time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

How did they distribute time in the old days?

HM
Hal Murray
Wed, Oct 14, 2015 5:12 AM

Somewhat time-nut related...  the project main application needed
millisecond consistent (not necessarily accurate) time stamps on a
world-wide network.  That was in the pre-gps, pre-fiber, pre-historic
before-times.  I don't think that they ever quite got there.

World wide seismology took off in the early 1970s as background for nuclear
underground non-testing treaties.  Both the US and the USSR had to be sure
they could detect the opponents tests and distinguish tests from earthquakes.
We had seismic stations scattered around the globe.

Does anybody know how they distributed time back then and/or how accurately
they could do it?

Google says the speed of sound in rock is 6-8 km/s so 10 ms error would be
100 meters.  That seems like a reasonable ballpark.

--
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.

holrum@hotmail.com said: > Somewhat time-nut related... the project main application needed > millisecond consistent (not necessarily accurate) time stamps on a > world-wide network. That was in the pre-gps, pre-fiber, pre-historic > before-times. I don't think that they ever quite got there. World wide seismology took off in the early 1970s as background for nuclear underground non-testing treaties. Both the US and the USSR had to be sure they could detect the opponents tests and distinguish tests from earthquakes. We had seismic stations scattered around the globe. Does anybody know how they distributed time back then and/or how accurately they could do it? Google says the speed of sound in rock is 6-8 km/s so 10 ms error would be 100 meters. That seems like a reasonable ballpark. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.
HD
Howard Davidson
Wed, Oct 14, 2015 6:18 AM

http://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/pdfs/IssuePDFs/1964-07.pdf

On 10/13/2015 10:12 PM, Hal Murray wrote:

Somewhat time-nut related...  the project main application needed
millisecond consistent (not necessarily accurate) time stamps on a
world-wide network.  That was in the pre-gps, pre-fiber, pre-historic
before-times.  I don't think that they ever quite got there.

World wide seismology took off in the early 1970s as background for nuclear
underground non-testing treaties.  Both the US and the USSR had to be sure
they could detect the opponents tests and distinguish tests from earthquakes.
We had seismic stations scattered around the globe.

Does anybody know how they distributed time back then and/or how accurately
they could do it?

Google says the speed of sound in rock is 6-8 km/s so 10 ms error would be
100 meters.  That seems like a reasonable ballpark.

--
Howard L. Davidson
hld42@att.net

http://www.hpl.hp.com/hpjournal/pdfs/IssuePDFs/1964-07.pdf On 10/13/2015 10:12 PM, Hal Murray wrote: > holrum@hotmail.com said: >> Somewhat time-nut related... the project main application needed >> millisecond consistent (not necessarily accurate) time stamps on a >> world-wide network. That was in the pre-gps, pre-fiber, pre-historic >> before-times. I don't think that they ever quite got there. > World wide seismology took off in the early 1970s as background for nuclear > underground non-testing treaties. Both the US and the USSR had to be sure > they could detect the opponents tests and distinguish tests from earthquakes. > We had seismic stations scattered around the globe. > > Does anybody know how they distributed time back then and/or how accurately > they could do it? > > Google says the speed of sound in rock is 6-8 km/s so 10 ms error would be > 100 meters. That seems like a reasonable ballpark. > > > -- Howard L. Davidson hld42@att.net
AM
Alan Melia
Wed, Oct 14, 2015 9:03 AM

Well I dont know if it was used for that but the16kHz VLF station at Rugby
call-sign GBR was rebuilt in 1967 and the output tank circuit stiffened to
provide better phase stability specifically foe international time standard
comparison. The transmitter was used for initial comparisons between NPL and
NBS (later NIST) time standards. It was also the starting point for the
Omega nav system. Prior to that accurate time data was passed over twisted
pairs in UK and probably Europe.

Alan
G3NYK
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hal Murray" hmurray@megapathdsl.net
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
time-nuts@febo.com
Cc: hmurray@megapathdsl.net
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 6:12 AM
Subject: [time-nuts] How did they distribute time in the old days?

Somewhat time-nut related...  the project main application needed
millisecond consistent (not necessarily accurate) time stamps on a
world-wide network.  That was in the pre-gps, pre-fiber, pre-historic
before-times.  I don't think that they ever quite got there.

World wide seismology took off in the early 1970s as background for
nuclear
underground non-testing treaties.  Both the US and the USSR had to be sure
they could detect the opponents tests and distinguish tests from
earthquakes.
We had seismic stations scattered around the globe.

Does anybody know how they distributed time back then and/or how
accurately
they could do it?

Google says the speed of sound in rock is 6-8 km/s so 10 ms error would be
100 meters.  That seems like a reasonable ballpark.

--
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Well I dont know if it was used for that but the16kHz VLF station at Rugby call-sign GBR was rebuilt in 1967 and the output tank circuit stiffened to provide better phase stability specifically foe international time standard comparison. The transmitter was used for initial comparisons between NPL and NBS (later NIST) time standards. It was also the starting point for the Omega nav system. Prior to that accurate time data was passed over twisted pairs in UK and probably Europe. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hal Murray" <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts@febo.com> Cc: <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 6:12 AM Subject: [time-nuts] How did they distribute time in the old days? > > holrum@hotmail.com said: >> Somewhat time-nut related... the project main application needed >> millisecond consistent (not necessarily accurate) time stamps on a >> world-wide network. That was in the pre-gps, pre-fiber, pre-historic >> before-times. I don't think that they ever quite got there. > > World wide seismology took off in the early 1970s as background for > nuclear > underground non-testing treaties. Both the US and the USSR had to be sure > they could detect the opponents tests and distinguish tests from > earthquakes. > We had seismic stations scattered around the globe. > > Does anybody know how they distributed time back then and/or how > accurately > they could do it? > > Google says the speed of sound in rock is 6-8 km/s so 10 ms error would be > 100 meters. That seems like a reasonable ballpark. > > > > -- > These are my opinions. I hate spam. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
W
Will
Wed, Oct 14, 2015 9:37 AM

Hi,

They used  (late 1970's) WWV or WWVH to sync up the time.  There was
fancy system that used a neon on a rotating disc rather like an early
depth sounder. Neon flashed with seconds beep. There was a way of
rotating the field that drove the disk to advance/delay the system to
set it fairly accurately.

Cheers,
Will

On 14/10/15 18:12, Hal Murray wrote:

Somewhat time-nut related...  the project main application needed
millisecond consistent (not necessarily accurate) time stamps on a
world-wide network.  That was in the pre-gps, pre-fiber, pre-historic
before-times.  I don't think that they ever quite got there.

World wide seismology took off in the early 1970s as background for nuclear
underground non-testing treaties.  Both the US and the USSR had to be sure
they could detect the opponents tests and distinguish tests from earthquakes.
We had seismic stations scattered around the globe.

Does anybody know how they distributed time back then and/or how accurately
they could do it?

Google says the speed of sound in rock is 6-8 km/s so 10 ms error would be
100 meters.  That seems like a reasonable ballpark.

Hi, They used (late 1970's) WWV or WWVH to sync up the time. There was fancy system that used a neon on a rotating disc rather like an early depth sounder. Neon flashed with seconds beep. There was a way of rotating the field that drove the disk to advance/delay the system to set it fairly accurately. Cheers, Will On 14/10/15 18:12, Hal Murray wrote: > holrum@hotmail.com said: >> Somewhat time-nut related... the project main application needed >> millisecond consistent (not necessarily accurate) time stamps on a >> world-wide network. That was in the pre-gps, pre-fiber, pre-historic >> before-times. I don't think that they ever quite got there. > World wide seismology took off in the early 1970s as background for nuclear > underground non-testing treaties. Both the US and the USSR had to be sure > they could detect the opponents tests and distinguish tests from earthquakes. > We had seismic stations scattered around the globe. > > Does anybody know how they distributed time back then and/or how accurately > they could do it? > > Google says the speed of sound in rock is 6-8 km/s so 10 ms error would be > 100 meters. That seems like a reasonable ballpark. > > >
B
billriches
Wed, Oct 14, 2015 11:42 AM

Not milisecond time distribution but time related!

In the early half of the 1900s Western Union was in the time business.  They
would rent businesses such as banks, office buildings, etc  clocks for a few
dollars a month.  These were pendulum wall clocks that had 2 #6 dry cell
batteries inside that would wind them every hour or so. The clocks were
connected to the WU telegraph line and for a minute before and after  the
top of the hour all traffic on the circuit would stop.  Exactly at the top
of the hour they would push a pulse of 50 ? volts or so over the line and it
would reset the clock to the top of the hour.

Eventually WU decided to get out of the time business and stopped the
service and they said all the customers could keep their clocks.  It was
said that at the end of that day many clocks were seen going home with some
of the workers!

I purchased one of these clocks about 15 years ago from a North New Jersey
junk dealer who had obtained several hundred of them.  My clock has a 1929
scratch mark inside and
is still ticking away. These clocks were made by the Self Winding Clock
Company and more information can be seen in the book "American Clocks Volume
2 " by Tran Duy Ly (page 177).  It loses or gains about a minute a month
depending on the moon phase or sunspots.  You can see a pic of the clock on
qrz.com under my call sign.

73,

Bill, WA2DVU
Cape May


This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Not milisecond time distribution but time related! In the early half of the 1900s Western Union was in the time business. They would rent businesses such as banks, office buildings, etc clocks for a few dollars a month. These were pendulum wall clocks that had 2 #6 dry cell batteries inside that would wind them every hour or so. The clocks were connected to the WU telegraph line and for a minute before and after the top of the hour all traffic on the circuit would stop. Exactly at the top of the hour they would push a pulse of 50 ? volts or so over the line and it would reset the clock to the top of the hour. Eventually WU decided to get out of the time business and stopped the service and they said all the customers could keep their clocks. It was said that at the end of that day many clocks were seen going home with some of the workers! I purchased one of these clocks about 15 years ago from a North New Jersey junk dealer who had obtained several hundred of them. My clock has a 1929 scratch mark inside and is still ticking away. These clocks were made by the Self Winding Clock Company and more information can be seen in the book "American Clocks Volume 2 " by Tran Duy Ly (page 177). It loses or gains about a minute a month depending on the moon phase or sunspots. You can see a pic of the clock on qrz.com under my call sign. 73, Bill, WA2DVU Cape May --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
TS
Tim Shoppa
Wed, Oct 14, 2015 12:42 PM

As recently as 1987, there was poor to no absolute time synchronization at
the world's underground neutrino detectors. When light and neutrino fronts
from supernova SN1987A arrived, the best they were able to put absolute
timestamps on neutrino events was about 1 minute.

Even after the neutrino arrivals they may have been able to back-correct
timestamps on the Kamiokande data to within milliseconds, but a power
failure a few days after SN1987A detection prevented this.

The timescales that the Kamiokande and IMB neutrino detectors were
originally designed to measure? Circa 10 to the 31st years!

Today the realtime neutrino detectors are tied together into a network to
look for neutrino bursts in realtime, and even determine direction to point
optical telescopes. The neutrino burst for a SN1987A type event precedes
the optical detectability by a few hours.

Tim N3QE

On Wednesday, October 14, 2015, Hal Murray hmurray@megapathdsl.net wrote:

Somewhat time-nut related...  the project main application needed
millisecond consistent (not necessarily accurate) time stamps on a
world-wide network.  That was in the pre-gps, pre-fiber, pre-historic
before-times.  I don't think that they ever quite got there.

World wide seismology took off in the early 1970s as background for nuclear
underground non-testing treaties.  Both the US and the USSR had to be sure
they could detect the opponents tests and distinguish tests from
earthquakes.
We had seismic stations scattered around the globe.

Does anybody know how they distributed time back then and/or how accurately
they could do it?

Google says the speed of sound in rock is 6-8 km/s so 10 ms error would be
100 meters.  That seems like a reasonable ballpark.

--
These are my opinions.  I hate spam.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

As recently as 1987, there was poor to no absolute time synchronization at the world's underground neutrino detectors. When light and neutrino fronts from supernova SN1987A arrived, the best they were able to put absolute timestamps on neutrino events was about 1 minute. Even after the neutrino arrivals they may have been able to back-correct timestamps on the Kamiokande data to within milliseconds, but a power failure a few days after SN1987A detection prevented this. The timescales that the Kamiokande and IMB neutrino detectors were originally designed to measure? Circa 10 to the 31st years! Today the realtime neutrino detectors are tied together into a network to look for neutrino bursts in realtime, and even determine direction to point optical telescopes. The neutrino burst for a SN1987A type event precedes the optical detectability by a few hours. Tim N3QE On Wednesday, October 14, 2015, Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net> wrote: > > holrum@hotmail.com said: > > Somewhat time-nut related... the project main application needed > > millisecond consistent (not necessarily accurate) time stamps on a > > world-wide network. That was in the pre-gps, pre-fiber, pre-historic > > before-times. I don't think that they ever quite got there. > > World wide seismology took off in the early 1970s as background for nuclear > underground non-testing treaties. Both the US and the USSR had to be sure > they could detect the opponents tests and distinguish tests from > earthquakes. > We had seismic stations scattered around the globe. > > Does anybody know how they distributed time back then and/or how accurately > they could do it? > > Google says the speed of sound in rock is 6-8 km/s so 10 ms error would be > 100 meters. That seems like a reasonable ballpark. > > > > -- > These are my opinions. I hate spam. > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
NS
Nick Sayer
Wed, Oct 14, 2015 4:42 PM

On Oct 14, 2015, at 4:42 AM, billriches bill.riches@verizon.net wrote:

Not milisecond time distribution but time related!

In the early half of the 1900s Western Union was in the time business.  They
would rent businesses such as banks, office buildings, etc  clocks for a few
dollars a month.  These were pendulum wall clocks that had 2 #6 dry cell
batteries inside that would wind them every hour or so. The clocks were
connected to the WU telegraph line and for a minute before and after  the
top of the hour all traffic on the circuit would stop.  Exactly at the top
of the hour they would push a pulse of 50 ? volts or so over the line and it
would reset the clock to the top of the hour.

The WU standard time service goes back further than the turn of the 20th century. It started in 1870.

I’ve always wanted to get my hands on one of those clocks and come up with a circuit to recreate the synchronization signal for it, probably with a Raspberry Pi running ntpd and a big ol’ MOSFET. The problem is that at this point, those clocks are quite expensive once they’re reconditioned.

My understanding (perhaps incorrect) was that the sync pulse was once daily and, as you said, would cause the hands to “snap” to 12. The trailing edge of the pulse was synchronized and would release the clock to operate normally.

That they had something as accurate and widespread as it was so early is astonishing.

> On Oct 14, 2015, at 4:42 AM, billriches <bill.riches@verizon.net> wrote: > > Not milisecond time distribution but time related! > > In the early half of the 1900s Western Union was in the time business. They > would rent businesses such as banks, office buildings, etc clocks for a few > dollars a month. These were pendulum wall clocks that had 2 #6 dry cell > batteries inside that would wind them every hour or so. The clocks were > connected to the WU telegraph line and for a minute before and after the > top of the hour all traffic on the circuit would stop. Exactly at the top > of the hour they would push a pulse of 50 ? volts or so over the line and it > would reset the clock to the top of the hour. The WU standard time service goes back further than the turn of the 20th century. It started in 1870. I’ve always wanted to get my hands on one of those clocks and come up with a circuit to recreate the synchronization signal for it, probably with a Raspberry Pi running ntpd and a big ol’ MOSFET. The problem is that at this point, those clocks are quite expensive once they’re reconditioned. My understanding (perhaps incorrect) was that the sync pulse was once daily and, as you said, would cause the hands to “snap” to 12. The trailing edge of the pulse was synchronized and would release the clock to operate normally. That they had something as accurate and widespread as it was so early is astonishing.
BC
Brooke Clarke
Wed, Oct 14, 2015 6:02 PM

Hi Nick:

One of my Self Winding Clock Co. (WU) clocks was taken down yesterday for painting.
When put up one of the Ken's Clock Synchronizers was installed and the hands moved to align with the heart shaped cam it
uses, but it never worked.
The problem was it used a 4.5 Volt signal which can develop the current needed to pull the sync electromagnet the time
constant is far too slow.
I'm going to add a high voltage circuit with series resistor to get the time constant down one or two orders of
magnitude.  The key to this is a PCB I make that holds 5 each 9V batteries connected in series, so I'll use one, two or
more of them to get the time constant down.
http://www.prc68.com/P/45VS.html

Before I had the 45 Volt Stick I was considering getting the needed high voltage by charging a cap a minute or two
before the top of the hour and discharging it through a resistor.  Here's a video showing that would work.
http://www.prc68.com/I/SWCC.shtml#Experiments_Feb_2014_

Mail_Attachment --
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html
Nick Sayer via time-nuts wrote:

On Oct 14, 2015, at 4:42 AM, billriches bill.riches@verizon.net wrote:

Not milisecond time distribution but time related!

In the early half of the 1900s Western Union was in the time business.  They
would rent businesses such as banks, office buildings, etc  clocks for a few
dollars a month.  These were pendulum wall clocks that had 2 #6 dry cell
batteries inside that would wind them every hour or so. The clocks were
connected to the WU telegraph line and for a minute before and after  the
top of the hour all traffic on the circuit would stop.  Exactly at the top
of the hour they would push a pulse of 50 ? volts or so over the line and it
would reset the clock to the top of the hour.

The WU standard time service goes back further than the turn of the 20th century. It started in 1870.

I’ve always wanted to get my hands on one of those clocks and come up with a circuit to recreate the synchronization signal for it, probably with a Raspberry Pi running ntpd and a big ol’ MOSFET. The problem is that at this point, those clocks are quite expensive once they’re reconditioned.

My understanding (perhaps incorrect) was that the sync pulse was once daily and, as you said, would cause the hands to “snap” to 12. The trailing edge of the pulse was synchronized and would release the clock to operate normally.

That they had something as accurate and widespread as it was so early is astonishing.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Nick: One of my Self Winding Clock Co. (WU) clocks was taken down yesterday for painting. When put up one of the Ken's Clock Synchronizers was installed and the hands moved to align with the heart shaped cam it uses, but it never worked. The problem was it used a 4.5 Volt signal which can develop the current needed to pull the sync electromagnet the time constant is far too slow. I'm going to add a high voltage circuit with series resistor to get the time constant down one or two orders of magnitude. The key to this is a PCB I make that holds 5 each 9V batteries connected in series, so I'll use one, two or more of them to get the time constant down. http://www.prc68.com/P/45VS.html Before I had the 45 Volt Stick I was considering getting the needed high voltage by charging a cap a minute or two before the top of the hour and discharging it through a resistor. Here's a video showing that would work. http://www.prc68.com/I/SWCC.shtml#Experiments_Feb_2014_ Mail_Attachment -- Have Fun, Brooke Clarke http://www.PRC68.com http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html Nick Sayer via time-nuts wrote: >> On Oct 14, 2015, at 4:42 AM, billriches <bill.riches@verizon.net> wrote: >> >> Not milisecond time distribution but time related! >> >> In the early half of the 1900s Western Union was in the time business. They >> would rent businesses such as banks, office buildings, etc clocks for a few >> dollars a month. These were pendulum wall clocks that had 2 #6 dry cell >> batteries inside that would wind them every hour or so. The clocks were >> connected to the WU telegraph line and for a minute before and after the >> top of the hour all traffic on the circuit would stop. Exactly at the top >> of the hour they would push a pulse of 50 ? volts or so over the line and it >> would reset the clock to the top of the hour. > The WU standard time service goes back further than the turn of the 20th century. It started in 1870. > > I’ve always wanted to get my hands on one of those clocks and come up with a circuit to recreate the synchronization signal for it, probably with a Raspberry Pi running ntpd and a big ol’ MOSFET. The problem is that at this point, those clocks are quite expensive once they’re reconditioned. > > My understanding (perhaps incorrect) was that the sync pulse was once daily and, as you said, would cause the hands to “snap” to 12. The trailing edge of the pulse was synchronized and would release the clock to operate normally. > > That they had something as accurate and widespread as it was so early is astonishing. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
BH
Bill Hawkins
Wed, Oct 14, 2015 6:05 PM

The book "Einstein's Clocks, Poincare's Maps" describes a pneumatic time
sync method for the public clocks on poles in the city of Paris, France
in the late 1800s. Pneumatic clocks were made and used in the US for a
while. Got one from the four letter auction site and dreamed of making a
pneumatic pulse generator synched to 10 MHz. Sadly, the diaphragm in the
pneumatic mechanism had rotted away, so I gave the clock to a friend who
could make it work, but didn't. One pulse advanced the clock one minute.
There was no auxiliary clockwork to keep it running between hourly sync
pulses.

I don't know of any mechanical clocks that sync once a day. IIRC,
Western Union had to send people to advance or retard the hour hand when
daylight savings time became common.

There is something about those clocks that makes a time nut want to
restore one.

Bill Hawkins

-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Sayer via time-nuts
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 11:42 AM

The WU standard time service goes back further than the turn of the 20th
century. It started in 1870.

I've always wanted to get my hands on one of those clocks and come up
with a circuit to recreate the synchronization signal for it, probably
with a Raspberry Pi running ntpd and a big ol' MOSFET. The problem is
that at this point, those clocks are quite expensive once they're
reconditioned.

My understanding (perhaps incorrect) was that the sync pulse was once
daily and, as you said, would cause the hands to "snap" to 12. The
trailing edge of the pulse was synchronized and would release the clock
to operate normally.

That they had something as accurate and widespread as it was so early is
astonishing.

The book "Einstein's Clocks, Poincare's Maps" describes a pneumatic time sync method for the public clocks on poles in the city of Paris, France in the late 1800s. Pneumatic clocks were made and used in the US for a while. Got one from the four letter auction site and dreamed of making a pneumatic pulse generator synched to 10 MHz. Sadly, the diaphragm in the pneumatic mechanism had rotted away, so I gave the clock to a friend who could make it work, but didn't. One pulse advanced the clock one minute. There was no auxiliary clockwork to keep it running between hourly sync pulses. I don't know of any mechanical clocks that sync once a day. IIRC, Western Union had to send people to advance or retard the hour hand when daylight savings time became common. There is something about those clocks that makes a time nut want to restore one. Bill Hawkins -----Original Message----- From: Nick Sayer via time-nuts Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2015 11:42 AM The WU standard time service goes back further than the turn of the 20th century. It started in 1870. I've always wanted to get my hands on one of those clocks and come up with a circuit to recreate the synchronization signal for it, probably with a Raspberry Pi running ntpd and a big ol' MOSFET. The problem is that at this point, those clocks are quite expensive once they're reconditioned. My understanding (perhaps incorrect) was that the sync pulse was once daily and, as you said, would cause the hands to "snap" to 12. The trailing edge of the pulse was synchronized and would release the clock to operate normally. That they had something as accurate and widespread as it was so early is astonishing.
BB
Bob Bownes
Wed, Oct 14, 2015 6:29 PM

Precise time (and time zones) and the relationship with the telegraph were
a side effect of the railroads. You need to keep time (and keep on time) in
order to avoid collisions on single tracked main lines.

On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Nick Sayer via time-nuts <
time-nuts@febo.com> wrote:

On Oct 14, 2015, at 4:42 AM, billriches bill.riches@verizon.net wrote:

Not milisecond time distribution but time related!

In the early half of the 1900s Western Union was in the time business.

They

would rent businesses such as banks, office buildings, etc  clocks for a

few

dollars a month.  These were pendulum wall clocks that had 2 #6 dry cell
batteries inside that would wind them every hour or so. The clocks were
connected to the WU telegraph line and for a minute before and after  the
top of the hour all traffic on the circuit would stop.  Exactly at the

top

of the hour they would push a pulse of 50 ? volts or so over the line

and it

would reset the clock to the top of the hour.

The WU standard time service goes back further than the turn of the 20th
century. It started in 1870.

I’ve always wanted to get my hands on one of those clocks and come up with
a circuit to recreate the synchronization signal for it, probably with a
Raspberry Pi running ntpd and a big ol’ MOSFET. The problem is that at this
point, those clocks are quite expensive once they’re reconditioned.

My understanding (perhaps incorrect) was that the sync pulse was once
daily and, as you said, would cause the hands to “snap” to 12. The trailing
edge of the pulse was synchronized and would release the clock to operate
normally.

That they had something as accurate and widespread as it was so early is
astonishing.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Precise time (and time zones) and the relationship with the telegraph were a side effect of the railroads. You need to keep time (and keep on time) in order to avoid collisions on single tracked main lines. On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Nick Sayer via time-nuts < time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: > > > On Oct 14, 2015, at 4:42 AM, billriches <bill.riches@verizon.net> wrote: > > > > Not milisecond time distribution but time related! > > > > In the early half of the 1900s Western Union was in the time business. > They > > would rent businesses such as banks, office buildings, etc clocks for a > few > > dollars a month. These were pendulum wall clocks that had 2 #6 dry cell > > batteries inside that would wind them every hour or so. The clocks were > > connected to the WU telegraph line and for a minute before and after the > > top of the hour all traffic on the circuit would stop. Exactly at the > top > > of the hour they would push a pulse of 50 ? volts or so over the line > and it > > would reset the clock to the top of the hour. > > The WU standard time service goes back further than the turn of the 20th > century. It started in 1870. > > I’ve always wanted to get my hands on one of those clocks and come up with > a circuit to recreate the synchronization signal for it, probably with a > Raspberry Pi running ntpd and a big ol’ MOSFET. The problem is that at this > point, those clocks are quite expensive once they’re reconditioned. > > My understanding (perhaps incorrect) was that the sync pulse was once > daily and, as you said, would cause the hands to “snap” to 12. The trailing > edge of the pulse was synchronized and would release the clock to operate > normally. > > That they had something as accurate and widespread as it was so early is > astonishing. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >