In a message dated 8/28/2007 15:24:24 Pacific Daylight Time,
magnus@rubidium.dyndns.org writes:
Said, you have your timing screwed up here. PNG is definitly much newer than
JPG. PNG is certainly standard and viewers are plentiful (web-browsers
anyone?).
Hi Magnus,
have you opened a PNG lately in internet explorer? What a headache. Looks
totally crappy, cannot zoom, cannot rotate etc. Not a format that's mainstream
yet such as JPG.
Bless all those PDF readers out there... But:
For some reason PDF's sometimes get generated with 75dpi embedded raster
schematics etc. Totally useless. That's where the 300 - 600 dpi is needed.
bye,
Said
************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at
http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
From: SAIDJACK@aol.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP E1938 Web Page
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:40:40 EDT
Message-ID: bdb.19d9d518.3405fe68@aol.com
Hi Magnus,
Said,
have you opened a PNG lately in internet explorer? What a headache. Looks
totally crappy, cannot zoom, cannot rotate etc. Not a format that's mainstream
yet such as JPG.
Why would I be using Internet Explorer?
Also, timing of when things happend is not related to how well Microsoft
chooses to support them.
Bless all those PDF readers out there... But:
For some reason PDF's sometimes get generated with 75dpi embedded raster
schematics etc. Totally useless. That's where the 300 - 600 dpi is needed.
Previews are wonderfull. If you need higher, you should use the vector data.
Cheers,
Magnus