I think we should enable Phabricator for c-c as well, the review tools
are much nicer than mozreview. Any objections?
Philipp
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Phabricator/Lando update, November 2017
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 08:35:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Mark Côté mcote@mozilla.com
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.platform
I posted an update on Phabricator and Lando to my blog a couple weeks
ago, but I figured I should share it here too:
https://mrcote.info/blog/2017/11/17/phabricator-and-lando-november-update/
There are two important points:
Note that we are still technically in a pre-release state as we are
making a few more changes to the underlying BMO-integration engine to
ensure it remains rock solid.
Mark
I would support this, at least once the MFA is tied to the existing one,
rather than requiring a separate setup.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:12 AM Philipp Kewisch kewisch@thunderbird.net
wrote:
I think we should enable Phabricator for c-c as well, the review tools
are much nicer than mozreview. Any objections?
Philipp
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Phabricator/Lando update, November 2017
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 08:35:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Mark Côté mcote@mozilla.com
Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.platform
I posted an update on Phabricator and Lando to my blog a couple weeks
ago, but I figured I should share it here too:
https://mrcote.info/blog/2017/11/17/phabricator-and-lando-november-update/
There are two important points:
Note that we are still technically in a pre-release state as we are
making a few more changes to the underlying BMO-integration engine to
ensure it remains rock solid.
Mark
Maildev mailing list
Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net
Philipp Kewisch wrote on 30.11.17 14:11:
I think we should enable Phabricator for c-c as well, the review tools
are much nicer than mozreview. Any objections?
Phabricator++
I use it in another project, and it's the best review tool I know.
Ben