1. Re: RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large (Sam Carey)
2. Can the USRP B210 do passive scanning of WIFI? (John DeLeong)
3. Re: Can the USRP B210 do passive scanning of WIFI?
   (Dave NotTelling)
4. Re: RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large (Long, Jeffrey P.)
5. Twin RX Bandwidth Requirements (Rigney, Kevin E)

Oh forgot to include the RFX1800 and one VERT900 So, E110 including those two item for half price. Kind Regards, Joe On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Joe Y. Mambu <jfk2414@aut.ac.nz> wrote: > Or you can also email jfk2414@aut.ac.nz > On Oct 4, 2016 7:14 AM, "Joe Y. Mambu" <jfk2414@aut.ac.nz> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> I'm selling my E110 for half the price. Bought from Ettus last year for >> academic purpose >> Please email jyym27@gmail.com if interested >> On Oct 4, 2016 12:02 AM, <usrp-users-request@lists.ettus.com> wrote: >> >> Send USRP-users mailing list submissions to >> usrp-users@lists.ettus.com >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ett >> us.com >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> usrp-users-request@lists.ettus.com >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> usrp-users-owner@lists.ettus.com >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of USRP-users digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large (Sam Carey) >> 2. Can the USRP B210 do passive scanning of WIFI? (John DeLeong) >> 3. Re: Can the USRP B210 do passive scanning of WIFI? >> (Dave NotTelling) >> 4. Re: RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large (Long, Jeffrey P.) >> 5. Twin RX Bandwidth Requirements (Rigney, Kevin E) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 20:14:32 -0400 >> From: Sam Carey <sam@samcarey.com> >> To: jplong@mitre.org, usrp-users@lists.ettus.com >> Subject: Re: [USRP-users] RFNOC x310 image 2 bytes too large >> Message-ID: <EC8A9C02-67AE-481F-BE73-CEA9FAE3EE86@samcarey.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >> >> Hey Jeff, >> >> I?ve had the same problem for a while. My workaround was to simply edit >> the image loader so that it is ok with the larger file size. >> Just do a search for the smaller byte number in the uhd/host source code, >> change it to the larger byte number, and rebuild/reinstall uhd. >> Apparently, the byte count is not a strict requirement for image loading. >> >> -Sam >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 16:30:00 +0800 >> From: John DeLeong <spiritanto@gmail.com> >> To: usrp-users@lists.ettus.com >> Subject: [USRP-users] Can the USRP B210 do passive scanning of WIFI? >> Message-ID: >> <CAC6KioZe6kaSFb8p-r8EUGxYd_WLixPCb0-_35DFHoRiJ2xY2w@mail.gm >> ail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Hi, >> >> Can the USRP B210 >> a) do passive scanning of Wifi APs and Clients; and >> b) do passive collection of Wifi packets off the air? >>