Re: [PCW] DSe 12m Hybrid

P
PaulJChristman@aol.com
Sat, Dec 15, 2007 8:34 PM

Len-
I noticed that you have owned a power trimaran.  What is this boat, and why
aren't there more power triimarans?  Is there an inherent problem with power
trimarans, compared to power catamarans?
It seems that a trimaran would be even more stable for pitch and yaw, and
would have more room for mechanicals, engines, fuel, etc.  It would also be able
to have a reduced draft.  If trimaran design works for sailboats, why not
for power?  Can anyone give some insight?  Malcolm?
Thanks,
Paul


See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

Len- I noticed that you have owned a power trimaran. What is this boat, and why aren't there more power triimarans? Is there an inherent problem with power trimarans, compared to power catamarans? It seems that a trimaran would be even more stable for pitch and yaw, and would have more room for mechanicals, engines, fuel, etc. It would also be able to have a reduced draft. If trimaran design works for sailboats, why not for power? Can anyone give some insight? Malcolm? Thanks, Paul ************************************** See AOL's top rated recipes (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)
C
Captnlen
Sat, Dec 15, 2007 11:30 PM

Hi

The PT 32 was a prototype for a 70 ft for the pacific trade.

It was 8'6" wide and I considered it a geriatric special with wide side
decks and high coamings

It ran fine with a 40 HP. we put a 100 on it since it was a 3 step
planing hull

I think a Displacement hull for extended cruising would work fine but
generally a tri needs 1/3 more length for the capacity and volume.  It
would be narrower then the comparable  cat. for ease of docking and
handling.

Anyway don't think anyone else has tried it yet.

Details are available at Trikini.com which is a mirror site and may not
be fully functional

PS  wish I still had it but a weird turn of events made giving it
(virtually ) away and then the plans fell apart.  Have the 6.09 and have
several times considered converting it to a power tri.

There are some sketches in the whats new section

PaulJChristman@aol.com wrote:

Len-
I noticed that you have owned a power trimaran.  What is this boat,
and why aren't there more power triimarans?  Is there an inherent
problem with power trimarans, compared to power catamarans?
It seems that a trimaran would be even more stable for pitch and yaw,
and would have more room for mechanicals, engines, fuel, etc.  It
would also be able to have a reduced draft.  If trimaran design works
for sailboats, why not for power?  Can anyone give some insight?  Malcolm?
Thanks,
Paul


See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)

--
Live Long and Prosper
Capt. Len Susman, retired
trikini23@trikini.com
After Dec. 13,2007
Email : trikini2007@comcast.net
What's New
http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm

Hi The PT 32 was a prototype for a 70 ft for the pacific trade. It was 8'6" wide and I considered it a geriatric special with wide side decks and high coamings It ran fine with a 40 HP. we put a 100 on it since it was a 3 step planing hull I think a Displacement hull for extended cruising would work fine but generally a tri needs 1/3 more length for the capacity and volume. It would be narrower then the comparable cat. for ease of docking and handling. Anyway don't think anyone else has tried it yet. Details are available at Trikini.com which is a mirror site and may not be fully functional PS wish I still had it but a weird turn of events made giving it (virtually ) away and then the plans fell apart. Have the 6.09 and have several times considered converting it to a power tri. There are some sketches in the whats new section PaulJChristman@aol.com wrote: > Len- > I noticed that you have owned a power trimaran. What is this boat, > and why aren't there more power triimarans? Is there an inherent > problem with power trimarans, compared to power catamarans? > It seems that a trimaran would be even more stable for pitch and yaw, > and would have more room for mechanicals, engines, fuel, etc. It > would also be able to have a reduced draft. If trimaran design works > for sailboats, why not for power? Can anyone give some insight? Malcolm? > Thanks, > Paul > > > ************************************** > See AOL's top rated recipes > (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) -- Live Long and Prosper Capt. Len Susman, retired trikini23@trikini.com After Dec. 13,2007 Email : trikini2007@comcast.net What's New http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm
GK
Georgs Kolesnikovs
Sat, Dec 15, 2007 11:58 PM

All hands!

Please use the above subject line for any further discussion of
powered trimarans. If we stick with the DSe subject line, no one will
find the trimaran discussion.

--Listmeister Georgs

All hands! Please use the above subject line for any further discussion of powered trimarans. If we stick with the DSe subject line, no one will find the trimaran discussion. --Listmeister Georgs
C
Captnlen
Sun, Dec 16, 2007 9:22 PM

Two pieces of news.

  1. We have found a mirror site for the trikini.com website and all the
    info on the PT-32 is available there.

  2. we are discussing producing plans for a PT 70 for use as a people bus
    on the Amazon.

The PT 32 was originally a prototype for a 70 footer for Micronesia that
never happened.

Will keep you guys posted.

Georgs Kolesnikovs wrote:

All hands!

Please use the above subject line for any further discussion of
powered trimarans. If we stick with the DSe subject line, no one will
find the trimaran discussion.

--Listmeister Georgs


Power-Catamaran Mailing List

--
Live Long and Prosper
Capt. Len Susman, retired
trikini23@trikini.com
After Dec. 13,2007
Email : trikini2007@comcast.net
What's New
http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm

Two pieces of news. 1) We have found a mirror site for the trikini.com website and all the info on the PT-32 is available there. 2) we are discussing producing plans for a PT 70 for use as a people bus on the Amazon. The PT 32 was originally a prototype for a 70 footer for Micronesia that never happened. Will keep you guys posted. Georgs Kolesnikovs wrote: >All hands! > >Please use the above subject line for any further discussion of >powered trimarans. If we stick with the DSe subject line, no one will >find the trimaran discussion. > >--Listmeister Georgs >_______________________________________________ >Power-Catamaran Mailing List > > > > -- Live Long and Prosper Capt. Len Susman, retired trikini23@trikini.com After Dec. 13,2007 Email : trikini2007@comcast.net What's New http://www.trikini.com/whatn.htm