AMR's VAD support on Nokia S60 devices?

FP
Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
Tue, Jul 28, 2009 9:55 AM

Hi all,

as not all you know, not all Nokia S60 devices support AMR's encoding
with VAD features and some of them does not support it in proper way.

It could be nice whether we could arrange a distributed testing activity
with a sample application that test the AMR VAD behaviour, in order to
create a knowledge base on device UID that works properly and devices
that does not work properly where VAD must be disabled.

Fabio

Hi all, as not all you know, not all Nokia S60 devices support AMR's encoding with VAD features and some of them does not support it in proper way. It could be nice whether we could arrange a distributed testing activity with a sample application that test the AMR VAD behaviour, in order to create a knowledge base on device UID that works properly and devices that does not work properly where VAD must be disabled. Fabio
NE
nir elkayam
Tue, Jul 28, 2009 10:18 AM

hi,
I have this problem in my app, and even when the VAD does work, it doesn't
do good job on noisy enviroment.

It would be nice feature to have VAD support on pjsip to reduce bandwidth
and help with voice quality.

I am using AMR vocoder with VAS and on reception of compressed AMR frame i
decode it back to PCM, compute the energy and make decision based on the
energy. not so sofisticate VAD algo but works fine.

nir

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) <
lists@infosecurity.ch> wrote:

Hi all,

as not all you know, not all Nokia S60 devices support AMR's encoding with
VAD features and some of them does not support it in proper way.

It could be nice whether we could arrange a distributed testing activity
with a sample application that test the AMR VAD behaviour, in order to
create a knowledge base on device UID that works properly and devices that
does not work properly where VAD must be disabled.

Fabio


Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org

pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org

--
ניר אלקיים
טל: 050-3930056
nir.elkayam@gmail.com

hi, I have this problem in my app, and even when the VAD does work, it doesn't do good job on noisy enviroment. It would be nice feature to have VAD support on pjsip to reduce bandwidth and help with voice quality. I am using AMR vocoder with VAS and on reception of compressed AMR frame i decode it back to PCM, compute the energy and make decision based on the energy. not so sofisticate VAD algo but works fine. nir On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) < lists@infosecurity.ch> wrote: > Hi all, > > as not all you know, not all Nokia S60 devices support AMR's encoding with > VAD features and some of them does not support it in proper way. > > It could be nice whether we could arrange a distributed testing activity > with a sample application that test the AMR VAD behaviour, in order to > create a knowledge base on device UID that works properly and devices that > does not work properly where VAD must be disabled. > > Fabio > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > -- ניר אלקיים טל: 050-3930056 nir.elkayam@gmail.com
FP
Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)
Tue, Jul 28, 2009 11:02 AM

nir elkayam wrote:

hi,

I have this problem in my app, and even when the VAD does work, it
doesn't do good job on noisy enviroment.

It would be nice feature to have VAD support on pjsip to reduce
bandwidth and help with voice quality.

I am using AMR vocoder with VAS and on reception of compressed AMR
frame i decode it back to PCM, compute the energy and make decision
based on the energy. not so sofisticate VAD algo but works fine.

Please tell me more about your approach.

You do not like the AMR VAD approach generating Full sample, Confort
Noise Sample and Silence Descriptor?

I am using it over GSM CSD (with http://privategsm.com) with APS and it
works fine, even if on some device it does not work as the VAD is not
properly supported.

Fabio

nir elkayam wrote: > hi, > > I have this problem in my app, and even when the VAD does work, it > doesn't do good job on noisy enviroment. > > It would be nice feature to have VAD support on pjsip to reduce > bandwidth and help with voice quality. > > I am using AMR vocoder with VAS and on reception of compressed AMR > frame i decode it back to PCM, compute the energy and make decision > based on the energy. not so sofisticate VAD algo but works fine. Please tell me more about your approach. You do not like the AMR VAD approach generating Full sample, Confort Noise Sample and Silence Descriptor? I am using it over GSM CSD (with http://privategsm.com) with APS and it works fine, even if on some device it does not work as the VAD is not properly supported. Fabio