use of dielectric,
These connectors can be mated 50 to 75 Ohm with out damage.
Just to warn of the possible damage.
73
Glenn
WB4UIV
On 12/6/2015 10:16 AM, David J Taylor wrote:
> David,
>
> You obviously is not working with 75 Ohm N-connectors on a regular basis.
>
> Also, the point was to show that using proper connectors isn't going to
> be a major issue in the loss process.
>
> Cheers,
> Magnus
> ====================
>
> Magnus,
>
> No, I've never seen a 75-ohm N connector, nor an N connector to fit
> RG-6U cable. What a sheltered life I've led! But I quite agree that
> for receivers, using 75-ohm components in a 50-ohm system (with care)
> isn't an issue for an amplified GPS antenna.
>
> Cheers,
> David
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Little ARRL Technical Specialist QCWA LM 28417
Amateur Callsign: WB4UIV wb4uiv@arrl.net AMSAT LM 2178
QTH: Goose Creek, SC USA (EM92xx) USSVI LM NRA LM SBE ARRL TAPR
"It is not the class of license that the Amateur holds but the class
of the Amateur that holds the license"
---------------------------------------------------------------------------