maildev@lists.thunderbird.net

Thunderbird email developers

View all threads

Integrating LookOut / TNEF / winmail.dat

BB
Ben Bucksch
Wed, Dec 6, 2017 10:04 PM

Hey Magnus,

you said the TNEF addons all have license problems and use non-OSS
libraries.

The most popular is LookOut
https://addons.mozilla.org/de/thunderbird/addon/lookout/

The page says it's MPL 1.1. I looked at the content, it's pure JS and
tnef.js has no special license header, so I assume it's MPL 1.1 like the
rest. The ext page description says "The TNEF decoding engine was
inspired (with permission) by the tnef.sf.net project", so that appears
to be a re-write by the LookOut author.

Do you still think that there are license problems? If so, which ones?

Ben

Hey Magnus, you said the TNEF addons all have license problems and use non-OSS libraries. The most popular is LookOut https://addons.mozilla.org/de/thunderbird/addon/lookout/ The page says it's MPL 1.1. I looked at the content, it's pure JS and tnef.js has no special license header, so I assume it's MPL 1.1 like the rest. The ext page description says "The TNEF decoding engine was inspired (with permission) by the tnef.sf.net project", so that appears to be a re-write by the LookOut author. Do you still think that there are license problems? If so, which ones? Ben
JK
Jörg Knobloch
Wed, Dec 6, 2017 10:30 PM

On 06/12/2017 23:04, Ben Bucksch wrote:

Hey Magnus,

you said the TNEF addons all have license problems and use non-OSS
libraries.

The most popular is LookOut
https://addons.mozilla.org/de/thunderbird/addon/lookout/

Note that this one is abandoned, it's successor LookOut+ is abandoned as
well (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/lookout-1/),
the real thing is here:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/lookout-fix-version/

That's already fit for TB 58 with my help.

Please don't look at the stats, they lie. There might be add-ons
installed for ages, which cause ADI pings but don't work and hence no
one uses them.

Jörg.

On 06/12/2017 23:04, Ben Bucksch wrote: > Hey Magnus, > > you said the TNEF addons all have license problems and use non-OSS > libraries. > > The most popular is LookOut > https://addons.mozilla.org/de/thunderbird/addon/lookout/ Note that this one is abandoned, it's successor LookOut+ is abandoned as well (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/lookout-1/), the real thing is here: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/lookout-fix-version/ That's already fit for TB 58 with my help. Please don't look at the stats, they lie. There might be add-ons installed for ages, which cause ADI pings but don't work and hence no one uses them. Jörg.
BB
Ben Bucksch
Wed, Dec 6, 2017 10:46 PM

Why it's useful to integrate this:

Once in a while, Microsoft Outlook (the desktop application) decides to
send out these "winmail.dat" files. They contain the actual email and/or
attachment. Without decoding it, you can't read what the sender wanted
to tell you. It maybe a meeting invitation (and then you don't know when
the meeting will be), and you have to ask back. It's highly
embarrassing, esp. in business negotiations. It has happened to me.

I am not sure about this particular addon, whether it works well. I'm
just saying that the functionality would be useful for our users.

Even as I despise the idea of winmail.dat. But given that it's one of
our most popular addons, that shows there's a need.

Ben Bucksch wrote on 06.12.17 23:04:

Hey Magnus,

you said the TNEF addons all have license problems and use non-OSS
libraries.

The most popular is LookOut
https://addons.mozilla.org/de/thunderbird/addon/lookout/

The page says it's MPL 1.1. I looked at the content, it's pure JS and
tnef.js has no special license header, so I assume it's MPL 1.1 like
the rest. The ext page description says "The TNEF decoding engine was
inspired (with permission) by the tnef.sf.net project", so that
appears to be a re-write by the LookOut author.

Do you still think that there are license problems? If so, which ones?

Ben

Why it's useful to integrate this: Once in a while, Microsoft Outlook (the desktop application) decides to send out these "winmail.dat" files. They contain the actual email and/or attachment. Without decoding it, you can't read what the sender wanted to tell you. It maybe a meeting invitation (and then you don't know when the meeting will be), and you have to ask back. It's highly embarrassing, esp. in business negotiations. It has happened to me. I am not sure about this particular addon, whether it works well. I'm just saying that the functionality would be useful for our users. Even as I despise the idea of winmail.dat. But given that it's one of our most popular addons, that shows there's a need. Ben Bucksch wrote on 06.12.17 23:04: > Hey Magnus, > > you said the TNEF addons all have license problems and use non-OSS > libraries. > > The most popular is LookOut > https://addons.mozilla.org/de/thunderbird/addon/lookout/ > > The page says it's MPL 1.1. I looked at the content, it's pure JS and > tnef.js has no special license header, so I assume it's MPL 1.1 like > the rest. The ext page description says "The TNEF decoding engine was > inspired (with permission) by the tnef.sf.net project", so that > appears to be a re-write by the LookOut author. > > Do you still think that there are license problems? If so, which ones? > > Ben >
JK
Jörg Knobloch
Wed, Dec 6, 2017 10:53 PM

On 06/12/2017 23:46, Ben Bucksch wrote:

Even as I despise the idea of winmail.dat. But given that it's one of
our most popular addons, that shows there's a need.

Sure, that's why we have
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77811 from 2001.

Lobby the add-on author of the "fix version" to integrate it.

Jörg.

On 06/12/2017 23:46, Ben Bucksch wrote: > Even as I despise the idea of winmail.dat. But given that it's one of > our most popular addons, that shows there's a need. Sure, that's why we have https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77811 from 2001. Lobby the add-on author of the "fix version" to integrate it. Jörg.
RS
Ryan Sipes
Wed, Dec 27, 2017 7:35 PM

Saw this come through as a request a couple of times in the comments for
this blog post:

Has anyone reached out to Oleksandr, the add-on author about
integration? I'm happy to do it if it hasn't been done. Also, does
anyone know his Email address? I can't find it on his blog.

Ryan

On 12/6/17 3:53 PM, Jörg Knobloch wrote:

On 06/12/2017 23:46, Ben Bucksch wrote:

Even as I despise the idea of winmail.dat. But given that it's one of
our most popular addons, that shows there's a need.

Sure, that's why we have
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77811 from 2001.

Lobby the add-on author of the "fix version" to integrate it.

Jörg.


Maildev mailing list
Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net

Saw this come through as a request a couple of times in the comments for this blog post: Has anyone reached out to Oleksandr, the add-on author about integration? I'm happy to do it if it hasn't been done. Also, does anyone know his Email address? I can't find it on his blog. Ryan On 12/6/17 3:53 PM, Jörg Knobloch wrote: > On 06/12/2017 23:46, Ben Bucksch wrote: >> Even as I despise the idea of winmail.dat. But given that it's one of >> our most popular addons, that shows there's a need. > > Sure, that's why we have > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77811 from 2001. > > Lobby the add-on author of the "fix version" to integrate it. > > Jörg. > > > _______________________________________________ > Maildev mailing list > Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net > http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net >
RS
Ryan Sipes
Wed, Dec 27, 2017 7:37 PM

Whoops, forgot to add the link, the blog post referenced is here:
https://blog.mozilla.org/thunderbird/2017/12/new-thunderbird-releases-and-new-thunderbird-staff/

On 12/27/17 12:35 PM, Ryan Sipes wrote:

Saw this come through as a request a couple of times in the comments
for this blog post:

Has anyone reached out to Oleksandr, the add-on author about
integration? I'm happy to do it if it hasn't been done. Also, does
anyone know his Email address? I can't find it on his blog.

Ryan

On 12/6/17 3:53 PM, Jörg Knobloch wrote:

On 06/12/2017 23:46, Ben Bucksch wrote:

Even as I despise the idea of winmail.dat. But given that it's one
of our most popular addons, that shows there's a need.

Sure, that's why we have
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77811 from 2001.

Lobby the add-on author of the "fix version" to integrate it.

Jörg.


Maildev mailing list
Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net

Whoops, forgot to add the link, the blog post referenced is here: https://blog.mozilla.org/thunderbird/2017/12/new-thunderbird-releases-and-new-thunderbird-staff/ On 12/27/17 12:35 PM, Ryan Sipes wrote: > Saw this come through as a request a couple of times in the comments > for this blog post: > > Has anyone reached out to Oleksandr, the add-on author about > integration? I'm happy to do it if it hasn't been done. Also, does > anyone know his Email address? I can't find it on his blog. > > Ryan > > On 12/6/17 3:53 PM, Jörg Knobloch wrote: >> On 06/12/2017 23:46, Ben Bucksch wrote: >>> Even as I despise the idea of winmail.dat. But given that it's one >>> of our most popular addons, that shows there's a need. >> >> Sure, that's why we have >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77811 from 2001. >> >> Lobby the add-on author of the "fix version" to integrate it. >> >> Jörg. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Maildev mailing list >> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net >> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net >> > > _______________________________________________ > Maildev mailing list > Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net > http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net >
RS
Ryan Sipes
Wed, Dec 27, 2017 8:36 PM

So the last bit in this saga, I got in touch with Alexander, the
developer of the add-on. He says he's going to continue to update it and
maintain it as we move forward. So I guess that is that.

On 12/27/17 12:37 PM, Ryan Sipes wrote:

Whoops, forgot to add the link, the blog post referenced is here:
https://blog.mozilla.org/thunderbird/2017/12/new-thunderbird-releases-and-new-thunderbird-staff/

On 12/27/17 12:35 PM, Ryan Sipes wrote:

Saw this come through as a request a couple of times in the comments
for this blog post:

Has anyone reached out to Oleksandr, the add-on author about
integration? I'm happy to do it if it hasn't been done. Also, does
anyone know his Email address? I can't find it on his blog.

Ryan

On 12/6/17 3:53 PM, Jörg Knobloch wrote:

On 06/12/2017 23:46, Ben Bucksch wrote:

Even as I despise the idea of winmail.dat. But given that it's one
of our most popular addons, that shows there's a need.

Sure, that's why we have
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77811 from 2001.

Lobby the add-on author of the "fix version" to integrate it.

Jörg.


Maildev mailing list
Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net
http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net

So the last bit in this saga, I got in touch with Alexander, the developer of the add-on. He says he's going to continue to update it and maintain it as we move forward. So I guess that is that. On 12/27/17 12:37 PM, Ryan Sipes wrote: > Whoops, forgot to add the link, the blog post referenced is here: > https://blog.mozilla.org/thunderbird/2017/12/new-thunderbird-releases-and-new-thunderbird-staff/ > > On 12/27/17 12:35 PM, Ryan Sipes wrote: >> Saw this come through as a request a couple of times in the comments >> for this blog post: >> >> Has anyone reached out to Oleksandr, the add-on author about >> integration? I'm happy to do it if it hasn't been done. Also, does >> anyone know his Email address? I can't find it on his blog. >> >> Ryan >> >> On 12/6/17 3:53 PM, Jörg Knobloch wrote: >>> On 06/12/2017 23:46, Ben Bucksch wrote: >>>> Even as I despise the idea of winmail.dat. But given that it's one >>>> of our most popular addons, that shows there's a need. >>> >>> Sure, that's why we have >>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77811 from 2001. >>> >>> Lobby the add-on author of the "fix version" to integrate it. >>> >>> Jörg. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Maildev mailing list >>> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net >>> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Maildev mailing list >> Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net >> http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net >> > > _______________________________________________ > Maildev mailing list > Maildev@lists.thunderbird.net > http://lists.thunderbird.net/mailman/listinfo/maildev_lists.thunderbird.net >