trawlers@lists.trawlering.com

TRAWLERS & TRAWLERING LIST

View all threads

TWL: Teak Caulk Holy Grail

JG
Joe Goldsmith
Thu, May 1, 2003 4:10 AM

Hello to all. I plan to redo my teak deck caulk and, not being one to enjoy
the binding of knee pads, thought I would take the time to find the holy
grail of teak caulk. After a lot of research I realized that there are more
ways to caulk a deck than navigation stars. Finally, I ran across a web page
on caulking teak and the author recommended Dow 995 Silicon Structural
Adhesive. The author said that the product has a long life, will stretch
with the wood, repel water, and will leap tall buildings with a single
squeeze of the caulk gun. Undaunted and unimpressed by the ruminations of
one author, I cruised the web a bit more and found a PDF (I can send it to
anyone who wants to read about it.) on the Dow web site that had very
interesting information. The product description included:

Selfpriming, shelf-stable, neutral-cure, elastomeric adhesive specifically
formulated for silicone structural glazing, exhibiting the following unique
features:

  • Excellent unprimed adhesion to most common building substrates, including
    glass, reflective glass, anodized aluminum, granite and paints, including
    most pluoropolymerbased paints.

  • Noncorrosive by-products

  • 20-year performance warranty available

  • Cures to extremely tough elastomeric rubber

<Basic Uses>: Dow Corning 995 Silicone Structural Adhesive is designed for
use in structural applications such as factory or field glazing of glass and
metal. Once cured, this adhesive forms a durable, flexible, watertight bond
that can be warranted for 20 years. The stress-strain relationship for Dow
Corning 995 Silicone Structural Adhesive is not warranted for use in
below-grade applications, for use as an interior penetration firestop
sealing system, in horizontal floor joints where abrasion and physical abuse
are likely to be encountered, to frost-laden or damp surfaces, or for
continuous immersion in water.  Further, Dow Corning 995 Silicone Structural
Adhesive should not be applied to building materials that bleed oils,
plasticizers or solvents - materials such as impregnated wood, oil-based
caulks, green or partially vulcanized rubber gaskets or tapes, In totally
confined spaces (the sealant requires atmospheric moisture for cure), when
surface temperatures exceed 600C (1400F), and where painting of the sealant
is required, as the paint film may crack and peel. Dow Corning 995 Silicone
Structural Adhesive is virtually unaffected by sunlight, rain, sleet, snow
and temperature extremes. Its unique weatherability enables it to retain its
original design properties even after years of exposure. Cured sealant will
remain elastomeric in cold to -400C (-400F) or heat to 1490C (3000F).

Well, this sounds great but no where did I read about teak except for
"materials that bleed oils." So far, this leaves a lot of room for
interpretation and I'm not sure I am ready to submit my deck to this
product. Not one to be satisfied with such uncured information, I contacted
Dow technical support. A very nice person who participates in research told
me that Dow 995 would be recommended for the job but it was never tested on
teak. Hmmm, it's not her boat, easy to say.

Anyone have any ideas? Am I just following the wrong caulk line? Is there no
teak caulk holy grail?

Joe Goldsmith

Sheer Magic

1973 38' Chris Craft Coho Aft Cabin

Hello to all. I plan to redo my teak deck caulk and, not being one to enjoy the binding of knee pads, thought I would take the time to find the holy grail of teak caulk. After a lot of research I realized that there are more ways to caulk a deck than navigation stars. Finally, I ran across a web page on caulking teak and the author recommended Dow 995 Silicon Structural Adhesive. The author said that the product has a long life, will stretch with the wood, repel water, and will leap tall buildings with a single squeeze of the caulk gun. Undaunted and unimpressed by the ruminations of one author, I cruised the web a bit more and found a PDF (I can send it to anyone who wants to read about it.) on the Dow web site that had very interesting information. The product description included: Selfpriming, shelf-stable, neutral-cure, elastomeric adhesive specifically formulated for silicone structural glazing, exhibiting the following unique features: - Excellent unprimed adhesion to most common building substrates, including glass, reflective glass, anodized aluminum, granite and paints, including most pluoropolymerbased paints. - Noncorrosive by-products - 20-year performance warranty available - Cures to extremely tough elastomeric rubber <Basic Uses>: Dow Corning 995 Silicone Structural Adhesive is designed for use in structural applications such as factory or field glazing of glass and metal. Once cured, this adhesive forms a durable, flexible, watertight bond that can be warranted for 20 years. The stress-strain relationship for Dow Corning 995 Silicone Structural Adhesive is not warranted for use in below-grade applications, for use as an interior penetration firestop sealing system, in horizontal floor joints where abrasion and physical abuse are likely to be encountered, to frost-laden or damp surfaces, or for continuous immersion in water. Further, Dow Corning 995 Silicone Structural Adhesive should not be applied to building materials that bleed oils, plasticizers or solvents - materials such as impregnated wood, oil-based caulks, green or partially vulcanized rubber gaskets or tapes, In totally confined spaces (the sealant requires atmospheric moisture for cure), when surface temperatures exceed 600C (1400F), and where painting of the sealant is required, as the paint film may crack and peel. Dow Corning 995 Silicone Structural Adhesive is virtually unaffected by sunlight, rain, sleet, snow and temperature extremes. Its unique weatherability enables it to retain its original design properties even after years of exposure. Cured sealant will remain elastomeric in cold to -400C (-400F) or heat to 1490C (3000F). Well, this sounds great but no where did I read about teak except for "materials that bleed oils." So far, this leaves a lot of room for interpretation and I'm not sure I am ready to submit my deck to this product. Not one to be satisfied with such uncured information, I contacted Dow technical support. A very nice person who participates in research told me that Dow 995 would be recommended for the job but it was never tested on teak. Hmmm, it's not her boat, easy to say. Anyone have any ideas? Am I just following the wrong caulk line? Is there no teak caulk holy grail? Joe Goldsmith Sheer Magic 1973 38' Chris Craft Coho Aft Cabin
A
Annieseztoo
Thu, May 1, 2003 6:53 AM

Well, this sounds great but no where did I read about teak except for
"materials that bleed oils." So far, this leaves a lot of room for
interpretation and I'm not sure I am ready to submit my deck to this
product.

<snip>

As I have just removed the teak decks on the starboard side of Annie Sez
Too to replace some wet deck core, I am very interested in caulking. I hope
to be rebedding the decks within the next couple of weeks.
There is one more line in their description that would cause me not to
use this product:

The stress-strain relationship for Dow

Corning 995 Silicone Structural Adhesive is not warranted for use in
below-grade applications, for use as an interior penetration firestop
sealing system, in horizontal floor joints where abrasion and physical

abuse

are likely to be encountered,

<snip>

So far from what information I've been able to gather the 2 part
polysulfides seem to be the front runner for teak deck caulking.

Good luck,

Walt Konieczko
Annie Sez Too      34 Marine Trader
Lanoka Harbor, NJ

> Well, this sounds great but no where did I read about teak except for > "materials that bleed oils." So far, this leaves a lot of room for > interpretation and I'm not sure I am ready to submit my deck to this > product. <snip> As I have just removed the teak decks on the starboard side of Annie Sez Too to replace some wet deck core, I am very interested in caulking. I hope to be rebedding the decks within the next couple of weeks. There is one more line in their description that would cause me not to use this product: The stress-strain relationship for Dow > Corning 995 Silicone Structural Adhesive is not warranted for use in > below-grade applications, for use as an interior penetration firestop > sealing system, in horizontal floor joints where abrasion and physical abuse > are likely to be encountered, <snip> So far from what information I've been able to gather the 2 part polysulfides seem to be the front runner for teak deck caulking. Good luck, Walt Konieczko Annie Sez Too 34 Marine Trader Lanoka Harbor, NJ
LL
lynn love
Thu, May 1, 2003 11:21 AM

Joe Goldsmith wrote:

Hello to all. I plan to redo my teak deck caulk and, not being one to enjoy
the binding of knee pads, thought I would take the time to find the holy
grail of teak caulk.
Anyone have any ideas? Am I just following the wrong caulk line? Is there no
teak caulk holy grail?

Joe Goldsmith

Sheer Magic

1973 38' Chris Craft Coho Aft Cabin


You might try TEAK DECKING SYSTEMS out of  Sarasota Florida.

Lynn
Tampa

Joe Goldsmith wrote: > Hello to all. I plan to redo my teak deck caulk and, not being one to enjoy > the binding of knee pads, thought I would take the time to find the holy > grail of teak caulk. > Anyone have any ideas? Am I just following the wrong caulk line? Is there no > teak caulk holy grail? > > Joe Goldsmith > > Sheer Magic > > 1973 38' Chris Craft Coho Aft Cabin > _______________________________________________ You might try TEAK DECKING SYSTEMS out of Sarasota Florida. Lynn Tampa
KW
Ken Wolf
Thu, May 1, 2003 2:16 PM

Has anyone used the teak caulking product from Maritime Wood Products?
www.maritimewoodproducts.com

Ken Wolf
"Gail Winds"

Has anyone used the teak caulking product from Maritime Wood Products? www.maritimewoodproducts.com Ken Wolf "Gail Winds"
AW
Andy Woods
Fri, May 2, 2003 2:23 AM

not warranted for use in
in horizontal floor joints where abrasion and physical abuse
are likely to be encountered, to frost-laden or damp surfaces

Adhesive should not be applied to building materials that bleed oils,

Those two statements mean a great big NO!!!!!

I am in the process of finishing up recaulking the bow section and the
starboard side deck.  This is not a job you want to do twice!  You need to
choose a proven product that has been tested and used for this specific
purpose.  There are many choices and some research will be required for you
to decide which one might be best for you.

I used BoatLife two part polysulfide and Detco two part polysulfide.  Both
products seem to be very similar, but I will know a little more when I
complete the sanding part this weekend.  Both products are expensive and
there is a real knack to using them.  It actually can be quite a mess with
mixing the two parts together, pouring the product into caulking tubes, then
applying the product in the seams.  You can't waste any time as the product
starts curing in a relatively short time.  Detco has a brochure that I think
I requested from their website that explains the process thoroughly.
www.detcomarine.com

Last year I used 3M's one part polysulfide on some small sections on the aft
deck.  It is already packaged in a caulk tube and it was very easy to use.
No mixing, no pouring into cartridges, and there were less problems with air
bubbles that seem to occur in the two part products.  I have also used
BoatLife's one part product for patching some areas and it seems to stick to
anything and everything just like the 3M product.

My initial assessment is that the Detco product is the superior product,
with the BoatLife two part polysulfide a close second.  I would not hesitate
to use either, but I can't say anything about longevity.  Ask me in five or
ten years.  On the other hand, the one part products seem to be excellent
products, and to be honest, I was tempted to use the 3M one part caulk.  If
I wanted to avoid the mess and complexity of the installation I would use a
one part product, but with the understanding that it might not last as long
as the two part polysulfides.

I have no monetary connection with any of these products, except they got a
lot of my money!  Don't take the website link as an endorsement, it's just a
link.  I am sure BoatLife has a website, but I have never been there.

Good Luck,

Andy

Andy & Linda Woods
Grand Folly
1970 Grand Banks 36 Classic
Georgetown, MD
awoods@surfbest.net

> not warranted for use in > in horizontal floor joints where abrasion and physical abuse > are likely to be encountered, to frost-laden or damp surfaces > Adhesive should not be applied to building materials that bleed oils, Those two statements mean a great big NO!!!!! I am in the process of finishing up recaulking the bow section and the starboard side deck. This is not a job you want to do twice! You need to choose a proven product that has been tested and used for this specific purpose. There are many choices and some research will be required for you to decide which one might be best for you. I used BoatLife two part polysulfide and Detco two part polysulfide. Both products seem to be very similar, but I will know a little more when I complete the sanding part this weekend. Both products are expensive and there is a real knack to using them. It actually can be quite a mess with mixing the two parts together, pouring the product into caulking tubes, then applying the product in the seams. You can't waste any time as the product starts curing in a relatively short time. Detco has a brochure that I think I requested from their website that explains the process thoroughly. www.detcomarine.com Last year I used 3M's one part polysulfide on some small sections on the aft deck. It is already packaged in a caulk tube and it was very easy to use. No mixing, no pouring into cartridges, and there were less problems with air bubbles that seem to occur in the two part products. I have also used BoatLife's one part product for patching some areas and it seems to stick to anything and everything just like the 3M product. My initial assessment is that the Detco product is the superior product, with the BoatLife two part polysulfide a close second. I would not hesitate to use either, but I can't say anything about longevity. Ask me in five or ten years. On the other hand, the one part products seem to be excellent products, and to be honest, I was tempted to use the 3M one part caulk. If I wanted to avoid the mess and complexity of the installation I would use a one part product, but with the understanding that it might not last as long as the two part polysulfides. I have no monetary connection with any of these products, except they got a lot of my money! Don't take the website link as an endorsement, it's just a link. I am sure BoatLife has a website, but I have never been there. Good Luck, Andy Andy & Linda Woods Grand Folly 1970 Grand Banks 36 Classic Georgetown, MD awoods@surfbest.net