passagemaking@lists.trawlering.com

Passagemaking Under Power List

View all threads

Re: [PUP] Selen or Kadey Krogen?

H
Highlan875@aol.com
Thu, Feb 19, 2009 8:26 PM

If you're asking there's still a lot to investigate.

We chartered a number of trawlers for a week or two at a time and  discovered
all the things we wanted and didn't want. If your investing 5-7 years  then
putting in a few weeks with charters will provide an abundance of  information.

Happy boating.

Jim Hughes

Money Yoga is Consciously  Transforming People's Relationship with Money.

Money Yoga Seminar Series

In a message dated 2/19/2009 12:00:18 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com writes:

Send  Passagemaking-Under-Power mailing list submissions to
passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe  via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power
or, via  email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com

You can reach the  person managing the list at
passagemaking-under-power-owner@lists.samurai.com

When replying, please  edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of  Passagemaking-Under-Power digest..."

Today's  Topics:

  1. Selen or Kadey Krogen? (Barbara Wilkinson  )
  2. Re: Selen or Kadey Krogen? (Anthony  Thorne)
  3. Re: Selen or Kadey Krogen? (John  Marshall)
  4. Re: Selene or Kadey Krogen? (Ron  Rogers)
  5. Selene or Kadey Krogen?  (barbarawilkinson)
  6. Re: Selen or Kadey Krogen? (Ken  Williams)

Message:  1
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:30:12 -0800
From: "Barbara Wilkinson "  xbrit@charter.net
Subject: [PUP] Selen or Kadey Krogen?
To:  passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com
Message-ID:  20090219013017.CZKK21772.mta31.charter.net@imp10
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Everyone!

We are  trying to decide between a Kadey Krogen 42 Widebody (later model) or
a  Selene 47 2000 model.  Our planned 5-7 year cruise would be from  Alaska,
down the West Coast & Mexico, through the Panama Canal into the  Carib, a
side trip to Guatemala, up to Florida and then probably at least  half of the
Loop.  From there we'd like to go to Holland and take the  route to the Black
Sea, Aegean & Med.  (Atlantic crossing probably  by Tanker delivery!).

We are concentrating on long range  blue-water pilothouse/trawlers with low
bridge clearances.  The  Nordhavns seems to have high stacks and almost no
cockpit.  Although  they are awesome boats, they don't seem to be compatible
with our need to  live mostly on the decks!  Is the Kadey Krogen hull design
really  superior?  Is the hull of the Selene 47 sufficient for the waters  we
plan on cruising?  We love both boats and can see why owners fall  in love
with both of them!

Would anyone like to  join a discussion on this?  Our last boat was a Marine
Trader, but  this time we're serious!

Barb & Don

Reno,  Nevada.


Message: 2
Date:  Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:10:12 -0800
From: Anthony Thorne  ajpenn42@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PUP] Selen or Kadey Krogen?
To:  Barbara Wilkinson xbrit@charter.net
Cc:  passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com
Message-ID:
ec8f340d0902181910w5f8863d1nf9881660b541f1bc@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

You are looking at two very different  types of cruising, tropical and north
of 30. 2 very different boat  configurations. Cockpits are not really that
useable, at sea they are cold  and stinky, in port that are suntraps. If I
was going to sea like that I  would opt Nordhavn or Kady K but both with
active stabilizers.

Best  of Luck

Carmen
La Paz Mexico

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:30 PM,  Barbara Wilkinson xbrit@charter.netwrote:

Hi  Everyone!

We are trying to decide between a  Kadey Krogen 42 Widebody (later model) or
a Selene 47 2000  model.  Our planned 5-7 year cruise would be from Alaska,
down  the West Coast & Mexico, through the Panama Canal into the Carib,  a
side trip to Guatemala, up to Florida and then probably at least  half of
the
Loop.  From there we'd like to go to Holland  and take the route to the
Black
Sea, Aegean & Med.  (Atlantic crossing probably by Tanker  delivery!).

We are concentrating on long range  blue-water pilothouse/trawlers with low
bridge clearances.  The  Nordhavns seems to have high stacks and almost no
cockpit.  Although they are awesome boats, they don't seem to be compatible
with  our need to live mostly on the decks!  Is the Kadey Krogen hull

design

really superior?  Is the hull of the Selene 47 sufficient  for the waters we
plan on cruising?  We love both boats and can  see why owners fall in love
with both of  them!

Would anyone like to join a discussion  on this?  Our last boat was a Marine
Trader, but this time we're  serious!

Barb & Don

Reno,  Nevada.


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power

To unsubscribe send email to
passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com with the word
UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the  message.

Passagemaking Under Power and PUP are trademarks of  Water World
Productions, formerly known as Trawler World  Productions.


Message:  3
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:22:05 -0800
From: John Marshall  johnamar1101@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PUP] Selen or Kadey  Krogen?
To: Anthony Thorne ajpenn42@gmail.com
Cc: Barbara  Wilkinson xbrit@charter.net,
passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com
Message-ID:  5F5CB773-3A0F-4B92-ACA0-FDAE142DD58B@gmail.com
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes

A cockpit on a  boat with a wet exhaust is uninhabitable underway,
IMHO. I find  inhaling diesel fumes contributes to sea sickness.

However, with a dry  stack, cockpits are great places to get a breath
of fresh air when  underway, although there is little sense in making
them too big. You  aren't going to have a dinner party out there while
underway.

Once we're at the dock or at anchor, the covered  flybridge is where we
socialize when the weather is good. Its airy,  its big, its up high and
has a great view and cool breezes. Or we  set up a table and chairs on
the boat deck.

Bottom line, the  cockpit is the least used area of our boat. It's just
my personal  preference, but I'd always keep the cockpit small and use
that space  for the salon.

John Marshall
Pacific Northwest

On Feb 18,  2009, at 7:10 PM, Anthony Thorne wrote:

You are looking at two  very different types of cruising, tropical
and north
of  30. 2 very different boat configurations. Cockpits are not really
that
useable, at sea they are cold and stinky, in port that  are suntraps.
If I
was going to sea like that I would  opt Nordhavn or Kady K but both
with
active  stabilizers.

Best of Luck

Carmen
La  Paz Mexico

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Barbara  Wilkinson
xbrit@charter.netwrote:

Hi Everyone!

We are trying to  decide between a Kadey Krogen 42 Widebody (later
model)  or
a Selene 47 2000 model.  Our planned 5-7 year cruise would  be from
Alaska,
down the West Coast &  Mexico, through the Panama Canal into the
Carib,  a
side trip to Guatemala, up to Florida and then probably at  least
half of
the
Loop.  From  there we'd like to go to Holland and take the route to
the
Black
Sea, Aegean & Med.  (Atlantic  crossing probably by Tanker  delivery!).

We are  concentrating on long range blue-water pilothouse/trawlers
with low
bridge clearances.  The Nordhavns seems to have high  stacks and
almost no
cockpit.  Although  they are awesome boats, they don't seem to be
compatible
with our need to live mostly on the decks!  Is the  Kadey Krogen
hull design
really superior?  Is the hull of the Selene 47 sufficient for the
waters  we
plan on cruising?  We love both boats and can see why  owners fall
in love
with both of  them!

Would anyone like to  join a discussion on this?  Our last boat was
a  Marine
Trader, but this time we're  serious!

Barb &  Don

Reno, Nevada.


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power

To unsubscribe send email to
passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com with the word
UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the  message.

Passagemaking Under Power and PUP are  trademarks of Water World
Productions, formerly known as Trawler  World Productions.


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power

To unsubscribe send email to
passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com with the word
UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the  message.

Passagemaking Under Power and PUP are trademarks of  Water World
Productions, formerly known as Trawler World  Productions.


Message:  4
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:14:38 -0500
From: "Ron Rogers"  rcrogers6@kennett.net
Subject: Re: [PUP] Selene or Kadey  Krogen?
To: "'Anthony Thorne'" ajpenn42@gmail.com, "'Barbara  Wilkinson'"
xbrit@charter.net
Cc:  passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com
Message-ID:  001a01c99248$952af1d0$bf80d570$@net
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="us-ascii"

Having seen a man almost thrown out (he hit and  grabbed the door jamb) of a
KK42's pilothouse by a passing sportfisherman  on the Severn River, I can
attest that they roll like crazy. Most KK42's  have foam core from the
waterline up. Some have foam all the way to the  keel. Late models are solid
fiberglass. They need a well-reinforced active  stabilizer installation
costing about $40,000. Slow trawlers need large fin  area stabilizers like
the Naiad 252 or equivalent. The wooden doors on  older KK42's are not
adequate for ocean service and I am not interested in  those who have
ventured-forth successfully with them. Otherwise they are  seaworthy and
commodious boats with good storage and a basement. Goods  placed in the
basement would have to be in waterproof wrapping. The vessels  of its era did
not come equipped with ocean crossing in mind. They look  great.

I have only seen one Selene up close and it was a 53 and  beautiful. It had
twin Cummins engines. Unlike KK yachts (the newer ones  are of even higher
quality) the Selenes do not appear to have a full  displacement hull as the
after section flattens out. Some owners think that  they are
full-displacement and Selene has made the forward hull "deeper."  Selenes
also require adaptation for ocean voyaging, A key factor in both  brands is
their range with existing fuel tanks at say 6 knots.

These  are dramatically different boats. The Nordhavn 46 comes closer to the
KK42  conceptually, but is a proven world-circling full-displacement trawler
and  they usually have either or both active and passive stabilization. Be
sure  that crossing the Atlantic is in your future. You mention crossing as
deck  cargo so that would subtract most of the North Atlantic, but the coast
of  Europe is the Atlantic and the Med (Mare Nostrum) and is not tame. Any  of
these boats would be comfortable as canal cruisers, although most would  have
to fold down their masts.

Ron Rogers

-----Original  Message-----
From: Anthony Thorne

You are looking at two very  different types of cruising, tropical and north
of 30. 2 very different  boat configurations. Cockpits are not really that
useable, at sea they are  cold and stinky, in port that are suntraps. If I
was going to sea like that  I would opt Nordhavn or Kady K but both with
active  stabilizers.


Message:  5
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:26:55 -0800
From: "barbarawilkinson"  barbarawilkinson@charter.net
Subject: [PUP] Selene or Kadey  Krogen?
To:  passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com
Message-ID:
20090219012700.MUKG25639.aarprv04.charter.net@youra9279112e3
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi Everyone!

We are  trying to decide between a Kadey Krogen 42 Widebody (later model) or
a  Selene 47 2000 model.  Our planned 5-7 year cruise would be from  Alaska,
down the West Coast & Mexico, through the Panama Canal into the  Carib, a
side trip to Guatemala, up to Florida and then probably at least  half of the
Loop.  From there we'd like to go to Holland and take the  route to the Black
Sea, Aegean & Med.  (Atlantic crossing probably  by Tanker delivery!).

We are concentrating on long range  blue-water pilothouse/trawlers with low
bridge clearances.  The  Nordhavns seems to have high stacks and almost no
cockpit.  Although  they are awesome boats, they don't seem to be compatible
with our need to  live mostly on the decks!  Is the Kadey Krogen hull design
really  superior?  Is the hull of the Selene 47 sufficient for the waters  we
plan on cruising?  We love both boats and can see why owners fall  in love
with both of them!

Would anyone like to  join a discussion on this?  Our last boat was a Marine
Trader, but  this time we're serious!

Barb & Don

Reno,  Nevada.


Message: 6
Date:  Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:14:13 -0700
From: "Ken Williams"  ken@kensblog.com
Subject: Re: [PUP] Selen or Kadey Krogen?
To:  "'Barbara Wilkinson '" xbrit@charter.net,
passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com
Message-ID:  00c401c99237$c2c95200$485bf600$@com
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="us-ascii"

"... We are trying to decide between a Kadey Krogen  42 Widebody (later
model) or
a Selene 47 2000 model.... The Nordhavns  seems to have high stacks and
almost no cockpit.  Although they are  awesome boats, they don't seem to be
compatible with our need to live  mostly on the decks!  ..."

Barb & Don:

It might be  beyond your budget, and possibly a waste of time, but before
giving up on  Nordhavn, you might want to check out the used Nordhavn 62
market. There is  an extreme amount of exterior deck space, and it's a pretty
tough world out  there right now. My guess is that an old N62 could be picked
up cheaper  than you think, and that sellers will grumble a lot, but take
seriously  offers that they would have laughed at a year ago.

-Ken  Williams
Nordhavn 68, Sans Souci
(former N62 owner)

PS That said,  I haven't actually looked to see if any of the older N62s are
for  sale...



Passagemaking-Under-Power  Mailing List

End of Passagemaking-Under-Power Digest, Vol 51, Issue  9


_ (http://www.moneyyogaseminar.com/) **************A Good Credit Score is 700
or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps!
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1218822736x1201267884/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%
2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID%3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62)

If you're asking there's still a lot to investigate. We chartered a number of trawlers for a week or two at a time and discovered all the things we wanted and didn't want. If your investing 5-7 years then putting in a few weeks with charters will provide an abundance of information. Happy boating. Jim Hughes Money Yoga is Consciously Transforming People's Relationship with Money. Money Yoga Seminar Series In a message dated 2/19/2009 12:00:18 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com writes: Send Passagemaking-Under-Power mailing list submissions to passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com You can reach the person managing the list at passagemaking-under-power-owner@lists.samurai.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Passagemaking-Under-Power digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Selen or Kadey Krogen? (Barbara Wilkinson ) 2. Re: Selen or Kadey Krogen? (Anthony Thorne) 3. Re: Selen or Kadey Krogen? (John Marshall) 4. Re: Selene or Kadey Krogen? (Ron Rogers) 5. Selene or Kadey Krogen? (barbarawilkinson) 6. Re: Selen or Kadey Krogen? (Ken Williams) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:30:12 -0800 From: "Barbara Wilkinson " <xbrit@charter.net> Subject: [PUP] Selen or Kadey Krogen? To: <passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com> Message-ID: <20090219013017.CZKK21772.mta31.charter.net@imp10> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Everyone! We are trying to decide between a Kadey Krogen 42 Widebody (later model) or a Selene 47 2000 model. Our planned 5-7 year cruise would be from Alaska, down the West Coast & Mexico, through the Panama Canal into the Carib, a side trip to Guatemala, up to Florida and then probably at least half of the Loop. From there we'd like to go to Holland and take the route to the Black Sea, Aegean & Med. (Atlantic crossing probably by Tanker delivery!). We are concentrating on long range blue-water pilothouse/trawlers with low bridge clearances. The Nordhavns seems to have high stacks and almost no cockpit. Although they are awesome boats, they don't seem to be compatible with our need to live mostly on the decks! Is the Kadey Krogen hull design really superior? Is the hull of the Selene 47 sufficient for the waters we plan on cruising? We love both boats and can see why owners fall in love with both of them! Would anyone like to join a discussion on this? Our last boat was a Marine Trader, but this time we're serious! Barb & Don Reno, Nevada. ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:10:12 -0800 From: Anthony Thorne <ajpenn42@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PUP] Selen or Kadey Krogen? To: Barbara Wilkinson <xbrit@charter.net> Cc: passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com Message-ID: <ec8f340d0902181910w5f8863d1nf9881660b541f1bc@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" You are looking at two very different types of cruising, tropical and north of 30. 2 very different boat configurations. Cockpits are not really that useable, at sea they are cold and stinky, in port that are suntraps. If I was going to sea like that I would opt Nordhavn or Kady K but both with active stabilizers. Best of Luck Carmen La Paz Mexico On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Barbara Wilkinson <xbrit@charter.net>wrote: > Hi Everyone! > > > > We are trying to decide between a Kadey Krogen 42 Widebody (later model) or > a Selene 47 2000 model. Our planned 5-7 year cruise would be from Alaska, > down the West Coast & Mexico, through the Panama Canal into the Carib, a > side trip to Guatemala, up to Florida and then probably at least half of > the > Loop. From there we'd like to go to Holland and take the route to the > Black > Sea, Aegean & Med. (Atlantic crossing probably by Tanker delivery!). > > > > We are concentrating on long range blue-water pilothouse/trawlers with low > bridge clearances. The Nordhavns seems to have high stacks and almost no > cockpit. Although they are awesome boats, they don't seem to be compatible > with our need to live mostly on the decks! Is the Kadey Krogen hull design > really superior? Is the hull of the Selene 47 sufficient for the waters we > plan on cruising? We love both boats and can see why owners fall in love > with both of them! > > > > Would anyone like to join a discussion on this? Our last boat was a Marine > Trader, but this time we're serious! > > > > Barb & Don > > Reno, Nevada. > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power > > To unsubscribe send email to > passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com with the word > UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message. > > Passagemaking Under Power and PUP are trademarks of Water World > Productions, formerly known as Trawler World Productions. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:22:05 -0800 From: John Marshall <johnamar1101@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PUP] Selen or Kadey Krogen? To: Anthony Thorne <ajpenn42@gmail.com> Cc: Barbara Wilkinson <xbrit@charter.net>, passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com Message-ID: <5F5CB773-3A0F-4B92-ACA0-FDAE142DD58B@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes A cockpit on a boat with a wet exhaust is uninhabitable underway, IMHO. I find inhaling diesel fumes contributes to sea sickness. However, with a dry stack, cockpits are great places to get a breath of fresh air when underway, although there is little sense in making them too big. You aren't going to have a dinner party out there while underway. Once we're at the dock or at anchor, the covered flybridge is where we socialize when the weather is good. Its airy, its big, its up high and has a great view and cool breezes. Or we set up a table and chairs on the boat deck. Bottom line, the cockpit is the least used area of our boat. It's just my personal preference, but I'd always keep the cockpit small and use that space for the salon. John Marshall Pacific Northwest On Feb 18, 2009, at 7:10 PM, Anthony Thorne wrote: > You are looking at two very different types of cruising, tropical > and north > of 30. 2 very different boat configurations. Cockpits are not really > that > useable, at sea they are cold and stinky, in port that are suntraps. > If I > was going to sea like that I would opt Nordhavn or Kady K but both > with > active stabilizers. > > Best of Luck > > Carmen > La Paz Mexico > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Barbara Wilkinson > <xbrit@charter.net>wrote: > >> Hi Everyone! >> >> >> >> We are trying to decide between a Kadey Krogen 42 Widebody (later >> model) or >> a Selene 47 2000 model. Our planned 5-7 year cruise would be from >> Alaska, >> down the West Coast & Mexico, through the Panama Canal into the >> Carib, a >> side trip to Guatemala, up to Florida and then probably at least >> half of >> the >> Loop. From there we'd like to go to Holland and take the route to >> the >> Black >> Sea, Aegean & Med. (Atlantic crossing probably by Tanker delivery!). >> >> >> >> We are concentrating on long range blue-water pilothouse/trawlers >> with low >> bridge clearances. The Nordhavns seems to have high stacks and >> almost no >> cockpit. Although they are awesome boats, they don't seem to be >> compatible >> with our need to live mostly on the decks! Is the Kadey Krogen >> hull design >> really superior? Is the hull of the Selene 47 sufficient for the >> waters we >> plan on cruising? We love both boats and can see why owners fall >> in love >> with both of them! >> >> >> >> Would anyone like to join a discussion on this? Our last boat was >> a Marine >> Trader, but this time we're serious! >> >> >> >> Barb & Don >> >> Reno, Nevada. >> _______________________________________________ >> http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power >> >> To unsubscribe send email to >> passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com with the word >> UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message. >> >> Passagemaking Under Power and PUP are trademarks of Water World >> Productions, formerly known as Trawler World Productions. > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power > > To unsubscribe send email to > passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com with the word > UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message. > > Passagemaking Under Power and PUP are trademarks of Water World > Productions, formerly known as Trawler World Productions. ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:14:38 -0500 From: "Ron Rogers" <rcrogers6@kennett.net> Subject: Re: [PUP] Selene or Kadey Krogen? To: "'Anthony Thorne'" <ajpenn42@gmail.com>, "'Barbara Wilkinson'" <xbrit@charter.net> Cc: passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com Message-ID: <001a01c99248$952af1d0$bf80d570$@net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Having seen a man almost thrown out (he hit and grabbed the door jamb) of a KK42's pilothouse by a passing sportfisherman on the Severn River, I can attest that they roll like crazy. Most KK42's have foam core from the waterline up. Some have foam all the way to the keel. Late models are solid fiberglass. They need a well-reinforced active stabilizer installation costing about $40,000. Slow trawlers need large fin area stabilizers like the Naiad 252 or equivalent. The wooden doors on older KK42's are not adequate for ocean service and I am not interested in those who have ventured-forth successfully with them. Otherwise they are seaworthy and commodious boats with good storage and a basement. Goods placed in the basement would have to be in waterproof wrapping. The vessels of its era did not come equipped with ocean crossing in mind. They look great. I have only seen one Selene up close and it was a 53 and beautiful. It had twin Cummins engines. Unlike KK yachts (the newer ones are of even higher quality) the Selenes do not appear to have a full displacement hull as the after section flattens out. Some owners think that they are full-displacement and Selene has made the forward hull "deeper." Selenes also require adaptation for ocean voyaging, A key factor in both brands is their range with existing fuel tanks at say 6 knots. These are dramatically different boats. The Nordhavn 46 comes closer to the KK42 conceptually, but is a proven world-circling full-displacement trawler and they usually have either or both active and passive stabilization. Be sure that crossing the Atlantic is in your future. You mention crossing as deck cargo so that would subtract most of the North Atlantic, but the coast of Europe is the Atlantic and the Med (Mare Nostrum) and is not tame. Any of these boats would be comfortable as canal cruisers, although most would have to fold down their masts. Ron Rogers -----Original Message----- From: Anthony Thorne You are looking at two very different types of cruising, tropical and north of 30. 2 very different boat configurations. Cockpits are not really that useable, at sea they are cold and stinky, in port that are suntraps. If I was going to sea like that I would opt Nordhavn or Kady K but both with active stabilizers. ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:26:55 -0800 From: "barbarawilkinson" <barbarawilkinson@charter.net> Subject: [PUP] Selene or Kadey Krogen? To: <passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com> Message-ID: <20090219012700.MUKG25639.aarprv04.charter.net@youra9279112e3> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Everyone! We are trying to decide between a Kadey Krogen 42 Widebody (later model) or a Selene 47 2000 model. Our planned 5-7 year cruise would be from Alaska, down the West Coast & Mexico, through the Panama Canal into the Carib, a side trip to Guatemala, up to Florida and then probably at least half of the Loop. From there we'd like to go to Holland and take the route to the Black Sea, Aegean & Med. (Atlantic crossing probably by Tanker delivery!). We are concentrating on long range blue-water pilothouse/trawlers with low bridge clearances. The Nordhavns seems to have high stacks and almost no cockpit. Although they are awesome boats, they don't seem to be compatible with our need to live mostly on the decks! Is the Kadey Krogen hull design really superior? Is the hull of the Selene 47 sufficient for the waters we plan on cruising? We love both boats and can see why owners fall in love with both of them! Would anyone like to join a discussion on this? Our last boat was a Marine Trader, but this time we're serious! Barb & Don Reno, Nevada. ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:14:13 -0700 From: "Ken Williams" <ken@kensblog.com> Subject: Re: [PUP] Selen or Kadey Krogen? To: "'Barbara Wilkinson '" <xbrit@charter.net>, <passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com> Message-ID: <00c401c99237$c2c95200$485bf600$@com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" "... We are trying to decide between a Kadey Krogen 42 Widebody (later model) or a Selene 47 2000 model.... The Nordhavns seems to have high stacks and almost no cockpit. Although they are awesome boats, they don't seem to be compatible with our need to live mostly on the decks! ..." Barb & Don: It might be beyond your budget, and possibly a waste of time, but before giving up on Nordhavn, you might want to check out the used Nordhavn 62 market. There is an extreme amount of exterior deck space, and it's a pretty tough world out there right now. My guess is that an old N62 could be picked up cheaper than you think, and that sellers will grumble a lot, but take seriously offers that they would have laughed at a year ago. -Ken Williams Nordhavn 68, Sans Souci (former N62 owner) PS That said, I haven't actually looked to see if any of the older N62s are for sale... ------------------------------ ________________________________________________ Passagemaking-Under-Power Mailing List End of Passagemaking-Under-Power Digest, Vol 51, Issue 9 ******************************************************** _ (http://www.moneyyogaseminar.com/) **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1218822736x1201267884/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm% 2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID%3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62)