CA
Chris Albertson
Sat, Jan 26, 2013 5:32 AM
This is by definition Off Topic
I'm looking for a forum where people are about as technically
competent as here but where an amateur scientist can ask questions
like
- What is a cost effective way to measure temperatures at around -80C
(about the temperature of dry ice) Thermocouples, NTC thermisters?
- Is brand X microscope as good as brand Y, they look identical to me.
All I'm finding is either places that cover "science news" or some
forum filled with nonsense about cloning dinosaurs and time travel.
--
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
This is by definition Off Topic
I'm looking for a forum where people are about as technically
competent as here but where an amateur scientist can ask questions
like
1) What is a cost effective way to measure temperatures at around -80C
(about the temperature of dry ice) Thermocouples, NTC thermisters?
2) Is brand X microscope as good as brand Y, they look identical to me.
All I'm finding is either places that cover "science news" or some
forum filled with nonsense about cloning dinosaurs and time travel.
--
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
BC
Bob Camp
Sat, Jan 26, 2013 1:58 PM
Hi
Platinum RTD's are a pretty good bet for -80C, they hold up well down there. For calibration, ammonia and acetylene both have triple points in the vicinity. I'd probably try ammonia first, but not for any good reason. Triple point cells aren't all that hard to make. Never tried it with something flammable ...
Bob
On Jan 26, 2013, at 12:32 AM, Chris Albertson albertson.chris@gmail.com wrote:
This is by definition Off Topic
I'm looking for a forum where people are about as technically
competent as here but where an amateur scientist can ask questions
like
- What is a cost effective way to measure temperatures at around -80C
(about the temperature of dry ice) Thermocouples, NTC thermisters?
- Is brand X microscope as good as brand Y, they look identical to me.
All I'm finding is either places that cover "science news" or some
forum filled with nonsense about cloning dinosaurs and time travel.
--
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi
Platinum RTD's are a pretty good bet for -80C, they hold up well down there. For calibration, ammonia and acetylene both have triple points in the vicinity. I'd probably try ammonia first, but not for any good reason. Triple point cells aren't all that hard to make. Never tried it with something flammable ...
Bob
On Jan 26, 2013, at 12:32 AM, Chris Albertson <albertson.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is by definition Off Topic
>
> I'm looking for a forum where people are about as technically
> competent as here but where an amateur scientist can ask questions
> like
>
> 1) What is a cost effective way to measure temperatures at around -80C
> (about the temperature of dry ice) Thermocouples, NTC thermisters?
> 2) Is brand X microscope as good as brand Y, they look identical to me.
>
> All I'm finding is either places that cover "science news" or some
> forum filled with nonsense about cloning dinosaurs and time travel.
>
> --
>
> Chris Albertson
> Redondo Beach, California
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
FE
Fabio Eboli
Sat, Jan 26, 2013 3:28 PM
Il 2013-01-26 14:58 Bob Camp ha scritto:
Hi
Platinum RTD's are a pretty good bet for -80C, they hold up well down
there. For calibration, ammonia and acetylene both have triple points
in the vicinity. I'd probably try ammonia first, but not for any good
Doesn't acetylene have a bad habit of dissociate when pure liquid?
Fabio.
Il 2013-01-26 14:58 Bob Camp ha scritto:
> Hi
>
> Platinum RTD's are a pretty good bet for -80C, they hold up well down
> there. For calibration, ammonia and acetylene both have triple points
> in the vicinity. I'd probably try ammonia first, but not for any good
Doesn't acetylene have a bad habit of dissociate when pure liquid?
Fabio.
JF
J. Forster
Sat, Jan 26, 2013 5:04 PM
For microscopes and all related topics, the Yahoo Microscope Group is very
knowledgeable. It has over 3500 members now.
-John
=================
This is by definition Off Topic
I'm looking for a forum where people are about as technically
competent as here but where an amateur scientist can ask questions
like
- What is a cost effective way to measure temperatures at around -80C
(about the temperature of dry ice) Thermocouples, NTC thermisters?
- Is brand X microscope as good as brand Y, they look identical to me.
All I'm finding is either places that cover "science news" or some
forum filled with nonsense about cloning dinosaurs and time travel.
--
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
For microscopes and all related topics, the Yahoo Microscope Group is very
knowledgeable. It has over 3500 members now.
-John
=================
> This is by definition Off Topic
>
> I'm looking for a forum where people are about as technically
> competent as here but where an amateur scientist can ask questions
> like
>
> 1) What is a cost effective way to measure temperatures at around -80C
> (about the temperature of dry ice) Thermocouples, NTC thermisters?
> 2) Is brand X microscope as good as brand Y, they look identical to me.
>
> All I'm finding is either places that cover "science news" or some
> forum filled with nonsense about cloning dinosaurs and time travel.
>
> --
>
> Chris Albertson
> Redondo Beach, California
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
BC
Bob Camp
Sat, Jan 26, 2013 5:22 PM
Hi
Sounds like a good reason to avoid it.
Bob
On Jan 26, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Fabio Eboli fabioeb@quipo.it wrote:
Il 2013-01-26 14:58 Bob Camp ha scritto:
Hi
Platinum RTD's are a pretty good bet for -80C, they hold up well down
there. For calibration, ammonia and acetylene both have triple points
in the vicinity. I'd probably try ammonia first, but not for any good
Hi
Sounds like a good reason to avoid it.
Bob
On Jan 26, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Fabio Eboli <fabioeb@quipo.it> wrote:
> Il 2013-01-26 14:58 Bob Camp ha scritto:
>> Hi
>>
>> Platinum RTD's are a pretty good bet for -80C, they hold up well down
>> there. For calibration, ammonia and acetylene both have triple points
>> in the vicinity. I'd probably try ammonia first, but not for any good
>
> Doesn't acetylene have a bad habit of dissociate when pure liquid?
>
> Fabio.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
JF
J. Forster
Sat, Jan 26, 2013 5:24 PM
Trying to play with liquid acetylene is like juggling operating chainsaws.
-John
================
Il 2013-01-26 14:58 Bob Camp ha scritto:
Hi
Platinum RTD's are a pretty good bet for -80C, they hold up well down
there. For calibration, ammonia and acetylene both have triple points
in the vicinity. I'd probably try ammonia first, but not for any good
Trying to play with liquid acetylene is like juggling operating chainsaws.
-John
================
> Il 2013-01-26 14:58 Bob Camp ha scritto:
>> Hi
>>
>> Platinum RTD's are a pretty good bet for -80C, they hold up well down
>> there. For calibration, ammonia and acetylene both have triple points
>> in the vicinity. I'd probably try ammonia first, but not for any good
>
> Doesn't acetylene have a bad habit of dissociate when pure liquid?
>
> Fabio.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
L
lists@lazygranch.com
Sat, Jan 26, 2013 6:00 PM
If the intent is surface mount work, get an old B&L Stereozoom 3. I'd suggest getting one with any attached illuminator, even a broken one, since the fitting to hold the illuminator is about $30. Later model stereozooms had plastic parts in the focus mechanism. If you need more magnification, you can always get "stronger" occulars.
-----Original Message-----
From: "J. Forster" jfor@quikus.com
Sender: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 09:04:59
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurementtime-nuts@febo.com
Reply-To: jfor@quikus.com, Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
time-nuts@febo.com
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OT, looking for a good science forum
For microscopes and all related topics, the Yahoo Microscope Group is very
knowledgeable. It has over 3500 members now.
-John
=================
This is by definition Off Topic
I'm looking for a forum where people are about as technically
competent as here but where an amateur scientist can ask questions
like
- What is a cost effective way to measure temperatures at around -80C
(about the temperature of dry ice) Thermocouples, NTC thermisters?
- Is brand X microscope as good as brand Y, they look identical to me.
All I'm finding is either places that cover "science news" or some
forum filled with nonsense about cloning dinosaurs and time travel.
--
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
If the intent is surface mount work, get an old B&L Stereozoom 3. I'd suggest getting one with any attached illuminator, even a broken one, since the fitting to hold the illuminator is about $30. Later model stereozooms had plastic parts in the focus mechanism. If you need more magnification, you can always get "stronger" occulars.
-----Original Message-----
From: "J. Forster" <jfor@quikus.com>
Sender: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 09:04:59
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement<time-nuts@febo.com>
Reply-To: jfor@quikus.com, Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
<time-nuts@febo.com>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OT, looking for a good science forum
For microscopes and all related topics, the Yahoo Microscope Group is very
knowledgeable. It has over 3500 members now.
-John
=================
> This is by definition Off Topic
>
> I'm looking for a forum where people are about as technically
> competent as here but where an amateur scientist can ask questions
> like
>
> 1) What is a cost effective way to measure temperatures at around -80C
> (about the temperature of dry ice) Thermocouples, NTC thermisters?
> 2) Is brand X microscope as good as brand Y, they look identical to me.
>
> All I'm finding is either places that cover "science news" or some
> forum filled with nonsense about cloning dinosaurs and time travel.
>
> --
>
> Chris Albertson
> Redondo Beach, California
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
DR
DARRELL ROBINSON
Sat, Jan 26, 2013 6:31 PM
I did a Google search and came across sciencenuts.org, but content was limited....
If you have no success, maybe science-nuts could be created. There would be at least two of us joining.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Albertson" albertson.chris@gmail.com
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:32:58 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] OT, looking for a good science forum
This is by definition Off Topic
I'm looking for a forum where people are about as technically
competent as here but where an amateur scientist can ask questions
like
- What is a cost effective way to measure temperatures at around -80C
(about the temperature of dry ice) Thermocouples, NTC thermisters?
- Is brand X microscope as good as brand Y, they look identical to me.
All I'm finding is either places that cover "science news" or some
forum filled with nonsense about cloning dinosaurs and time travel.
--
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
I did a Google search and came across sciencenuts.org, but content was limited....
If you have no success, maybe science-nuts could be created. There would be at least two of us joining.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Albertson" <albertson.chris@gmail.com>
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts@febo.com>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:32:58 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] OT, looking for a good science forum
This is by definition Off Topic
I'm looking for a forum where people are about as technically
competent as here but where an amateur scientist can ask questions
like
1) What is a cost effective way to measure temperatures at around -80C
(about the temperature of dry ice) Thermocouples, NTC thermisters?
2) Is brand X microscope as good as brand Y, they look identical to me.
All I'm finding is either places that cover "science news" or some
forum filled with nonsense about cloning dinosaurs and time travel.
--
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
DL
Don Latham
Sat, Jan 26, 2013 7:28 PM
I did a Google search and came across sciencenuts.org, but content was
limited....
If you have no success, maybe science-nuts could be created. There
would be at least two of us joining.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Albertson" albertson.chris@gmail.com
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:32:58 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] OT, looking for a good science forum
This is by definition Off Topic
I'm looking for a forum where people are about as technically
competent as here but where an amateur scientist can ask questions
like
- What is a cost effective way to measure temperatures at around -80C
(about the temperature of dry ice) Thermocouples, NTC thermisters?
- Is brand X microscope as good as brand Y, they look identical to me.
All I'm finding is either places that cover "science news" or some
forum filled with nonsense about cloning dinosaurs and time travel.
--
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
--
"Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind."
De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century.
"If you don't know what it is, don't poke it."
Ghost in the Shell
Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com
Maybe wrong search words;
There may be pearls in here:
http://www.goedonline.com/101-websites-for-science-teachers
Don
DARRELL ROBINSON
> I did a Google search and came across sciencenuts.org, but content was
> limited....
>
> If you have no success, maybe science-nuts could be created. There
> would be at least two of us joining.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Albertson" <albertson.chris@gmail.com>
> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
> <time-nuts@febo.com>
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:32:58 PM
> Subject: [time-nuts] OT, looking for a good science forum
>
> This is by definition Off Topic
>
> I'm looking for a forum where people are about as technically
> competent as here but where an amateur scientist can ask questions
> like
>
> 1) What is a cost effective way to measure temperatures at around -80C
> (about the temperature of dry ice) Thermocouples, NTC thermisters?
> 2) Is brand X microscope as good as brand Y, they look identical to me.
>
> All I'm finding is either places that cover "science news" or some
> forum filled with nonsense about cloning dinosaurs and time travel.
>
> --
>
> Chris Albertson
> Redondo Beach, California
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
--
"Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind."
De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century.
"If you don't know what it is, don't poke it."
Ghost in the Shell
Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com
DL
Don Latham
Sat, Jan 26, 2013 7:38 PM
I did a Google search and came across sciencenuts.org, but content was
limited....
If you have no success, maybe science-nuts could be created. There
would be at least two of us joining.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Albertson" albertson.chris@gmail.com
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:32:58 PM
Subject: [time-nuts] OT, looking for a good science forum
This is by definition Off Topic
I'm looking for a forum where people are about as technically
competent as here but where an amateur scientist can ask questions
like
- What is a cost effective way to measure temperatures at around -80C
(about the temperature of dry ice) Thermocouples, NTC thermisters?
- Is brand X microscope as good as brand Y, they look identical to
me.
All I'm finding is either places that cover "science news" or some
forum filled with nonsense about cloning dinosaurs and time travel.
--
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
--
"Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind."
De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century.
"If you don't know what it is, don't poke it."
Ghost in the Shell
Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com
Or perhaps:
http://www.scienceforums.net/forum/78-amateur-science/
Don
Don Latham
> Maybe wrong search words;
> There may be pearls in here:
> http://www.goedonline.com/101-websites-for-science-teachers
> Don
> DARRELL ROBINSON
>> I did a Google search and came across sciencenuts.org, but content was
>> limited....
>>
>> If you have no success, maybe science-nuts could be created. There
>> would be at least two of us joining.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Chris Albertson" <albertson.chris@gmail.com>
>> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
>> <time-nuts@febo.com>
>> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:32:58 PM
>> Subject: [time-nuts] OT, looking for a good science forum
>>
>> This is by definition Off Topic
>>
>> I'm looking for a forum where people are about as technically
>> competent as here but where an amateur scientist can ask questions
>> like
>>
>> 1) What is a cost effective way to measure temperatures at around -80C
>> (about the temperature of dry ice) Thermocouples, NTC thermisters?
>> 2) Is brand X microscope as good as brand Y, they look identical to
>> me.
>>
>> All I'm finding is either places that cover "science news" or some
>> forum filled with nonsense about cloning dinosaurs and time travel.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Chris Albertson
>> Redondo Beach, California
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>
>
> --
> "Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
> are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind."
> De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century.
> "If you don't know what it is, don't poke it."
> Ghost in the Shell
>
>
> Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
> Six Mile Systems LLP
> 17850 Six Mile Road
> POB 134
> Huson, MT, 59846
> VOX 406-626-4304
> www.lightningforensics.com
> www.sixmilesystems.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
--
"Neither the voice of authority nor the weight of reason and argument
are as significant as experiment, for thence comes quiet to the mind."
De Erroribus Medicorum, R. Bacon, 13th century.
"If you don't know what it is, don't poke it."
Ghost in the Shell
Dr. Don Latham AJ7LL
Six Mile Systems LLP
17850 Six Mile Road
POB 134
Huson, MT, 59846
VOX 406-626-4304
www.lightningforensics.com
www.sixmilesystems.com
CA
Chris Albertson
Sat, Jan 26, 2013 9:36 PM
If the intent is surface mount work, get an old B&L Stereozoom 3. I'd suggest getting one with any attached illuminator, even a broken one, since the fitting to hold the illuminator is about $30. Later model stereozooms had plastic parts in the focus mechanism. If you need more magnification, you can always get "stronger"
This is really OT for the TN list. But no. I'm looking to equip a
biology lab. Need a compound microscope that has on the high side a
1000x magnification. Pretty much your "Standard" university lab
microscope that all freshmen bio students would use. These are a
little hard to know what's best to get
But I think in addition I want a stereo microscope too. There are
decent new ones from China for under $100 and older ones like you
mentioned for about the same price. New ones are attractive because
of advances like battery powered LED illumination. This kind of
microscope is pretty easy to find compared to the other.
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:00 AM, <lists@lazygranch.com> wrote:
> If the intent is surface mount work, get an old B&L Stereozoom 3. I'd suggest getting one with any attached illuminator, even a broken one, since the fitting to hold the illuminator is about $30. Later model stereozooms had plastic parts in the focus mechanism. If you need more magnification, you can always get "stronger"
This is really OT for the TN list. But no. I'm looking to equip a
biology lab. Need a compound microscope that has on the high side a
1000x magnification. Pretty much your "Standard" university lab
microscope that all freshmen bio students would use. These are a
little hard to know what's best to get
But I think in addition I want a stereo microscope too. There are
decent new ones from China for under $100 and older ones like you
mentioned for about the same price. New ones are attractive because
of advances like battery powered LED illumination. This kind of
microscope is pretty easy to find compared to the other.
--
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
JF
J. Forster
Sat, Jan 26, 2013 9:46 PM
The microscope group can help with reccomendations. 1000x is really
pushing it, because of 'empty magnification'.
Best,
-John
==================
If the intent is surface mount work, get an old B&L Stereozoom 3. I'd
suggest getting one with any attached illuminator, even a broken one,
since the fitting to hold the illuminator is about $30. Later model
stereozooms had plastic parts in the focus mechanism. If you need more
magnification, you can always get "stronger"
This is really OT for the TN list. But no. I'm looking to equip a
biology lab. Need a compound microscope that has on the high side a
1000x magnification. Pretty much your "Standard" university lab
microscope that all freshmen bio students would use. These are a
little hard to know what's best to get
But I think in addition I want a stereo microscope too. There are
decent new ones from China for under $100 and older ones like you
mentioned for about the same price. New ones are attractive because
of advances like battery powered LED illumination. This kind of
microscope is pretty easy to find compared to the other.
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
The microscope group can help with reccomendations. 1000x is really
pushing it, because of 'empty magnification'.
Best,
-John
==================
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:00 AM, <lists@lazygranch.com> wrote:
>> If the intent is surface mount work, get an old B&L Stereozoom 3. I'd
>> suggest getting one with any attached illuminator, even a broken one,
>> since the fitting to hold the illuminator is about $30. Later model
>> stereozooms had plastic parts in the focus mechanism. If you need more
>> magnification, you can always get "stronger"
>
> This is really OT for the TN list. But no. I'm looking to equip a
> biology lab. Need a compound microscope that has on the high side a
> 1000x magnification. Pretty much your "Standard" university lab
> microscope that all freshmen bio students would use. These are a
> little hard to know what's best to get
>
> But I think in addition I want a stereo microscope too. There are
> decent new ones from China for under $100 and older ones like you
> mentioned for about the same price. New ones are attractive because
> of advances like battery powered LED illumination. This kind of
> microscope is pretty easy to find compared to the other.
> --
>
> Chris Albertson
> Redondo Beach, California
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
EG
Eric Garner
Sat, Jan 26, 2013 9:59 PM
The stereo boom mount scopes from amscope are priced right. The one I have seems well made and works great for surface mount work down to 0201. Some of the finish details are a bit off (generic metal adjustment handles) but it was a new, complete, guaranteed working scope so I don't have any legitimate complaints.
If you are going to buy one, buy it from amazon after figuring out which on you want on the amscope site. You'll pay less
Eric
Sent from my Banana Jr.(tm) mobile device
On Jan 26, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Chris Albertson albertson.chris@gmail.com wrote:
If the intent is surface mount work, get an old B&L Stereozoom 3. I'd suggest getting one with any attached illuminator, even a broken one, since the fitting to hold the illuminator is about $30. Later model stereozooms had plastic parts in the focus mechanism. If you need more magnification, you can always get "stronger"
This is really OT for the TN list. But no. I'm looking to equip a
biology lab. Need a compound microscope that has on the high side a
1000x magnification. Pretty much your "Standard" university lab
microscope that all freshmen bio students would use. These are a
little hard to know what's best to get
But I think in addition I want a stereo microscope too. There are
decent new ones from China for under $100 and older ones like you
mentioned for about the same price. New ones are attractive because
of advances like battery powered LED illumination. This kind of
microscope is pretty easy to find compared to the other.
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
The stereo boom mount scopes from amscope are priced right. The one I have seems well made and works great for surface mount work down to 0201. Some of the finish details are a bit off (generic metal adjustment handles) but it was a new, complete, guaranteed working scope so I don't have any legitimate complaints.
If you are going to buy one, buy it from amazon after figuring out which on you want on the amscope site. You'll pay less
Eric
Sent from my Banana Jr.(tm) mobile device
On Jan 26, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Chris Albertson <albertson.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:00 AM, <lists@lazygranch.com> wrote:
>> If the intent is surface mount work, get an old B&L Stereozoom 3. I'd suggest getting one with any attached illuminator, even a broken one, since the fitting to hold the illuminator is about $30. Later model stereozooms had plastic parts in the focus mechanism. If you need more magnification, you can always get "stronger"
>
> This is really OT for the TN list. But no. I'm looking to equip a
> biology lab. Need a compound microscope that has on the high side a
> 1000x magnification. Pretty much your "Standard" university lab
> microscope that all freshmen bio students would use. These are a
> little hard to know what's best to get
>
> But I think in addition I want a stereo microscope too. There are
> decent new ones from China for under $100 and older ones like you
> mentioned for about the same price. New ones are attractive because
> of advances like battery powered LED illumination. This kind of
> microscope is pretty easy to find compared to the other.
> --
>
> Chris Albertson
> Redondo Beach, California
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
CA
Chris Albertson
Sat, Jan 26, 2013 10:14 PM
The microscope group can help with reccomendations. 1000x is really
pushing it, because of 'empty magnification'.
1000x is the "standard". Almost every microscope in a biology lab
will have a 100x oil immersion objective and a 10x eyepiece. And
then also have two or three lower power objectives as well.
If you were to try and get 1000x from a 40x objective or if the
optical quality were poor, yes, then you are just getting big, blurry
images with no more detai than you'd see at 400x. That is what you
call "empty magnification" and it is.
It turns out that 1000x is about the limit of light microscopes and
you pretty much need that if the goal is to see structures inside a
cell, rather then just the cell's outline. You need to use oil that
has about the same refractive index as the glass cover slide. In
high school level labs they use cheaper 400x scopes and just look at
larger stuff.
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 1:46 PM, J. Forster <jfor@quikus.com> wrote:
> The microscope group can help with reccomendations. 1000x is really
> pushing it, because of 'empty magnification'.
>
1000x is the "standard". Almost every microscope in a biology lab
will have a 100x oil immersion objective and a 10x eyepiece. And
then also have two or three lower power objectives as well.
If you were to try and get 1000x from a 40x objective or if the
optical quality were poor, yes, then you are just getting big, blurry
images with no more detai than you'd see at 400x. That is what you
call "empty magnification" and it is.
It turns out that 1000x is about the limit of light microscopes and
you pretty much need that if the goal is to see structures inside a
cell, rather then just the cell's outline. You need to use oil that
has about the same refractive index as the glass cover slide. In
high school level labs they use cheaper 400x scopes and just look at
larger stuff.
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
DK
David Kirkby
Sat, Jan 26, 2013 10:45 PM
I did a Google search and came across sciencenuts.org, but content was limited....
If you have no success, maybe science-nuts could be created. There would be at least two of us joining.
On 26 January 2013 18:31, DARRELL ROBINSON <darrell@shaw.ca> wrote:
> I did a Google search and came across sciencenuts.org, but content was limited....
>
> If you have no success, maybe science-nuts could be created. There would be at least two of us joining.
Make that three.
Dave
SW
Stan, W1LE
Sun, Jan 27, 2013 12:27 AM
I like the idea of a "amateur microscopy nuts" reflector.
After a warm day, my bees took their cleansing flights and I collected
some of their poop to look for parasites.
Did not find anything moving at 500x , like tracheal mites or their
parts, but I did find a lot of undigested pollen.
I have not found a reflector for my microscopy interests.
Stan, W1LE
On 1/26/2013 5:45 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
I did a Google search and came across sciencenuts.org, but content was limited....
If you have no success, maybe science-nuts could be created. There would be at least two of us joining.
I like the idea of a "amateur microscopy nuts" reflector.
After a warm day, my bees took their cleansing flights and I collected
some of their poop to look for parasites.
Did not find anything moving at 500x , like tracheal mites or their
parts, but I did find a lot of undigested pollen.
I have not found a reflector for my microscopy interests.
Stan, W1LE
On 1/26/2013 5:45 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 26 January 2013 18:31, DARRELL ROBINSON <darrell@shaw.ca> wrote:
>> I did a Google search and came across sciencenuts.org, but content was limited....
>>
>> If you have no success, maybe science-nuts could be created. There would be at least two of us joining.
> Make that three.
>
> Dave
JF
J. Forster
Sun, Jan 27, 2013 1:59 AM
The Yahoo Microscope Group already exists with over 3700 members world
wide, which forms a huge knowlege base, from biology to microelectronics.
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/
Why re-invent the wheel?
-John
==========
I like the idea of a "amateur microscopy nuts" reflector.
After a warm day, my bees took their cleansing flights and I collected
some of their poop to look for parasites.
Did not find anything moving at 500x , like tracheal mites or their
parts, but I did find a lot of undigested pollen.
I have not found a reflector for my microscopy interests.
Stan, W1LE
On 1/26/2013 5:45 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
I did a Google search and came across sciencenuts.org, but content was
limited....
If you have no success, maybe science-nuts could be created. There
would be at least two of us joining.
The Yahoo Microscope Group already exists with over 3700 members world
wide, which forms a huge knowlege base, from biology to microelectronics.
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/
Why re-invent the wheel?
-John
==========
> I like the idea of a "amateur microscopy nuts" reflector.
>
> After a warm day, my bees took their cleansing flights and I collected
> some of their poop to look for parasites.
> Did not find anything moving at 500x , like tracheal mites or their
> parts, but I did find a lot of undigested pollen.
>
> I have not found a reflector for my microscopy interests.
>
> Stan, W1LE
>
>
> On 1/26/2013 5:45 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
>> On 26 January 2013 18:31, DARRELL ROBINSON <darrell@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>> I did a Google search and came across sciencenuts.org, but content was
>>> limited....
>>>
>>> If you have no success, maybe science-nuts could be created. There
>>> would be at least two of us joining.
>> Make that three.
>>
>> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
SW
Stan, W1LE
Sun, Jan 27, 2013 3:01 AM
Thanks for the pointer. I am checking it out now. Stan
On 1/26/2013 8:59 PM, J. Forster wrote:
Thanks for the pointer. I am checking it out now. Stan
On 1/26/2013 8:59 PM, J. Forster wrote:
> The Yahoo Microscope Group already exists with over 3700 members world
> wide, which forms a huge knowlege base, from biology to microelectronics.
>
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Microscope/
>
> Why re-invent the wheel?
>
> -John
>
SM
Scott McGrath
Sun, Jan 27, 2013 4:19 AM
Try a AO PhaseStar phase contrast microscope they are relatively cheap on eBay and they should be more than adequate for beekeeping. The phase contrast feature allows you to see celluar details without staining in most cases
Most of them have fittings for camera tubes so photomicrography is easily accomplished or use a video camera and a large monitor for studying details or group viewing
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 26, 2013, at 4:36 PM, Chris Albertson albertson.chris@gmail.com wrote:
If the intent is surface mount work, get an old B&L Stereozoom 3. I'd suggest getting one with any attached illuminator, even a broken one, since the fitting to hold the illuminator is about $30. Later model stereozooms had plastic parts in the focus mechanism. If you need more magnification, you can always get "stronger"
This is really OT for the TN list. But no. I'm looking to equip a
biology lab. Need a compound microscope that has on the high side a
1000x magnification. Pretty much your "Standard" university lab
microscope that all freshmen bio students would use. These are a
little hard to know what's best to get
But I think in addition I want a stereo microscope too. There are
decent new ones from China for under $100 and older ones like you
mentioned for about the same price. New ones are attractive because
of advances like battery powered LED illumination. This kind of
microscope is pretty easy to find compared to the other.
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Try a AO PhaseStar phase contrast microscope they are relatively cheap on eBay and they should be more than adequate for beekeeping. The phase contrast feature allows you to see celluar details without staining in most cases
Most of them have fittings for camera tubes so photomicrography is easily accomplished or use a video camera and a large monitor for studying details or group viewing
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 26, 2013, at 4:36 PM, Chris Albertson <albertson.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:00 AM, <lists@lazygranch.com> wrote:
>> If the intent is surface mount work, get an old B&L Stereozoom 3. I'd suggest getting one with any attached illuminator, even a broken one, since the fitting to hold the illuminator is about $30. Later model stereozooms had plastic parts in the focus mechanism. If you need more magnification, you can always get "stronger"
>
> This is really OT for the TN list. But no. I'm looking to equip a
> biology lab. Need a compound microscope that has on the high side a
> 1000x magnification. Pretty much your "Standard" university lab
> microscope that all freshmen bio students would use. These are a
> little hard to know what's best to get
>
> But I think in addition I want a stereo microscope too. There are
> decent new ones from China for under $100 and older ones like you
> mentioned for about the same price. New ones are attractive because
> of advances like battery powered LED illumination. This kind of
> microscope is pretty easy to find compared to the other.
> --
>
> Chris Albertson
> Redondo Beach, California
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
JS
Jeff Stevens
Sun, Jan 27, 2013 8:01 AM
I'm looking for a forum where people are about as technically
competent as here but where an amateur scientist can ask questions
I've read a lot on sciencemadness.org, which as Bob Said, leans heavily
toward chemistry. They seem to have quite an interesting an thriving
community.
-Jeff
W7WWA
>I'm looking for a forum where people are about as technically
>competent as here but where an amateur scientist can ask questions
I've read a lot on sciencemadness.org, which as Bob Said, leans heavily
toward chemistry. They seem to have quite an interesting an thriving
community.
-Jeff
W7WWA