In a message dated 12/11/2007 22:00:37 Pacific Standard Time,
bg@lysator.liu.se writes:
I am surprised surveying mode is needed anymore. In a SA environment it
makes sense, but for me its hard to understand with the current accuracy
given by the GPS system.
--
Björn
Hi Bjoern,
even with a very good M12M or M12+ receiver we will typically see some
variation of the averaged position over it's ~3 hour (default) auto-survey
interval. I've seen altitude change by a meter or two for example.
Those couple of nanoseconds may be insignificant when compared to older GPS
receiver performance (VP Oncore etc), but if one has the time, why not get
the best position average possible.
I did also note that it does make a difference if the Auto Survey is done
during the day, at dawn, or during the night etc. Might be caused by multipath
etc. A 12 hour or 24 hour Auto Survey may reduce the Diurnal effects.
We recently added a command to our Fury firmware that allows the user to set
any time from 1s to 10,000s for the Auto Survey process to finish. This was
done because the differences are so small between any given single-second
position, and an auto-surveyed position (less than 5 meters or so). The error
due to this is much less than 100ns which is more than adequate for a lot of
applications.
We have some customers that want the unit to do only 3 to 5 minutes of Auto
Surveying for a particular mobile military application, and the resulting
<<100ns UTC accuracy is way better than their requirement.
In that case the Auto Survey time is insignificant when compared to the OCXO
warmup time.
It all depends on your particular accuracy requirement.
bye,
Said
**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
Hi Said and All
I have been following this thread with a lot of interest because my
application is also in portable Microwave operations with narrowband modes
such as WSJT. The main issue here is not so much long term frequency
stability as one only has to find a signal in an SSB passband, but the
short-term stability should preferably be better than a few Hz over a 46
second transmission. A second issue as others have mentioned is that one
needs to have a stable signal at a new location within a relatively short
period for many rover operations (say 15 mins).
(Note: I earlier asked a question about short term stability with my Trimble
Min-T and this has been solved by increasing the Time constant from the
default value of 10 seconds to 200 seconds. The short-term stability is now
better than one part in 10^10 which is the limit to which I can measure)
Now to my Question: I note the importance of the self survey for absolute
time but I wonder if a self survey is important for accurate frequency where
the absolute time is not an issue?
There are number of things that it seems one could do to achieve frequency
stability as fast as possible at a new location.
Now I am not sure which of any of the above points are necessary or
important but I would be grateful for the thoughts of others.
Regards Rex VK7MO
We have some customers that want the unit to do only 3 to 5 minutes of Auto
Surveying for a particular mobile military application, and the resulting
<<100ns UTC accuracy is way better than their requirement.
In that case the Auto Survey time is insignificant when compared to the
OCXO
warmup time.
It all depends on your particular accuracy requirement.
bye,
Said
**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Rex Moncur wrote:
Hi Said and All
I have been following this thread with a lot of interest because my
application is also in portable Microwave operations with narrowband modes
such as WSJT. The main issue here is not so much long term frequency
stability as one only has to find a signal in an SSB passband, but the
short-term stability should preferably be better than a few Hz over a 46
second transmission. A second issue as others have mentioned is that one
needs to have a stable signal at a new location within a relatively short
period for many rover operations (say 15 mins).
(Note: I earlier asked a question about short term stability with my Trimble
Min-T and this has been solved by increasing the Time constant from the
default value of 10 seconds to 200 seconds. The short-term stability is now
better than one part in 10^10 which is the limit to which I can measure)
Now to my Question: I note the importance of the self survey for absolute
time but I wonder if a self survey is important for accurate frequency where
the absolute time is not an issue?
There are number of things that it seems one could do to achieve frequency
stability as fast as possible at a new location.
Now I am not sure which of any of the above points are necessary or
important but I would be grateful for the thoughts of others.
Regards Rex VK7MO
Rex
If you make provision for multiple power sources with preassigned
priority its not necessary to run of a battery all the time, however the
battery needs to be present as a backup when the other power supplies
are disconnected.
Achieving this without disturbing the power supply voltages when
switching between various power sources requires careful design, a
simple diode OR circuit is in general inadequate particularly if more
than 2 sources (mains, external dc, internal battery) are available,
however the required circuity need not be overly complex.
Bruce
Bruce