time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: [time-nuts] Advice on 10 MHz isolation/distribution (Clay)

HM
Hal Murray
Thu, Feb 18, 2010 10:48 PM

The problem is modulation of the reference signal via relative
movement of the transformer guts.  While I understand there are ways
to 'harden' magnetic devices, my application is far too sensitive to
even consider a magnetic approach given the availability of
alternatives.  Any spurious signals present on the 10 MHz reference
will be increased by 56 dB by the phase-locked loop.

Capacitors are piezoelectric too.

Does anybodyhave any handy numbers for this sort of stuff?

--
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.

> The problem is modulation of the reference signal via relative > movement of the transformer guts.  While I understand there are ways > to 'harden' magnetic devices, my application is far too sensitive to > even consider a magnetic approach given the availability of > alternatives.  Any spurious signals present on the 10 MHz reference > will be increased by 56 dB by the phase-locked loop. Capacitors are piezoelectric too. Does anybodyhave any handy numbers for this sort of stuff? -- These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam.
BC
Bob Camp
Thu, Feb 18, 2010 11:03 PM

Hi

Vibration modulates lead inductance. That's true even on SMT semiconductors.. It's true big time for leaded parts of the axial persuasion. Weather the amount of change matters to you is another thing entirely.

If you stick with NPO even for the bypass caps, the piezo stuff is not going to be a big issue.

Bob

On Feb 18, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Hal Murray wrote:

The problem is modulation of the reference signal via relative
movement of the transformer guts.  While I understand there are ways
to 'harden' magnetic devices, my application is far too sensitive to
even consider a magnetic approach given the availability of
alternatives.  Any spurious signals present on the 10 MHz reference
will be increased by 56 dB by the phase-locked loop.

Capacitors are piezoelectric too.

Does anybodyhave any handy numbers for this sort of stuff?

--
These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's.  I hate spam.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Vibration modulates lead inductance. That's true even on SMT semiconductors.. It's true big time for leaded parts of the axial persuasion. Weather the amount of change matters to you is another thing entirely. If you stick with NPO even for the bypass caps, the piezo stuff is not going to be a big issue. Bob On Feb 18, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Hal Murray wrote: > >> The problem is modulation of the reference signal via relative >> movement of the transformer guts. While I understand there are ways >> to 'harden' magnetic devices, my application is far too sensitive to >> even consider a magnetic approach given the availability of >> alternatives. Any spurious signals present on the 10 MHz reference >> will be increased by 56 dB by the phase-locked loop. > > Capacitors are piezoelectric too. > > Does anybodyhave any handy numbers for this sort of stuff? > > > -- > These are my opinions, not necessarily my employer's. I hate spam. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
BG
Bruce Griffiths
Thu, Feb 18, 2010 11:23 PM

Hal Murray wrote:

The problem is modulation of the reference signal via relative
movement of the transformer guts.  While I understand there are ways
to 'harden' magnetic devices, my application is far too sensitive to
even consider a magnetic approach given the availability of
alternatives.  Any spurious signals present on the 10 MHz reference
will be increased by 56 dB by the phase-locked loop.

Capacitors are piezoelectric too.

Does anybodyhave any handy numbers for this sort of stuff?

Most high K ceramic caps are ferroelectric below the Curie temperature
and paraelectic above that.
The resultant capacitance nonlinearity can allow low frequency noise to
phase modulate a capacitor coupled RF signal if the phase shift due to
the capacitor is sufficiently large.
Yet another reason to avoid high K ceramic capacitors or at least ensure
that the RF phase shift due to such capacitors is sufficiently small.

Low frequency magnetic fields can phase modulate transformer coupled RF
signals by modulating the transformer phase shift.

Bruce

Hal Murray wrote: > >> The problem is modulation of the reference signal via relative >> movement of the transformer guts. While I understand there are ways >> to 'harden' magnetic devices, my application is far too sensitive to >> even consider a magnetic approach given the availability of >> alternatives. Any spurious signals present on the 10 MHz reference >> will be increased by 56 dB by the phase-locked loop. >> > Capacitors are piezoelectric too. > > Does anybodyhave any handy numbers for this sort of stuff? > > > Most high K ceramic caps are ferroelectric below the Curie temperature and paraelectic above that. The resultant capacitance nonlinearity can allow low frequency noise to phase modulate a capacitor coupled RF signal if the phase shift due to the capacitor is sufficiently large. Yet another reason to avoid high K ceramic capacitors or at least ensure that the RF phase shift due to such capacitors is sufficiently small. Low frequency magnetic fields can phase modulate transformer coupled RF signals by modulating the transformer phase shift. Bruce