board@lists.nationalcoalitionforliteracy.org

National Coalition for Literacy Board Members List

View all threads

Re: [NCL Board] COABE and NCL - Final Draft

DK
Deborah Kennedy
Wed, May 4, 2016 7:26 PM

All,

Here is the final (I hope) draft. Jeff, thanks for your superb edits. When I send this, I'll pdf it b/c the letterhead can get messed up if it's transmitted in Word.

One note: I've left the recent appointments (Judy, Kristin) off of the Board members list b/c announcement hasn't been made to the general membership yet. Okay?

Deborah

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Carter [mailto:jcarter@literacypolicy.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 2:37 PM
To: Deborah Kennedy
Cc: National Coalition for Literacy Board Members List
Subject: Re: [NCL Board] COABE and NCL - Revised Draft

Here are my edits. I did have a few concerns but I thought this was a nice response. I appreciate you doing this.

My suggested edits mainly have to do with striking a balance between being sensitive and responsive to their concerns while not going on the record with any suggestion or even a hint they are entitled to benefits or opportunities beyond what any other member receives. Generally I think generally the note balances this well — there are just a couple of spots where I would put things in more general terms.

If we are in fact a D.C. corporation (I can’t remember), you may want to look at this regarding member rights to inspect records:

http://dccode.org/simple/Title-29/Chapter-4/Subchapter-XIII/

Thanks!

Jeff

On May 4, 2016, at 12:14 PM, Deborah Kennedy dkennedy@cal.org wrote:

<Response to COABE_Draft2_4May2016.docx>
All, Here is the final (I hope) draft. Jeff, thanks for your superb edits. When I send this, I'll pdf it b/c the letterhead can get messed up if it's transmitted in Word. One note: I've left the recent appointments (Judy, Kristin) off of the Board members list b/c announcement hasn't been made to the general membership yet. Okay? Deborah -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Carter [mailto:jcarter@literacypolicy.org] Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 2:37 PM To: Deborah Kennedy Cc: National Coalition for Literacy Board Members List Subject: Re: [NCL Board] COABE and NCL - Revised Draft Here are my edits. I did have a few concerns but I thought this was a nice response. I appreciate you doing this. My suggested edits mainly have to do with striking a balance between being sensitive and responsive to their concerns while not going on the record with any suggestion or even a hint they are entitled to benefits or opportunities beyond what any other member receives. Generally I think generally the note balances this well — there are just a couple of spots where I would put things in more general terms. If we are in fact a D.C. corporation (I can’t remember), you may want to look at this regarding member rights to inspect records: http://dccode.org/simple/Title-29/Chapter-4/Subchapter-XIII/ Thanks! Jeff > On May 4, 2016, at 12:14 PM, Deborah Kennedy <dkennedy@cal.org> wrote: > > <Response to COABE_Draft2_4May2016.docx>
JC
Jeff Carter
Wed, May 4, 2016 10:38 PM

Sounds good to me.

Jeff

On May 4, 2016, at 3:26 PM, Deborah Kennedy dkennedy@cal.org wrote:

All,

Here is the final (I hope) draft. Jeff, thanks for your superb edits. When I send this, I'll pdf it b/c the letterhead can get messed up if it's transmitted in Word.

One note: I've left the recent appointments (Judy, Kristin) off of the Board members list b/c announcement hasn't been made to the general membership yet. Okay?

Deborah

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Carter [mailto:jcarter@literacypolicy.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 2:37 PM
To: Deborah Kennedy
Cc: National Coalition for Literacy Board Members List
Subject: Re: [NCL Board] COABE and NCL - Revised Draft

Here are my edits. I did have a few concerns but I thought this was a nice response. I appreciate you doing this.

My suggested edits mainly have to do with striking a balance between being sensitive and responsive to their concerns while not going on the record with any suggestion or even a hint they are entitled to benefits or opportunities beyond what any other member receives. Generally I think generally the note balances this well — there are just a couple of spots where I would put things in more general terms.

If we are in fact a D.C. corporation (I can’t remember), you may want to look at this regarding member rights to inspect records:

http://dccode.org/simple/Title-29/Chapter-4/Subchapter-XIII/

Thanks!

Jeff

On May 4, 2016, at 12:14 PM, Deborah Kennedy dkennedy@cal.org wrote:

<Response to COABE_Draft2_4May2016.docx>

<Response to COABE_FINAL.docx>_______________________________________________
National Coalition for Literacy Board mailing list
Board@lists.national-coalition-literacy.org
http://lists.national-coalition-literacy.org/mailman/listinfo/board_lists.national-coalition-literacy.org

Sounds good to me. Jeff > On May 4, 2016, at 3:26 PM, Deborah Kennedy <dkennedy@cal.org> wrote: > > All, > > Here is the final (I hope) draft. Jeff, thanks for your superb edits. When I send this, I'll pdf it b/c the letterhead can get messed up if it's transmitted in Word. > > One note: I've left the recent appointments (Judy, Kristin) off of the Board members list b/c announcement hasn't been made to the general membership yet. Okay? > > Deborah > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Carter [mailto:jcarter@literacypolicy.org] > Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 2:37 PM > To: Deborah Kennedy > Cc: National Coalition for Literacy Board Members List > Subject: Re: [NCL Board] COABE and NCL - Revised Draft > > Here are my edits. I did have a few concerns but I thought this was a nice response. I appreciate you doing this. > > My suggested edits mainly have to do with striking a balance between being sensitive and responsive to their concerns while not going on the record with any suggestion or even a hint they are entitled to benefits or opportunities beyond what any other member receives. Generally I think generally the note balances this well — there are just a couple of spots where I would put things in more general terms. > > If we are in fact a D.C. corporation (I can’t remember), you may want to look at this regarding member rights to inspect records: > > http://dccode.org/simple/Title-29/Chapter-4/Subchapter-XIII/ > > Thanks! > > Jeff > >> On May 4, 2016, at 12:14 PM, Deborah Kennedy <dkennedy@cal.org> wrote: >> >> <Response to COABE_Draft2_4May2016.docx> > <Response to COABE_FINAL.docx>_______________________________________________ > National Coalition for Literacy Board mailing list > Board@lists.national-coalition-literacy.org > http://lists.national-coalition-literacy.org/mailman/listinfo/board_lists.national-coalition-literacy.org