trawlers@lists.trawlering.com

TRAWLERS & TRAWLERING LIST

View all threads

Alcohol at anchor...

WM
Wally Moran
Mon, Feb 27, 2006 3:34 PM

I've seen the anchored part applied in Canada, but

they were creating a ruckus in an anchorage with
multiple boats.

Carl, I'm going to challenge this one, since I'm
Canadian...to the best of my knowledge, Canadian law
states that you may partake provided your vessel is
equipped with a head, sleeping arrangements and is at
anchor. I have never, in 30 years of boating, even
heard of anyone being busted for alcohol while at
anchor.
They COULD get charged for noise violations or
mischief which is what I suspect your noisy
acquaintances had happen - but, short of phoning home
and talking to the head of the Ontario Provincial
Police Maritime Unit, that's my position.
As for the following, if you've been pouring them
back, it's only logical that you don't even think
about moving your boat - just like you wouldn't get
into a car in the same circumstance on land.
FYI - if you get charged with a DUI in Canada, it's an
automatic driver's license suspension and a night in
the can until you make bail, with six months tacked on
after/if you're convicted. Because of reciprocity,
that suspension will suspend your US driver's license
as well. No idea however if our two countries actively
notify one another of this sort of thing.

Wally Moran

If you do get into a situation where you know you

are being observed, do  not move your boat or it will
get real expensive and you can be thrown in the
clink.......
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

>>>I've seen the anchored part applied in Canada, but they were creating a ruckus in an anchorage with multiple boats. Carl, I'm going to challenge this one, since I'm Canadian...to the best of my knowledge, Canadian law states that you may partake provided your vessel is equipped with a head, sleeping arrangements and is at anchor. I have never, in 30 years of boating, even heard of anyone being busted for alcohol while at anchor. They COULD get charged for noise violations or mischief which is what I suspect your noisy acquaintances had happen - but, short of phoning home and talking to the head of the Ontario Provincial Police Maritime Unit, that's my position. As for the following, if you've been pouring them back, it's only logical that you don't even think about moving your boat - just like you wouldn't get into a car in the same circumstance on land. FYI - if you get charged with a DUI in Canada, it's an automatic driver's license suspension and a night in the can until you make bail, with six months tacked on after/if you're convicted. Because of reciprocity, that suspension will suspend your US driver's license as well. No idea however if our two countries actively notify one another of this sort of thing. Wally Moran >>>If you do get into a situation where you know you are being observed, do not move your boat or it will get real expensive and you can be thrown in the clink....... Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
BD
Bob Davies
Mon, Feb 27, 2006 5:02 PM

Wally Moran wrote:

" FYI - if you get charged with a DUI in Canada, it's an
automatic driver's license suspension and a night in
the can until you make bail, with six months tacked on
after/if you're convicted. Because of reciprocity,
that suspension will suspend your US driver's license
as well. No idea however if our two countries actively
notify one another of this sort of thing."

REPLY

Wally, for the most part you are correct.  But there is one minor error in
your comments.  I have spoken at length with the Canadian Coast Guard, the
Toronto Police Services Marine Unit, the Ontario Provincial Police Marine
Unit and other agencies in order to clarify this for my CPS Boating Class
students.  You are correct to some extent, in that the charges are laid
under the same section of the Criminal Code.  That section makes it illegal
to operate automobiles, vessels, aircraft and railway locomotives under the
influence.

However, it is up to the Crown Attorney to decide how to prepare the
Information (The formal statement of the offence).  If the Crown decides to
specify that you were operating a vessel in contravention of the Act, but
does not quote the entire Section in the Information, the Judge has the
option of convicting you of unlawful operation of a vessel, and may or may
not extend the suspension to your driver's licence.  If the Crown quotes the
entire section, the Judge generally is compelled to extend the suspension to
all relevant activities, including your driver's licence.  As with other
Canadian legal anomalies, it's a coin toss, as the same charge could have
different consequences depending on who prepares and/or hears the case.

I guess it's better to be safe than sorry, especially when you don't know
whether you have a really diligent Crown and Judge on the case.  In Ontario,
at least, it is normal practice for notification to be given to the
jurisdiction in which the person charged lives, and that includes the
neighbouring US States.

As in all things, YMMV!!  <VBG>

Bob Davies
"Taid's Inn"
1965 Pacemaker Sedan Express, HIN 389-32
Toronto

Wally Moran wrote: " FYI - if you get charged with a DUI in Canada, it's an automatic driver's license suspension and a night in the can until you make bail, with six months tacked on after/if you're convicted. Because of reciprocity, that suspension will suspend your US driver's license as well. No idea however if our two countries actively notify one another of this sort of thing." REPLY Wally, for the most part you are correct. But there is one minor error in your comments. I have spoken at length with the Canadian Coast Guard, the Toronto Police Services Marine Unit, the Ontario Provincial Police Marine Unit and other agencies in order to clarify this for my CPS Boating Class students. You are correct to some extent, in that the charges are laid under the same section of the Criminal Code. That section makes it illegal to operate automobiles, vessels, aircraft and railway locomotives under the influence. However, it is up to the Crown Attorney to decide how to prepare the Information (The formal statement of the offence). If the Crown decides to specify that you were operating a vessel in contravention of the Act, but does not quote the entire Section in the Information, the Judge has the option of convicting you of unlawful operation of a vessel, and may or may not extend the suspension to your driver's licence. If the Crown quotes the entire section, the Judge generally is compelled to extend the suspension to all relevant activities, including your driver's licence. As with other Canadian legal anomalies, it's a coin toss, as the same charge could have different consequences depending on who prepares and/or hears the case. I guess it's better to be safe than sorry, especially when you don't know whether you have a really diligent Crown and Judge on the case. In Ontario, at least, it is normal practice for notification to be given to the jurisdiction in which the person charged lives, and that includes the neighbouring US States. As in all things, YMMV!! <VBG> Bob Davies "Taid's Inn" 1965 Pacemaker Sedan Express, HIN 389-32 Toronto
AJ
Arild Jensen
Tue, Mar 7, 2006 7:31 PM

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Davies
Wally Moran wrote:
" FYI - if you get charged with a DUI in Canada, it's an automatic
driver's license suspension and a night in the can until you make bail,
with six months tacked on after/if you're convicted. Because of
reciprocity, that suspension will suspend your US driver's license as
well. No idea however if our two countries actively notify one another
of this sort of thing."

REPLY
Wally, for the most part you are correct.  But there is one minor error
in your comments.  I have spoken at length with the Canadian Coast
Guard, the Toronto Police Services Marine Unit, the Ontario Provincial
Police Marine Unit and other agencies in order to clarify this for my
CPS Boating Class students.  You are correct to some extent, in that the
charges are laid under the same section of the Criminal Code.  That
section makes it illegal to operate automobiles, vessels, aircraft and
railway locomotives under the influence.

However, it is up to the Crown Attorney to decide how to prepare the
Information (The formal statement of the offence).

REPLY
At a boat show this week-end I spoke to some Transport Canada
representatives.
They had copies of the relevant rules but those documents made reference
to a motorized vessel and said nothing about paddles or rowing.

I then asked about anchoring in a place other than a designated
anchorage.
According to Canadian law  and perhaps some US law;  the key words are "
care and control of"

In other words if you are found asleep and intoxicated in your vehicle
and the keys are in the ignition or your pocket, they got you.
However if the keys are  not readily accessible to you, you can
successfully argue that you opted to sleep it off rather than operate
that vessel or vehicle.
I then asked if hoisting a "not under Command" signal while anchored
away from a designated anchorage would suffice and they concurred that
under maritime rules doing so would in effect signify that you are not
in command of the vessel and therefore cannot be charged with having
control of the vessel while you are sleeping it off.
Admittedly this does require you to be clearly "not preparing to get
under way" but also in a location not immediately adjacent to the helm
station and the keys nowhere near. Perhaps a kill switch or fuse to
disable the start circuit would add strength to the claim.
After all the boat is also a private residence.

Cheers
Arild

-----Original Message----- From: Bob Davies Wally Moran wrote: " FYI - if you get charged with a DUI in Canada, it's an automatic driver's license suspension and a night in the can until you make bail, with six months tacked on after/if you're convicted. Because of reciprocity, that suspension will suspend your US driver's license as well. No idea however if our two countries actively notify one another of this sort of thing." REPLY Wally, for the most part you are correct. But there is one minor error in your comments. I have spoken at length with the Canadian Coast Guard, the Toronto Police Services Marine Unit, the Ontario Provincial Police Marine Unit and other agencies in order to clarify this for my CPS Boating Class students. You are correct to some extent, in that the charges are laid under the same section of the Criminal Code. That section makes it illegal to operate automobiles, vessels, aircraft and railway locomotives under the influence. However, it is up to the Crown Attorney to decide how to prepare the Information (The formal statement of the offence). REPLY At a boat show this week-end I spoke to some Transport Canada representatives. They had copies of the relevant rules but those documents made reference to a motorized vessel and said nothing about paddles or rowing. I then asked about anchoring in a place other than a designated anchorage. According to Canadian law and perhaps some US law; the key words are " care and control of" In other words if you are found asleep and intoxicated in your vehicle and the keys are in the ignition or your pocket, they got you. However if the keys are not readily accessible to you, you can successfully argue that you opted to sleep it off rather than operate that vessel or vehicle. I then asked if hoisting a "not under Command" signal while anchored away from a designated anchorage would suffice and they concurred that under maritime rules doing so would in effect signify that you are not in command of the vessel and therefore cannot be charged with having control of the vessel while you are sleeping it off. Admittedly this does require you to be clearly "not preparing to get under way" but also in a location not immediately adjacent to the helm station and the keys nowhere near. Perhaps a kill switch or fuse to disable the start circuit would add strength to the claim. After all the boat is also a private residence. Cheers Arild
RB
Roger Bingham
Tue, Mar 7, 2006 8:14 PM

Hi All

Arild tried:

I then asked if hoisting a "not under Command" signal while anchored
away from a designated anchorage would suffice and they concurred that
under maritime rules doing so would in effect signify that you are not
in command of the vessel and therefore cannot be charged with having
control of the vessel while you are sleeping it off.

Reply:

Nice if you can get away with it <grin> but see below

(f) The term "vessel not under command" means a vessel which through some
exceptional circumstance is unable to maneuver as required by these Rules
and is therefore unable to keep out of the way of another vessel.

My interpretation is that the vessel must be under way otherwise with the
skipper "sleeping it off" she should be at anchor.

Regards

Roger Bingham
France

Hi All Arild tried: >I then asked if hoisting a "not under Command" signal while anchored >away from a designated anchorage would suffice and they concurred that >under maritime rules doing so would in effect signify that you are not >in command of the vessel and therefore cannot be charged with having >control of the vessel while you are sleeping it off. Reply: Nice if you can get away with it <grin> but see below (f) The term "vessel not under command" means a vessel which through some exceptional circumstance is unable to maneuver as required by these Rules and is therefore unable to keep out of the way of another vessel. My interpretation is that the vessel must be under way otherwise with the skipper "sleeping it off" she should be at anchor. Regards Roger Bingham France
MM
Mike Maurice
Tue, Mar 7, 2006 8:55 PM

"Roger Bingham" rbingham@tele2.fr
At 09:14 PM 3/7/2006 +0100, you wrote:

(f) The term "vessel not under command" means a vessel which through some
exceptional circumstance is unable to maneuver as required by these Rules
and is therefore unable to keep out of the way of another vessel.

Farwell's Rules of the Nautical road, clarifies this with the following:
This important privilege must not be assumed for mere convenience,
but must be justified by genuine defects that prevent compliance with
the rules.

As for alcohol at anchor. This is a gray area and has been abused by
small craft operators to the point where the authorities have no tolerance.

Mike

Capt. Mike Maurice
Tualatin(Portland), Oregon

"Roger Bingham" <rbingham@tele2.fr> At 09:14 PM 3/7/2006 +0100, you wrote: >(f) The term "vessel not under command" means a vessel which through some >exceptional circumstance is unable to maneuver as required by these Rules >and is therefore unable to keep out of the way of another vessel. Farwell's Rules of the Nautical road, clarifies this with the following: This important privilege must not be assumed for mere convenience, but must be justified by genuine defects that prevent compliance with the rules. As for alcohol at anchor. This is a gray area and has been abused by small craft operators to the point where the authorities have no tolerance. Mike Capt. Mike Maurice Tualatin(Portland), Oregon