Well, we sure have opened a can of worm about the USCG. But clearly, a
nerve has been touched.
First, we all need the CG and respect them for the work they do. However,
as a federal police agency directly involved with the public, they surely
can do better in working with people. However, here are some
observations.
- Teaching clarity of speech on the VHF, even for a new recruit should
not be a major expense and should be part of their training.
- Changing the procedures and protocol of dumb sounding questions when
responding to a SAR emergency will not take anymore manpower and should
cost the CG little.
- If the USCG is really strapped for cash and manpower, perhaps they
could stop some of the frivolous safety boardings which usually add
little or nothing to real safety or homeland security. That would free up
a great deal of limited resources.
- It seems the real issue on this thread is the perception which much of
the older boating public (i.e., us) has of the USCG. For my wife and
myself, our somewhat negative perception has come from firsthand
interaction with the CG or listening to them on the radio.
- Most coasties on SAR and safety boarding parties clearly have been
coached to be courteous. That is to their credit. Surely senior CG
command could issue new procedures for radio protocols.
- Theyre human just like most of us. ; ) We all can improve. But it
seems like some on the list and in the USCG react to any criticism as a
challenge to their patriotism. For those who have been in the CG, I am
sure you are still loyal to your branch of service to the point of blind
loyalty. However, the other 99% of us are not so encumbered.
- Finally, I think a large part of the issue is that most of us on this
list are old enough to be fathers, maybe grandfathers, to the young
coasties just out of high school. They are usually immature,
notwithstanding being agents of the federal government who often wear a
badge and carry a gun. That age and experience gap does not foster
confidence when the young coasties at times convey the perception of
being inept. The radio protocol issue just brings all of this to the
surface.
Maybe somebody on the list knows how to forward this entire thread to
some senior officer of the USCG in Washington.
David Sorenson
Duluth
Summer Spa Sweepstakes
Enter for your chance to WIN a Summer Spa Vacation!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/JKFkuJi7UbfgebPXHli4yThACktcT45V7esmTFm6pwpaoeGP7J8WL6/
Well, we sure have opened a can of worm about the USCG. But clearly, a
nerve has been touched.
First, we all need the CG and respect them for the work they do. However,
as a federal police agency directly involved with the public, they surely
can do better in working with people. However, here are some
observations.
1. Teaching clarity of speech on the VHF, even for a new recruit should
not be a major expense and should be part of their training.
2. Changing the procedures and protocol of dumb sounding questions when
responding to a SAR emergency will not take anymore manpower and should
cost the CG little.
3. If the USCG is really strapped for cash and manpower, perhaps they
could stop some of the frivolous safety boardings which usually add
little or nothing to real safety or homeland security. That would free up
a great deal of limited resources.
4. It seems the real issue on this thread is the perception which much of
the older boating public (i.e., us) has of the USCG. For my wife and
myself, our somewhat negative perception has come from firsthand
interaction with the CG or listening to them on the radio.
5. Most coasties on SAR and safety boarding parties clearly have been
coached to be courteous. That is to their credit. Surely senior CG
command could issue new procedures for radio protocols.
6. Theyre human just like most of us. ; ) We all can improve. But it
seems like some on the list and in the USCG react to any criticism as a
challenge to their patriotism. For those who have been in the CG, I am
sure you are still loyal to your branch of service to the point of blind
loyalty. However, the other 99% of us are not so encumbered.
7. Finally, I think a large part of the issue is that most of us on this
list are old enough to be fathers, maybe grandfathers, to the young
coasties just out of high school. They are usually immature,
notwithstanding being agents of the federal government who often wear a
badge and carry a gun. That age and experience gap does not foster
confidence when the young coasties at times convey the perception of
being inept. The radio protocol issue just brings all of this to the
surface.
Maybe somebody on the list knows how to forward this entire thread to
some senior officer of the USCG in Washington.
David Sorenson
Duluth
____________________________________________________________
Summer Spa Sweepstakes
Enter for your chance to WIN a Summer Spa Vacation!
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/JKFkuJi7UbfgebPXHli4yThACktcT45V7esmTFm6pwpaoeGP7J8WL6/