In a message dated 1/4/04 9:46:19 AM Eastern Standard Time,
klemmons@airmail.net writes:
Every independent
test I've ever seen basically says that passive radar reflectors of ANY kind
really don't work that well.
"Powerboat Reports" &/or "Practical Sailor" did a test on the various
available radar reflectors several years back and they indicated that the
construction, positioning and orientation of reflectors, esp. "corner reflectors" is
critical. I have a rigid AL corner reflector mounted atop my mizzen in the
"double rain-catch position", which is recommended for boats that are more or less
upright as opposed to heeled over. I have on occasion contacted freighters
offshore and asked them how my radar image paints--all reports have been
excellent.
Best--Michael Oritt
Durbeck 48--NAMASTE
Hello All,
Most of you are aware that we distribute an active radar target enhancer
product on our commercial website. The units are manufactured in the United
Kingdom and are intended to answer many of the shortcomings discussed in
this thread. Besides ours, there are several competitors.
Basically the active units receive a radar pulse, run it through an
amplifier section and retransmit the pulse back in an omnidirectional
pattern. The advantages of the active radar target enhancers are: 1. Size;
they take up very little room on the masthead. 2. Aesthetics; being small,
they don't look like a giant wart on the top of your mast. 3. Survivable;
They have much less surface area and are less likely to be carried off by
the wind 4. Ease of installation; all the units are a snap to install with
the main task being the necessity of running a multiconductor cable between
the helm station and the RTE antenna. There are several disadvantages. 1.
Cost; they are much more expensive than corner reflectors. 2. Power
requirements. While they draw 650 MA of current when transmitting and less
than half that when in a quiescent state, they do consume power. 3. More
complex installation. 4. Only operate on the dominant X band, no S band
units out there to the best of my knowledge.
They have a couple other features that corner reflectors don't have. They
notify you when you're being painted by radar with either a visual alarm, an
audio alarm or both. They increase RCS by a meaningful amount regardless
of their orientation to the sea or the painting vessels transmitter.
Radar horizon is still a factor. The higher the unit above the sea, the
further it can "see". Can't fight physics.
This is a UK regulatory issue and we can't sell the units over there. There
are a number of UK based dealers. However, we ARE affiliated and do have
both an interest and a bias so our disclaimer is limited. We mainly sell to
the gov't and research vessel markets that put these things on RIB's so they
can track the little critters while they zoom about away from the mother
ship.
Someone asked the question if another vessel could "see" your radar when it
is transmitting. The short answer is no, each radar unit can only "see"
itself. They are narrowly tuned and sometimes uniquely coded because a
radar set can only deal with timing the arrival of their own return pulses.
If they were wide open to all radar pulses, the radar unit could not
discriminate between its own pulses and another vessels pulses.
Consequently, they would be unable to function.
Reflective Regards to All,
Frank & Claudette Weismantel
Elverta, CA
Boatless for a little while longer
<SNIP>
Frank did an excellent job of describing the active radar transponder that
enhance your RCS.
He also explained this:
Someone asked the question if another vessel could "see" your radar when it
is transmitting. The short answer is no, each radar unit can only "see"
itself. They are narrowly tuned and sometimes uniquely coded because a
radar set can only deal with timing the arrival of their own return pulses.
If they were wide open to all radar pulses, the radar unit could not
discriminate between its own pulses and another vessels pulses.
Consequently, they would be unable to function.
Comment:
His answer and explanation is correct.
I suspect the original question stems from someone reading stories about
military aircraft systems which does "see" other radar systems.
This is a very different animal consisting of multiple receivers and very
sophisticated signal processing circuits and computers.
Absolutely no comparison between these military systems and a conventional
marine radar set.
Cheers
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.555 / Virus Database: 347 - Release Date: 12/23/2003
Arild and Frank, you lost me. If radars can't "see" other radars, why do
they come equipped with IR (Interference Rejection) controls to minimize the
display of other radars' emissions?
Bob Peterson
-----Original Message-----
From: Arild Jensen
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 7:33 AM
To: Service@CFX Marine.Com; Trawler-World-List
Subject: RE: Increasing Radar Cross Section, Was: RE: TWL: Re:
Vesselradarreflection
Someone asked the question if another vessel could "see" your radar when it
is transmitting. The short answer is no, each radar unit can only "see"
itself.
Comment:
His answer and explanation is correct.
I suspect the original question stems from someone reading stories about
military aircraft systems which does "see" other radar systems.
Tuesday, January 6, 2004, 8:33:38 AM, Bob wrote:
Arild and Frank, you lost me. If radars can't "see" other radars, why do
they come equipped with IR (Interference Rejection) controls to minimize the
display of other radars' emissions?
A radar will see signals from other radars operating on the same
frequency - however, the resulting display is random arcs on the
screen, and is of no use in locating the other vessel.
--
Peter Bennett, VE7CEI Vancouver, B.C., Canada
GPS and NMEA info: http://vancouver-webpages.com/peter
Vancouver Power Squadron: http://vancouver-webpages.com/van-ps
Okay, so the definition of "sees" varies among us. And I wouldn't say that
the arcs of are "no use in locating the other vessel" as they tend to
emanate from the vessel. Granted it does take some time and patience to
determine their source.
Bob Peterson
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Bennett [mailto:peterbb@interchange.ubc.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 9:00 AM
To: Bob Peterson; trawler-world-list@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re[2]: Increasing Radar Cross Section, Was: RE: TWL: Re:
Vesselradarreflection
A radar will see signals from other radars operating on the same frequency -
however, the resulting display is random arcs on the screen, and is of no
use in locating the other vessel.
At 08:59 AM 01/06/2004 -0800, Peter Bennett wrote:
Tuesday, January 6, 2004, 8:33:38 AM, Bob wrote:
Arild and Frank, you lost me. If radars can't "see" other radars, why do
they come equipped with IR (Interference Rejection) controls to minimize
the
display of other radars' emissions?
You folks are talking about two different things. It is easy to detect if
radar energy is painting your boat. Just like car radar detectors. What
Arild and folks are talking about is the ability to locate the source which
is really hard and only the tax payers as a group can do that via the
defense dept.
Skooch
David Stahl
Beacon Technologies Inc.
Serving The Delaware Valley
Business and Residential Internet Services
Frank,
Is this a legal device in the US? Since this is obviously an active RF
transmitter in the marine radar band, is it safe to assume it has been type
accepted by the FCC?
What are the station license requirements for operating this transponder?
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Service@CFX Marine.Com
Most of you are aware that we distribute an active radar target enhancer
product on our commercial website. The units are manufactured in the United
Kingdom and are intended to answer many of the shortcomings discussed in
this thread. Besides ours, there are several competitors.
Basically the active units receive a radar pulse, run it through an
amplifier section and retransmit the pulse back in an omnidirectional
pattern. ..........................................