time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

10 MHz Filters

PS
Perry Sandeen
Thu, Nov 27, 2014 4:08 AM

List,

 
I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but have no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style Lucent boxes.

 
Thoughts?

 
On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if you buy 30.  My question wouldthese be good for making some type of simple ladder filter?

 
In his article Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium FrequencyStandard the author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from an old 10MbitEthernet LAN board. The part number he used was 20F001N and I found them onEbay for low prices.

 
Now I don’t have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I’d have to build from scratch.

 
Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on the new style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small distributionamplifier with good isolation?

 
Regards,

 
Perrier

List,   I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but have no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style Lucent boxes.   Thoughts?   On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if you buy 30.  My question wouldthese be good for making some type of simple ladder filter?   In his article *Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium FrequencyStandard* the author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from an old 10MbitEthernet LAN board. The part number he used was 20F001N and I found them onEbay for low prices.   Now I don’t have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I’d have to build from scratch.   Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on the new style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small distributionamplifier with good isolation?   Regards,   Perrier
DM
Dave M
Thu, Nov 27, 2014 3:50 PM

Electronic Goldmine has some Pulse Engineering LAN transformers (same as
those used on many LAN boards) on clearance at $1.00 each.
http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=G17078
Datasheet is at http://www.datasheet4u.com/download_new.php?id=541958

Quite cheap, in my opinion.

Cheers,
Dave M

Perry Sandeen via time-nuts wrote:

List,
I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but
have no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style
Lucent boxes.

Thoughts?

On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if you
buy 30. My question wouldthese be good for making some type of simple
ladder filter?

In his article Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium FrequencyStandard
the author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from an old
10MbitEthernet LAN board. The part number he used was 20F001N and I
found them onEbay for low prices.

Now I don’t have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I’d have
to build from scratch.

Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on the
new style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small
distributionamplifier with good isolation?

Regards,

Perrier

Electronic Goldmine has some Pulse Engineering LAN transformers (same as those used on many LAN boards) on clearance at $1.00 each. http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=G17078 Datasheet is at http://www.datasheet4u.com/download_new.php?id=541958 Quite cheap, in my opinion. Cheers, Dave M Perry Sandeen via time-nuts wrote: > List, > I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but > have no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style > Lucent boxes. > > Thoughts? >> > On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if you > buy 30. My question wouldthese be good for making some type of simple > ladder filter? > > In his article *Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium FrequencyStandard* > the author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from an old > 10MbitEthernet LAN board. The part number he used was 20F001N and I > found them onEbay for low prices. > > Now I don’t have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I’d have > to build from scratch. > > Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on the > new style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small > distributionamplifier with good isolation? > > Regards, > > Perrier
CA
Chris Albertson
Thu, Nov 27, 2014 4:36 PM

I'm not much further along then you but I did find a few things...

  1. You can buy/salvage good quality 10.0 MHz transformers form networking
    equipment designed for 10BaseT Ethernet.  These are designed for galvanic
    isolation and are used in old 10baseT routers and switches.  Newer Ethernet
    works are 100 and 1000 Mhz but the older version was 10 MHz.  I have a box
    of salvaged parts I removed from junked routers.  These transformers are in
    wide DIP packages with 0.1" lead spacing.

  2. Cheap 10MHz crystals need to be measured, sorted and matched by hand.
    And then you want to keep the temperature from moving around to much.
    Before I owned a GPSDO and a two channel scope I used to think the cheap
    crystals where all exactly "spot-on"

  3. it is really easy to build a temperature controller using a $2 8-pin uP
    and a few lines of code.  The 8-pin uP will have a few analog inputs and
    outputs and even pins left over for status LEDs.

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Perry Sandeen via time-nuts <
time-nuts@febo.com> wrote:

List,

I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but have
no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style Lucent
boxes.

Thoughts?

On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if you buy
30.  My question wouldthese be good for making some type of simple ladder
filter?

In his article Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium FrequencyStandard the
author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from an old 10MbitEthernet LAN
board. The part number he used was 20F001N and I found them onEbay for low
prices.

Now I don’t have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I’d have to
build from scratch.

Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on the new
style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small distributionamplifier with
good isolation?

Regards,

Perrier


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--

Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California

I'm not much further along then you but I did find a few things... 1) You can buy/salvage good quality 10.0 MHz transformers form networking equipment designed for 10BaseT Ethernet. These are designed for galvanic isolation and are used in old 10baseT routers and switches. Newer Ethernet works are 100 and 1000 Mhz but the older version was 10 MHz. I have a box of salvaged parts I removed from junked routers. These transformers are in wide DIP packages with 0.1" lead spacing. 2) Cheap 10MHz crystals need to be measured, sorted and matched by hand. And then you want to keep the temperature from moving around to much. Before I owned a GPSDO and a two channel scope I used to think the cheap crystals where all exactly "spot-on" 3) it is really easy to build a temperature controller using a $2 8-pin uP and a few lines of code. The 8-pin uP will have a few analog inputs and outputs and even pins left over for status LEDs. On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Perry Sandeen via time-nuts < time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: > List, > > > > I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but have > no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style Lucent > boxes. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if you buy > 30. My question wouldthese be good for making some type of simple ladder > filter? > > > > In his article *Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium FrequencyStandard* the > author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from an old 10MbitEthernet LAN > board. The part number he used was 20F001N and I found them onEbay for low > prices. > > > > Now I don’t have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I’d have to > build from scratch. > > > > Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on the new > style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small distributionamplifier with > good isolation? > > > > Regards, > > > > Perrier > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- Chris Albertson Redondo Beach, California
RS
Richard Solomon
Thu, Nov 27, 2014 4:41 PM

If you want to see how to really do it right, check out this
distribution Amp
on the TAPR site.

https://www.tapr.org/kits_tadd-1.html

73, Dick, W1KSZ

On 11/26/2014 9:08 PM, Perry Sandeen via time-nuts wrote:

List,

I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but have no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style Lucent boxes.

Thoughts?

On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if you buy 30.  My question wouldthese be good for making some type of simple ladder filter?

In his article Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium FrequencyStandard the author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from an old 10MbitEthernet LAN board. The part number he used was 20F001N and I found them onEbay for low prices.

Now I don’t have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I’d have to build from scratch.

Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on the new style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small distributionamplifier with good isolation?

Regards,

Perrier


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

If you want to see how to really do it right, check out this distribution Amp on the TAPR site. https://www.tapr.org/kits_tadd-1.html 73, Dick, W1KSZ On 11/26/2014 9:08 PM, Perry Sandeen via time-nuts wrote: > List, > > > > I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but have no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style Lucent boxes. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if you buy 30. My question wouldthese be good for making some type of simple ladder filter? > > > > In his article *Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium FrequencyStandard* the author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from an old 10MbitEthernet LAN board. The part number he used was 20F001N and I found them onEbay for low prices. > > > > Now I don’t have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I’d have to build from scratch. > > > > Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on the new style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small distributionamplifier with good isolation? > > > > Regards, > > > > Perrier > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
JG
Joseph Gray
Thu, Nov 27, 2014 5:04 PM

Perry,

Just three days ago, I posted about my using transformers from
Ethernet cards. I also summarized the results of some measurements
using the spectrum analyzer. There was only one response, so it seems
that what I posted was widely ignored.

Dave M - good find on Electronic Goldmine.

Joe Gray
W5JG

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Dave M dgminala@mediacombb.net wrote:

Electronic Goldmine has some Pulse Engineering LAN transformers (same as
those used on many LAN boards) on clearance at $1.00 each.
http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=G17078
Datasheet is at http://www.datasheet4u.com/download_new.php?id=541958

Quite cheap, in my opinion.

Cheers,
Dave M

Perry Sandeen via time-nuts wrote:

List,
I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but
have no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style
Lucent boxes.

Thoughts?

On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if you
buy 30. My question wouldthese be good for making some type of simple
ladder filter?

In his article Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium FrequencyStandard
the author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from an old
10MbitEthernet LAN board. The part number he used was 20F001N and I
found them onEbay for low prices.

Now I don't have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I'd have
to build from scratch.

Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on the
new style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small
distributionamplifier with good isolation?

Regards,

Perrier


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Perry, Just three days ago, I posted about my using transformers from Ethernet cards. I also summarized the results of some measurements using the spectrum analyzer. There was only one response, so it seems that what I posted was widely ignored. Dave M - good find on Electronic Goldmine. Joe Gray W5JG On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Dave M <dgminala@mediacombb.net> wrote: > Electronic Goldmine has some Pulse Engineering LAN transformers (same as > those used on many LAN boards) on clearance at $1.00 each. > http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=G17078 > Datasheet is at http://www.datasheet4u.com/download_new.php?id=541958 > > Quite cheap, in my opinion. > > Cheers, > Dave M > > > Perry Sandeen via time-nuts wrote: >> >> List, >> I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but >> have no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style >> Lucent boxes. >> >> Thoughts? >>> >>> >> On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if you >> buy 30. My question wouldthese be good for making some type of simple >> ladder filter? >> >> In his article *Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium FrequencyStandard* >> the author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from an old >> 10MbitEthernet LAN board. The part number he used was 20F001N and I >> found them onEbay for low prices. >> >> Now I don't have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I'd have >> to build from scratch. >> >> Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on the >> new style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small >> distributionamplifier with good isolation? >> >> Regards, >> >> Perrier > > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
JS
Jim Sanford
Thu, Nov 27, 2014 5:25 PM

Any suggestions as to which chips, or links to any documentation?
Thanks,
Jim

On 11/27/2014 11:36 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:

  1. it is really easy to build a temperature controller using a $2 8-pin uP
    and a few lines of code.  The 8-pin uP will have a few analog inputs and
    outputs and even pins left over for status LEDs.

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Perry Sandeen via time-nuts <
time-nuts@febo.com> wrote:

List,

I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but have
no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style Lucent
boxes.

Thoughts?

On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if you buy
30.  My question wouldthese be good for making some type of simple ladder
filter?

In his article Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium FrequencyStandard the
author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from an old 10MbitEthernet LAN
board. The part number he used was 20F001N and I found them onEbay for low
prices.

Now I don’t have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I’d have to
build from scratch.

Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on the new
style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small distributionamplifier with
good isolation?

Regards,

Perrier


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

Any suggestions as to which chips, or links to any documentation? Thanks, Jim On 11/27/2014 11:36 AM, Chris Albertson wrote: > 3) it is really easy to build a temperature controller using a $2 8-pin uP > and a few lines of code. The 8-pin uP will have a few analog inputs and > outputs and even pins left over for status LEDs. > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Perry Sandeen via time-nuts < > time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: > >> List, >> >> >> >> I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but have >> no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style Lucent >> boxes. >> >> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> >> On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if you buy >> 30. My question wouldthese be good for making some type of simple ladder >> filter? >> >> >> >> In his article *Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium FrequencyStandard* the >> author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from an old 10MbitEthernet LAN >> board. The part number he used was 20F001N and I found them onEbay for low >> prices. >> >> >> >> Now I don’t have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I’d have to >> build from scratch. >> >> >> >> Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on the new >> style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small distributionamplifier with >> good isolation? >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> Perrier >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com
BC
Bob Camp
Thu, Nov 27, 2014 5:35 PM

Hi

Just as you can “move” 455 KHz IF transformers down with a little padding, you can do the same thing with 10.7 MHz IF cans. They may or may not tune to 10 MHz. If you get some that don’t tune, it’s just a cap to bump them down.

The gotcha to any filter in a distribution system is Q. High Q implies high phase slope or long delay. In the real world things are temperature sensitive. Delta temp -> delta inductance -> delta phase -> bad ADEV. The trick is to get the job done with as low a Q as practical.

The next layer to the onion is loading. If the filter is on the output of the amp, it’s phase will change with load. Same issue as temperature, high Q -> big changes -> bad performance.

Even with a “class C” multiplier, fixed tuned Q< 10 circuits will do the trick for 5 -> 10 MHz doubling. With more exotic multipliers, even simpler filtering will do the job.

If you don’t need -200 db harmonics, and 30 db is fine — don’t go nuts with the filters.

Bob

On Nov 26, 2014, at 10:08 PM, Perry Sandeen via time-nuts time-nuts@febo.com wrote:

List,

I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but have no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style Lucent boxes.

Thoughts?

On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if you buy 30.  My question wouldthese be good for making some type of simple ladder filter?

In his article Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium FrequencyStandard the author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from an old 10MbitEthernet LAN board. The part number he used was 20F001N and I found them onEbay for low prices.

Now I don’t have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I’d have to build from scratch.

Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on the new style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small distributionamplifier with good isolation?

Regards,

Perrier


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Just as you can “move” 455 KHz IF transformers down with a little padding, you can do the same thing with 10.7 MHz IF cans. They may or may not tune to 10 MHz. If you get some that don’t tune, it’s just a cap to bump them down. The gotcha to any filter in a distribution system is Q. High Q implies high phase slope or long delay. In the real world things are temperature sensitive. Delta temp -> delta inductance -> delta phase -> bad ADEV. The trick is to get the job done with as low a Q as practical. The next layer to the onion is loading. If the filter is on the output of the amp, it’s phase will change with load. Same issue as temperature, high Q -> big changes -> bad performance. Even with a “class C” multiplier, fixed tuned Q< 10 circuits will do the trick for 5 -> 10 MHz doubling. With more exotic multipliers, even simpler filtering will do the job. If you don’t *need* -200 db harmonics, and 30 db is fine — don’t go nuts with the filters. Bob > On Nov 26, 2014, at 10:08 PM, Perry Sandeen via time-nuts <time-nuts@febo.com> wrote: > > List, > > > > I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but have no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style Lucent boxes. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if you buy 30. My question wouldthese be good for making some type of simple ladder filter? > > > > In his article *Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium FrequencyStandard* the author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from an old 10MbitEthernet LAN board. The part number he used was 20F001N and I found them onEbay for low prices. > > > > Now I don’t have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I’d have to build from scratch. > > > > Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on the new style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small distributionamplifier with good isolation? > > > > Regards, > > > > Perrier > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
BC
Bob Camp
Thu, Nov 27, 2014 5:41 PM

Hi

We are talking about many different parts here and calling them all “transformers”.

The parts from an Ethernet line card are broadband devices used primarily for isolation. The 10.7 MHz IF transformers are designed for use in a filter. The first could be used to break a ground loop on a cable. The second could be used to knock out a harmonic or sub-harmonic. Each will do quite poorly trying to do the other one’s job.

Bob

On Nov 27, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Joseph Gray jgray@zianet.com wrote:

Perry,

Just three days ago, I posted about my using transformers from
Ethernet cards. I also summarized the results of some measurements
using the spectrum analyzer. There was only one response, so it seems
that what I posted was widely ignored.

Dave M - good find on Electronic Goldmine.

Joe Gray
W5JG

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Dave M dgminala@mediacombb.net wrote:

Electronic Goldmine has some Pulse Engineering LAN transformers (same as
those used on many LAN boards) on clearance at $1.00 each.
http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=G17078
Datasheet is at http://www.datasheet4u.com/download_new.php?id=541958

Quite cheap, in my opinion.

Cheers,
Dave M

Perry Sandeen via time-nuts wrote:

List,
I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but
have no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style
Lucent boxes.

Thoughts?

On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if you
buy 30. My question wouldthese be good for making some type of simple
ladder filter?

In his article Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium FrequencyStandard
the author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from an old
10MbitEthernet LAN board. The part number he used was 20F001N and I
found them onEbay for low prices.

Now I don't have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I'd have
to build from scratch.

Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on the
new style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small
distributionamplifier with good isolation?

Regards,

Perrier


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi We are talking about many different parts here and calling them all “transformers”. The parts from an Ethernet line card are broadband devices used primarily for isolation. The 10.7 MHz IF transformers are designed for use in a filter. The first could be used to break a ground loop on a cable. The second could be used to knock out a harmonic or sub-harmonic. Each will do quite poorly trying to do the other one’s job. Bob > On Nov 27, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Joseph Gray <jgray@zianet.com> wrote: > > Perry, > > Just three days ago, I posted about my using transformers from > Ethernet cards. I also summarized the results of some measurements > using the spectrum analyzer. There was only one response, so it seems > that what I posted was widely ignored. > > Dave M - good find on Electronic Goldmine. > > > Joe Gray > W5JG > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Dave M <dgminala@mediacombb.net> wrote: >> Electronic Goldmine has some Pulse Engineering LAN transformers (same as >> those used on many LAN boards) on clearance at $1.00 each. >> http://www.goldmine-elec-products.com/prodinfo.asp?number=G17078 >> Datasheet is at http://www.datasheet4u.com/download_new.php?id=541958 >> >> Quite cheap, in my opinion. >> >> Cheers, >> Dave M >> >> >> Perry Sandeen via time-nuts wrote: >>> >>> List, >>> I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but >>> have no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style >>> Lucent boxes. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> >>> On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if you >>> buy 30. My question wouldthese be good for making some type of simple >>> ladder filter? >>> >>> In his article *Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium FrequencyStandard* >>> the author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from an old >>> 10MbitEthernet LAN board. The part number he used was 20F001N and I >>> found them onEbay for low prices. >>> >>> Now I don't have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I'd have >>> to build from scratch. >>> >>> Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on the >>> new style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small >>> distributionamplifier with good isolation? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Perrier >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
CF
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX
Thu, Nov 27, 2014 7:26 PM

I have 4 or 5 devices that use the 10 MHz from my Trimble Thunderbolt.
All but one have high impedance 10 MHz inputs, so the Thunderbolt
can drive the lot without any amplifier.

When I put together my Thunderbolt, power supply, and filter I assumed I
would
need a distribution amp ans made provisions for it.  Turns out it is not
necessary.

The real trick was locating well shielded patch cables to keep the
Thunderbolt from
jamming WWV on 10 MHz.

On 11/27/2014 08:41 AM, Richard Solomon wrote:

If you want to see how to really do it right, check out this
distribution Amp
on the TAPR site.

https://www.tapr.org/kits_tadd-1.html

73, Dick, W1KSZ

On 11/26/2014 9:08 PM, Perry Sandeen via time-nuts wrote:

List,

I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers
but have no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew
style Lucent boxes.

Thoughts?

On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if
you buy 30.  My question wouldthese be good for making some type of
simple ladder filter?

In his article Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium
FrequencyStandard
the author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from
an old 10MbitEthernet LAN board. The part number he used was 20F001N
and I found them onEbay for low prices.

Now I don’t have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I’d
have to build from scratch.

Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on
the new style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small
distributionamplifier with good isolation?

Regards,

Perrier


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX  caf@omen.com  www.omen.com
Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications
Omen Technology Inc      "The High Reliability Software"
10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231  503-614-0430

I have 4 or 5 devices that use the 10 MHz from my Trimble Thunderbolt. All but one have high impedance 10 MHz inputs, so the Thunderbolt can drive the lot without any amplifier. When I put together my Thunderbolt, power supply, and filter I assumed I would need a distribution amp ans made provisions for it. Turns out it is not necessary. The real trick was locating well shielded patch cables to keep the Thunderbolt from jamming WWV on 10 MHz. On 11/27/2014 08:41 AM, Richard Solomon wrote: > If you want to see how to really do it right, check out this > distribution Amp > on the TAPR site. > > https://www.tapr.org/kits_tadd-1.html > > 73, Dick, W1KSZ > > > On 11/26/2014 9:08 PM, Perry Sandeen via time-nuts wrote: >> List, >> >> >> I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers >> but have no idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew >> style Lucent boxes. >> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> On Ebay venders are offering 10 MHz crystals for almostnothing if >> you buy 30. My question wouldthese be good for making some type of >> simple ladder filter? >> >> >> In his article *Modifying Lucent RFG-M-RB Rubidium >> FrequencyStandard* the author used a 10MHz filter that was taken from >> an old 10MbitEthernet LAN board. The part number he used was 20F001N >> and I found them onEbay for low prices. >> >> >> Now I don’t have any access to any old ethernet LAN boardsso I’d >> have to build from scratch. >> >> >> Does anyone of these methods have an advantage over theothers on >> the new style Lucent boxes or in the making of a small >> distributionamplifier with good isolation? >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Perrier >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX caf@omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software" 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430
JM
John Miles
Thu, Nov 27, 2014 8:02 PM

For the most part, you don't want transformer isolation unless you plan on using balanced lines.  There are worse things than ground loops out there, and lifting a coax shield away from ground is a great way to find all of them.

You definitely don't want 10.7 MHz IF transformers, unless you are just trying to build a thermometer.

-- john, KE5FX
Miles Design LLC

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Perry
Sandeen via time-nuts
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 8:08 PM
To: time-nuts
Subject: [time-nuts] 10 MHz Filters

List,

I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but have no
idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style Lucent boxes.

For the most part, you don't want transformer isolation unless you plan on using balanced lines. There are worse things than ground loops out there, and lifting a coax shield away from ground is a great way to find all of them. You definitely don't want 10.7 MHz IF transformers, unless you are just trying to build a thermometer. -- john, KE5FX Miles Design LLC > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Perry > Sandeen via time-nuts > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 8:08 PM > To: time-nuts > Subject: [time-nuts] 10 MHz Filters > > List, > > > > I have seen on the net a 10 MHz filter using 10.7 IFtransformers but have no > idea how well they would work for isolation with thenew style Lucent boxes. >