time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Conducting Bench Top Material

CP
Charles P. Steinmetz
Sun, Jan 31, 2010 6:21 AM

Max wrote:

I remember hearing about a law suit in an engineering law class I
had to take way back when.  It seems a farmer had a long fence
running under and parallel to a high tension distribution line.  He
had hidden a copper line in it and was harvesting enough power to
operate most of his farm buildings. This amounted to a measurable
loss from the distribution line and the power company found him out
and sued.  The court ruled he had to pay for power used in the past
and stop getting his power that way.  Considering the source I don't
think this is an urban legend.

Both long wires running parallel to transmission lines and coils
situated under transformers were used "back in the day."  The power
companies' ability to detect small losses (hundreds of watts on a
line carrying megawatts) has always been much better than the average
person would think.  Well-established law (at least in the US) holds
that it is theft of services, although some folks think it should be otherwise.

I knew several people who lit outbuildings with fluorescent tubes
powered from wires strung in the near field of a 50 kW AM radio
station I once worked for.  The closest farmers had to take
precautions putting up wire fences (limiting the continuous length
and grounding at intervals), without which they could give you a nasty RF burn.

Best regards,

Charles

Max wrote: >I remember hearing about a law suit in an engineering law class I >had to take way back when. It seems a farmer had a long fence >running under and parallel to a high tension distribution line. He >had hidden a copper line in it and was harvesting enough power to >operate most of his farm buildings. This amounted to a measurable >loss from the distribution line and the power company found him out >and sued. The court ruled he had to pay for power used in the past >and stop getting his power that way. Considering the source I don't >think this is an urban legend. Both long wires running parallel to transmission lines and coils situated under transformers were used "back in the day." The power companies' ability to detect small losses (hundreds of watts on a line carrying megawatts) has always been much better than the average person would think. Well-established law (at least in the US) holds that it is theft of services, although some folks think it should be otherwise. I knew several people who lit outbuildings with fluorescent tubes powered from wires strung in the near field of a 50 kW AM radio station I once worked for. The closest farmers had to take precautions putting up wire fences (limiting the continuous length and grounding at intervals), without which they could give you a nasty RF burn. Best regards, Charles
DD
Dr. David Kirkby
Sun, Jan 31, 2010 8:29 AM

Max Robinson wrote:

I remember hearing about a law suit in an engineering law class I had to
take way back when.  It seems a farmer had a long fence running under
and parallel to a high tension distribution line.  He had hidden a
copper line in it and was harvesting enough power to operate most of his
farm buildings. This amounted to a measurable loss from the distribution
line and the power company found him out and sued.  The court ruled he
had to pay for power used in the past and stop getting his power that
way.  Considering the source I don't think this is an urban legend.

Regards.

Max.  K 4 O D S.

It sounds a bit of a myth to me. I've never done the maths, but I doubt you
could get a lot of power from a wire like this. To power most of his farm
machinery would need many kW.

On the very high power lines, they tend to be location very high, in which case
I would have thought the fields should cancel at long distances, as there will
be 3 out of phase currents.

I think for lighting, you might be able to claim you did it to reduce the
E-field at your house, as you were worried by the health effects. Sine you need
to dump the power somewhere, a light bulb seemed the cheapest dummy load. A 100
W light bulb is a lot cheaper than a 100 W resistor!

On a similar note, I heard about someone who powered his greenhouse by using the
small voltage between neutral and earth that will exist. I know there is at
least 30 mA available at my house, as shorting neutral to earth will trip a 30
mA RCD. But I measured the voltage once, and whilst I can't recall what it was,
it was less than 1 Volt.

Dave

Max Robinson wrote: > I remember hearing about a law suit in an engineering law class I had to > take way back when. It seems a farmer had a long fence running under > and parallel to a high tension distribution line. He had hidden a > copper line in it and was harvesting enough power to operate most of his > farm buildings. This amounted to a measurable loss from the distribution > line and the power company found him out and sued. The court ruled he > had to pay for power used in the past and stop getting his power that > way. Considering the source I don't think this is an urban legend. > > Regards. > > Max. K 4 O D S. It sounds a bit of a myth to me. I've never done the maths, but I doubt you could get a lot of power from a wire like this. To power most of his farm machinery would need many kW. On the very high power lines, they tend to be location very high, in which case I would have thought the fields should cancel at long distances, as there will be 3 out of phase currents. I think for lighting, you might be able to claim you did it to reduce the E-field at your house, as you were worried by the health effects. Sine you need to dump the power somewhere, a light bulb seemed the cheapest dummy load. A 100 W light bulb is a lot cheaper than a 100 W resistor! On a similar note, I heard about someone who powered his greenhouse by using the small voltage between neutral and earth that will exist. I know there is at least 30 mA available at my house, as shorting neutral to earth will trip a 30 mA RCD. But I measured the voltage once, and whilst I can't recall what it was, it was less than 1 Volt. Dave
SR
Steve Rooke
Sun, Jan 31, 2010 9:19 AM

Not wishing to push this O/T thread more O/T but coming from England,
and now in New Zealand, we have these sodium streetlights which I
think are a pain in the neck. They have only two narrow spectra of
yellow light and although they produce light it makes it hard, if not
impossible, to make out colours. I wonder if they are being used in
other members countries?

Steve

2010/1/31 Dave Martindale dave.martindale@gmail.com:

If you care about accurate colour rendering, stick with incandescent,
preferably halogen.  "White" LEDs are actually blue LEDs coated with a
phosphor that absorbs some of the blue light and emits approximately yellow
instead.  If you look at the spectrum, you'll see a broad yellow peak and a
narrower blue peak.  Your eyes see it as approximately white, but it's
deficient in red and green compared to a black body emitter like hot
tungsten.  On the other hand, it's not as spiky as the output of
fluorescents.

--
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV & G8KVD
A man with one clock knows what time it is;
A man with two clocks is never quite sure.

Not wishing to push this O/T thread more O/T but coming from England, and now in New Zealand, we have these sodium streetlights which I think are a pain in the neck. They have only two narrow spectra of yellow light and although they produce light it makes it hard, if not impossible, to make out colours. I wonder if they are being used in other members countries? Steve 2010/1/31 Dave Martindale <dave.martindale@gmail.com>: > If you care about accurate colour rendering, stick with incandescent, > preferably halogen.  "White" LEDs are actually blue LEDs coated with a > phosphor that absorbs some of the blue light and emits approximately yellow > instead.  If you look at the spectrum, you'll see a broad yellow peak and a > narrower blue peak.  Your eyes see it as approximately white, but it's > deficient in red and green compared to a black body emitter like hot > tungsten.  On the other hand, it's not as spiky as the output of > fluorescents. -- Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV & G8KVD A man with one clock knows what time it is; A man with two clocks is never quite sure.
RA
Robert Atkinson
Sun, Jan 31, 2010 11:34 AM

Hi Steve,They do use them in the USA.The advantages are,1 High efficiency2 Better visibility in rain and fog. As there is only one main colour you do not get diffraction rainbows.3 Kind to astronomers. A simple narrow stop band optical filter allows astronomers to remove the light pollution. In some areas around observatories they are mandated by local planning regulations.
These are considered to outweigh the disadvantage of no colour rendition.
Robert G8RPI.  

--- On Sun, 31/1/10, Steve Rooke sar10538@gmail.com wrote:

From: Steve Rooke sar10538@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] [OT] Ikea Lamp
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" time-nuts@febo.com
Date: Sunday, 31 January, 2010, 9:19

Not wishing to push this O/T thread more O/T but coming from England,
and now in New Zealand, we have these sodium streetlights which I
think are a pain in the neck. They have only two narrow spectra of
yellow light and although they produce light it makes it hard, if not
impossible, to make out colours. I wonder if they are being used in
other members countries?

Steve

2010/1/31 Dave Martindale dave.martindale@gmail.com:

If you care about accurate colour rendering, stick with incandescent,
preferably halogen.  "White" LEDs are actually blue LEDs coated with a
phosphor that absorbs some of the blue light and emits approximately yellow
instead.  If you look at the spectrum, you'll see a broad yellow peak and a
narrower blue peak.  Your eyes see it as approximately white, but it's
deficient in red and green compared to a black body emitter like hot
tungsten.  On the other hand, it's not as spiky as the output of
fluorescents.

--
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV & G8KVD
A man with one clock knows what time it is;
A man with two clocks is never quite sure.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Steve,They do use them in the USA.The advantages are,1 High efficiency2 Better visibility in rain and fog. As there is only one main colour you do not get diffraction rainbows.3 Kind to astronomers. A simple narrow stop band optical filter allows astronomers to remove the light pollution. In some areas around observatories they are mandated by local planning regulations. These are considered to outweigh the disadvantage of no colour rendition. Robert G8RPI.   --- On Sun, 31/1/10, Steve Rooke <sar10538@gmail.com> wrote: From: Steve Rooke <sar10538@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] [OT] Ikea Lamp To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts@febo.com> Date: Sunday, 31 January, 2010, 9:19 Not wishing to push this O/T thread more O/T but coming from England, and now in New Zealand, we have these sodium streetlights which I think are a pain in the neck. They have only two narrow spectra of yellow light and although they produce light it makes it hard, if not impossible, to make out colours. I wonder if they are being used in other members countries? Steve 2010/1/31 Dave Martindale <dave.martindale@gmail.com>: > If you care about accurate colour rendering, stick with incandescent, > preferably halogen.  "White" LEDs are actually blue LEDs coated with a > phosphor that absorbs some of the blue light and emits approximately yellow > instead.  If you look at the spectrum, you'll see a broad yellow peak and a > narrower blue peak.  Your eyes see it as approximately white, but it's > deficient in red and green compared to a black body emitter like hot > tungsten.  On the other hand, it's not as spiky as the output of > fluorescents. -- Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV & G8KVD A man with one clock knows what time it is; A man with two clocks is never quite sure. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
DJ
Didier Juges
Sun, Jan 31, 2010 1:19 PM

In France, it is known as "fleur de souffre", which translates litterally to
"flower of sulphur". In French, there is no confusion possible between the
terms flower (fleur) and flour (farine).

Didier

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com
[mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of J. Forster
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 10:05 PM
To: Bruce Griffiths
Cc: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Conducting Bench Top Material

Among chemists, it's flour of sulpher. Flowers is an
(incorrect & archeic) popular name, like quicksilver.

-John

===========

It is known (for whatever reason) as flowers of sulphur by

gardeners

medical practitioners (althernative and conventional) and others
outside the US.
http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/fl/flower+of+sulphur.html

http://mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/phys/sulphur.htm
http://mysite.du.edu/%7Ejcalvert/phys/sulphur.htm

It is a powder produced by sublimation of sulphur.

Bruce

In France, it is known as "fleur de souffre", which translates litterally to "flower of sulphur". In French, there is no confusion possible between the terms flower (fleur) and flour (farine). Didier > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com > [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of J. Forster > Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 10:05 PM > To: Bruce Griffiths > Cc: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Conducting Bench Top Material > > Among chemists, it's flour of sulpher. Flowers is an > (incorrect & archeic) popular name, like quicksilver. > > -John > > =========== > > > It is known (for whatever reason) as flowers of sulphur by > gardeners > > medical practitioners (althernative and conventional) and others > > outside the US. > > http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/fl/flower+of+sulphur.html > > > > http://mysite.du.edu/~jcalvert/phys/sulphur.htm > > <http://mysite.du.edu/%7Ejcalvert/phys/sulphur.htm> > > > > It is a powder produced by sublimation of sulphur. > > > > Bruce > >
CH
Chuck Harris
Sun, Jan 31, 2010 3:08 PM

In my 1963 EH Sargent and Company catalog, they list:

Sulfur, USP, Precipitated Powder
Sulfur, NF Sublimed Powder
Sulfur, Sublimed Flowers (Tech)
Sulfur, Lump (Roll)

And something about Seconds, NIST Grade...

-Chuck Harris

Don Latham wrote:

The connection is alchemical,
Don

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Griffiths"
bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz
To: jfor@quik.com; "Discussion of precise time and frequency
measurement" time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 8:53 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Conducting Bench Top Material

It is known (for whatever reason) as flowers of sulphur by gardeners
medical practitioners (althernative and conventional) and others
outside the US.
http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/fl/flower+of+sulphur.html

In my 1963 EH Sargent and Company catalog, they list: Sulfur, USP, Precipitated Powder Sulfur, NF Sublimed Powder Sulfur, Sublimed Flowers (Tech) Sulfur, Lump (Roll) And something about Seconds, NIST Grade... -Chuck Harris Don Latham wrote: > The connection is alchemical, > Don > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Griffiths" > <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz> > To: <jfor@quik.com>; "Discussion of precise time and frequency > measurement" <time-nuts@febo.com> > Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 8:53 PM > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Conducting Bench Top Material > > >> It is known (for whatever reason) as flowers of sulphur by gardeners >> medical practitioners (althernative and conventional) and others >> outside the US. >> http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/fl/flower+of+sulphur.html
MD
Magnus Danielson
Sun, Jan 31, 2010 3:10 PM

Steve Rooke wrote:

Not wishing to push this O/T thread more O/T but coming from England,
and now in New Zealand, we have these sodium streetlights which I
think are a pain in the neck. They have only two narrow spectra of
yellow light and although they produce light it makes it hard, if not
impossible, to make out colours. I wonder if they are being used in
other members countries?

Sweden has them. It's the classical sodium D1 and D2 lines. Kind of neat
that one can calibrate ones spectrometer by the highway. :)

I think white is becoming more popular now.

Cheers,
Magnus

Steve Rooke wrote: > Not wishing to push this O/T thread more O/T but coming from England, > and now in New Zealand, we have these sodium streetlights which I > think are a pain in the neck. They have only two narrow spectra of > yellow light and although they produce light it makes it hard, if not > impossible, to make out colours. I wonder if they are being used in > other members countries? Sweden has them. It's the classical sodium D1 and D2 lines. Kind of neat that one can calibrate ones spectrometer by the highway. :) I think white is becoming more popular now. Cheers, Magnus
JF
J. Forster
Sun, Jan 31, 2010 3:57 PM

I believe that it is possible to light a fluorescent tube, at least
dimly, by standing on the ground under a power transmission line
operating at more than 100 kV , holding one end of the tube in your
hand, and sticking the other end up in the air.  I have never done
this, exactly, but I have held a fluorescent tube near a ham antenna
and seen it light, and on the web I have seen photos of people doing
it under electric utility lines.

Of course I have seen fluorescent tubes light near Van de Graaff
generators and Tesla coils.  We all have.  However, such machines
generate E-fields much stronger than you'll find near ground level
under an electric utility line.

I do not believe that one could get a fluorescent tube to light by
holding it near ground level under an 11-kV line.  But this is just my
gut feeling.  I could certainly be wrong.  I have not done the
experiment; nor have I done a calculation of the expected field
strength.

The story of a farmer drawing enough power "to operate most of his
farm buildings" from a wire running under and parallel to a HV line
sounds like an urban legend to me.  As does the story of a "guy that
had a big coil of wire in the roof of his shed and... could light a
100W incandescent bulb from the stray fields."  It's hard to draw
significant power from the field surrounding a power line because a
huge reactance must be tuned out.  If it were easy, then power-
transmission companies would be dissipating substantial and
economically intolerable amounts of power in the ground, which has
non-negligible conductivity.

During my summer working in the engineering department of a Bell
System operating company, I personally observed examples of 60-Hz AC
e.m.f. induced longitudinally in telephone cables running for miles
along rural pole lines, directly under 60-Hz power lines.  It was not
unusual to see an induced e.m.f. of the order of 100 V RMS.  A person
could get a painful shock from this voltage.  However, a human is a
pretty high-resistance load.  You could not draw watts of power from
such a source.  The Thevenin equivalent source impedance was too high.

BTW, it is necessary to distinguish induced e.m.f. from a potential
difference between separated points on the surface of the ground due
to resistance in the ground multiplied by conduction current in
the ground.  Conduction current in the ground arises whenever less
than 100% of the current flowing in a single-phase power line, or the
common-mode current in a three-phase line, does not return through the
neutral wire/cable of the line.  In rural areas where most of the
loads are single-phase, and a three-phase line is tapped for single-
phase loads separated by miles or more, it is not unusual to find very
high ground currents.  I remember observing symptoms of high ground
currents also near electric railroad lines.  As electric locomotive
such as the Pennsylvania RR's GG-1 drew single-phase 25-Hz current
from an overhead wire and returned it through the rails; but a
significant fraction of the return current flowed through the ground,
because the rails were connected to driven "ground" rods, presumably
for safety.  Trolley cars on the streets of Baltimore ran on DC, and
did the same thing.  Some of the ground current would find its way via
safety-ground rods through the neutral wires of the 60-Hz electric
utility.  When this DC flowed through the windings of 60-Hz power
transformers, it partially saturated the transformer cores, causing
waveform distortion, so that 60-Hz harmonics were heard in
neighborhood telephones.

The notion of "ground" as one big equipotential surface, an infinite
sink for charge / current, is a mass delusion.  It's a delusion for DC
and low-frequency AC.  For RF, it is so wrong that words fail me.

-John

===============

I remember hearing about a law suit in an engineering law class I
had to
take way back when.  It seems a farmer had a long fence running
under and
parallel to a high tension distribution line.  He had hidden a
copper line
in it and was harvesting enough power to operate most of his farm
buildings.
This amounted to a measurable loss from the distribution line and the
power
company found him out and sued.  The court ruled he had to pay for
power
used in the past and stop getting his power that way.  Considering
the
source I don't think this is an urban legend.

Regards.

Max.  K 4 O D S.

Email: max@maxsmusicplace.com

Transistor site http://www.funwithtransistors.net
Vacuum tube site: http://www.funwithtubes.net
Music site: http://www.maxsmusicplace.com

To subscribe to the fun with transistors group send an email to.
funwithtransistors-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

To subscribe to the fun with tubes group send an email to,
funwithtubes-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Harris" cfharris@erols.com
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] White LED's

Dr. David Kirkby wrote:

I should have added, it carried on glowing for some time after I
got
home too. At that point, I was well away from the train lines,
though
we
do have 11 kV overhead cables around 30m from the house. It
eventually
stopped glowing so I assume it was the presence of the overhead
train
lines which caused this.

When I was a kid, there was a main set of high tension power lines
several
hundred yards from my house.  I had friends that had garden sheds
under
the
towers that were lit by fluorescent lamps collecting the stray
fields.
A
piece of wire on each end of the bulb enhanced the effect.

I knew of one guy that had a big coil of wire in the roof of his
shed
and he could light a 100W incandescent bulb from the stray fields.

-Chuck Harris

Max Robinson wrote:

I remember hearing about a law suit in an engineering law class I had to
take way back when.  It seems a farmer had a long fence running under
and parallel to a high tension distribution line.  He had hidden a
copper line in it and was harvesting enough power to operate most of his
farm buildings. This amounted to a measurable loss from the distribution
line and the power company found him out and sued.  The court ruled he
had to pay for power used in the past and stop getting his power that
way.  Considering the source I don't think this is an urban legend.

Regards.

Max.  K 4 O D S.

It sounds a bit of a myth to me. I've never done the maths, but I doubt
you
could get a lot of power from a wire like this. To power most of his farm
machinery would need many kW.

On the very high power lines, they tend to be location very high, in which
case
I would have thought the fields should cancel at long distances, as there
will
be 3 out of phase currents.

I think for lighting, you might be able to claim you did it to reduce the
E-field at your house, as you were worried by the health effects. Sine you
need
to dump the power somewhere, a light bulb seemed the cheapest dummy load.
A 100
W light bulb is a lot cheaper than a 100 W resistor!

On a similar note, I heard about someone who powered his greenhouse by
using the
small voltage between neutral and earth that will exist. I know there is
at
least 30 mA available at my house, as shorting neutral to earth will trip
a 30
mA RCD. But I measured the voltage once, and whilst I can't recall what it
was,
it was less than 1 Volt.

Dave


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

I believe that it is possible to light a fluorescent tube, at least dimly, by standing on the ground under a power transmission line operating at more than 100 kV , holding one end of the tube in your hand, and sticking the other end up in the air. I have never done _this_, exactly, but I have held a fluorescent tube near a ham antenna and seen it light, and on the web I have seen photos of people doing it under electric utility lines. Of course I have seen fluorescent tubes light near Van de Graaff generators and Tesla coils. We all have. However, such machines generate E-fields much stronger than you'll find near ground level under an electric utility line. I do _not_ believe that one could get a fluorescent tube to light by holding it near ground level under an 11-kV line. But this is just my gut feeling. I could certainly be wrong. I have not done the experiment; nor have I done a calculation of the expected field strength. The story of a farmer drawing enough power "to operate most of his farm buildings" from a wire running under and parallel to a HV line sounds like an urban legend to me. As does the story of a "guy that had a big coil of wire in the roof of his shed and... could light a 100W incandescent bulb from the stray fields." It's _hard_ to draw significant power from the field surrounding a power line because a huge reactance must be tuned out. If it were easy, then power- transmission companies would be dissipating substantial and economically intolerable amounts of power in the _ground_, which has non-negligible conductivity. During my summer working in the engineering department of a Bell System operating company, I personally observed examples of 60-Hz AC e.m.f. induced longitudinally in telephone cables running for miles along rural pole lines, directly under 60-Hz power lines. It was not unusual to see an induced e.m.f. of the order of 100 V RMS. A person could get a painful shock from this voltage. However, a human is a pretty high-resistance load. You could _not_ draw watts of power from such a source. The Thevenin equivalent source impedance was too high. BTW, it is necessary to distinguish induced e.m.f. from a potential difference between separated points on the surface of the ground due to _resistance_ in the ground multiplied by _conduction_ current in the ground. Conduction current in the ground arises whenever less than 100% of the current flowing in a single-phase power line, or the common-mode current in a three-phase line, does not return through the neutral wire/cable of the line. In rural areas where most of the loads are single-phase, and a three-phase line is tapped for single- phase loads separated by miles or more, it is not unusual to find very high ground currents. I remember observing symptoms of high ground currents also near electric railroad lines. As electric locomotive such as the Pennsylvania RR's GG-1 drew single-phase 25-Hz current from an overhead wire and returned it through the rails; but a significant fraction of the return current flowed through the ground, because the rails were connected to driven "ground" rods, presumably for safety. Trolley cars on the streets of Baltimore ran on DC, and did the same thing. Some of the ground current would find its way via safety-ground rods through the neutral wires of the 60-Hz electric utility. When this DC flowed through the windings of 60-Hz power transformers, it partially saturated the transformer cores, causing waveform distortion, so that 60-Hz harmonics were heard in neighborhood telephones. The notion of "ground" as one big equipotential surface, an infinite sink for charge / current, is a mass delusion. It's a delusion for DC and low-frequency AC. For RF, it is so wrong that words fail me. -John > =============== > >> I remember hearing about a law suit in an engineering law class I >> had to >> take way back when. It seems a farmer had a long fence running >> under and >> parallel to a high tension distribution line. He had hidden a >> copper line >> in it and was harvesting enough power to operate most of his farm >> buildings. >> This amounted to a measurable loss from the distribution line and the >> power >> company found him out and sued. The court ruled he had to pay for >> power >> used in the past and stop getting his power that way. Considering >> the >> source I don't think this is an urban legend. >> >> Regards. >> >> Max. K 4 O D S. >> >> Email: max@maxsmusicplace.com >> >> Transistor site http://www.funwithtransistors.net >> Vacuum tube site: http://www.funwithtubes.net >> Music site: http://www.maxsmusicplace.com >> >> To subscribe to the fun with transistors group send an email to. >> funwithtransistors-subscribe@yahoogroups.com >> >> To subscribe to the fun with tubes group send an email to, >> funwithtubes-subscribe@yahoogroups.com >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Chuck Harris" <cfharris@erols.com> >> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" >> <time-nuts@febo.com> >> Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 12:21 PM >> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] White LED's >> >> >>> Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >>> >>>> I should have added, it carried on glowing for some time after I >>>> got >>>> home too. At that point, I was well away from the train lines, >>>> though >>>> we >>>> do have 11 kV overhead cables around 30m from the house. It >>>> eventually >>>> stopped glowing so I assume it was the presence of the overhead >>>> train >>>> lines which caused this. >>> >>> When I was a kid, there was a main set of high tension power lines >>> several >>> hundred yards from my house. I had friends that had garden sheds >>> under >>> the >>> towers that were lit by fluorescent lamps collecting the stray >>> fields. >>> A >>> piece of wire on each end of the bulb enhanced the effect. >>> >>> I knew of one guy that had a big coil of wire in the roof of his >>> shed >>> and he could light a 100W incandescent bulb from the stray fields. >>> >>> -Chuck Harris > Max Robinson wrote: >> I remember hearing about a law suit in an engineering law class I had to >> take way back when. It seems a farmer had a long fence running under >> and parallel to a high tension distribution line. He had hidden a >> copper line in it and was harvesting enough power to operate most of his >> farm buildings. This amounted to a measurable loss from the distribution >> line and the power company found him out and sued. The court ruled he >> had to pay for power used in the past and stop getting his power that >> way. Considering the source I don't think this is an urban legend. >> >> Regards. >> >> Max. K 4 O D S. > > It sounds a bit of a myth to me. I've never done the maths, but I doubt > you > could get a lot of power from a wire like this. To power most of his farm > machinery would need many kW. > > On the very high power lines, they tend to be location very high, in which > case > I would have thought the fields should cancel at long distances, as there > will > be 3 out of phase currents. > > I think for lighting, you might be able to claim you did it to reduce the > E-field at your house, as you were worried by the health effects. Sine you > need > to dump the power somewhere, a light bulb seemed the cheapest dummy load. > A 100 > W light bulb is a lot cheaper than a 100 W resistor! > > On a similar note, I heard about someone who powered his greenhouse by > using the > small voltage between neutral and earth that will exist. I know there is > at > least 30 mA available at my house, as shorting neutral to earth will trip > a 30 > mA RCD. But I measured the voltage once, and whilst I can't recall what it > was, > it was less than 1 Volt. > > Dave > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > >
DS
d.seiter@comcast.net
Mon, Feb 1, 2010 12:42 AM

I hate the yellow lamps in my area because they are only found in certain vicinities. You're driving along at night, maybe searching for something, and suddenly one of the "street lamps" turns red! It's happened to me a few times...

Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Atkinson" <robert8rpi@yahoo.co. uk >
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts@ febo .com>
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 4:34:23 AM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] [OT] Ikea Lamp

Hi Steve,They do use them in the USA.The advantages are,1 High efficiency2 Better visibility in rain and fog. As there is only one main colour you do not get diffraction rainbows.3 Kind to astronomers. A simple narrow stop band optical filter allows astronomers to remove the light pollution. In some areas around observatories they are mandated by local planning regulations.
These are considered to outweigh the disadvantage of no colour rendition.
Robert G8RPI.

--- On Sun, 31/1/10, Steve Rooke <sar10538@ gmail .com> wrote:

From: Steve Rooke <sar10538@ gmail .com>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] [OT] Ikea Lamp
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts@ febo .com>
Date: Sunday, 31 January, 2010, 9:19

Not wishing to push this O/T thread more O/T but coming from England,
and now in New Zealand , we have these sodium streetlights which I
think are a pain in the neck. They have only two narrow spectra of
yellow light and although they produce light it makes it hard, if not
impossible, to make out colours. I wonder if they are being used in
other members countries?

Steve

2010/1/31 Dave Martindale < dave . martindale @ gmail .com>:

If you care about accurate colour rendering, stick with incandescent,
preferably halogen. "White" LEDs are actually blue LEDs coated with a
phosphor that absorbs some of the blue light and emits approximately yellow
instead. If you look at the spectrum, you'll see a broad yellow peak and a
narrower blue peak. Your eyes see it as approximately white, but it's
deficient in red and green compared to a black body emitter like hot
tungsten. On the other hand, it's not as spiky as the output of
fluorescents .

--
Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV & G8KVD
A man with one clock knows what time it is;
A man with two clocks is never quite sure.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@ febo .com
To unsubscribe , go to https :// www . febo .com/cgi-bin/mailman/ listinfo /time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@ febo .com
To unsubscribe , go to https :// www . febo .com/cgi-bin/mailman/ listinfo /time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

I hate the yellow lamps in my area because they are only found in certain vicinities. You're driving along at night, maybe searching for something, and suddenly one of the "street lamps" turns red! It's happened to me a few times... Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Atkinson" <robert8rpi@yahoo.co. uk > To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts@ febo .com> Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 4:34:23 AM GMT -07:00 US/Canada Mountain Subject: Re: [time-nuts] [OT] Ikea Lamp Hi Steve,They do use them in the USA.The advantages are,1 High efficiency2 Better visibility in rain and fog. As there is only one main colour you do not get diffraction rainbows.3 Kind to astronomers. A simple narrow stop band optical filter allows astronomers to remove the light pollution. In some areas around observatories they are mandated by local planning regulations. These are considered to outweigh the disadvantage of no colour rendition. Robert G8RPI. --- On Sun, 31/1/10, Steve Rooke <sar10538@ gmail .com> wrote: From: Steve Rooke <sar10538@ gmail .com> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] [OT] Ikea Lamp To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts@ febo .com> Date: Sunday, 31 January, 2010, 9:19 Not wishing to push this O/T thread more O/T but coming from England, and now in New Zealand , we have these sodium streetlights which I think are a pain in the neck. They have only two narrow spectra of yellow light and although they produce light it makes it hard, if not impossible, to make out colours. I wonder if they are being used in other members countries? Steve 2010/1/31 Dave Martindale < dave . martindale @ gmail .com>: > If you care about accurate colour rendering, stick with incandescent, > preferably halogen. "White" LEDs are actually blue LEDs coated with a > phosphor that absorbs some of the blue light and emits approximately yellow > instead. If you look at the spectrum, you'll see a broad yellow peak and a > narrower blue peak. Your eyes see it as approximately white, but it's > deficient in red and green compared to a black body emitter like hot > tungsten. On the other hand, it's not as spiky as the output of > fluorescents . -- Steve Rooke - ZL3TUV & G8KVD A man with one clock knows what time it is; A man with two clocks is never quite sure. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@ febo .com To unsubscribe , go to https :// www . febo .com/cgi-bin/mailman/ listinfo /time-nuts and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@ febo .com To unsubscribe , go to https :// www . febo .com/cgi-bin/mailman/ listinfo /time-nuts and follow the instructions there.