weeklydvar@list.weeklydvar.com

Short, practical, relevant Weekly Dvar

View all threads

Dvar for Vayikra (Leviticus 1:1-5:26)

SP
Short, practical, relevant Weekly Dvar
Thu, Mar 14, 2019 5:00 AM

The streak of personal relevance continues with this Dvar. While we
intuitively understand that our actions affect us, even if accidental, it's
nice to find confirmation from this week's Parsha...


Among the intricate laws presented in Parshat Vayikra is that “If a soul
touches something impure… and the fact escapes him, he is unclean, and
guilty” (5:2). From the text alone it is unclear if he is guilty of
touching something impure or of forgetting that he’s unclean and
subsequently touching something holy that he wasn’t allowed to touch.
Commentaries differ in their interpretation. The Ramban points out that
becoming pure is not a sin, and touching something holy while one is impure
is not a sin. If that’s so, what is this person actually guilty of?

The answer may lie in the ambiguity of this law. Guilt is not borne of the
specific act of accidentally becoming impure, nor of unintentionally
touching a holy object. Rather, the guilt stems from an overall
carelessness for one’s actions. That may also be why our Passuk describes a
soul rather than a person, because our actions affect our souls, whether
intentional or not. The Torah could be teaching us that both our actions
and their consequences impact our soul, and require care and thoughtful
diligence.

Shlomo Ressler


Quotation of the week:

“Only those who care about you can hear you when you're quiet."

The streak of personal relevance continues with this Dvar. While we intuitively understand that our actions affect us, even if accidental, it's nice to find confirmation from this week's Parsha... _______________________________________________ Among the intricate laws presented in Parshat Vayikra is that “If a soul touches something impure… and the fact escapes him, he is unclean, and guilty” (5:2). From the text alone it is unclear if he is guilty of touching something impure or of forgetting that he’s unclean and subsequently touching something holy that he wasn’t allowed to touch. Commentaries differ in their interpretation. The Ramban points out that becoming pure is not a sin, and touching something holy while one is impure is not a sin. If that’s so, what is this person actually guilty of? The answer may lie in the ambiguity of this law. Guilt is not borne of the specific act of accidentally becoming impure, nor of unintentionally touching a holy object. Rather, the guilt stems from an overall carelessness for one’s actions. That may also be why our Passuk describes a soul rather than a person, because our actions affect our souls, whether intentional or not. The Torah could be teaching us that both our actions and their consequences impact our soul, and require care and thoughtful diligence. Shlomo Ressler _______________________________________________ Quotation of the week: “Only those who care about you can hear you when you're quiet."