time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Information on the Danjon Astrolab

BC
Brooke Clarke
Tue, Aug 8, 2006 1:31 AM

Hi:

After seeing a reference to "Splitting the Second" by Tony Jones on
Tom's web page I read it and found that the Photographic Zenith
Telescope was replaced by the "Danjon Astrolabe".  But Google provides
almost no information about it.  A patent search has turned up a number
of optical systems, mostly for spacecraft, that use star separation for
navigation, and if used at a know location on the earth could be used
for timing.  For these see my  Stellar Time Keeping web page:
http://www.pacificsites.com/~brooke/StellarTime.shtml

Does anyone know how a "Danjon Astrolabe" works?

Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke

w/Java http://www.PRC68.com
w/o Java http://www.pacificsites.com/~brooke/PRC68COM.shtml
http://www.precisionclock.com

Hi: After seeing a reference to "Splitting the Second" by Tony Jones on Tom's web page I read it and found that the Photographic Zenith Telescope was replaced by the "Danjon Astrolabe". But Google provides almost no information about it. A patent search has turned up a number of optical systems, mostly for spacecraft, that use star separation for navigation, and if used at a know location on the earth could be used for timing. For these see my Stellar Time Keeping web page: http://www.pacificsites.com/~brooke/StellarTime.shtml Does anyone know how a "Danjon Astrolabe" works? Have Fun, Brooke Clarke -- w/Java http://www.PRC68.com w/o Java http://www.pacificsites.com/~brooke/PRC68COM.shtml http://www.precisionclock.com
GP
Geoff Powell
Tue, Aug 8, 2006 7:18 AM

In article 44D7E964.4000604@pacific.net, Brooke Clarke
brooke@pacific.net writes

Hi:

After seeing a reference to "Splitting the Second" by Tony Jones on
Tom's web page I read it and found that the Photographic Zenith
Telescope was replaced by the "Danjon Astrolabe".  But Google provides
almost no information about it.  A patent search has turned up a number
of optical systems, mostly for spacecraft, that use star separation for
navigation, and if used at a know location on the earth could be used
for timing.  For these see my  Stellar Time Keeping web page:
http://www.pacificsites.com/~brooke/StellarTime.shtml

Does anyone know how a "Danjon Astrolabe" works?

IIRC, the Danjon astrolabe uses a mercury pool, and a semi-reflecting
prism.

The optical telescope is aligned horizontally, and the prism provides 2
light paths, one aimed upward at some angle (normally 45 or 60 degrees)
and the other downwards. The mercury pool reflects the downward beam
upwards.

As a result, when you look through the telescope, you see double images.
As the skies go through their apparent diurnal rotation, objects will
pass through the nominal viewing angle, and the image doubling will go
away. The observer presses a button at the magic moment to record the
time.

Advantages -

can use more stars, not just those at the zenith.
can observe more stars in a night, leading to improved accuracy in time
determination.

Disadvantage -

requires manual operation, with resultant errors due to "personal
equation" - the eye-hand delay.

Accuracy of the Danjon astrolabe and the PZT were considered similar,
but the automated capabilities of the PZT won out - I think.

Source for this - the book "Geodesy" by Bomford. Sorry, no ISBN or
publisher (I'm typing from memory)

--
Geoff Powell

In article <44D7E964.4000604@pacific.net>, Brooke Clarke <brooke@pacific.net> writes >Hi: > >After seeing a reference to "Splitting the Second" by Tony Jones on >Tom's web page I read it and found that the Photographic Zenith >Telescope was replaced by the "Danjon Astrolabe". But Google provides >almost no information about it. A patent search has turned up a number >of optical systems, mostly for spacecraft, that use star separation for >navigation, and if used at a know location on the earth could be used >for timing. For these see my Stellar Time Keeping web page: >http://www.pacificsites.com/~brooke/StellarTime.shtml > >Does anyone know how a "Danjon Astrolabe" works? IIRC, the Danjon astrolabe uses a mercury pool, and a semi-reflecting prism. The optical telescope is aligned horizontally, and the prism provides 2 light paths, one aimed upward at some angle (normally 45 or 60 degrees) and the other downwards. The mercury pool reflects the downward beam upwards. As a result, when you look through the telescope, you see double images. As the skies go through their apparent diurnal rotation, objects will pass through the nominal viewing angle, and the image doubling will go away. The observer presses a button at the magic moment to record the time. Advantages - can use more stars, not just those at the zenith. can observe more stars in a night, leading to improved accuracy in time determination. Disadvantage - requires manual operation, with resultant errors due to "personal equation" - the eye-hand delay. Accuracy of the Danjon astrolabe and the PZT were considered similar, but the automated capabilities of the PZT won out - I think. Source for this - the book "Geodesy" by Bomford. Sorry, no ISBN or publisher (I'm typing from memory) > >Have Fun, > >Brooke Clarke >-- > >w/Java http://www.PRC68.com >w/o Java http://www.pacificsites.com/~brooke/PRC68COM.shtml >http://www.precisionclock.com > > >_______________________________________________ >time-nuts mailing list >time-nuts@febo.com >https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > -- Geoff Powell
GP
Geoff Powell
Tue, Aug 8, 2006 7:43 AM

Does anyone know how a "Danjon Astrolabe" works?

<snip>

Source for this - the book "Geodesy" by Bomford. Sorry, no ISBN or
publisher (I'm typing from memory)

Geodesy

Bomford, Guy

Clarendon Press, Oxford

2nd Edition (1965) (Out of Print)

3rd Edition (1971) ISBN 0198519192 (Out of Print)

4th edition, from 1980. ISBN 0-19-851946-X

Or you can try this Biblioquest search

http://www.biblioz.com/main.php?action=5&u=24b729e881416a4d4feb2da5a9d34
ed3&author=Bomford&title=Geodesy

It is considered one of the primary references for geodetic surveying,
albeit somewhat dated.

Geoff Powell

In article <7ntf7JA6qD2EFwuF@g8kbz.demon.co.uk>, Geoff Powell <geoff@g8kbz.demon.co.uk> writes >>Does anyone know how a "Danjon Astrolabe" works? > <snip> >Source for this - the book "Geodesy" by Bomford. Sorry, no ISBN or >publisher (I'm typing from memory) >> Geodesy Bomford, Guy Clarendon Press, Oxford 2nd Edition (1965) (Out of Print) 3rd Edition (1971) ISBN 0198519192 (Out of Print) 4th edition, from 1980. ISBN 0-19-851946-X Or you can try this Biblioquest search http://www.biblioz.com/main.php?action=5&u=24b729e881416a4d4feb2da5a9d34 ed3&author=Bomford&title=Geodesy It is considered one of the primary references for geodetic surveying, albeit somewhat dated. -- Geoff Powell
PK
Poul-Henning Kamp
Tue, Aug 8, 2006 7:59 AM

In message 7ntf7JA6qD2EFwuF@g8kbz.demon.co.uk, Geoff Powell writes:

IIRC, the Danjon astrolabe uses a mercury pool, and a semi-reflecting
prism.

Hmm, but doesn't the local value of "horizontal" affect the precision
also ?

You would really need to know the direction of local gravity for
this to be any good...

--
Poul-Henning Kamp      | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG        | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer      | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

In message <7ntf7JA6qD2EFwuF@g8kbz.demon.co.uk>, Geoff Powell writes: >IIRC, the Danjon astrolabe uses a mercury pool, and a semi-reflecting >prism. Hmm, but doesn't the local value of "horizontal" affect the precision also ? You would really need to know the direction of local gravity for this to be any good... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
MD
Magnus Danielson
Tue, Aug 8, 2006 8:23 AM

From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" phk@phk.freebsd.dk
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Information on the Danjon Astrolab
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 07:59:00 +0000
Message-ID: 53121.1155023940@critter.freebsd.dk

In message 7ntf7JA6qD2EFwuF@g8kbz.demon.co.uk, Geoff Powell writes:

IIRC, the Danjon astrolabe uses a mercury pool, and a semi-reflecting
prism.

Hmm, but doesn't the local value of "horizontal" affect the precision
also ?

You would really need to know the direction of local gravity for
this to be any good...

Down? :-)

Wouln't a number of measurements and comparision with other methods and
measurements help to reveal such deviations? Then again, question is if the
deviation is so large that it has a real impact.

Cheers,
Magnus

From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Information on the Danjon Astrolab Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 07:59:00 +0000 Message-ID: <53121.1155023940@critter.freebsd.dk> > In message <7ntf7JA6qD2EFwuF@g8kbz.demon.co.uk>, Geoff Powell writes: > > >IIRC, the Danjon astrolabe uses a mercury pool, and a semi-reflecting > >prism. > > Hmm, but doesn't the local value of "horizontal" affect the precision > also ? > > You would really need to know the direction of local gravity for > this to be any good... Down? :-) Wouln't a number of measurements and comparision with other methods and measurements help to reveal such deviations? Then again, question is if the deviation is so large that it has a real impact. Cheers, Magnus
PK
Poul-Henning Kamp
Tue, Aug 8, 2006 8:33 AM

In message 20060808.102323.-861060158.cfmd@bredband.net, Magnus Danielson wri
tes:

You would really need to know the direction of local gravity for
this to be any good...

Down? :-)

There's a big difference between "down enough that cows don't easily
tip over" and "passes through the center of the earth".

I know the Carlsberg Meridian had to take it into account when
it was moved down to the Canary Islands.

Wouln't a number of measurements and comparision with other methods and
measurements help to reveal such deviations? Then again, question is if the
deviation is so large that it has a real impact.

Obviously, it all depends how precise you want it.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp      | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG        | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer      | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

In message <20060808.102323.-861060158.cfmd@bredband.net>, Magnus Danielson wri tes: >> You would really need to know the direction of local gravity for >> this to be any good... > >Down? :-) There's a big difference between "down enough that cows don't easily tip over" and "passes through the center of the earth". I know the Carlsberg Meridian had to take it into account when it was moved down to the Canary Islands. >Wouln't a number of measurements and comparision with other methods and >measurements help to reveal such deviations? Then again, question is if the >deviation is so large that it has a real impact. Obviously, it all depends how precise you want it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
R
Rex
Tue, Aug 8, 2006 8:44 AM

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:33:32 +0000, "Poul-Henning Kamp"
phk@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:

There's a big difference between "down enough that cows don't easily
tip over" and "passes through the center of the earth".

LOL

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:33:32 +0000, "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: >There's a big difference between "down enough that cows don't easily >tip over" and "passes through the center of the earth". LOL
R
Rex
Tue, Aug 8, 2006 9:04 AM

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 01:44:45 -0700, Rex rexa@sonic.net wrote:

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:33:32 +0000, "Poul-Henning Kamp"
phk@phk.freebsd.dk wrote:

There's a big difference between "down enough that cows don't easily
tip over" and "passes through the center of the earth".

LOL

Oh, you reminded me...

A friend of mine once told me a long elaborate story about a mountainous
section of the world where they had two breeds of cattle --
The clockwise and the counter-clockwise. It depended on which legs had
evolved longer to let them stand upright and eat the grass on the steep
mountain sides.

Obviously, cross breeding between the two breeds was impossible in
nature, and if man got involved with his special equipment to help them
breed, you never knew what to expect. You could get a normal
counter-clockwise or a clockwise or you could get a new breed of
flatland cow or you could get a cow that could only stand upright on a
hill so steep that they would just slide to the bottom. (A wall hugger?)

Sorry. Hope my off topic posting doesn't start a trend here.

On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 01:44:45 -0700, Rex <rexa@sonic.net> wrote: >On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:33:32 +0000, "Poul-Henning Kamp" ><phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: > >>There's a big difference between "down enough that cows don't easily >>tip over" and "passes through the center of the earth". > >LOL > Oh, you reminded me... A friend of mine once told me a long elaborate story about a mountainous section of the world where they had two breeds of cattle -- The clockwise and the counter-clockwise. It depended on which legs had evolved longer to let them stand upright and eat the grass on the steep mountain sides. Obviously, cross breeding between the two breeds was impossible in nature, and if man got involved with his special equipment to help them breed, you never knew what to expect. You could get a normal counter-clockwise or a clockwise or you could get a new breed of flatland cow or you could get a cow that could only stand upright on a hill so steep that they would just slide to the bottom. (A wall hugger?) Sorry. Hope my off topic posting doesn't start a trend here.
MD
Magnus Danielson
Tue, Aug 8, 2006 9:17 AM

From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" phk@phk.freebsd.dk
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Information on the Danjon Astrolab
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:33:32 +0000
Message-ID: 53594.1155026012@critter.freebsd.dk

In message 20060808.102323.-861060158.cfmd@bredband.net, Magnus Danielson wri
tes:

You would really need to know the direction of local gravity for
this to be any good...

Down? :-)

There's a big difference between "down enough that cows don't easily
tip over" and "passes through the center of the earth".

Hence the smiley.

I know the Carlsberg Meridian had to take it into account when
it was moved down to the Canary Islands.

Ofcourse they would have to, they moved down on the longitude on an ellipsoid
and then ofcourse they have a different local gravity and the gradient of that
will differ (and hence the angle of the gravity will differ slightly from that
of the normal on the ellipsoid). Ever looked at a gravity map of the earth?

Wouln't a number of measurements and comparision with other methods and
measurements help to reveal such deviations? Then again, question is if the
deviation is so large that it has a real impact.

Obviously, it all depends how precise you want it.

Indeed.

Cheers,
Magnus

From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Information on the Danjon Astrolab Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 08:33:32 +0000 Message-ID: <53594.1155026012@critter.freebsd.dk> > In message <20060808.102323.-861060158.cfmd@bredband.net>, Magnus Danielson wri > tes: > > >> You would really need to know the direction of local gravity for > >> this to be any good... > > > >Down? :-) > > There's a big difference between "down enough that cows don't easily > tip over" and "passes through the center of the earth". Hence the smiley. > I know the Carlsberg Meridian had to take it into account when > it was moved down to the Canary Islands. Ofcourse they would have to, they moved down on the longitude on an ellipsoid and then ofcourse they have a different local gravity and the gradient of that will differ (and hence the angle of the gravity will differ slightly from that of the normal on the ellipsoid). Ever looked at a gravity map of the earth? > >Wouln't a number of measurements and comparision with other methods and > >measurements help to reveal such deviations? Then again, question is if the > >deviation is so large that it has a real impact. > > Obviously, it all depends how precise you want it. Indeed. Cheers, Magnus
B
bg@lysator.liu.se
Tue, Aug 8, 2006 10:06 AM

On Tue, August 8, 2006 10:33, Poul-Henning Kamp said:

In message 20060808.102323.-861060158.cfmd@bredband.net, Magnus
Danielson wri
tes:

You would really need to know the direction of local gravity for
this to be any good...

Down? :-)

There's a big difference between "down enough that cows don't easily
tip over" and "passes through the center of the earth".

Next time you have a surprice visit from a strategic submarine, be sure to
ask the navigator for the local gravity anomalies!

Or check the deflection from one of the earth gravity models.

--

Björn
On Tue, August 8, 2006 10:33, Poul-Henning Kamp said: > In message <20060808.102323.-861060158.cfmd@bredband.net>, Magnus > Danielson wri > tes: > >>> You would really need to know the direction of local gravity for >>> this to be any good... >> >>Down? :-) > > There's a big difference between "down enough that cows don't easily > tip over" and "passes through the center of the earth". Next time you have a surprice visit from a strategic submarine, be sure to ask the navigator for the local gravity anomalies! Or check the deflection from one of the earth gravity models. -- Björn