time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

Re: Low Phase Noise 10 MHz bench signal source sought

MM
Mike Monett
Tue, Apr 5, 2022 8:09 PM

Joseph,

You will find it difficult to get below -170 dBc/Hz. However, you can use
cross-correlation to get as low as -220 dBc/Hz.

Rubiola is a wealth of information on cross-correlation. You can download
his papers at

http://rubiola.org/index.html

See "The cross-spectrum experimental method, February 2010"

See also measurements by John Ackerman:

http://www.febo.com/pages/cross-correlation/

MRM

Joseph, You will find it difficult to get below -170 dBc/Hz. However, you can use cross-correlation to get as low as -220 dBc/Hz. Rubiola is a wealth of information on cross-correlation. You can download his papers at http://rubiola.org/index.html See "The cross-spectrum experimental method, February 2010" See also measurements by John Ackerman: http://www.febo.com/pages/cross-correlation/ MRM
G
ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de
Wed, Apr 6, 2022 12:24 AM

Am 2022-04-05 22:09, schrieb Mike Monett:

Joseph,

You will find it difficult to get below -170 dBc/Hz. However, you can
use
cross-correlation to get as low as -220 dBc/Hz.

Yes, it is not impossible to get these numbers. But it is cheaper to
throw dice.

U.Rohde is 30 dB more modest:

"...amplifier certainly has a higher noise figure, as it is driven with
more power and there is no
improvement possible. There is an optimum condition and some of the
measurements showing
‐190dBc/Hz do not seem to match the theoretical calculations. The
correlation allows us to look
below KT, but the noise contribution below KT is as useful as finding
one gold atom in your body’s
blood. This gold atom has no contribution to your system."

taken from the conclusion of "Phase Noise Measurements and its
Limitations – Sent to MWJ – for publication in April 2013 issue"

Gerhard

Rubiola is a wealth of information on cross-correlation. You can
download
his papers at

http://rubiola.org/index.html

See "The cross-spectrum experimental method, February 2010"

See also measurements by John Ackerman:

http://www.febo.com/pages/cross-correlation/

MRM


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe
send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.

Am 2022-04-05 22:09, schrieb Mike Monett: > Joseph, > > You will find it difficult to get below -170 dBc/Hz. However, you can > use > cross-correlation to get as low as -220 dBc/Hz. Yes, it is not impossible to get these numbers. But it is cheaper to throw dice. U.Rohde is 30 dB more modest: "...amplifier certainly has a higher noise figure, as it is driven with more power and there is no improvement possible. There is an optimum condition and some of the measurements showing ‐190dBc/Hz do not seem to match the theoretical calculations. The correlation allows us to look below KT, but the noise contribution below KT is as useful as finding one gold atom in your body’s blood. This gold atom has no contribution to your system." taken from the conclusion of "Phase Noise Measurements and its Limitations – Sent to MWJ – for publication in April 2013 issue" Gerhard > > Rubiola is a wealth of information on cross-correlation. You can > download > his papers at > > http://rubiola.org/index.html > > See "The cross-spectrum experimental method, February 2010" > > See also measurements by John Ackerman: > > http://www.febo.com/pages/cross-correlation/ > > MRM > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com -- To unsubscribe > send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to and follow the instructions there.
G
ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de
Wed, Apr 6, 2022 7:53 AM

Am 2022-04-06 2:24, schrieb ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de:

Ingrid adds:
<    https://synergymwave.com/articles/2013/04/full_article.pdf      >

The reference section is interesting, too.

Gerhard

(Ingrid was a woman in the German sub-internet who was
thinking in cascades of auto-follow-ups.)

Am 2022-04-06 2:24, schrieb ghf@hoffmann-hochfrequenz.de: Ingrid adds: < https://synergymwave.com/articles/2013/04/full_article.pdf > The reference section is interesting, too. Gerhard (Ingrid was a woman in the German sub-internet who was thinking in cascades of auto-follow-ups.)