PS
paul swed
Sun, Feb 28, 2010 3:08 PM
Jim
Worse case if you do not find the replacement
Digi-key and I would guess mouser caries the filter material for a
reasonable price.
(At least they did)
I needed some to replace a missing piece on a HP 5360 and HP 8505.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Jim Cotton jim.cotton@wmich.edu wrote:
I need the red plastic digit cover/window [approximately 1 3/4" x 14 3/4"]
to complete the repair of a HP 5370 counter/timer. I don't care if it says
5370A or B. I assume that no major change occurred other than the
unit identifier changing. Perhaps someone can correct me if I am wrong in
making this assumption.
It would be nice to get the bezel clip/strip too, however I suspect that
they tend to disintegrate during removal of the red display cover.
Does anyone have this available from a parts chassis in their lab?
I would be happy to pay a reasonable price plus postage. I am located in
Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA.
Jim Cotton
n8qoh
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Jim
Worse case if you do not find the replacement
Digi-key and I would guess mouser caries the filter material for a
reasonable price.
(At least they did)
I needed some to replace a missing piece on a HP 5360 and HP 8505.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Jim Cotton <jim.cotton@wmich.edu> wrote:
>
> I need the red plastic digit cover/window [approximately 1 3/4" x 14 3/4"]
> to complete the repair of a HP 5370 counter/timer. I don't care if it says
> 5370A or B. I assume that no major change occurred other than the
> unit identifier changing. Perhaps someone can correct me if I am wrong in
> making this assumption.
>
> It would be nice to get the bezel clip/strip too, however I suspect that
> they tend to disintegrate during removal of the red display cover.
>
> Does anyone have this available from a parts chassis in their lab?
>
> I would be happy to pay a reasonable price plus postage. I am located in
> Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA.
>
> Jim Cotton
> n8qoh
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
JL
J. L. Trantham
Sun, Feb 28, 2010 3:25 PM
I have a 5370B that is missing about half of it's red plastic digit
cover/window and would like to repair it as well. Do you have a suggestion
as to how to start searching Digi-Key and Mouser?
Thanks,
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of paul swed
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 9:09 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Looking for a 5370 red digit cover/window
Jim
Worse case if you do not find the replacement
Digi-key and I would guess mouser caries the filter material for a
reasonable price. (At least they did) I needed some to replace a missing
piece on a HP 5360 and HP 8505.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Jim Cotton jim.cotton@wmich.edu wrote:
I need the red plastic digit cover/window [approximately 1 3/4" x 14
3/4"] to complete the repair of a HP 5370 counter/timer. I don't care
if it says 5370A or B. I assume that no major change occurred other
than the unit identifier changing. Perhaps someone can correct me if
I am wrong in making this assumption.
It would be nice to get the bezel clip/strip too, however I suspect
that they tend to disintegrate during removal of the red display
cover.
Does anyone have this available from a parts chassis in their lab?
I would be happy to pay a reasonable price plus postage. I am located
in Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA.
Jim Cotton
n8qoh
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
I have a 5370B that is missing about half of it's red plastic digit
cover/window and would like to repair it as well. Do you have a suggestion
as to how to start searching Digi-Key and Mouser?
Thanks,
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of paul swed
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 9:09 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Looking for a 5370 red digit cover/window
Jim
Worse case if you do not find the replacement
Digi-key and I would guess mouser caries the filter material for a
reasonable price. (At least they did) I needed some to replace a missing
piece on a HP 5360 and HP 8505.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Jim Cotton <jim.cotton@wmich.edu> wrote:
>
> I need the red plastic digit cover/window [approximately 1 3/4" x 14
> 3/4"] to complete the repair of a HP 5370 counter/timer. I don't care
> if it says 5370A or B. I assume that no major change occurred other
> than the unit identifier changing. Perhaps someone can correct me if
> I am wrong in making this assumption.
>
> It would be nice to get the bezel clip/strip too, however I suspect
> that they tend to disintegrate during removal of the red display
> cover.
>
> Does anyone have this available from a parts chassis in their lab?
>
> I would be happy to pay a reasonable price plus postage. I am located
> in Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA.
>
> Jim Cotton
> n8qoh
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
PS
paul swed
Sun, Feb 28, 2010 5:44 PM
I found them in the led section
Try led filter???
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 10:25 AM, J. L. Trantham jltran@att.net wrote:
I have a 5370B that is missing about half of it's red plastic digit
cover/window and would like to repair it as well. Do you have a suggestion
as to how to start searching Digi-Key and Mouser?
Thanks,
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of paul swed
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 9:09 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Looking for a 5370 red digit cover/window
Jim
Worse case if you do not find the replacement
Digi-key and I would guess mouser caries the filter material for a
reasonable price. (At least they did) I needed some to replace a missing
piece on a HP 5360 and HP 8505.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Jim Cotton jim.cotton@wmich.edu wrote:
I need the red plastic digit cover/window [approximately 1 3/4" x 14
3/4"] to complete the repair of a HP 5370 counter/timer. I don't care
if it says 5370A or B. I assume that no major change occurred other
than the unit identifier changing. Perhaps someone can correct me if
I am wrong in making this assumption.
It would be nice to get the bezel clip/strip too, however I suspect
that they tend to disintegrate during removal of the red display
cover.
Does anyone have this available from a parts chassis in their lab?
I would be happy to pay a reasonable price plus postage. I am located
in Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA.
Jim Cotton
n8qoh
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
I found them in the led section
Try led filter???
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 10:25 AM, J. L. Trantham <jltran@att.net> wrote:
> I have a 5370B that is missing about half of it's red plastic digit
> cover/window and would like to repair it as well. Do you have a suggestion
> as to how to start searching Digi-Key and Mouser?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
> Behalf Of paul swed
> Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 9:09 AM
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Looking for a 5370 red digit cover/window
>
>
> Jim
> Worse case if you do not find the replacement
> Digi-key and I would guess mouser caries the filter material for a
> reasonable price. (At least they did) I needed some to replace a missing
> piece on a HP 5360 and HP 8505.
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Jim Cotton <jim.cotton@wmich.edu> wrote:
>
> >
> > I need the red plastic digit cover/window [approximately 1 3/4" x 14
> > 3/4"] to complete the repair of a HP 5370 counter/timer. I don't care
> > if it says 5370A or B. I assume that no major change occurred other
> > than the unit identifier changing. Perhaps someone can correct me if
> > I am wrong in making this assumption.
> >
> > It would be nice to get the bezel clip/strip too, however I suspect
> > that they tend to disintegrate during removal of the red display
> > cover.
> >
> > Does anyone have this available from a parts chassis in their lab?
> >
> > I would be happy to pay a reasonable price plus postage. I am located
> > in Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA.
> >
> > Jim Cotton
> > n8qoh
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
DH
Dave hartzell
Mon, Mar 1, 2010 3:28 AM
Today I have been trying to drive a 5370B directly from a TADD-2, with
little luck (other HP freq counters seem to work OK). I was about to ask
about it on this list, but noticed this thread.
I guess this could explain why I am getting erroneous, random readings?
Dave
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz
The attached excerpts from the 5370A and 5370B manuals indicate that for
best performance, that the common practice of driving the 5370A/B 1x inputs
directly from a 5V CMOS logic signal is a bad idea.
For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 1V swing with the
threshold set to 0.5V is close to optimum.
An input signal with limits of 0V and +1.4V with a trigger threshold of
0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger threshold of
0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 2V swing with the
threshold set to 1V is close to optimum.
An input signal with limits of 0V and +3.5V with a trigger threshold of
0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger threshold of
0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
Bruce
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Today I have been trying to drive a 5370B directly from a TADD-2, with
little luck (other HP freq counters seem to work OK). I was about to ask
about it on this list, but noticed this thread.
I guess this could explain why I am getting erroneous, random readings?
Dave
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz
> wrote:
> The attached excerpts from the 5370A and 5370B manuals indicate that for
> best performance, that the common practice of driving the 5370A/B 1x inputs
> directly from a 5V CMOS logic signal is a bad idea.
>
> For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 1V swing with the
> threshold set to 0.5V is close to optimum.
> An input signal with limits of 0V and +1.4V with a trigger threshold of
> 0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
> An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger threshold of
> 0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
>
> For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 2V swing with the
> threshold set to 1V is close to optimum.
> An input signal with limits of 0V and +3.5V with a trigger threshold of
> 0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
> An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger threshold of
> 0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
>
> Bruce
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
JM
John Miles
Mon, Mar 1, 2010 3:42 AM
What threshold are you using? If you leave it set to preset/0 volts, you
may find that crosstalk between outputs on the TADD-2 cause false
triggering. I usually use the divide-by-10 setting with the threshold set
to about 0.25V.
It also helps to remove the jumpers from any outputs on the TADD-2 you
aren't using.
-- john, KE5FX
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com]On
Behalf Of Dave hartzell
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 7:28 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Achieving maximum performance when driving
5370A/Binputs
Today I have been trying to drive a 5370B directly from a TADD-2, with
little luck (other HP freq counters seem to work OK). I was about to ask
about it on this list, but noticed this thread.
I guess this could explain why I am getting erroneous, random readings?
Dave
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Bruce Griffiths
<bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz
The attached excerpts from the 5370A and 5370B manuals indicate that for
best performance, that the common practice of driving the
directly from a 5V CMOS logic signal is a bad idea.
For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 1V swing with the
threshold set to 0.5V is close to optimum.
An input signal with limits of 0V and +1.4V with a trigger threshold of
0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger threshold of
0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 2V swing with the
threshold set to 1V is close to optimum.
An input signal with limits of 0V and +3.5V with a trigger threshold of
0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger threshold of
0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
Bruce
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
What threshold are you using? If you leave it set to preset/0 volts, you
may find that crosstalk between outputs on the TADD-2 cause false
triggering. I usually use the divide-by-10 setting with the threshold set
to about 0.25V.
It also helps to remove the jumpers from any outputs on the TADD-2 you
aren't using.
-- john, KE5FX
> -----Original Message-----
> From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com]On
> Behalf Of Dave hartzell
> Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 7:28 PM
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Achieving maximum performance when driving
> 5370A/Binputs
>
>
> Today I have been trying to drive a 5370B directly from a TADD-2, with
> little luck (other HP freq counters seem to work OK). I was about to ask
> about it on this list, but noticed this thread.
>
> I guess this could explain why I am getting erroneous, random readings?
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Bruce Griffiths
> <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz
> > wrote:
>
> > The attached excerpts from the 5370A and 5370B manuals indicate that for
> > best performance, that the common practice of driving the
> 5370A/B 1x inputs
> > directly from a 5V CMOS logic signal is a bad idea.
> >
> > For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 1V swing with the
> > threshold set to 0.5V is close to optimum.
> > An input signal with limits of 0V and +1.4V with a trigger threshold of
> > 0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
> > An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger threshold of
> > 0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
> >
> > For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 2V swing with the
> > threshold set to 1V is close to optimum.
> > An input signal with limits of 0V and +3.5V with a trigger threshold of
> > 0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
> > An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger threshold of
> > 0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
> >
> > Bruce
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
BG
Bruce Griffiths
Mon, Mar 1, 2010 3:43 AM
The TADD-2 output drivers exhibit significant ringing and crosstalk due
to ground and Vcc bounce.
To minimise crosstalk dedicate each 74AC04 output device to a single
frequency and load.
Because of the ringing setting the trigger threshold is more critical
than usual.
No damage occurs when driving the 5370A/B 1x inputs with 5V logic levels
however various protection diodes will turn on and the preamp input
stage becomes nonlinear.
Bruce
Dave hartzell wrote:
Today I have been trying to drive a 5370B directly from a TADD-2, with
little luck (other HP freq counters seem to work OK). I was about to ask
about it on this list, but noticed this thread.
I guess this could explain why I am getting erroneous, random readings?
Dave
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Bruce Griffiths<bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz
The attached excerpts from the 5370A and 5370B manuals indicate that for
best performance, that the common practice of driving the 5370A/B 1x inputs
directly from a 5V CMOS logic signal is a bad idea.
For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 1V swing with the
threshold set to 0.5V is close to optimum.
An input signal with limits of 0V and +1.4V with a trigger threshold of
0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger threshold of
0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 2V swing with the
threshold set to 1V is close to optimum.
An input signal with limits of 0V and +3.5V with a trigger threshold of
0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger threshold of
0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
Bruce
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
The TADD-2 output drivers exhibit significant ringing and crosstalk due
to ground and Vcc bounce.
To minimise crosstalk dedicate each 74AC04 output device to a single
frequency and load.
Because of the ringing setting the trigger threshold is more critical
than usual.
No damage occurs when driving the 5370A/B 1x inputs with 5V logic levels
however various protection diodes will turn on and the preamp input
stage becomes nonlinear.
Bruce
Dave hartzell wrote:
> Today I have been trying to drive a 5370B directly from a TADD-2, with
> little luck (other HP freq counters seem to work OK). I was about to ask
> about it on this list, but noticed this thread.
>
> I guess this could explain why I am getting erroneous, random readings?
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Bruce Griffiths<bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz
>
>> wrote:
>>
>
>> The attached excerpts from the 5370A and 5370B manuals indicate that for
>> best performance, that the common practice of driving the 5370A/B 1x inputs
>> directly from a 5V CMOS logic signal is a bad idea.
>>
>> For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 1V swing with the
>> threshold set to 0.5V is close to optimum.
>> An input signal with limits of 0V and +1.4V with a trigger threshold of
>> 0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
>> An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger threshold of
>> 0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
>>
>> For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 2V swing with the
>> threshold set to 1V is close to optimum.
>> An input signal with limits of 0V and +3.5V with a trigger threshold of
>> 0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
>> An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger threshold of
>> 0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to
>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
DH
Dave hartzell
Mon, Mar 1, 2010 4:04 AM
Thanks for the tips John. Do you use the 50 ohm or 1M ohm settings with the
TADD-2?
Dave
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:42 PM, John Miles jmiles@pop.net wrote:
What threshold are you using? If you leave it set to preset/0 volts, you
may find that crosstalk between outputs on the TADD-2 cause false
triggering. I usually use the divide-by-10 setting with the threshold set
to about 0.25V.
It also helps to remove the jumpers from any outputs on the TADD-2 you
aren't using.
-- john, KE5FX
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com]On
Behalf Of Dave hartzell
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 7:28 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Achieving maximum performance when driving
5370A/Binputs
Today I have been trying to drive a 5370B directly from a TADD-2, with
little luck (other HP freq counters seem to work OK). I was about to
about it on this list, but noticed this thread.
I guess this could explain why I am getting erroneous, random readings?
Dave
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Bruce Griffiths
<bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz
The attached excerpts from the 5370A and 5370B manuals indicate that
best performance, that the common practice of driving the
directly from a 5V CMOS logic signal is a bad idea.
For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 1V swing with the
threshold set to 0.5V is close to optimum.
An input signal with limits of 0V and +1.4V with a trigger threshold of
0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger threshold of
0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 2V swing with the
threshold set to 1V is close to optimum.
An input signal with limits of 0V and +3.5V with a trigger threshold of
0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger threshold of
0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
Bruce
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Thanks for the tips John. Do you use the 50 ohm or 1M ohm settings with the
TADD-2?
Dave
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:42 PM, John Miles <jmiles@pop.net> wrote:
> What threshold are you using? If you leave it set to preset/0 volts, you
> may find that crosstalk between outputs on the TADD-2 cause false
> triggering. I usually use the divide-by-10 setting with the threshold set
> to about 0.25V.
>
> It also helps to remove the jumpers from any outputs on the TADD-2 you
> aren't using.
>
> -- john, KE5FX
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com]On
> > Behalf Of Dave hartzell
> > Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 7:28 PM
> > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Achieving maximum performance when driving
> > 5370A/Binputs
> >
> >
> > Today I have been trying to drive a 5370B directly from a TADD-2, with
> > little luck (other HP freq counters seem to work OK). I was about to
> ask
> > about it on this list, but noticed this thread.
> >
> > I guess this could explain why I am getting erroneous, random readings?
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Bruce Griffiths
> > <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > The attached excerpts from the 5370A and 5370B manuals indicate that
> for
> > > best performance, that the common practice of driving the
> > 5370A/B 1x inputs
> > > directly from a 5V CMOS logic signal is a bad idea.
> > >
> > > For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 1V swing with the
> > > threshold set to 0.5V is close to optimum.
> > > An input signal with limits of 0V and +1.4V with a trigger threshold of
> > > 0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
> > > An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger threshold of
> > > 0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
> > >
> > > For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 2V swing with the
> > > threshold set to 1V is close to optimum.
> > > An input signal with limits of 0V and +3.5V with a trigger threshold of
> > > 0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
> > > An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger threshold of
> > > 0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
> > >
> > > Bruce
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> > > To unsubscribe, go to
> > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > > and follow the instructions there.
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
DH
Dave hartzell
Mon, Mar 1, 2010 4:06 AM
Thanks for the tips Bruce.
Is there a "better" version of the 74AC04? It sounds like I should also
use an attenuator, perhaps 3 - 10 dB...
Dave
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz
The TADD-2 output drivers exhibit significant ringing and crosstalk due to
ground and Vcc bounce.
To minimise crosstalk dedicate each 74AC04 output device to a single
frequency and load.
Because of the ringing setting the trigger threshold is more critical than
usual.
No damage occurs when driving the 5370A/B 1x inputs with 5V logic levels
however various protection diodes will turn on and the preamp input stage
becomes nonlinear.
Bruce
Thanks for the tips Bruce.
Is there a "better" version of the 74AC04? It sounds like I should also
use an attenuator, perhaps 3 - 10 dB...
Dave
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Bruce Griffiths <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz
> wrote:
> The TADD-2 output drivers exhibit significant ringing and crosstalk due to
> ground and Vcc bounce.
>
> To minimise crosstalk dedicate each 74AC04 output device to a single
> frequency and load.
>
> Because of the ringing setting the trigger threshold is more critical than
> usual.
>
> No damage occurs when driving the 5370A/B 1x inputs with 5V logic levels
> however various protection diodes will turn on and the preamp input stage
> becomes nonlinear.
>
> Bruce
>
>
JM
John Miles
Mon, Mar 1, 2010 4:11 AM
If you drive it from 50-ohm coax, you need to use the 50-ohm setting, or the
resulting reflections may cause trouble. The 74AC04s in the TADD-2 are
happy enough driving 50 ohms, so that's the best way to go.
-- john, KE5FX
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com]On
Behalf Of Dave hartzell
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 8:05 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Achieving maximum performance when
driving5370A/Binputs
Thanks for the tips John. Do you use the 50 ohm or 1M ohm
settings with the
TADD-2?
Dave
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:42 PM, John Miles jmiles@pop.net wrote:
What threshold are you using? If you leave it set to preset/0
may find that crosstalk between outputs on the TADD-2 cause false
triggering. I usually use the divide-by-10 setting with the
to about 0.25V.
It also helps to remove the jumpers from any outputs on the TADD-2 you
aren't using.
-- john, KE5FX
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com]On
Behalf Of Dave hartzell
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 7:28 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Achieving maximum performance when driving
5370A/Binputs
Today I have been trying to drive a 5370B directly from a TADD-2, with
little luck (other HP freq counters seem to work OK). I was about to
about it on this list, but noticed this thread.
I guess this could explain why I am getting erroneous, random
The attached excerpts from the 5370A and 5370B manuals indicate that
best performance, that the common practice of driving the
directly from a 5V CMOS logic signal is a bad idea.
For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 1V swing with the
threshold set to 0.5V is close to optimum.
An input signal with limits of 0V and +1.4V with a trigger
0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger
0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 2V swing with the
threshold set to 1V is close to optimum.
An input signal with limits of 0V and +3.5V with a trigger
0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger
If you drive it from 50-ohm coax, you need to use the 50-ohm setting, or the
resulting reflections may cause trouble. The 74AC04s in the TADD-2 are
happy enough driving 50 ohms, so that's the best way to go.
-- john, KE5FX
> -----Original Message-----
> From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com]On
> Behalf Of Dave hartzell
> Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 8:05 PM
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Achieving maximum performance when
> driving5370A/Binputs
>
>
> Thanks for the tips John. Do you use the 50 ohm or 1M ohm
> settings with the
> TADD-2?
>
> Dave
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:42 PM, John Miles <jmiles@pop.net> wrote:
>
> > What threshold are you using? If you leave it set to preset/0
> volts, you
> > may find that crosstalk between outputs on the TADD-2 cause false
> > triggering. I usually use the divide-by-10 setting with the
> threshold set
> > to about 0.25V.
> >
> > It also helps to remove the jumpers from any outputs on the TADD-2 you
> > aren't using.
> >
> > -- john, KE5FX
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com]On
> > > Behalf Of Dave hartzell
> > > Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 7:28 PM
> > > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> > > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Achieving maximum performance when driving
> > > 5370A/Binputs
> > >
> > >
> > > Today I have been trying to drive a 5370B directly from a TADD-2, with
> > > little luck (other HP freq counters seem to work OK). I was about to
> > ask
> > > about it on this list, but noticed this thread.
> > >
> > > I guess this could explain why I am getting erroneous, random
> readings?
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Bruce Griffiths
> > > <bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > The attached excerpts from the 5370A and 5370B manuals indicate that
> > for
> > > > best performance, that the common practice of driving the
> > > 5370A/B 1x inputs
> > > > directly from a 5V CMOS logic signal is a bad idea.
> > > >
> > > > For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 1V swing with the
> > > > threshold set to 0.5V is close to optimum.
> > > > An input signal with limits of 0V and +1.4V with a trigger
> threshold of
> > > > 0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
> > > > An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger
> threshold of
> > > > 0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
> > > >
> > > > For the 5370A attenuating the 5V CMOS signal to a 2V swing with the
> > > > threshold set to 1V is close to optimum.
> > > > An input signal with limits of 0V and +3.5V with a trigger
> threshold of
> > > > 0.7V is the maximum usable (for high performance).
> > > > An input signal with limits of 0V and +0.3V with a trigger
> threshold of
> > > > 0.15V is the minimum usable (for high performance).
> > > >
> > > > Bruce
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> > > > To unsubscribe, go to
> > > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > > > and follow the instructions there.
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> > > To unsubscribe, go to
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> > To unsubscribe, go to
> > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> > and follow the instructions there.
> >
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
BG
Bruce Griffiths
Mon, Mar 1, 2010 4:53 AM
You could substitute a 74AHC04 which has better control of ground and
Vcc bounce.
At least they are specified.
At least a 3dB attenuator with a 5370B.
at least 11dB with a 5370A.
Or just use the built in 20dB (10x) attenuator.
Bruce
Dave hartzell wrote:
Thanks for the tips Bruce.
Is there a "better" version of the 74AC04? It sounds like I should also
use an attenuator, perhaps 3 - 10 dB...
Dave
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Bruce Griffiths<bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz
The TADD-2 output drivers exhibit significant ringing and crosstalk due to
ground and Vcc bounce.
To minimise crosstalk dedicate each 74AC04 output device to a single
frequency and load.
Because of the ringing setting the trigger threshold is more critical than
usual.
No damage occurs when driving the 5370A/B 1x inputs with 5V logic levels
however various protection diodes will turn on and the preamp input stage
becomes nonlinear.
Bruce
You could substitute a 74AHC04 which has better control of ground and
Vcc bounce.
At least they are specified.
At least a 3dB attenuator with a 5370B.
at least 11dB with a 5370A.
Or just use the built in 20dB (10x) attenuator.
Bruce
Dave hartzell wrote:
> Thanks for the tips Bruce.
>
> Is there a "better" version of the 74AC04? It sounds like I should also
> use an attenuator, perhaps 3 - 10 dB...
>
> Dave
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Bruce Griffiths<bruce.griffiths@xtra.co.nz
>
>> wrote:
>>
>
>> The TADD-2 output drivers exhibit significant ringing and crosstalk due to
>> ground and Vcc bounce.
>>
>> To minimise crosstalk dedicate each 74AC04 output device to a single
>> frequency and load.
>>
>> Because of the ringing setting the trigger threshold is more critical than
>> usual.
>>
>> No damage occurs when driving the 5370A/B 1x inputs with 5V logic levels
>> however various protection diodes will turn on and the preamp input stage
>> becomes nonlinear.
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>