B
bkboater@delanet.com
Sat, Dec 4, 1999 10:02 PM
Here is a link to your congressman. If you disapprove of the upcoming bill
to charge a fee for use of the internet, please let him know.
Bob Kassal
-----Original Message-----
From: James Kassal jkassal@snet.net
To: Bauch, Terry 102361.2660@COMPUSERVE.COM; Beyeler
beyeler@inforamp.net; robert.v.breen@snet.net robert.v.breen@snet.net;
Coady, Kemp kcoady8482@aol.com; Daftary, Shrenik
shrenik_daftary@datascope.com; dallemolle@aol.com dallemolle@aol.com;
Donnelly, Rob rmdonnelly@earthlink.net; Fronzoni, Jim
lsijim@tl.infi.net; Gallick, Gallick dgallick@suntechmed.com; Gardner,
Joseph P joseph_p_gardner@groton.pfizer.com; Gayle gaylem@edgenet.net;
Grasso, Vincent vgrasso@tima.net; Hiscox, David Hiscox@concentric.net;
Horn, Gary garyhorn@home.com; Jang, Roland projang@msn.com; Johnson,
Keith keithj@cardionics.com; mikeandsuz@home.com mikeandsuz@home.com;
slothicus@hotmail.com slothicus@hotmail.com; Kassal, Robert
bkboater@delanet.com; Kelly, Bruce bkelly@suntechmed.com; Kris Kolet
Kris.Kolet@nipp.org; Ladonis, Judy VICKIAT8@aol.com;
sleclair@ultranet.com sleclair@ultranet.com; Lyons, Chad chadl@npwt.net;
Mark Singer singerm@elcsci.com; McCauley, Matthew dn4762@concentric.net;
oompahdave@aol.com oompahdave@aol.com; Owsley, Norm
J.N.Owsley@Worldnet.att.net; Pam dubeyhouse@juno.com
Date: Saturday, December 04, 1999 10:40 AM
Subject: [Fwd: Fw: CHARGE A TOLL FEE for Internet access? Read This
(172503)]
<STRONG>attached mail follows:</STRONG><HR NOSHADE><P><P>
-----Original Message-----
From: RICHARD DALY bigrich33@hotmail.com
To: bdaly555@aol.com bdaly555@aol.com; Melaniedaly@dca.net
Melaniedaly@dca.net; Kcherill@osbornnet.org Kcherill@osbornnet.org
Cc: felicity@interlog.com felicity@interlog.com; hotgirlmaya@hotmail.com
hotgirlmaya@hotmail.com; rfaison@pampel.com rfaison@pampel.com
Date: Friday, December 03, 1999 8:35 PM
Subject: Fwd: CHARGE A TOLL FEE for Internet access? Read This (172503)
From: 78615@ <78615@>
Subject: CHARGE A TOLL FEE for Internet access? Read This (172503)
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 09:01:49 -0400 (EDT)
CNN has reported that within the next two weeks Congress is going to
allowing telephone companies to CHARGE A TOLL FEE for Internet access.
Translation: Every time we send a long distance e-mail we will receive
distance charge. This will get costly. Please visit the following web
file a complaint to your Congressperson. We can't allow this to pass!
following address will allow you tosend an e-mail on this subject
to all your friends and family. We should ALL have an interest in
WAIT, THERE'S MORE! IN ADDITION, The last few months have revealed an
trend in the Government of the United States attempting to quietly
legislation that will affect your use of the Internet. Under proposed
legislation the U.S. Postal Service will be attempting to bilk email
of "alternate postage fees". Bill 602P will permit the Federal Govt.
a 5 cent surcharge on every email delivered, by billing Internet
Providers at source. The consumer would then be billed in turn by the
Washington D.C. lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent
legislation from becoming law. The U.S. Postal Service is claiming
revenue due to the proliferation of e-mail costing nearly $230,000,000
revenue per year. (Oh, isn't that too bad?) You may have noticed
ad campaign "There is nothing like a letter". Since the average
about 10 pieces of email per day in 1998, the cost to the typical
would be an additional 50 cents per day, or over $180 dollars per
and beyond their regular Internet costs. Note that this would be
directly to the U.S. Postal Service for a service they do not even
The whole point of the Internet is democracy and non-interference. If
federal government is permitted to tamper with our liberties by adding
surcharge to email, who knows where it will end. You are already
exorbitant price for snail mail because of bureaucratic inefficiency.
currently takes up to 6 days for a letter to be delivered from New
Buffalo. If the U.S. Postal Service is allowed to tinker with email,
mark the end of the "free" Internet in the United States.
One congressman, Tony Schnell (r) has even suggested a "twenty to
per month surcharge on all Internet service" above and beyond the
proposed email charges. Note that most of the major newspapers have
story, the only exception being the Washingtonian which called the
surcharge "a useful concept whose time has come" (March 6th, 1999
Don't sit by and watch your freedoms erode away! Send this e-mail to
your list, and tell all your friends and relatives to write to their
and say "No!" to Bill 602P. It will only take a few moments of your
could very well be instrumental in killing a bill we don't want.
PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW WHO USES EMAIL REMEMBER THESE ARE
ISSUES THAT EFFECT ALL OF US ONLINE LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD
NOW, NOT AFTER.
Here is a link to your congressman. If you disapprove of the upcoming bill
to charge a fee for use of the internet, please let him know.
Bob Kassal
-----Original Message-----
From: James Kassal <jkassal@snet.net>
To: Bauch, Terry <102361.2660@COMPUSERVE.COM>; Beyeler
<beyeler@inforamp.net>; robert.v.breen@snet.net <robert.v.breen@snet.net>;
Coady, Kemp <kcoady8482@aol.com>; Daftary, Shrenik
<shrenik_daftary@datascope.com>; dallemolle@aol.com <dallemolle@aol.com>;
Donnelly, Rob <rmdonnelly@earthlink.net>; Fronzoni, Jim
<lsijim@tl.infi.net>; Gallick, Gallick <dgallick@suntechmed.com>; Gardner,
Joseph P <joseph_p_gardner@groton.pfizer.com>; Gayle <gaylem@edgenet.net>;
Grasso, Vincent <vgrasso@tima.net>; Hiscox, David <Hiscox@concentric.net>;
Horn, Gary <garyhorn@home.com>; Jang, Roland <projang@msn.com>; Johnson,
Keith <keithj@cardionics.com>; mikeandsuz@home.com <mikeandsuz@home.com>;
slothicus@hotmail.com <slothicus@hotmail.com>; Kassal, Robert
<bkboater@delanet.com>; Kelly, Bruce <bkelly@suntechmed.com>; Kris Kolet
<Kris.Kolet@nipp.org>; Ladonis, Judy <VICKIAT8@aol.com>;
sleclair@ultranet.com <sleclair@ultranet.com>; Lyons, Chad <chadl@npwt.net>;
Mark Singer <singerm@elcsci.com>; McCauley, Matthew <dn4762@concentric.net>;
oompahdave@aol.com <oompahdave@aol.com>; Owsley, Norm
<J.N.Owsley@Worldnet.att.net>; Pam <dubeyhouse@juno.com>
Date: Saturday, December 04, 1999 10:40 AM
Subject: [Fwd: Fw: CHARGE A TOLL FEE for Internet access? Read This
(172503)]
<STRONG>attached mail follows:</STRONG><HR NOSHADE><P><P>
-----Original Message-----
From: RICHARD DALY <bigrich33@hotmail.com>
To: bdaly555@aol.com <bdaly555@aol.com>; Melaniedaly@dca.net
<Melaniedaly@dca.net>; Kcherill@osbornnet.org <Kcherill@osbornnet.org>
Cc: felicity@interlog.com <felicity@interlog.com>; hotgirlmaya@hotmail.com
<hotgirlmaya@hotmail.com>; rfaison@pampel.com <rfaison@pampel.com>
Date: Friday, December 03, 1999 8:35 PM
Subject: Fwd: CHARGE A TOLL FEE for Internet access? Read This (172503)
>
>
>
>>From: 78615@ <78615@>
>>Subject: CHARGE A TOLL FEE for Internet access? Read This (172503)
>>Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 09:01:49 -0400 (EDT)
>>
>> >
>> > >CNN has reported that within the next two weeks Congress is going to
>>vote
>> > on
>> > >allowing telephone companies to CHARGE A TOLL FEE for Internet access.
>> > >
>> > >Translation: Every time we send a long distance e-mail we will receive
>>a
>> > long
>> > >distance charge. This will get costly. Please visit the following web
>>site
>> > and
>> > >file a complaint to your Congressperson. We can't allow this to pass!
>>The
>> > >following address will allow you tosend an e-mail on this subject
>>DIRECTLY
>> > to
>> > >your Congressperson. http://www.house.gov/writerep
>> > >
>> > >Pass this on to your friends. It is urgent! I hope all of you will
pass
>> > this on
>> > >to all your friends and family. We should ALL have an interest in
this
>> > one.
>> > >
>> > >WAIT, THERE'S MORE! IN ADDITION, The last few months have revealed an
>> > alarming
>> > >trend in the Government of the United States attempting to quietly
push
>> > through
>> > >legislation that will affect your use of the Internet. Under proposed
>> > >legislation the U.S. Postal Service will be attempting to bilk email
>>users
>> > out
>> > >of "alternate postage fees". Bill 602P will permit the Federal Govt.
>>to
>> > charge
>> > >a 5 cent surcharge on every email delivered, by billing Internet
>>Service
>> > >Providers at source. The consumer would then be billed in turn by the
>>ISP.
>> > >Washington D.C. lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent
>>this
>> > >legislation from becoming law. The U.S. Postal Service is claiming
that
>> > lost
>> > >revenue due to the proliferation of e-mail costing nearly $230,000,000
>>in
>> > >revenue per year. (Oh, isn't that too bad?) You may have noticed
their
>> > recent
>> > >ad campaign "There is nothing like a letter". Since the average
citizen
>> > received
>> > >about 10 pieces of email per day in 1998, the cost to the typical
>> > individual
>> > >would be an additional 50 cents per day, or over $180 dollars per
year,
>> > above
>> > >and beyond their regular Internet costs. Note that this would be
money
>> > paid
>> > >directly to the U.S. Postal Service for a service they do not even
>>provide.
>> > >
>> > >The whole point of the Internet is democracy and non-interference. If
>>the
>> > >federal government is permitted to tamper with our liberties by adding
>>a
>> > >surcharge to email, who knows where it will end. You are already
paying
>>an
>> > >exorbitant price for snail mail because of bureaucratic inefficiency.
>>It
>> > > currently takes up to 6 days for a letter to be delivered from New
>>York
>>to
>> > >Buffalo. If the U.S. Postal Service is allowed to tinker with email,
it
>> > will
>> > >mark the end of the "free" Internet in the United States.
>> > >
>> > >One congressman, Tony Schnell (r) has even suggested a "twenty to
forty
>> > dollar
>> > >per month surcharge on all Internet service" above and beyond the
>> > government's
>> > >proposed email charges. Note that most of the major newspapers have
>> > ignored the
>> > >story, the only exception being the Washingtonian which called the
idea
>>of
>> > email
>> > >surcharge "a useful concept whose time has come" (March 6th, 1999
>> > Editorial).
>> > >
>> > >Don't sit by and watch your freedoms erode away! Send this e-mail to
>> > EVERYONE on
>> > >your list, and tell all your friends and relatives to write to their
>> > Congressman
>> > >and say "No!" to Bill 602P. It will only take a few moments of your
>>time,
>> > and
>> > >could very well be instrumental in killing a bill we don't want.
>> > >
>> > >PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW WHO USES EMAIL REMEMBER THESE ARE
TWO
>> > SEPARATE
>> > >ISSUES THAT EFFECT ALL OF US ONLINE LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD
>> > >
>> > >NOW, NOT AFTER.
>> > >
>>************************************
>>92825
>>
>
>______________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
JD
jim_donohue@computer.org
Sun, Dec 5, 1999 12:02 AM
The site - http://ciac.llnl.gov/ciac/CIACHoaxes.html#internetcharge shows
this is a long standing internet myth. If you go to that site before
publishing such things you can avoid the embarassment and waste of band
width.
I think the email tax is down the same list a few items
Jim
The site - http://ciac.llnl.gov/ciac/CIACHoaxes.html#internetcharge shows
this is a long standing internet myth. If you go to that site before
publishing such things you can avoid the embarassment and waste of band
width.
I think the email tax is down the same list a few items
Jim