Hi all, PJSIP automatically escape "#" to "%23". But in my case, I have to have "#" un-escaped in the message. I've skimmed the documents of PJSIP but didn't found any clues how to change this behavior. Has anyone ever met the same problem?

It is ok if remote side handle URL correctlly. What's your problem? regards, Gang On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Peter Cai <newptcai@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > PJSIP automatically escape "#" to "%23". > > But in my case, I have to have "#" un-escaped in the message. > > I've skimmed the documents of PJSIP but didn't found any clues how to > change this behavior. > > Has anyone ever met the same problem? > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >

# must be escaped to %23 per the SIP syntax. If the remote party requires # to appear in the user portion of the URI then it's not conforming to the standard. Thanks Donald On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Peter Cai <newptcai@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > PJSIP automatically escape "#" to "%23". > > But in my case, I have to have "#" un-escaped in the message. > > I've skimmed the documents of PJSIP but didn't found any clues how to > change this behavior. > > Has anyone ever met the same problem? > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >

I guess remote party didn't convert %23 into #. regards, Gang On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Hoi-Ho Chan <hoiho.chan@gmail.com> wrote: > # must be escaped to %23 per the SIP syntax. If the remote party requires # > to appear in the user portion of the URI then it's not conforming to the > standard. > > Thanks > Donald > > On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Peter Cai <newptcai@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> PJSIP automatically escape "#" to "%23". >> >> But in my case, I have to have "#" un-escaped in the message. >> >> I've skimmed the documents of PJSIP but didn't found any clues how to >> change this behavior. >> >> Has anyone ever met the same problem? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> pjsip mailing list >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > >

:) Right, that's the problem. As "esacpe" in URI is optional in RFC3261, I have no strong reason to ask the other team to convert %23 to #. Actually I was laughed because I asserted that the escape is a "MUST" before I read the RFC carefully. On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Gang Liu <gangban.lau@gmail.com> wrote: > I guess remote party didn't convert %23 into #. > > regards, > Gang > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Hoi-Ho Chan <hoiho.chan@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> # must be escaped to %23 per the SIP syntax. If the remote party requires >> # to appear in the user portion of the URI then it's not conforming to the >> standard. >> >> Thanks >> Donald >> >> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Peter Cai <newptcai@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> PJSIP automatically escape "#" to "%23". >>> >>> But in my case, I have to have "#" un-escaped in the message. >>> >>> I've skimmed the documents of PJSIP but didn't found any clues how to >>> change this behavior. >>> >>> Has anyone ever met the same problem? >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >>> >>> pjsip mailing list >>> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> pjsip mailing list >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > -- 有一种人，不知道是因为DNA的变异还是前世的夙缘，总是无法安稳下来。他们的生命之流如同咆哮奔涌的大河，没有一刻能够停顿下来。在寂静无人的深夜里，无梦相扰的安睡中，心中也有猛兽会随时醒来，躁动不安，永无宁日。

I think "#" must be encoded if we need put it into URI. As I know, RFC 2396 says '#' is excluded US-ASCII character, '#' is disallowed within the URI syntax. regards, Gang 2008/11/10 Peter Cai <newptcai@gmail.com> > :) Right, that's the problem. > > As "esacpe" in URI is optional in RFC3261, I have no strong reason to > ask the other team to convert %23 to #. > > Actually I was laughed because I asserted that the escape is a "MUST" > before I read the RFC carefully. > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Gang Liu <gangban.lau@gmail.com> wrote: > > I guess remote party didn't convert %23 into #. > > > > regards, > > Gang > > > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Hoi-Ho Chan <hoiho.chan@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> # must be escaped to %23 per the SIP syntax. If the remote party > requires > >> # to appear in the user portion of the URI then it's not conforming to > the > >> standard. > >> > >> Thanks > >> Donald > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Peter Cai <newptcai@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> PJSIP automatically escape "#" to "%23". > >>> > >>> But in my case, I have to have "#" un-escaped in the message. > >>> > >>> I've skimmed the documents of PJSIP but didn't found any clues how to > >>> change this behavior. > >>> > >>> Has anyone ever met the same problem? > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > >>> > >>> pjsip mailing list > >>> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > >>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > >> > >> pjsip mailing list > >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > > > pjsip mailing list > > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > > > > > > > -- > > 有一种人，不知道是因为DNA的变异还是前世的夙缘，总是无法安稳下来。他们的生命之流如同咆哮奔涌的大河，没有一刻能够停顿下来。在寂静无人的深夜里，无梦相扰的安睡中，心中也有猛兽会随时醒来，躁动不安，永无宁日。 > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >

          default  Req.-URI  To  From  Contact   R-R/Route  external

It's not a MUST in RFC3216, it's only OPTIONAL. See PAGE 152. "o" means optional. default Req.-URI To From Contact R-R/Route external user -- o o o o o o 2008/11/11 Gang Liu <gangban.lau@gmail.com>: > I think "#" must be encoded if we need put it into URI. > > As I know, RFC 2396 says '#' is excluded US-ASCII character, '#' is > disallowed within the URI syntax. > > regards, > Gang > > 2008/11/10 Peter Cai <newptcai@gmail.com> >> >> :) Right, that's the problem. >> >> As "esacpe" in URI is optional in RFC3261, I have no strong reason to >> ask the other team to convert %23 to #. >> >> Actually I was laughed because I asserted that the escape is a "MUST" >> before I read the RFC carefully. >> >> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Gang Liu <gangban.lau@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I guess remote party didn't convert %23 into #. >> > >> > regards, >> > Gang >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Hoi-Ho Chan <hoiho.chan@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> # must be escaped to %23 per the SIP syntax. If the remote party >> >> requires >> >> # to appear in the user portion of the URI then it's not conforming to >> >> the >> >> standard. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Donald >> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Peter Cai <newptcai@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi all, >> >>> >> >>> PJSIP automatically escape "#" to "%23". >> >>> >> >>> But in my case, I have to have "#" un-escaped in the message. >> >>> >> >>> I've skimmed the documents of PJSIP but didn't found any clues how to >> >>> change this behavior. >> >>> >> >>> Has anyone ever met the same problem? >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >>> >> >>> pjsip mailing list >> >>> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> >>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> >> >> pjsip mailing list >> >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> >> >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> > >> > pjsip mailing list >> > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> 有一种人，不知道是因为DNA的变异还是前世的夙缘，总是无法安稳下来。他们的生命之流如同咆哮奔涌的大河，没有一刻能够停顿下来。在寂静无人的深夜里，无梦相扰的安睡中，心中也有猛兽会随时醒来，躁动不安，永无宁日。 >> _______________________________________________ >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> pjsip mailing list >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > -- 有一种人，不知道是因为DNA的变异还是前世的夙缘，总是无法安稳下来。他们的生命之流如同咆哮奔涌的大河，没有一刻能够停顿下来。在寂静无人的深夜里，无梦相扰的安睡中，心中也有猛兽会随时醒来，躁动不安，永无宁日。

          default  Req.-URI  To  From  Contact   R-R/Route  external

Yes, user part could be normal format if we put user into URI. But URI spec don't allow '#' within URI syntax. So I think if it is bad if we put '#' into user part without escaping because it isn't a corrent URI. regards, Gang 2008/11/12 Peter Cai <newptcai@gmail.com> > It's not a MUST in RFC3216, it's only OPTIONAL. > > See PAGE 152. "o" means optional. > > default Req.-URI To From Contact R-R/Route external > user -- o o o o o o > > > 2008/11/11 Gang Liu <gangban.lau@gmail.com>: > > I think "#" must be encoded if we need put it into URI. > > > > As I know, RFC 2396 says '#' is excluded US-ASCII character, '#' is > > disallowed within the URI syntax. > > > > regards, > > Gang > > > > 2008/11/10 Peter Cai <newptcai@gmail.com> > >> > >> :) Right, that's the problem. > >> > >> As "esacpe" in URI is optional in RFC3261, I have no strong reason to > >> ask the other team to convert %23 to #. > >> > >> Actually I was laughed because I asserted that the escape is a "MUST" > >> before I read the RFC carefully. > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Gang Liu <gangban.lau@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > I guess remote party didn't convert %23 into #. > >> > > >> > regards, > >> > Gang > >> > > >> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Hoi-Ho Chan <hoiho.chan@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> # must be escaped to %23 per the SIP syntax. If the remote party > >> >> requires > >> >> # to appear in the user portion of the URI then it's not conforming > to > >> >> the > >> >> standard. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks > >> >> Donald > >> >> > >> >> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Peter Cai <newptcai@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Hi all, > >> >>> > >> >>> PJSIP automatically escape "#" to "%23". > >> >>> > >> >>> But in my case, I have to have "#" un-escaped in the message. > >> >>> > >> >>> I've skimmed the documents of PJSIP but didn't found any clues how > to > >> >>> change this behavior. > >> >>> > >> >>> Has anyone ever met the same problem? > >> >>> > >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > >> >>> > >> >>> pjsip mailing list > >> >>> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > >> >>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > >> >> > >> >> pjsip mailing list > >> >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > >> >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > >> > > >> > pjsip mailing list > >> > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > >> > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> > 有一种人，不知道是因为DNA的变异还是前世的夙缘，总是无法安稳下来。他们的生命之流如同咆哮奔涌的大河，没有一刻能够停顿下来。在寂静无人的深夜里，无梦相扰的安睡中，心中也有猛兽会随时醒来，躁动不安，永无宁日。 > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > >> > >> pjsip mailing list > >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > > > pjsip mailing list > > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > > > > > > > -- > > 有一种人，不知道是因为DNA的变异还是前世的夙缘，总是无法安稳下来。他们的生命之流如同咆哮奔涌的大河，没有一刻能够停顿下来。在寂静无人的深夜里，无梦相扰的安睡中，心中也有猛兽会随时醒来，躁动不安，永无宁日。 > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >

          default  Req.-URI  To  From  Contact   R-R/Route  external

There are two questions: 1, whether we need escape user chars when building Req-URI. the answer is OPTIONAL; 2, whether '#' allowed within URI. I think answer is NO. So sip:11111#22222@example.com isn't a correct SIP URI regards, Gang 2008/11/12 Gang Liu <gangban.lau@gmail.com> > Yes, user part could be normal format if we put user into URI. > But URI spec don't allow '#' within URI syntax. > So I think if it is bad if we put '#' into user part without escaping > because it isn't a corrent URI. > > regards, > Gang > > 2008/11/12 Peter Cai <newptcai@gmail.com> > > It's not a MUST in RFC3216, it's only OPTIONAL. >> >> See PAGE 152. "o" means optional. >> >> default Req.-URI To From Contact R-R/Route external >> user -- o o o o o o >> >> >> 2008/11/11 Gang Liu <gangban.lau@gmail.com>: >> > I think "#" must be encoded if we need put it into URI. >> > >> > As I know, RFC 2396 says '#' is excluded US-ASCII character, '#' is >> > disallowed within the URI syntax. >> > >> > regards, >> > Gang >> > >> > 2008/11/10 Peter Cai <newptcai@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> :) Right, that's the problem. >> >> >> >> As "esacpe" in URI is optional in RFC3261, I have no strong reason to >> >> ask the other team to convert %23 to #. >> >> >> >> Actually I was laughed because I asserted that the escape is a "MUST" >> >> before I read the RFC carefully. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Gang Liu <gangban.lau@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > I guess remote party didn't convert %23 into #. >> >> > >> >> > regards, >> >> > Gang >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Hoi-Ho Chan <hoiho.chan@gmail.com> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> # must be escaped to %23 per the SIP syntax. If the remote party >> >> >> requires >> >> >> # to appear in the user portion of the URI then it's not conforming >> to >> >> >> the >> >> >> standard. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> Donald >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Peter Cai <newptcai@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Hi all, >> >> >>> >> >> >>> PJSIP automatically escape "#" to "%23". >> >> >>> >> >> >>> But in my case, I have to have "#" un-escaped in the message. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I've skimmed the documents of PJSIP but didn't found any clues how >> to >> >> >>> change this behavior. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Has anyone ever met the same problem? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> >>> >> >> >>> pjsip mailing list >> >> >>> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> >> >>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> >> >> >> >> pjsip mailing list >> >> >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> >> >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> > >> >> > pjsip mailing list >> >> > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> >> > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> >> 有一种人，不知道是因为DNA的变异还是前世的夙缘，总是无法安稳下来。他们的生命之流如同咆哮奔涌的大河，没有一刻能够停顿下来。在寂静无人的深夜里，无梦相扰的安睡中，心中也有猛兽会随时醒来，躁动不安，永无宁日。 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> >> >> pjsip mailing list >> >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> > >> > pjsip mailing list >> > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> 有一种人，不知道是因为DNA的变异还是前世的夙缘，总是无法安稳下来。他们的生命之流如同咆哮奔涌的大河，没有一刻能够停顿下来。在寂静无人的深夜里，无梦相扰的安睡中，心中也有猛兽会随时醒来，躁动不安，永无宁日。 >> _______________________________________________ >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> pjsip mailing list >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> > >

          default  Req.-URI  To  From  Contact   R-R/Route  external

I think we have misunderstanding here, this is Table 1 of RFC3261, and it describes whether certain URI components can be included in a SIP URI. "user" is clearly optional because in a SIP REGISTER it's not included in the request URI but the host portion is mandatory. If you look a little bit down section 19.1.2, here is the paragraph: For each component, the set of valid BNF expansions defines exactly which characters may appear unescaped. All other characters MUST be escaped. # is not in the list of characters which may appear unescaped in the user component. Hence it MUST be escaped. Thanks Donald 2008/11/12 Peter Cai <newptcai@gmail.com> > It's not a MUST in RFC3216, it's only OPTIONAL. > > See PAGE 152. "o" means optional. > > default Req.-URI To From Contact R-R/Route external > user -- o o o o o o > > > 2008/11/11 Gang Liu <gangban.lau@gmail.com>: > > I think "#" must be encoded if we need put it into URI. > > > > As I know, RFC 2396 says '#' is excluded US-ASCII character, '#' is > > disallowed within the URI syntax. > > > > regards, > > Gang > > > > 2008/11/10 Peter Cai <newptcai@gmail.com> > >> > >> :) Right, that's the problem. > >> > >> As "esacpe" in URI is optional in RFC3261, I have no strong reason to > >> ask the other team to convert %23 to #. > >> > >> Actually I was laughed because I asserted that the escape is a "MUST" > >> before I read the RFC carefully. > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 5:57 PM, Gang Liu <gangban.lau@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > I guess remote party didn't convert %23 into #. > >> > > >> > regards, > >> > Gang > >> > > >> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Hoi-Ho Chan <hoiho.chan@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> # must be escaped to %23 per the SIP syntax. If the remote party > >> >> requires > >> >> # to appear in the user portion of the URI then it's not conforming > to > >> >> the > >> >> standard. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks > >> >> Donald > >> >> > >> >> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Peter Cai <newptcai@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Hi all, > >> >>> > >> >>> PJSIP automatically escape "#" to "%23". > >> >>> > >> >>> But in my case, I have to have "#" un-escaped in the message. > >> >>> > >> >>> I've skimmed the documents of PJSIP but didn't found any clues how > to > >> >>> change this behavior. > >> >>> > >> >>> Has anyone ever met the same problem? > >> >>> > >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > >> >>> > >> >>> pjsip mailing list > >> >>> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > >> >>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > >> >> > >> >> pjsip mailing list > >> >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > >> >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > >> > > >> > pjsip mailing list > >> > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > >> > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> > 有一种人，不知道是因为DNA的变异还是前世的夙缘，总是无法安稳下来。他们的生命之流如同咆哮奔涌的大河，没有一刻能够停顿下来。在寂静无人的深夜里，无梦相扰的安睡中，心中也有猛兽会随时醒来，躁动不安，永无宁日。 > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > >> > >> pjsip mailing list > >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > > > pjsip mailing list > > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > > > > > > > -- > > 有一种人，不知道是因为DNA的变异还是前世的夙缘，总是无法安稳下来。他们的生命之流如同咆哮奔涌的大河，没有一刻能够停顿下来。在寂静无人的深夜里，无梦相扰的安睡中，心中也有猛兽会随时醒来，躁动不安，永无宁日。 > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >