time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

New NIST Time Code to Boost Reception for Radio-Controlled Clocks

BC
Brooke Clarke
Sat, May 31, 2014 8:31 PM

Hi:

What are the left two digits telling us?
http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/wwvb-030513.cfm

I've emailed John Lowe & James Burrus the above question and for more information about the different transmission modes
as well as more information about the hardware shown on the above web page.

--
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html

Hi: What are the left two digits telling us? http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/wwvb-030513.cfm I've emailed John Lowe & James Burrus the above question and for more information about the different transmission modes as well as more information about the hardware shown on the above web page. -- Have Fun, Brooke Clarke http://www.PRC68.com http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html
PS
paul swed
Sat, May 31, 2014 9:23 PM

I had reached out several times to the new wwvb chip maker for this
timecode.
And though first run chips were available they are not to us unless we want
1000 of them. Also pricing is unclear.
That said yes the intent is to receive time. The new chip doesn't easily
allow a way to d-psk the signal. Though it can be helpful.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Brooke Clarke brooke@pacific.net wrote:

Hi:

What are the left two digits telling us?
http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/wwvb-030513.cfm

I've emailed John Lowe & James Burrus the above question and for more
information about the different transmission modes as well as more
information about the hardware shown on the above web page.

--
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

I had reached out several times to the new wwvb chip maker for this timecode. And though first run chips were available they are not to us unless we want 1000 of them. Also pricing is unclear. That said yes the intent is to receive time. The new chip doesn't easily allow a way to d-psk the signal. Though it can be helpful. Regards Paul WB8TSL On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Brooke Clarke <brooke@pacific.net> wrote: > Hi: > > What are the left two digits telling us? > http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/wwvb-030513.cfm > > I've emailed John Lowe & James Burrus the above question and for more > information about the different transmission modes as well as more > information about the hardware shown on the above web page. > > -- > Have Fun, > > Brooke Clarke > http://www.PRC68.com > http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html > http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
BC
Bob Camp
Sun, Jun 1, 2014 12:48 AM

Hi

A thousand chips at $1 a chip is a very different thing than a thousand chips at $100 a chip. The next issue might be that they only have them in die form. The issue after that probably is that you really want the version 3 (or 9) chips that actually work with all the modulation schemes. I’ve been down the road with a number of similar chips that took many rev’s before they really did what they were intended to do. Many millions of dollars a pass times 3 or 6 passes is an whole different world …..

Bob

On May 31, 2014, at 5:23 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:

I had reached out several times to the new wwvb chip maker for this
timecode.
And though first run chips were available they are not to us unless we want
1000 of them. Also pricing is unclear.
That said yes the intent is to receive time. The new chip doesn't easily
allow a way to d-psk the signal. Though it can be helpful.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Brooke Clarke brooke@pacific.net wrote:

Hi:

What are the left two digits telling us?
http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/wwvb-030513.cfm

I've emailed John Lowe & James Burrus the above question and for more
information about the different transmission modes as well as more
information about the hardware shown on the above web page.

--
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi A thousand chips at $1 a chip is a very different thing than a thousand chips at $100 a chip. The next issue might be that they only have them in die form. The issue after that probably is that you really want the version 3 (or 9) chips that actually work with all the modulation schemes. I’ve been down the road with a number of similar chips that took *many* rev’s before they really did what they were intended to do. Many millions of dollars a pass times 3 or 6 passes is an whole different world ….. Bob On May 31, 2014, at 5:23 PM, paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> wrote: > I had reached out several times to the new wwvb chip maker for this > timecode. > And though first run chips were available they are not to us unless we want > 1000 of them. Also pricing is unclear. > That said yes the intent is to receive time. The new chip doesn't easily > allow a way to d-psk the signal. Though it can be helpful. > Regards > Paul > WB8TSL > > > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Brooke Clarke <brooke@pacific.net> wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> What are the left two digits telling us? >> http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/wwvb-030513.cfm >> >> I've emailed John Lowe & James Burrus the above question and for more >> information about the different transmission modes as well as more >> information about the hardware shown on the above web page. >> >> -- >> Have Fun, >> >> Brooke Clarke >> http://www.PRC68.com >> http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html >> http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ >> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
JL
Jim Lux
Sun, Jun 1, 2014 1:08 AM

On 5/31/14, 5:48 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

A thousand chips at $1 a chip is a very different thing than a thousand chips at $100 a chip. The next issue might be that they only have them in die form. The issue after that probably is that you really want the version 3 (or 9) chips that actually work with all the modulation schemes. I’ve been down the road with a number of similar chips that took many rev’s before they really did what they were intended to do. Many millions of dollars a pass times 3 or 6 passes is an whole different world …..

These days, though, the "per spin" cost is substantially lower, and the
number of spins has been reduced, assuming you're forking out the many
$M /year for the design tools.  I've been given to understand that an RF
ASIC spin in CMOS (which works up to low microwave frequencies) is
around $100k and would get you a wafer of dice.

On 5/31/14, 5:48 PM, Bob Camp wrote: > Hi > > A thousand chips at $1 a chip is a very different thing than a thousand chips at $100 a chip. The next issue might be that they only have them in die form. The issue after that probably is that you really want the version 3 (or 9) chips that actually work with all the modulation schemes. I’ve been down the road with a number of similar chips that took *many* rev’s before they really did what they were intended to do. Many millions of dollars a pass times 3 or 6 passes is an whole different world ….. > > These days, though, the "per spin" cost is substantially lower, and the number of spins has been reduced, assuming you're forking out the many $M /year for the design tools. I've been given to understand that an RF ASIC spin in CMOS (which works up to low microwave frequencies) is around $100k and would get you a wafer of dice.
BC
Bob Camp
Sun, Jun 1, 2014 1:31 AM

Hi

The price of the spin isn’t just the cost of the masks. There’s a non-trivial cost involved in the redesign of the chip and the testing that finds the problem.

You can indeed do a project run for $5,000 and get usable chips. The same process moved to a single wafer also can give you a few thousand (maybe) of some very expensive dice. If you want a proper mask set and high volume / low cost tooling - it’s not cheap.

Bob

On May 31, 2014, at 9:08 PM, Jim Lux jimlux@earthlink.net wrote:

On 5/31/14, 5:48 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

Hi

A thousand chips at $1 a chip is a very different thing than a thousand chips at $100 a chip. The next issue might be that they only have them in die form. The issue after that probably is that you really want the version 3 (or 9) chips that actually work with all the modulation schemes. I’ve been down the road with a number of similar chips that took many rev’s before they really did what they were intended to do. Many millions of dollars a pass times 3 or 6 passes is an whole different world …..

These days, though, the "per spin" cost is substantially lower, and the number of spins has been reduced, assuming you're forking out the many $M /year for the design tools.  I've been given to understand that an RF ASIC spin in CMOS (which works up to low microwave frequencies) is around $100k and would get you a wafer of dice.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi The price of the spin isn’t just the cost of the masks. There’s a non-trivial cost involved in the redesign of the chip and the testing that finds the problem. You can indeed do a project run for $5,000 and get usable chips. The same process moved to a single wafer also can give you a few thousand (maybe) of some very expensive dice. If you want a proper mask set and high volume / low cost tooling - it’s not cheap. Bob On May 31, 2014, at 9:08 PM, Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote: > On 5/31/14, 5:48 PM, Bob Camp wrote: >> Hi >> >> A thousand chips at $1 a chip is a very different thing than a thousand chips at $100 a chip. The next issue might be that they only have them in die form. The issue after that probably is that you really want the version 3 (or 9) chips that actually work with all the modulation schemes. I’ve been down the road with a number of similar chips that took *many* rev’s before they really did what they were intended to do. Many millions of dollars a pass times 3 or 6 passes is an whole different world ….. >> >> > > These days, though, the "per spin" cost is substantially lower, and the number of spins has been reduced, assuming you're forking out the many $M /year for the design tools. I've been given to understand that an RF ASIC spin in CMOS (which works up to low microwave frequencies) is around $100k and would get you a wafer of dice. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
AP
Alexander Pummer
Sun, Jun 1, 2014 3:34 AM

here is a description how a receiver works for a time signal with very
similar modulation
http://caxapa.ru/thumbs/417284/Engeler_DCF77.pdf
73
KJ6UHN

On 5/31/2014 2:23 PM, paul swed wrote:

I had reached out several times to the new wwvb chip maker for this
timecode.
And though first run chips were available they are not to us unless we want
1000 of them. Also pricing is unclear.
That said yes the intent is to receive time. The new chip doesn't easily
allow a way to d-psk the signal. Though it can be helpful.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Brooke Clarke brooke@pacific.net wrote:

Hi:

What are the left two digits telling us?
http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/wwvb-030513.cfm

I've emailed John Lowe & James Burrus the above question and for more
information about the different transmission modes as well as more
information about the hardware shown on the above web page.

--
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

here is a description how a receiver works for a time signal with very similar modulation http://caxapa.ru/thumbs/417284/Engeler_DCF77.pdf 73 KJ6UHN On 5/31/2014 2:23 PM, paul swed wrote: > I had reached out several times to the new wwvb chip maker for this > timecode. > And though first run chips were available they are not to us unless we want > 1000 of them. Also pricing is unclear. > That said yes the intent is to receive time. The new chip doesn't easily > allow a way to d-psk the signal. Though it can be helpful. > Regards > Paul > WB8TSL > > > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Brooke Clarke <brooke@pacific.net> wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> What are the left two digits telling us? >> http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/wwvb-030513.cfm >> >> I've emailed John Lowe & James Burrus the above question and for more >> information about the different transmission modes as well as more >> information about the hardware shown on the above web page. >> >> -- >> Have Fun, >> >> Brooke Clarke >> http://www.PRC68.com >> http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html >> http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ >> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
PS
paul swed
Sun, Jun 1, 2014 2:35 PM

Good morning to the group
I do have the extendwave chip sheets. But they are 668K generally in size
so can not send through Time-nuts. I have sent them to Scott already.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Alexander Pummer alexpcs@ieee.org wrote:

here is a description how a receiver works for a time signal with very
similar modulation
http://caxapa.ru/thumbs/417284/Engeler_DCF77.pdf
73
KJ6UHN

On 5/31/2014 2:23 PM, paul swed wrote:

I had reached out several times to the new wwvb chip maker for this
timecode.
And though first run chips were available they are not to us unless we
want
1000 of them. Also pricing is unclear.
That said yes the intent is to receive time. The new chip doesn't easily
allow a way to d-psk the signal. Though it can be helpful.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Brooke Clarke brooke@pacific.net
wrote:

Hi:

What are the left two digits telling us?
http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/wwvb-030513.cfm

I've emailed John Lowe & James Burrus the above question and for more
information about the different transmission modes as well as more
information about the hardware shown on the above web page.

--
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/
mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Good morning to the group I do have the extendwave chip sheets. But they are 668K generally in size so can not send through Time-nuts. I have sent them to Scott already. Regards Paul WB8TSL On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Alexander Pummer <alexpcs@ieee.org> wrote: > here is a description how a receiver works for a time signal with very > similar modulation > http://caxapa.ru/thumbs/417284/Engeler_DCF77.pdf > 73 > KJ6UHN > > > On 5/31/2014 2:23 PM, paul swed wrote: > >> I had reached out several times to the new wwvb chip maker for this >> timecode. >> And though first run chips were available they are not to us unless we >> want >> 1000 of them. Also pricing is unclear. >> That said yes the intent is to receive time. The new chip doesn't easily >> allow a way to d-psk the signal. Though it can be helpful. >> Regards >> Paul >> WB8TSL >> >> >> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Brooke Clarke <brooke@pacific.net> >> wrote: >> >> Hi: >>> >>> What are the left two digits telling us? >>> http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/wwvb-030513.cfm >>> >>> I've emailed John Lowe & James Burrus the above question and for more >>> information about the different transmission modes as well as more >>> information about the hardware shown on the above web page. >>> >>> -- >>> Have Fun, >>> >>> Brooke Clarke >>> http://www.PRC68.com >>> http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html >>> http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ >>> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ >> mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >