trawlers@lists.trawlering.com

TRAWLERS & TRAWLERING LIST

View all threads

TWL: Fw: [Fwd: Fw: CHARGE A TOLL FEE for Internet access? Read This (172503)]

B
bkboater@delanet.com
Sat, Dec 4, 1999 10:02 PM

Here is a link to your congressman. If you disapprove of the upcoming bill
to charge a fee for use of the internet, please let him know.

Bob Kassal
-----Original Message-----
From: James Kassal jkassal@snet.net
To: Bauch, Terry 102361.2660@COMPUSERVE.COM; Beyeler
beyeler@inforamp.net; robert.v.breen@snet.net robert.v.breen@snet.net;
Coady, Kemp kcoady8482@aol.com; Daftary, Shrenik
shrenik_daftary@datascope.com; dallemolle@aol.com dallemolle@aol.com;
Donnelly, Rob rmdonnelly@earthlink.net; Fronzoni, Jim
lsijim@tl.infi.net; Gallick, Gallick dgallick@suntechmed.com; Gardner,
Joseph P joseph_p_gardner@groton.pfizer.com; Gayle gaylem@edgenet.net;
Grasso, Vincent vgrasso@tima.net; Hiscox, David Hiscox@concentric.net;
Horn, Gary garyhorn@home.com; Jang, Roland projang@msn.com; Johnson,
Keith keithj@cardionics.com; mikeandsuz@home.com mikeandsuz@home.com;
slothicus@hotmail.com slothicus@hotmail.com; Kassal, Robert
bkboater@delanet.com; Kelly, Bruce bkelly@suntechmed.com; Kris Kolet
Kris.Kolet@nipp.org; Ladonis, Judy VICKIAT8@aol.com;
sleclair@ultranet.com sleclair@ultranet.com; Lyons, Chad chadl@npwt.net;
Mark Singer singerm@elcsci.com; McCauley, Matthew dn4762@concentric.net;
oompahdave@aol.com oompahdave@aol.com; Owsley, Norm
J.N.Owsley@Worldnet.att.net; Pam dubeyhouse@juno.com
Date: Saturday, December 04, 1999 10:40 AM
Subject: [Fwd: Fw: CHARGE A TOLL FEE for Internet access? Read This
(172503)]

<STRONG>attached mail follows:</STRONG><HR NOSHADE><P><P>

-----Original Message-----
From: RICHARD DALY bigrich33@hotmail.com
To: bdaly555@aol.com bdaly555@aol.com; Melaniedaly@dca.net
Melaniedaly@dca.net; Kcherill@osbornnet.org Kcherill@osbornnet.org
Cc: felicity@interlog.com felicity@interlog.com; hotgirlmaya@hotmail.com
hotgirlmaya@hotmail.com; rfaison@pampel.com rfaison@pampel.com
Date: Friday, December 03, 1999 8:35 PM
Subject: Fwd: CHARGE A TOLL FEE for Internet access? Read This (172503)

From: 78615@ <78615@>
Subject: CHARGE A TOLL FEE for Internet access? Read This (172503)
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 09:01:49 -0400 (EDT)

CNN has reported that within the next two weeks Congress is going to

vote

on

allowing telephone companies to CHARGE A TOLL FEE for Internet access.

Translation: Every time we send a long distance e-mail we will receive

a

long

distance charge. This will get costly. Please visit the following web

site

and

file a complaint to your Congressperson.  We can't allow this to pass!

The

following address will allow you tosend an e-mail on this subject

DIRECTLY

to

your Congressperson.  http://www.house.gov/writerep

Pass this on to your friends. It is urgent! I hope all of you will

pass

this on

to all your friends and family.  We should ALL have an interest in

this

one.

WAIT, THERE'S MORE! IN ADDITION, The last few months have revealed an

alarming

trend in the Government of the United States attempting to quietly

push

through

legislation that will affect your use of the Internet.  Under proposed
legislation the U.S. Postal Service will be attempting to bilk email

users

out

of "alternate postage fees".  Bill 602P will permit the Federal Govt.

to

charge

a 5 cent surcharge on every email delivered, by billing Internet

Service

Providers at source. The consumer would then be billed in turn by the

ISP.

Washington D.C. lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent

this

legislation from becoming law. The U.S. Postal Service is claiming

that

lost

revenue due to the proliferation of e-mail costing nearly $230,000,000

in

revenue per year.  (Oh, isn't that too bad?) You may have noticed

their

recent

ad campaign "There is nothing like a letter". Since the average

citizen

received

about 10 pieces of email per day in 1998, the cost to the typical

individual

would be an additional 50 cents per day, or over $180 dollars per

year,

above

and beyond their regular Internet costs.  Note that this would be

money

paid

directly to the U.S. Postal Service for a service they do not even

provide.

The whole point of the Internet is democracy and non-interference. If

the

federal government is permitted to tamper with our liberties by adding

a

surcharge to email, who knows where it will end. You are already

paying

an

exorbitant price for snail mail because of bureaucratic inefficiency.

It

currently takes up to 6 days for a letter to be delivered from New

York
to

Buffalo. If the U.S. Postal Service is allowed to tinker with email,

it

will

mark the end of the "free" Internet in the United States.

One congressman, Tony Schnell (r) has even suggested a "twenty to

forty

dollar

per month surcharge on all Internet service" above and beyond the

government's

proposed email charges. Note that most of the major newspapers have

ignored the

story, the only exception being the Washingtonian which called the

idea

of

email

surcharge "a useful concept whose time has come" (March 6th, 1999

Editorial).

Don't sit by and watch your freedoms erode away! Send this e-mail to

EVERYONE on

your list, and tell all your friends and relatives to write to their

Congressman

and say "No!" to Bill 602P. It will only take a few moments of your

time,

and

could very well be instrumental in killing a bill we don't want.

PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW WHO USES EMAIL REMEMBER THESE ARE

TWO

SEPARATE

ISSUES THAT EFFECT ALL OF US ONLINE LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD

NOW, NOT AFTER.


92825


Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Here is a link to your congressman. If you disapprove of the upcoming bill to charge a fee for use of the internet, please let him know. Bob Kassal -----Original Message----- From: James Kassal <jkassal@snet.net> To: Bauch, Terry <102361.2660@COMPUSERVE.COM>; Beyeler <beyeler@inforamp.net>; robert.v.breen@snet.net <robert.v.breen@snet.net>; Coady, Kemp <kcoady8482@aol.com>; Daftary, Shrenik <shrenik_daftary@datascope.com>; dallemolle@aol.com <dallemolle@aol.com>; Donnelly, Rob <rmdonnelly@earthlink.net>; Fronzoni, Jim <lsijim@tl.infi.net>; Gallick, Gallick <dgallick@suntechmed.com>; Gardner, Joseph P <joseph_p_gardner@groton.pfizer.com>; Gayle <gaylem@edgenet.net>; Grasso, Vincent <vgrasso@tima.net>; Hiscox, David <Hiscox@concentric.net>; Horn, Gary <garyhorn@home.com>; Jang, Roland <projang@msn.com>; Johnson, Keith <keithj@cardionics.com>; mikeandsuz@home.com <mikeandsuz@home.com>; slothicus@hotmail.com <slothicus@hotmail.com>; Kassal, Robert <bkboater@delanet.com>; Kelly, Bruce <bkelly@suntechmed.com>; Kris Kolet <Kris.Kolet@nipp.org>; Ladonis, Judy <VICKIAT8@aol.com>; sleclair@ultranet.com <sleclair@ultranet.com>; Lyons, Chad <chadl@npwt.net>; Mark Singer <singerm@elcsci.com>; McCauley, Matthew <dn4762@concentric.net>; oompahdave@aol.com <oompahdave@aol.com>; Owsley, Norm <J.N.Owsley@Worldnet.att.net>; Pam <dubeyhouse@juno.com> Date: Saturday, December 04, 1999 10:40 AM Subject: [Fwd: Fw: CHARGE A TOLL FEE for Internet access? Read This (172503)] <STRONG>attached mail follows:</STRONG><HR NOSHADE><P><P> -----Original Message----- From: RICHARD DALY <bigrich33@hotmail.com> To: bdaly555@aol.com <bdaly555@aol.com>; Melaniedaly@dca.net <Melaniedaly@dca.net>; Kcherill@osbornnet.org <Kcherill@osbornnet.org> Cc: felicity@interlog.com <felicity@interlog.com>; hotgirlmaya@hotmail.com <hotgirlmaya@hotmail.com>; rfaison@pampel.com <rfaison@pampel.com> Date: Friday, December 03, 1999 8:35 PM Subject: Fwd: CHARGE A TOLL FEE for Internet access? Read This (172503) > > > >>From: 78615@ <78615@> >>Subject: CHARGE A TOLL FEE for Internet access? Read This (172503) >>Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1999 09:01:49 -0400 (EDT) >> >> > >> > >CNN has reported that within the next two weeks Congress is going to >>vote >> > on >> > >allowing telephone companies to CHARGE A TOLL FEE for Internet access. >> > > >> > >Translation: Every time we send a long distance e-mail we will receive >>a >> > long >> > >distance charge. This will get costly. Please visit the following web >>site >> > and >> > >file a complaint to your Congressperson. We can't allow this to pass! >>The >> > >following address will allow you tosend an e-mail on this subject >>DIRECTLY >> > to >> > >your Congressperson. http://www.house.gov/writerep >> > > >> > >Pass this on to your friends. It is urgent! I hope all of you will pass >> > this on >> > >to all your friends and family. We should ALL have an interest in this >> > one. >> > > >> > >WAIT, THERE'S MORE! IN ADDITION, The last few months have revealed an >> > alarming >> > >trend in the Government of the United States attempting to quietly push >> > through >> > >legislation that will affect your use of the Internet. Under proposed >> > >legislation the U.S. Postal Service will be attempting to bilk email >>users >> > out >> > >of "alternate postage fees". Bill 602P will permit the Federal Govt. >>to >> > charge >> > >a 5 cent surcharge on every email delivered, by billing Internet >>Service >> > >Providers at source. The consumer would then be billed in turn by the >>ISP. >> > >Washington D.C. lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to prevent >>this >> > >legislation from becoming law. The U.S. Postal Service is claiming that >> > lost >> > >revenue due to the proliferation of e-mail costing nearly $230,000,000 >>in >> > >revenue per year. (Oh, isn't that too bad?) You may have noticed their >> > recent >> > >ad campaign "There is nothing like a letter". Since the average citizen >> > received >> > >about 10 pieces of email per day in 1998, the cost to the typical >> > individual >> > >would be an additional 50 cents per day, or over $180 dollars per year, >> > above >> > >and beyond their regular Internet costs. Note that this would be money >> > paid >> > >directly to the U.S. Postal Service for a service they do not even >>provide. >> > > >> > >The whole point of the Internet is democracy and non-interference. If >>the >> > >federal government is permitted to tamper with our liberties by adding >>a >> > >surcharge to email, who knows where it will end. You are already paying >>an >> > >exorbitant price for snail mail because of bureaucratic inefficiency. >>It >> > > currently takes up to 6 days for a letter to be delivered from New >>York >>to >> > >Buffalo. If the U.S. Postal Service is allowed to tinker with email, it >> > will >> > >mark the end of the "free" Internet in the United States. >> > > >> > >One congressman, Tony Schnell (r) has even suggested a "twenty to forty >> > dollar >> > >per month surcharge on all Internet service" above and beyond the >> > government's >> > >proposed email charges. Note that most of the major newspapers have >> > ignored the >> > >story, the only exception being the Washingtonian which called the idea >>of >> > email >> > >surcharge "a useful concept whose time has come" (March 6th, 1999 >> > Editorial). >> > > >> > >Don't sit by and watch your freedoms erode away! Send this e-mail to >> > EVERYONE on >> > >your list, and tell all your friends and relatives to write to their >> > Congressman >> > >and say "No!" to Bill 602P. It will only take a few moments of your >>time, >> > and >> > >could very well be instrumental in killing a bill we don't want. >> > > >> > >PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW WHO USES EMAIL REMEMBER THESE ARE TWO >> > SEPARATE >> > >ISSUES THAT EFFECT ALL OF US ONLINE LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD >> > > >> > >NOW, NOT AFTER. >> > > >>************************************ >>92825 >> > >______________________________________________________ >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com >
JD
jim_donohue@computer.org
Sun, Dec 5, 1999 12:02 AM

The site - http://ciac.llnl.gov/ciac/CIACHoaxes.html#internetcharge shows
this is a long standing internet myth.  If you go to that site before
publishing such things you can avoid the embarassment and waste of band
width.

I think the email tax is down the same list a few items

Jim

The site - http://ciac.llnl.gov/ciac/CIACHoaxes.html#internetcharge shows this is a long standing internet myth. If you go to that site before publishing such things you can avoid the embarassment and waste of band width. I think the email tax is down the same list a few items Jim