time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

No GPS satellites

DR
Doug Ronald
Wed, Feb 25, 2015 7:35 PM

I'm hoping someone can shed some light on my problem receiving any GPS satellites.

I have two TrueTime GPS Time & Frequency Receivers, Model XL-DC. One has a regular crystal oscillator, and the other one has a rubidium oscillator. I have two outdoor GPS antennas with internal LNAs, one a 28 dB gain unit, and the other a 40 dB unit. When either antenna is connected to my Lucent KS-24361, it locks right up and tracks up to 8 satellites. When either of the antennas is connected to the XL-DCs, they just sit there and status : "Looking for GPS satellites".

In the Alarm menu of either XL-DC there is an alarm for Antenna. Both units say "OK" and if I disconnect the antenna they both logically say "Open". So, what is the problem? I can't believe I don't have enough signal, after the Lucent locks-up right away. Is it possible the TrueTime sanctioned antenna has a down converter in it, perhaps placing the GPS signal from L-band to some lower frequency? I would appreciate any info the group might have...

-Doug Ronald
W6DSR

I'm hoping someone can shed some light on my problem receiving any GPS satellites. I have two TrueTime GPS Time & Frequency Receivers, Model XL-DC. One has a regular crystal oscillator, and the other one has a rubidium oscillator. I have two outdoor GPS antennas with internal LNAs, one a 28 dB gain unit, and the other a 40 dB unit. When either antenna is connected to my Lucent KS-24361, it locks right up and tracks up to 8 satellites. When either of the antennas is connected to the XL-DCs, they just sit there and status : "Looking for GPS satellites". In the Alarm menu of either XL-DC there is an alarm for Antenna. Both units say "OK" and if I disconnect the antenna they both logically say "Open". So, what is the problem? I can't believe I don't have enough signal, after the Lucent locks-up right away. Is it possible the TrueTime sanctioned antenna has a down converter in it, perhaps placing the GPS signal from L-band to some lower frequency? I would appreciate any info the group might have... -Doug Ronald W6DSR
TS
Tim Shoppa
Thu, Feb 26, 2015 1:56 AM

Yes, the XL-DC and other Truetime models had as an option for long cable
runs, a downconverter in the antenna. I don't know how to tell the
difference from part number, but I know the truetimes my employer uses all
have the downconverter option and the option is very common.

Tim N3QE

On Wednesday, February 25, 2015, Doug Ronald <doug@dougronald.com
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','doug@dougronald.com');> wrote:

I'm hoping someone can shed some light on my problem receiving any GPS
satellites.

I have two TrueTime GPS Time & Frequency Receivers, Model XL-DC. One has a
regular crystal oscillator, and the other one has a rubidium oscillator. I
have two outdoor GPS antennas with internal LNAs, one a 28 dB gain unit,
and the other a 40 dB unit. When either antenna is connected to my Lucent
KS-24361, it locks right up and tracks up to 8 satellites. When either of
the antennas is connected to the XL-DCs, they just sit there and status :
"Looking for GPS satellites".

In the Alarm menu of either XL-DC there is an alarm for Antenna. Both
units say "OK" and if I disconnect the antenna they both logically say
"Open". So, what is the problem? I can't believe I don't have enough
signal, after the Lucent locks-up right away. Is it possible the TrueTime
sanctioned antenna has a down converter in it, perhaps placing the GPS
signal from L-band to some lower frequency? I would appreciate any info the
group might have...

-Doug Ronald
W6DSR


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Yes, the XL-DC and other Truetime models had as an option for long cable runs, a downconverter in the antenna. I don't know how to tell the difference from part number, but I know the truetimes my employer uses all have the downconverter option and the option is very common. Tim N3QE On Wednesday, February 25, 2015, Doug Ronald <doug@dougronald.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','doug@dougronald.com');>> wrote: > I'm hoping someone can shed some light on my problem receiving any GPS > satellites. > > I have two TrueTime GPS Time & Frequency Receivers, Model XL-DC. One has a > regular crystal oscillator, and the other one has a rubidium oscillator. I > have two outdoor GPS antennas with internal LNAs, one a 28 dB gain unit, > and the other a 40 dB unit. When either antenna is connected to my Lucent > KS-24361, it locks right up and tracks up to 8 satellites. When either of > the antennas is connected to the XL-DCs, they just sit there and status : > "Looking for GPS satellites". > > In the Alarm menu of either XL-DC there is an alarm for Antenna. Both > units say "OK" and if I disconnect the antenna they both logically say > "Open". So, what is the problem? I can't believe I don't have enough > signal, after the Lucent locks-up right away. Is it possible the TrueTime > sanctioned antenna has a down converter in it, perhaps placing the GPS > signal from L-band to some lower frequency? I would appreciate any info the > group might have... > > -Doug Ronald > W6DSR > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
MP
Michael Perrett
Thu, Feb 26, 2015 4:16 AM

Since your antennas have a lot of gain I assume they are active and require
a DC voltage to the LNA. Does the XL-DC provide that voltage (sometime you
have to select active or passive antenna)?
Michael / K7HIL

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Doug Ronald doug@dougronald.com wrote:

I'm hoping someone can shed some light on my problem receiving any GPS
satellites.

I have two TrueTime GPS Time & Frequency Receivers, Model XL-DC. One has a
regular crystal oscillator, and the other one has a rubidium oscillator. I
have two outdoor GPS antennas with internal LNAs, one a 28 dB gain unit,
and the other a 40 dB unit. When either antenna is connected to my Lucent
KS-24361, it locks right up and tracks up to 8 satellites. When either of
the antennas is connected to the XL-DCs, they just sit there and status :
"Looking for GPS satellites".

In the Alarm menu of either XL-DC there is an alarm for Antenna. Both
units say "OK" and if I disconnect the antenna they both logically say
"Open". So, what is the problem? I can't believe I don't have enough
signal, after the Lucent locks-up right away. Is it possible the TrueTime
sanctioned antenna has a down converter in it, perhaps placing the GPS
signal from L-band to some lower frequency? I would appreciate any info the
group might have...

-Doug Ronald
W6DSR


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Since your antennas have a lot of gain I assume they are active and require a DC voltage to the LNA. Does the XL-DC provide that voltage (sometime you have to select active or passive antenna)? Michael / K7HIL On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Doug Ronald <doug@dougronald.com> wrote: > I'm hoping someone can shed some light on my problem receiving any GPS > satellites. > > I have two TrueTime GPS Time & Frequency Receivers, Model XL-DC. One has a > regular crystal oscillator, and the other one has a rubidium oscillator. I > have two outdoor GPS antennas with internal LNAs, one a 28 dB gain unit, > and the other a 40 dB unit. When either antenna is connected to my Lucent > KS-24361, it locks right up and tracks up to 8 satellites. When either of > the antennas is connected to the XL-DCs, they just sit there and status : > "Looking for GPS satellites". > > In the Alarm menu of either XL-DC there is an alarm for Antenna. Both > units say "OK" and if I disconnect the antenna they both logically say > "Open". So, what is the problem? I can't believe I don't have enough > signal, after the Lucent locks-up right away. Is it possible the TrueTime > sanctioned antenna has a down converter in it, perhaps placing the GPS > signal from L-band to some lower frequency? I would appreciate any info the > group might have... > > -Doug Ronald > W6DSR > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
AB
Azelio Boriani
Thu, Feb 26, 2015 10:50 AM

Yes, the TrueTime unit needs its antenna/downconverter to work. Other
GPSDOs, like the Meinberg units GPS-SA used in the Rohde Schwarz
ED167MP have this arrangement.

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Doug Ronald doug@dougronald.com wrote:

I'm hoping someone can shed some light on my problem receiving any GPS satellites.

I have two TrueTime GPS Time & Frequency Receivers, Model XL-DC. One has a regular crystal oscillator, and the other one has a rubidium oscillator. I have two outdoor GPS antennas with internal LNAs, one a 28 dB gain unit, and the other a 40 dB unit. When either antenna is connected to my Lucent KS-24361, it locks right up and tracks up to 8 satellites. When either of the antennas is connected to the XL-DCs, they just sit there and status : "Looking for GPS satellites".

In the Alarm menu of either XL-DC there is an alarm for Antenna. Both units say "OK" and if I disconnect the antenna they both logically say "Open". So, what is the problem? I can't believe I don't have enough signal, after the Lucent locks-up right away. Is it possible the TrueTime sanctioned antenna has a down converter in it, perhaps placing the GPS signal from L-band to some lower frequency? I would appreciate any info the group might have...

-Doug Ronald
W6DSR


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Yes, the TrueTime unit needs its antenna/downconverter to work. Other GPSDOs, like the Meinberg units GPS-SA used in the Rohde Schwarz ED167MP have this arrangement. On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Doug Ronald <doug@dougronald.com> wrote: > I'm hoping someone can shed some light on my problem receiving any GPS satellites. > > I have two TrueTime GPS Time & Frequency Receivers, Model XL-DC. One has a regular crystal oscillator, and the other one has a rubidium oscillator. I have two outdoor GPS antennas with internal LNAs, one a 28 dB gain unit, and the other a 40 dB unit. When either antenna is connected to my Lucent KS-24361, it locks right up and tracks up to 8 satellites. When either of the antennas is connected to the XL-DCs, they just sit there and status : "Looking for GPS satellites". > > In the Alarm menu of either XL-DC there is an alarm for Antenna. Both units say "OK" and if I disconnect the antenna they both logically say "Open". So, what is the problem? I can't believe I don't have enough signal, after the Lucent locks-up right away. Is it possible the TrueTime sanctioned antenna has a down converter in it, perhaps placing the GPS signal from L-band to some lower frequency? I would appreciate any info the group might have... > > -Doug Ronald > W6DSR > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
MC
Mike Cook
Thu, Feb 26, 2015 12:13 PM

The XL-DC Can use either a normal L1 or Down converter Antenna according to the manual. http://www.prostudioconnection.net/1112/xl-dc-manual.pdf

If your antenna works with the Lucent then it will be a normal one. Does your XL-DC have any option codes?

"Ceux qui sont prêts à abandonner une liberté essentielle pour obtenir une petite et provisoire sécurité, ne méritent ni liberté ni sécurité."
Benjimin Franklin

Le 25 févr. 2015 à 20:35, Doug Ronald doug@dougronald.com a écrit :

I'm hoping someone can shed some light on my problem receiving any GPS satellites.

I have two TrueTime GPS Time & Frequency Receivers, Model XL-DC. One has a regular crystal oscillator, and the other one has a rubidium oscillator. I have two outdoor GPS antennas with internal LNAs, one a 28 dB gain unit, and the other a 40 dB unit. When either antenna is connected to my Lucent KS-24361, it locks right up and tracks up to 8 satellites. When either of the antennas is connected to the XL-DCs, they just sit there and status : "Looking for GPS satellites".

In the Alarm menu of either XL-DC there is an alarm for Antenna. Both units say "OK" and if I disconnect the antenna they both logically say "Open". So, what is the problem? I can't believe I don't have enough signal, after the Lucent locks-up right away. Is it possible the TrueTime sanctioned antenna has a down converter in it, perhaps placing the GPS signal from L-band to some lower frequency? I would appreciate any info the group might have...

-Doug Ronald
W6DSR


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

The XL-DC Can use either a normal L1 or Down converter Antenna according to the manual. <http://www.prostudioconnection.net/1112/xl-dc-manual.pdf> If your antenna works with the Lucent then it will be a normal one. Does your XL-DC have any option codes? "Ceux qui sont prêts à abandonner une liberté essentielle pour obtenir une petite et provisoire sécurité, ne méritent ni liberté ni sécurité." Benjimin Franklin > Le 25 févr. 2015 à 20:35, Doug Ronald <doug@dougronald.com> a écrit : > > I'm hoping someone can shed some light on my problem receiving any GPS satellites. > > I have two TrueTime GPS Time & Frequency Receivers, Model XL-DC. One has a regular crystal oscillator, and the other one has a rubidium oscillator. I have two outdoor GPS antennas with internal LNAs, one a 28 dB gain unit, and the other a 40 dB unit. When either antenna is connected to my Lucent KS-24361, it locks right up and tracks up to 8 satellites. When either of the antennas is connected to the XL-DCs, they just sit there and status : "Looking for GPS satellites". > > In the Alarm menu of either XL-DC there is an alarm for Antenna. Both units say "OK" and if I disconnect the antenna they both logically say "Open". So, what is the problem? I can't believe I don't have enough signal, after the Lucent locks-up right away. Is it possible the TrueTime sanctioned antenna has a down converter in it, perhaps placing the GPS signal from L-band to some lower frequency? I would appreciate any info the group might have... > > -Doug Ronald > W6DSR > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
MC
Mike Cook
Thu, Feb 26, 2015 12:27 PM

Just a heads up as I stumbled on an interesting XL-DC plugin module for sale on ebay  while looking for info for Doug.
TrueTime Symmetricom XL-DC FTM-III AC Line Frequency Measurement & Time Monitor

Unfortunately I don’t have an XL-DC, but it looks just just the tick for a time nut who has.

"Ceux qui sont prêts à abandonner une liberté essentielle pour obtenir une petite et provisoire sécurité, ne méritent ni liberté ni sécurité."
Benjimin Franklin

Le 25 févr. 2015 à 20:35, Doug Ronald doug@dougronald.com a écrit :

I'm hoping someone can shed some light on my problem receiving any GPS satellites.

I have two TrueTime GPS Time & Frequency Receivers, Model XL-DC. One has a regular crystal oscillator, and the other one has a rubidium oscillator. I have two outdoor GPS antennas with internal LNAs, one a 28 dB gain unit, and the other a 40 dB unit. When either antenna is connected to my Lucent KS-24361, it locks right up and tracks up to 8 satellites. When either of the antennas is connected to the XL-DCs, they just sit there and status : "Looking for GPS satellites".

In the Alarm menu of either XL-DC there is an alarm for Antenna. Both units say "OK" and if I disconnect the antenna they both logically say "Open". So, what is the problem? I can't believe I don't have enough signal, after the Lucent locks-up right away. Is it possible the TrueTime sanctioned antenna has a down converter in it, perhaps placing the GPS signal from L-band to some lower frequency? I would appreciate any info the group might have...

-Doug Ronald
W6DSR


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Just a heads up as I stumbled on an interesting XL-DC plugin module for sale on ebay while looking for info for Doug. TrueTime Symmetricom XL-DC FTM-III AC Line Frequency Measurement & Time Monitor Unfortunately I don’t have an XL-DC, but it looks just just the tick for a time nut who has. "Ceux qui sont prêts à abandonner une liberté essentielle pour obtenir une petite et provisoire sécurité, ne méritent ni liberté ni sécurité." Benjimin Franklin > Le 25 févr. 2015 à 20:35, Doug Ronald <doug@dougronald.com> a écrit : > > I'm hoping someone can shed some light on my problem receiving any GPS satellites. > > I have two TrueTime GPS Time & Frequency Receivers, Model XL-DC. One has a regular crystal oscillator, and the other one has a rubidium oscillator. I have two outdoor GPS antennas with internal LNAs, one a 28 dB gain unit, and the other a 40 dB unit. When either antenna is connected to my Lucent KS-24361, it locks right up and tracks up to 8 satellites. When either of the antennas is connected to the XL-DCs, they just sit there and status : "Looking for GPS satellites". > > In the Alarm menu of either XL-DC there is an alarm for Antenna. Both units say "OK" and if I disconnect the antenna they both logically say "Open". So, what is the problem? I can't believe I don't have enough signal, after the Lucent locks-up right away. Is it possible the TrueTime sanctioned antenna has a down converter in it, perhaps placing the GPS signal from L-band to some lower frequency? I would appreciate any info the group might have... > > -Doug Ronald > W6DSR > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
TV
Tom Van Baak
Thu, Feb 26, 2015 9:33 PM

Mike,

That's the same card I used for the 40-day run:
http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains/

It's robust and professional (used in the electric grid industry) and nice if you already have a working XL-DC but most of us now use a $1 microcontroller or DCD pin and NTP to track mains phase & frequency.

/tvb

On Feb 26, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Mike Cook michael.cook@sfr.fr wrote:

Just a heads up as I stumbled on an interesting XL-DC plugin module for sale on ebay  while looking for info for Doug.
TrueTime Symmetricom XL-DC FTM-III AC Line Frequency Measurement & Time Monitor

Unfortunately I don’t have an XL-DC, but it looks just just the tick for a time nut who has.

"Ceux qui sont prêts à abandonner une liberté essentielle pour obtenir une petite et provisoire sécurité, ne méritent ni liberté ni sécurité."
Benjimin Franklin

Le 25 févr. 2015 à 20:35, Doug Ronald doug@dougronald.com a écrit :

I'm hoping someone can shed some light on my problem receiving any GPS satellites.

I have two TrueTime GPS Time & Frequency Receivers, Model XL-DC. One has a regular crystal oscillator, and the other one has a rubidium oscillator. I have two outdoor GPS antennas with internal LNAs, one a 28 dB gain unit, and the other a 40 dB unit. When either antenna is connected to my Lucent KS-24361, it locks right up and tracks up to 8 satellites. When either of the antennas is connected to the XL-DCs, they just sit there and status : "Looking for GPS satellites".

In the Alarm menu of either XL-DC there is an alarm for Antenna. Both units say "OK" and if I disconnect the antenna they both logically say "Open". So, what is the problem? I can't believe I don't have enough signal, after the Lucent locks-up right away. Is it possible the TrueTime sanctioned antenna has a down converter in it, perhaps placing the GPS signal from L-band to some lower frequency? I would appreciate any info the group might have...

-Doug Ronald
W6DSR


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Mike, That's the same card I used for the 40-day run: http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains/ It's robust and professional (used in the electric grid industry) and nice if you already have a working XL-DC but most of us now use a $1 microcontroller or DCD pin and NTP to track mains phase & frequency. /tvb > On Feb 26, 2015, at 2:27 AM, Mike Cook <michael.cook@sfr.fr> wrote: > > Just a heads up as I stumbled on an interesting XL-DC plugin module for sale on ebay while looking for info for Doug. > TrueTime Symmetricom XL-DC FTM-III AC Line Frequency Measurement & Time Monitor > > Unfortunately I don’t have an XL-DC, but it looks just just the tick for a time nut who has. > > > "Ceux qui sont prêts à abandonner une liberté essentielle pour obtenir une petite et provisoire sécurité, ne méritent ni liberté ni sécurité." > Benjimin Franklin > >> Le 25 févr. 2015 à 20:35, Doug Ronald <doug@dougronald.com> a écrit : >> >> I'm hoping someone can shed some light on my problem receiving any GPS satellites. >> >> I have two TrueTime GPS Time & Frequency Receivers, Model XL-DC. One has a regular crystal oscillator, and the other one has a rubidium oscillator. I have two outdoor GPS antennas with internal LNAs, one a 28 dB gain unit, and the other a 40 dB unit. When either antenna is connected to my Lucent KS-24361, it locks right up and tracks up to 8 satellites. When either of the antennas is connected to the XL-DCs, they just sit there and status : "Looking for GPS satellites". >> >> In the Alarm menu of either XL-DC there is an alarm for Antenna. Both units say "OK" and if I disconnect the antenna they both logically say "Open". So, what is the problem? I can't believe I don't have enough signal, after the Lucent locks-up right away. Is it possible the TrueTime sanctioned antenna has a down converter in it, perhaps placing the GPS signal from L-band to some lower frequency? I would appreciate any info the group might have... >> >> -Doug Ronald >> W6DSR >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
BH
Bill Hawkins
Thu, Feb 26, 2015 9:46 PM

Doesn't the DC in the model number mean "down conversion" or something
like that?

Seems to me it did in the obsolete 468-DC GOES time receivers, which had
to down convert to about 1.8 MHz.
Also, the down conversion was more than a simple local oscillator and
mixer. You had to have their antenna to make it work, as the mixer was
in the base of the antenna.

Bill Hawkins

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Shoppa
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 7:56 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: [time-nuts] No GPS satellites

Yes, the XL-DC and other Truetime models had as an option for long cable
runs, a downconverter in the antenna. I don't know how to tell the
difference from part number, but I know the truetimes my employer uses
all have the downconverter option and the option is very common.

Tim N3QE

Doesn't the DC in the model number mean "down conversion" or something like that? Seems to me it did in the obsolete 468-DC GOES time receivers, which had to down convert to about 1.8 MHz. Also, the down conversion was more than a simple local oscillator and mixer. You had to have their antenna to make it work, as the mixer was in the base of the antenna. Bill Hawkins -----Original Message----- From: Tim Shoppa Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 7:56 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: [time-nuts] No GPS satellites Yes, the XL-DC and other Truetime models had as an option for long cable runs, a downconverter in the antenna. I don't know how to tell the difference from part number, but I know the truetimes my employer uses all have the downconverter option and the option is very common. Tim N3QE
BH
Ben Hall
Thu, Feb 26, 2015 10:56 PM

Hi Tom and list,

I joined the list a few days ago after getting my HP Z3801 back running
after a couple of years of it being off-line.  I'm using it as a 10 MHz
frequency standard for my various ham-radio activities.

On 2/26/2015 3:33 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:

...but most of us now use a $1
microcontroller or DCD pin and NTP to track mains phase & frequency.

I'm going to have to build one of these.  Assume you have some sort of
circuit that converts low-voltage AC from a transformer secondary to a
pulse train, start a timer, and count x amount of pulses?

Very interesting.

thanks much,
ben

Hi Tom and list, I joined the list a few days ago after getting my HP Z3801 back running after a couple of years of it being off-line. I'm using it as a 10 MHz frequency standard for my various ham-radio activities. On 2/26/2015 3:33 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote: > ...but most of us now use a $1 > microcontroller or DCD pin and NTP to track mains phase & frequency. I'm going to have to build one of these. Assume you have some sort of circuit that converts low-voltage AC from a transformer secondary to a pulse train, start a timer, and count x amount of pulses? Very interesting. thanks much, ben
DR
Doug Ronald
Thu, Feb 26, 2015 10:56 PM

I want to thank everyone who jumped in to contribute on my issue, especially Mike who supplied a much needed manual for this instrument.

Well, one unit with the xtal oscillator, had the upconverter end of the downconverter/upconverter chain in the chassis which was easily bypassed. Once that was accomplished, it locked up fairly quickly, however the LCD display had many bad segments. The rubidium unit has a defective Trimble receiver as it never gets out of the "looking for satellites" mode even after hours of on time, but it has a pristine LCD display, so I swapped around parts, and now have a good working standard. The xtal unit draws about half the power that the rubidium unit draws, so that one shall be my standard since it's on 24/7.

It was rewarding to use the TrueTime 10 MHz output for the reference input to my HP-5370B, and the frequency input of the counter connected to the Lucent 15 MHz standard. Both standards are completely independent right up to the antennas, and the counter shows only a few milliHertz variation.

Thanks again,
-Doug, W6DSR

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Mike Cook
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 4:13 AM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] No GPS satellites
Importance: Low

The XL-DC Can use either a normal L1 or Down converter Antenna according to the manual. http://www.prostudioconnection.net/1112/xl-dc-manual.pdf

If your antenna works with the Lucent then it will be a normal one. Does your XL-DC have any option codes?

"Ceux qui sont prêts à abandonner une liberté essentielle pour obtenir une petite et provisoire sécurité, ne méritent ni liberté ni sécurité."
Benjimin Franklin

Le 25 févr. 2015 à 20:35, Doug Ronald doug@dougronald.com a écrit :

I'm hoping someone can shed some light on my problem receiving any GPS satellites.

I have two TrueTime GPS Time & Frequency Receivers, Model XL-DC. One has a regular crystal oscillator, and the other one has a rubidium oscillator. I have two outdoor GPS antennas with internal LNAs, one a 28 dB gain unit, and the other a 40 dB unit. When either antenna is connected to my Lucent KS-24361, it locks right up and tracks up to 8 satellites. When either of the antennas is connected to the XL-DCs, they just sit there and status : "Looking for GPS satellites".

In the Alarm menu of either XL-DC there is an alarm for Antenna. Both units say "OK" and if I disconnect the antenna they both logically say "Open". So, what is the problem? I can't believe I don't have enough signal, after the Lucent locks-up right away. Is it possible the TrueTime sanctioned antenna has a down converter in it, perhaps placing the GPS signal from L-band to some lower frequency? I would appreciate any info the group might have...

-Doug Ronald
W6DSR


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

I want to thank everyone who jumped in to contribute on my issue, especially Mike who supplied a much needed manual for this instrument. Well, one unit with the xtal oscillator, had the upconverter end of the downconverter/upconverter chain in the chassis which was easily bypassed. Once that was accomplished, it locked up fairly quickly, however the LCD display had many bad segments. The rubidium unit has a defective Trimble receiver as it never gets out of the "looking for satellites" mode even after hours of on time, but it has a pristine LCD display, so I swapped around parts, and now have a good working standard. The xtal unit draws about half the power that the rubidium unit draws, so that one shall be my standard since it's on 24/7. It was rewarding to use the TrueTime 10 MHz output for the reference input to my HP-5370B, and the frequency input of the counter connected to the Lucent 15 MHz standard. Both standards are completely independent right up to the antennas, and the counter shows only a few milliHertz variation. Thanks again, -Doug, W6DSR -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf Of Mike Cook Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 4:13 AM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] No GPS satellites Importance: Low The XL-DC Can use either a normal L1 or Down converter Antenna according to the manual. <http://www.prostudioconnection.net/1112/xl-dc-manual.pdf> If your antenna works with the Lucent then it will be a normal one. Does your XL-DC have any option codes? "Ceux qui sont prêts à abandonner une liberté essentielle pour obtenir une petite et provisoire sécurité, ne méritent ni liberté ni sécurité." Benjimin Franklin > Le 25 févr. 2015 à 20:35, Doug Ronald <doug@dougronald.com> a écrit : > > I'm hoping someone can shed some light on my problem receiving any GPS satellites. > > I have two TrueTime GPS Time & Frequency Receivers, Model XL-DC. One has a regular crystal oscillator, and the other one has a rubidium oscillator. I have two outdoor GPS antennas with internal LNAs, one a 28 dB gain unit, and the other a 40 dB unit. When either antenna is connected to my Lucent KS-24361, it locks right up and tracks up to 8 satellites. When either of the antennas is connected to the XL-DCs, they just sit there and status : "Looking for GPS satellites". > > In the Alarm menu of either XL-DC there is an alarm for Antenna. Both units say "OK" and if I disconnect the antenna they both logically say "Open". So, what is the problem? I can't believe I don't have enough signal, after the Lucent locks-up right away. Is it possible the TrueTime sanctioned antenna has a down converter in it, perhaps placing the GPS signal from L-band to some lower frequency? I would appreciate any info the group might have... > > -Doug Ronald > W6DSR > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
PS
paul swed
Fri, Feb 27, 2015 1:15 AM

A fellow time-nut shared the manual for the xl-dc and I downloaded it.
It clearly states that it has a down converter. That was very typical of
these generation receivers. As examples the Odetics and Austrons. It
allowed for very short antenna runs or virtually 0 length antenna runs and
losses. The DC468 goes used the same trick.
Almost always the receivers show up without the dowconverter because those
stay on the roof. Without the down converter the units useless.
I have been lucky in some exploits to use odetics down converters with the
austron and the another approach using older styles semi-integrated
receivers to fake it.
So if you want to experiment there is hope. Though it seems each receivers
a bit different.The older Truetime manuals were pretty good with schematics
and explanations. Unfortunately it looks like the new manual has little to
go on.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Bill Hawkins bill@iaxs.net wrote:

Doesn't the DC in the model number mean "down conversion" or something
like that?

Seems to me it did in the obsolete 468-DC GOES time receivers, which had
to down convert to about 1.8 MHz.
Also, the down conversion was more than a simple local oscillator and
mixer. You had to have their antenna to make it work, as the mixer was
in the base of the antenna.

Bill Hawkins

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Shoppa
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 7:56 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: [time-nuts] No GPS satellites

Yes, the XL-DC and other Truetime models had as an option for long cable
runs, a downconverter in the antenna. I don't know how to tell the
difference from part number, but I know the truetimes my employer uses
all have the downconverter option and the option is very common.

Tim N3QE


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

A fellow time-nut shared the manual for the xl-dc and I downloaded it. It clearly states that it has a down converter. That was very typical of these generation receivers. As examples the Odetics and Austrons. It allowed for very short antenna runs or virtually 0 length antenna runs and losses. The DC468 goes used the same trick. Almost always the receivers show up without the dowconverter because those stay on the roof. Without the down converter the units useless. I have been lucky in some exploits to use odetics down converters with the austron and the another approach using older styles semi-integrated receivers to fake it. So if you want to experiment there is hope. Though it seems each receivers a bit different.The older Truetime manuals were pretty good with schematics and explanations. Unfortunately it looks like the new manual has little to go on. Regards Paul WB8TSL On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Bill Hawkins <bill@iaxs.net> wrote: > Doesn't the DC in the model number mean "down conversion" or something > like that? > > Seems to me it did in the obsolete 468-DC GOES time receivers, which had > to down convert to about 1.8 MHz. > Also, the down conversion was more than a simple local oscillator and > mixer. You had to have their antenna to make it work, as the mixer was > in the base of the antenna. > > Bill Hawkins > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Shoppa > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 7:56 PM > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: [time-nuts] No GPS satellites > > Yes, the XL-DC and other Truetime models had as an option for long cable > runs, a downconverter in the antenna. I don't know how to tell the > difference from part number, but I know the truetimes my employer uses > all have the downconverter option and the option is very common. > > Tim N3QE > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
PS
paul swed
Fri, Feb 27, 2015 1:19 AM

Boy I ran out to mr google and did a search and now I am wondering if some
versions of the xl-dc just used a plain old GPS antenna. It sure looks like
that could be the case. The manual does say down converter. Maybe it
changed over time.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:15 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:

A fellow time-nut shared the manual for the xl-dc and I downloaded it.
It clearly states that it has a down converter. That was very typical of
these generation receivers. As examples the Odetics and Austrons. It
allowed for very short antenna runs or virtually 0 length antenna runs and
losses. The DC468 goes used the same trick.
Almost always the receivers show up without the dowconverter because those
stay on the roof. Without the down converter the units useless.
I have been lucky in some exploits to use odetics down converters with the
austron and the another approach using older styles semi-integrated
receivers to fake it.
So if you want to experiment there is hope. Though it seems each receivers
a bit different.The older Truetime manuals were pretty good with schematics
and explanations. Unfortunately it looks like the new manual has little to
go on.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Bill Hawkins bill@iaxs.net wrote:

Doesn't the DC in the model number mean "down conversion" or something
like that?

Seems to me it did in the obsolete 468-DC GOES time receivers, which had
to down convert to about 1.8 MHz.
Also, the down conversion was more than a simple local oscillator and
mixer. You had to have their antenna to make it work, as the mixer was
in the base of the antenna.

Bill Hawkins

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Shoppa
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 7:56 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: [time-nuts] No GPS satellites

Yes, the XL-DC and other Truetime models had as an option for long cable
runs, a downconverter in the antenna. I don't know how to tell the
difference from part number, but I know the truetimes my employer uses
all have the downconverter option and the option is very common.

Tim N3QE


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Boy I ran out to mr google and did a search and now I am wondering if some versions of the xl-dc just used a plain old GPS antenna. It sure looks like that could be the case. The manual does say down converter. Maybe it changed over time. Regards Paul WB8TSL On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:15 PM, paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> wrote: > A fellow time-nut shared the manual for the xl-dc and I downloaded it. > It clearly states that it has a down converter. That was very typical of > these generation receivers. As examples the Odetics and Austrons. It > allowed for very short antenna runs or virtually 0 length antenna runs and > losses. The DC468 goes used the same trick. > Almost always the receivers show up without the dowconverter because those > stay on the roof. Without the down converter the units useless. > I have been lucky in some exploits to use odetics down converters with the > austron and the another approach using older styles semi-integrated > receivers to fake it. > So if you want to experiment there is hope. Though it seems each receivers > a bit different.The older Truetime manuals were pretty good with schematics > and explanations. Unfortunately it looks like the new manual has little to > go on. > Regards > Paul > WB8TSL > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Bill Hawkins <bill@iaxs.net> wrote: > >> Doesn't the DC in the model number mean "down conversion" or something >> like that? >> >> Seems to me it did in the obsolete 468-DC GOES time receivers, which had >> to down convert to about 1.8 MHz. >> Also, the down conversion was more than a simple local oscillator and >> mixer. You had to have their antenna to make it work, as the mixer was >> in the base of the antenna. >> >> Bill Hawkins >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tim Shoppa >> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 7:56 PM >> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement >> Subject: [time-nuts] No GPS satellites >> >> Yes, the XL-DC and other Truetime models had as an option for long cable >> runs, a downconverter in the antenna. I don't know how to tell the >> difference from part number, but I know the truetimes my employer uses >> all have the downconverter option and the option is very common. >> >> Tim N3QE >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> > >
CS
Charles Steinmetz
Fri, Feb 27, 2015 1:39 AM

ben wrote:

I'm going to have to build one of these.  Assume you have some sort
of circuit that converts low-voltage AC from a transformer secondary
to a pulse train, start a timer, and count x amount of pulses?

Here is a zero-cross detector designed for this purpose:

http://www.ko4bb.com/manuals/download.php?file=02_GPS_Timing/Simple_AC_Mains_Zero_Crossing_Detector.pdf

Most mains-nuts feed the ZCD pulse to the DCD line of a PC's RS232
port and use the computer to time-stamp the crossings and append them
to a file of such time stamps.

Alternatively, Tom designed the picPET Precision Event Timer to do
this sort of timestamping:

http://www.leapsecond.com/pic/picpet.htm

An Ardu/berry/bone with a flash card can also be used, so you don't
need to leave a PC running.

Best regards,

Charles

ben wrote: >I'm going to have to build one of these. Assume you have some sort >of circuit that converts low-voltage AC from a transformer secondary >to a pulse train, start a timer, and count x amount of pulses? Here is a zero-cross detector designed for this purpose: <http://www.ko4bb.com/manuals/download.php?file=02_GPS_Timing/Simple_AC_Mains_Zero_Crossing_Detector.pdf> Most mains-nuts feed the ZCD pulse to the DCD line of a PC's RS232 port and use the computer to time-stamp the crossings and append them to a file of such time stamps. Alternatively, Tom designed the picPET Precision Event Timer to do this sort of timestamping: <http://www.leapsecond.com/pic/picpet.htm> An Ardu/berry/bone with a flash card can also be used, so you don't need to leave a PC running. Best regards, Charles
PG
Philip Gladstone
Fri, Feb 27, 2015 3:46 PM

On 2/26/15 20:39, Charles Steinmetz wrote:

ben wrote:

I'm going to have to build one of these. Assume you have some sort of
circuit that converts low-voltage AC from a transformer secondary to
a pulse train, start a timer, and count x amount of pulses?

Here is a zero-cross detector designed for this purpose:

http://www.ko4bb.com/manuals/download.php?file=02_GPS_Timing/Simple_AC_Mains_Zero_Crossing_Detector.pdf

Most mains-nuts feed the ZCD pulse to the DCD line of a PC's RS232
port and use the computer to time-stamp the crossings and append them
to a file of such time stamps.

If we all did this, then I realize that we could identify the different
power grids. However, I wonder if there is any interesting variation
within a grid. As the electricity flows vary throughout the day, it
seems possible that the phase difference between two people on the same
grid would actually change (a bit).

Has anybody done this experiment?

Philip

On 2/26/15 20:39, Charles Steinmetz wrote: > ben wrote: > >> I'm going to have to build one of these. Assume you have some sort of >> circuit that converts low-voltage AC from a transformer secondary to >> a pulse train, start a timer, and count x amount of pulses? > > Here is a zero-cross detector designed for this purpose: > > <http://www.ko4bb.com/manuals/download.php?file=02_GPS_Timing/Simple_AC_Mains_Zero_Crossing_Detector.pdf> > > > Most mains-nuts feed the ZCD pulse to the DCD line of a PC's RS232 > port and use the computer to time-stamp the crossings and append them > to a file of such time stamps. If we all did this, then I realize that we could identify the different power grids. However, I wonder if there is any interesting variation *within* a grid. As the electricity flows vary throughout the day, it seems possible that the phase difference between two people on the same grid would actually change (a bit). Has anybody done this experiment? Philip
BC
Bob Camp
Fri, Feb 27, 2015 4:38 PM

Hi

All of these older rack mount “GPSDO” products had a fairly long lifespan compared
to the advances in GPS receivers. When some / most of them first came out, the only practical /proven
way to do timing off GPS was with a downconverter. Without things like serial numbers / date codes it’s
tough to figure out if this sample of box A has anything at all to do with another sample of the same box.
On top of that, these are very low volume products compared to normal HP or Fluke
test gear. It’s unlikely that anybody has a database that tells what is what simply from
the serial numbers or date codes. I’d bet that many of them were built to order and rarely in
groups larger than a few dozen.

Bob

On Feb 26, 2015, at 8:19 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:

Boy I ran out to mr google and did a search and now I am wondering if some
versions of the xl-dc just used a plain old GPS antenna. It sure looks like
that could be the case. The manual does say down converter. Maybe it
changed over time.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:15 PM, paul swed paulswedb@gmail.com wrote:

A fellow time-nut shared the manual for the xl-dc and I downloaded it.
It clearly states that it has a down converter. That was very typical of
these generation receivers. As examples the Odetics and Austrons. It
allowed for very short antenna runs or virtually 0 length antenna runs and
losses. The DC468 goes used the same trick.
Almost always the receivers show up without the dowconverter because those
stay on the roof. Without the down converter the units useless.
I have been lucky in some exploits to use odetics down converters with the
austron and the another approach using older styles semi-integrated
receivers to fake it.
So if you want to experiment there is hope. Though it seems each receivers
a bit different.The older Truetime manuals were pretty good with schematics
and explanations. Unfortunately it looks like the new manual has little to
go on.
Regards
Paul
WB8TSL

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Bill Hawkins bill@iaxs.net wrote:

Doesn't the DC in the model number mean "down conversion" or something
like that?

Seems to me it did in the obsolete 468-DC GOES time receivers, which had
to down convert to about 1.8 MHz.
Also, the down conversion was more than a simple local oscillator and
mixer. You had to have their antenna to make it work, as the mixer was
in the base of the antenna.

Bill Hawkins

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Shoppa
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 7:56 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: [time-nuts] No GPS satellites

Yes, the XL-DC and other Truetime models had as an option for long cable
runs, a downconverter in the antenna. I don't know how to tell the
difference from part number, but I know the truetimes my employer uses
all have the downconverter option and the option is very common.

Tim N3QE


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi All of these older rack mount “GPSDO” products had a fairly long lifespan compared to the advances in GPS receivers. When some / most of them first came out, the only practical /proven way to do timing off GPS was with a downconverter. Without things like serial numbers / date codes it’s tough to figure out if this sample of box A has anything at all to do with another sample of the same box. On top of that, these are very low volume products compared to normal HP or Fluke test gear. It’s unlikely that anybody has a database that tells what is what simply from the serial numbers or date codes. I’d bet that many of them were built to order and rarely in groups larger than a few dozen. Bob > On Feb 26, 2015, at 8:19 PM, paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> wrote: > > Boy I ran out to mr google and did a search and now I am wondering if some > versions of the xl-dc just used a plain old GPS antenna. It sure looks like > that could be the case. The manual does say down converter. Maybe it > changed over time. > Regards > Paul > WB8TSL > > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:15 PM, paul swed <paulswedb@gmail.com> wrote: > >> A fellow time-nut shared the manual for the xl-dc and I downloaded it. >> It clearly states that it has a down converter. That was very typical of >> these generation receivers. As examples the Odetics and Austrons. It >> allowed for very short antenna runs or virtually 0 length antenna runs and >> losses. The DC468 goes used the same trick. >> Almost always the receivers show up without the dowconverter because those >> stay on the roof. Without the down converter the units useless. >> I have been lucky in some exploits to use odetics down converters with the >> austron and the another approach using older styles semi-integrated >> receivers to fake it. >> So if you want to experiment there is hope. Though it seems each receivers >> a bit different.The older Truetime manuals were pretty good with schematics >> and explanations. Unfortunately it looks like the new manual has little to >> go on. >> Regards >> Paul >> WB8TSL >> >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Bill Hawkins <bill@iaxs.net> wrote: >> >>> Doesn't the DC in the model number mean "down conversion" or something >>> like that? >>> >>> Seems to me it did in the obsolete 468-DC GOES time receivers, which had >>> to down convert to about 1.8 MHz. >>> Also, the down conversion was more than a simple local oscillator and >>> mixer. You had to have their antenna to make it work, as the mixer was >>> in the base of the antenna. >>> >>> Bill Hawkins >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Tim Shoppa >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 7:56 PM >>> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement >>> Subject: [time-nuts] No GPS satellites >>> >>> Yes, the XL-DC and other Truetime models had as an option for long cable >>> runs, a downconverter in the antenna. I don't know how to tell the >>> difference from part number, but I know the truetimes my employer uses >>> all have the downconverter option and the option is very common. >>> >>> Tim N3QE >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to >>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
BC
Bob Camp
Fri, Feb 27, 2015 7:24 PM

HI

On Feb 27, 2015, at 10:46 AM, Philip Gladstone pjsg-timenuts@nospam.gladstonefamily.net wrote:

On 2/26/15 20:39, Charles Steinmetz wrote:

ben wrote:

I'm going to have to build one of these. Assume you have some sort of
circuit that converts low-voltage AC from a transformer secondary to
a pulse train, start a timer, and count x amount of pulses?

Here is a zero-cross detector designed for this purpose:

http://www.ko4bb.com/manuals/download.php?file=02_GPS_Timing/Simple_AC_Mains_Zero_Crossing_Detector.pdf

Most mains-nuts feed the ZCD pulse to the DCD line of a PC's RS232
port and use the computer to time-stamp the crossings and append them
to a file of such time stamps.

If we all did this, then I realize that we could identify the different power grids. However, I wonder if there is any interesting variation within a grid. As the electricity flows vary throughout the day, it seems possible that the phase difference between two people on the same grid would actually change (a bit).

Has anybody done this experiment?

It’s done by utilities to monitor power flow and balance electric grids. The first data on this (grid vs GPS) date to the 1980’s. I think the
paper I recall was done by Quebec Hydro. Since then it’s become a pretty standard monitoring tool.

Bob

Philip


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

HI > On Feb 27, 2015, at 10:46 AM, Philip Gladstone <pjsg-timenuts@nospam.gladstonefamily.net> wrote: > > On 2/26/15 20:39, Charles Steinmetz wrote: >> ben wrote: >> >>> I'm going to have to build one of these. Assume you have some sort of >>> circuit that converts low-voltage AC from a transformer secondary to >>> a pulse train, start a timer, and count x amount of pulses? >> >> Here is a zero-cross detector designed for this purpose: >> >> <http://www.ko4bb.com/manuals/download.php?file=02_GPS_Timing/Simple_AC_Mains_Zero_Crossing_Detector.pdf> >> >> >> Most mains-nuts feed the ZCD pulse to the DCD line of a PC's RS232 >> port and use the computer to time-stamp the crossings and append them >> to a file of such time stamps. > If we all did this, then I realize that we could identify the different power grids. However, I wonder if there is any interesting variation *within* a grid. As the electricity flows vary throughout the day, it seems possible that the phase difference between two people on the same grid would actually change (a bit). > > Has anybody done this experiment? It’s done by utilities to monitor power flow and balance electric grids. The first data on this (grid vs GPS) date to the 1980’s. I think the paper I recall was done by Quebec Hydro. Since then it’s become a pretty standard monitoring tool. Bob > > Philip > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
TV
Tom Van Baak
Fri, Feb 27, 2015 7:27 PM

If we all did this, then I realize that we could identify the different
power grids. However, I wonder if there is any interesting variation
within a grid. As the electricity flows vary throughout the day, it
seems possible that the phase difference between two people on the same
grid would actually change (a bit).

Has anybody done this experiment?

Philip

Yes, it's really quite interesting and very easy to do. Check the time nuts archives -- over the years there are by now hundreds of postings about measuring mains phase and frequency. See also:

http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains/
http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains/mains-picpet-23.gif
http://leapsecond.com/pages/ac-detect/

There are many wonderful web sites that deal with power line frequency; some with live plots. Just google for words like: mains frequency detect accuracy stability measurement

Also, make sure to read the growing literature about ENF:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_network_frequency_analysis

/tvb

> If we all did this, then I realize that we could identify the different > power grids. However, I wonder if there is any interesting variation > *within* a grid. As the electricity flows vary throughout the day, it > seems possible that the phase difference between two people on the same > grid would actually change (a bit). > > Has anybody done this experiment? > > Philip Yes, it's really quite interesting and very easy to do. Check the time nuts archives -- over the years there are by now hundreds of postings about measuring mains phase and frequency. See also: http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains/ http://leapsecond.com/pages/mains/mains-picpet-23.gif http://leapsecond.com/pages/ac-detect/ There are many wonderful web sites that deal with power line frequency; some with live plots. Just google for words like: mains frequency detect accuracy stability measurement Also, make sure to read the growing literature about ENF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_network_frequency_analysis /tvb
D
DaveH
Sat, Feb 28, 2015 7:50 PM

Like this?

http://fnetpublic.utk.edu/gradientmap.html

I am the dot just below the Canadian border in WA State.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf
Of Philip Gladstone
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 07:47
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Recording mains frequency/phase
[WAS: No GPSsatellites]

On 2/26/15 20:39, Charles Steinmetz wrote:

ben wrote:

I'm going to have to build one of these. Assume you have

some sort of

circuit that converts low-voltage AC from a transformer

secondary to

a pulse train, start a timer, and count x amount of pulses?

Here is a zero-cross detector designed for this purpose:

<http://www.ko4bb.com/manuals/download.php?file=02_GPS_Timing/
Simple_AC_Mains_Zero_Crossing_Detector.pdf>

Most mains-nuts feed the ZCD pulse to the DCD line of a PC's RS232
port and use the computer to time-stamp the crossings and

append them

to a file of such time stamps.

If we all did this, then I realize that we could identify the
different
power grids. However, I wonder if there is any interesting variation
within a grid. As the electricity flows vary throughout the day, it
seems possible that the phase difference between two people
on the same
grid would actually change (a bit).

Has anybody done this experiment?

Philip


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Like this? http://fnetpublic.utk.edu/gradientmap.html I am the dot just below the Canadian border in WA State. Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf > Of Philip Gladstone > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 07:47 > To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement > Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Recording mains frequency/phase > [WAS: No GPSsatellites] > > On 2/26/15 20:39, Charles Steinmetz wrote: > > ben wrote: > > > >> I'm going to have to build one of these. Assume you have > some sort of > >> circuit that converts low-voltage AC from a transformer > secondary to > >> a pulse train, start a timer, and count x amount of pulses? > > > > Here is a zero-cross detector designed for this purpose: > > > > > <http://www.ko4bb.com/manuals/download.php?file=02_GPS_Timing/ > Simple_AC_Mains_Zero_Crossing_Detector.pdf> > > > > > > Most mains-nuts feed the ZCD pulse to the DCD line of a PC's RS232 > > port and use the computer to time-stamp the crossings and > append them > > to a file of such time stamps. > If we all did this, then I realize that we could identify the > different > power grids. However, I wonder if there is any interesting variation > *within* a grid. As the electricity flows vary throughout the day, it > seems possible that the phase difference between two people > on the same > grid would actually change (a bit). > > Has anybody done this experiment? > > Philip > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
MD
Magnus Danielson
Sun, Mar 1, 2015 12:48 AM

Hi Bob,

On 02/27/2015 08:24 PM, Bob Camp wrote:

HI

On Feb 27, 2015, at 10:46 AM, Philip Gladstone pjsg-timenuts@nospam.gladstonefamily.net wrote:

On 2/26/15 20:39, Charles Steinmetz wrote:

ben wrote:

I'm going to have to build one of these. Assume you have some sort of
circuit that converts low-voltage AC from a transformer secondary to
a pulse train, start a timer, and count x amount of pulses?

Here is a zero-cross detector designed for this purpose:

http://www.ko4bb.com/manuals/download.php?file=02_GPS_Timing/Simple_AC_Mains_Zero_Crossing_Detector.pdf

Most mains-nuts feed the ZCD pulse to the DCD line of a PC's RS232
port and use the computer to time-stamp the crossings and append them
to a file of such time stamps.

If we all did this, then I realize that we could identify the different power grids. However, I wonder if there is any interesting variation within a grid. As the electricity flows vary throughout the day, it seems possible that the phase difference between two people on the same grid would actually change (a bit).

Has anybody done this experiment?

It’s done by utilities to monitor power flow and balance electric grids. The first data on this (grid vs GPS) date to the 1980’s. I think the
paper I recall was done by Quebec Hydro. Since then it’s become a pretty standard monitoring tool.

Yes. They implemented the first Phasor-Measurement Unit (PMU), it went
into the IEEE 1344 standard, but had many issues with it and created a
new standard in IEEE C37.118, which has since been split into IEEE
C37.118.1 and C37.118.2 with the advent of the IEC 61850 context, where
the data-transport is being replaced, but the measurement methods is
maintained in C37.118.1.

For an intro, you can read this paper:
http://rubidium.dyndns.org/~magnus/papers/KTH_paper1.pdf

Cheers,
Magnus

Hi Bob, On 02/27/2015 08:24 PM, Bob Camp wrote: > HI >> On Feb 27, 2015, at 10:46 AM, Philip Gladstone <pjsg-timenuts@nospam.gladstonefamily.net> wrote: >> >> On 2/26/15 20:39, Charles Steinmetz wrote: >>> ben wrote: >>> >>>> I'm going to have to build one of these. Assume you have some sort of >>>> circuit that converts low-voltage AC from a transformer secondary to >>>> a pulse train, start a timer, and count x amount of pulses? >>> >>> Here is a zero-cross detector designed for this purpose: >>> >>> <http://www.ko4bb.com/manuals/download.php?file=02_GPS_Timing/Simple_AC_Mains_Zero_Crossing_Detector.pdf> >>> >>> >>> Most mains-nuts feed the ZCD pulse to the DCD line of a PC's RS232 >>> port and use the computer to time-stamp the crossings and append them >>> to a file of such time stamps. >> If we all did this, then I realize that we could identify the different power grids. However, I wonder if there is any interesting variation *within* a grid. As the electricity flows vary throughout the day, it seems possible that the phase difference between two people on the same grid would actually change (a bit). >> >> Has anybody done this experiment? > > It’s done by utilities to monitor power flow and balance electric grids. The first data on this (grid vs GPS) date to the 1980’s. I think the > paper I recall was done by Quebec Hydro. Since then it’s become a pretty standard monitoring tool. Yes. They implemented the first Phasor-Measurement Unit (PMU), it went into the IEEE 1344 standard, but had many issues with it and created a new standard in IEEE C37.118, which has since been split into IEEE C37.118.1 and C37.118.2 with the advent of the IEC 61850 context, where the data-transport is being replaced, but the measurement methods is maintained in C37.118.1. For an intro, you can read this paper: http://rubidium.dyndns.org/~magnus/papers/KTH_paper1.pdf Cheers, Magnus
G
Graham
Sun, Mar 1, 2015 7:18 AM

Dave,

That's cool. I am the dot just above the US / Canada border and just
below the Ontario/Quebec border in Eastern Ontario.

There are many (many) documents that can found using Google on the
subject of power grids and frequency and monitoring. I have only been
able to read through only a small handful. An interesting application of
time and frequency measurement.

cheers, Graham ve3gtc

On 2015-02-28 19:50, DaveH wrote:

Like this?

http://fnetpublic.utk.edu/gradientmap.html

I am the dot just below the Canadian border in WA State.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf
Of Philip Gladstone
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 07:47
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Recording mains frequency/phase
[WAS: No GPSsatellites]

On 2/26/15 20:39, Charles Steinmetz wrote:

ben wrote:

I'm going to have to build one of these. Assume you have

some sort of

circuit that converts low-voltage AC from a transformer

secondary to

a pulse train, start a timer, and count x amount of pulses?

Here is a zero-cross detector designed for this purpose:

<http://www.ko4bb.com/manuals/download.php?file=02_GPS_Timing/
Simple_AC_Mains_Zero_Crossing_Detector.pdf>

Most mains-nuts feed the ZCD pulse to the DCD line of a PC's RS232
port and use the computer to time-stamp the crossings and

append them

to a file of such time stamps.

If we all did this, then I realize that we could identify the
different
power grids. However, I wonder if there is any interesting variation
within a grid. As the electricity flows vary throughout the day, it
seems possible that the phase difference between two people
on the same
grid would actually change (a bit).

Has anybody done this experiment?

Philip


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Dave, That's cool. I am the dot just above the US / Canada border and just below the Ontario/Quebec border in Eastern Ontario. There are many (many) documents that can found using Google on the subject of power grids and frequency and monitoring. I have only been able to read through only a small handful. An interesting application of time and frequency measurement. cheers, Graham ve3gtc On 2015-02-28 19:50, DaveH wrote: > Like this? > > http://fnetpublic.utk.edu/gradientmap.html > > I am the dot just below the Canadian border in WA State. > > Dave > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: time-nuts [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On Behalf >> Of Philip Gladstone >> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 07:47 >> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement >> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Recording mains frequency/phase >> [WAS: No GPSsatellites] >> >> On 2/26/15 20:39, Charles Steinmetz wrote: >>> ben wrote: >>> >>>> I'm going to have to build one of these. Assume you have >> some sort of >>>> circuit that converts low-voltage AC from a transformer >> secondary to >>>> a pulse train, start a timer, and count x amount of pulses? >>> Here is a zero-cross detector designed for this purpose: >>> >>> >> <http://www.ko4bb.com/manuals/download.php?file=02_GPS_Timing/ >> Simple_AC_Mains_Zero_Crossing_Detector.pdf> >>> >>> Most mains-nuts feed the ZCD pulse to the DCD line of a PC's RS232 >>> port and use the computer to time-stamp the crossings and >> append them >>> to a file of such time stamps. >> If we all did this, then I realize that we could identify the >> different >> power grids. However, I wonder if there is any interesting variation >> *within* a grid. As the electricity flows vary throughout the day, it >> seems possible that the phase difference between two people >> on the same >> grid would actually change (a bit). >> >> Has anybody done this experiment? >> >> Philip >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.