On 19 August 2016 at 02:58, Ronaldo Persiano rcmpersiano@gmail.com wrote:

Okay. If that error message visited your computer again please ping me
with error message and some other info like OS, editor that you are
using, settings OpenSCAD at that time etc that you feel might be
helpful.

--
Amarjeet Singh
https://amarjeetkapoor1.wordpress.com
https://github.com/amarjeetkapoor1
https://bitbucket.org/amarjeetkapoor

"The journey of a thousand commit begins with a single init"

Reset button is making big difference to usability - nice. Thankyou.

I would also vote strongly for:

• see Tabs in order of appearance in file
• see Parameters in order of appearance.

(IMHO alphabetical order is not useful. in my experience, no parameters
group meaningfully that way.)

Thanks for your excellent work. I see how the JSON works now. nice.

On 8/19/2016 6:31 PM, Amarjeet Kapoor wrote:

The grouping feature is very nice.
I also see now how the Preset works. Very good.
However, after a Reset, the Preset botton label is not updated and reflects
the previous settings.
On fact, default values settings could be just another Preset, an always
present one.
Great work. Thank you.

2016-08-19 9:38 GMT-03:00 Mark Schafer mschafer@wireframe.biz:

Another note:
When I press the "-" button the current preset is deleted. However the
preview is not updated to reflect that.
It would be nice to ask for a confirmation of that deletion or it will be
lost forever.

On fact, the labels "+" and "-" are a bit misleading for me. I would prefer
3 buttons instead of 2:
New - for a new Preset,
Update - to update the current Preset with the current parameter values
Delete - to delete the current Preset (after a confirmation)

2016-08-19 11:47 GMT-03:00 Ronaldo Persiano rcmpersiano@gmail.com:

On 19 August 2016 at 18:08, Mark Schafer mschafer@wireframe.biz wrote:

I can't argue that alphabetical order would be better but alphabetical
order doesn't make grouping meaningless.
I will try to make it that way as you suggested.

If you found another issue do report.

--
Amarjeet Singh
https://amarjeetkapoor1.wordpress.com
https://github.com/amarjeetkapoor1
https://bitbucket.org/amarjeetkapoor

"The journey of a thousand commit begins with a single init"

On 19 August 2016 at 20:17, Ronaldo Persiano rcmpersiano@gmail.com wrote:

It is not meant to be updated. when you press reset than values in
customizer are updated and reflected in the model but to save that
values in JSON file for that set you need to click on + button.

Yes, This is something that Torsten suggested in the start of this
feature but to keep things simple in start we left it for future.

--
Amarjeet Singh
https://amarjeetkapoor1.wordpress.com
https://github.com/amarjeetkapoor1
https://bitbucket.org/amarjeetkapoor

"The journey of a thousand commit begins with a single init"

On 19 August 2016 at 20:33, Ronaldo Persiano rcmpersiano@gmail.com wrote:

On "-" only set is deleted but it values are not. So,there is no
change that is needed to be reflected.

Some updates related to buttons will be there.

--
Amarjeet Singh
https://amarjeetkapoor1.wordpress.com
https://github.com/amarjeetkapoor1
https://bitbucket.org/amarjeetkapoor

"The journey of a thousand commit begins with a single init"

It has crashed again in the same circunstances. It seems to be a Windows
issue however. The system asked me permission to send some files about the
issue to Microsoft. If it may be helpful I can send you a copy of the files
by private message:
C:\Users\ronaldo\AppData\Local\Temp\WER4E07.tmp.WERInternalMetadata.xml
C:\Users\ronaldo\AppData\Local\Temp\WER6936.tmp.appcompat.txt
C:\Users\ronaldo\AppData\Local\Temp\WER69E2.tmp.mdmp

2016-08-19 12:49 GMT-03:00 Amarjeet Kapoor amarjeet.kapoor1@gmail.com:

I have a suggestion: if a parameter has no detail text, the space reserved
for it should be suppressed, even when Show Details is marked. The space in
the Customizer column is gold.

2016-08-25 18:22 GMT-03:00 Ronaldo Persiano rcmpersiano@gmail.com:

On 2 September 2016 at 07:46, Ronaldo Persiano rcmpersiano@gmail.com wrote:

Thanks for pointing out. I thought this thing is being taken care of
in present code but its not he case.

--
Amarjeet Singh
https://amarjeetkapoor1.wordpress.com
https://github.com/amarjeetkapoor1
https://bitbucket.org/amarjeetkapoor

"The journey of a thousand commit begins with a single init"