time-nuts@lists.febo.com

Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement

View all threads

potential source for cheap copy of labview

EG
Eric Garner
Fri, Jun 19, 2015 5:40 PM

National Instruments (and may other vendors of software) has apparently
cottoned on to the fact that if they don't start catering to the "Maker"
market (I hate that term) that they will get left behind. In that spirit
they have released a non-commercial licence of labview.

you can learn more about it here:

https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/

I mention it on this list since many of us would like to use labview in our
home labs but haven't been willing to shell out for the exorbitant price.
I'm currently using one of the  spare licences from work to to labview
stuff at home, but i'd be willing to shell out the $49 to see what it got
me. I'm sending this out in the spirit of information, I'd rather not have
this devolve into the "labview sucks" sort of discussion that often comes
up with it's mention.

I haven't explored it much, but wanted to send it out.

--
--Eric


Eric Garner

National Instruments (and may other vendors of software) has apparently cottoned on to the fact that if they don't start catering to the "Maker" market (I hate that term) that they will get left behind. In that spirit they have released a non-commercial licence of labview. you can learn more about it here: https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/ I mention it on this list since many of us would like to use labview in our home labs but haven't been willing to shell out for the exorbitant price. I'm currently using one of the spare licences from work to to labview stuff at home, but i'd be willing to shell out the $49 to see what it got me. I'm sending this out in the spirit of information, I'd rather not have this devolve into the "labview sucks" sort of discussion that often comes up with it's mention. I haven't explored it much, but wanted to send it out. -- --Eric _________________________________________ Eric Garner
BK
Bob kb8tq
Sat, Jun 20, 2015 3:18 AM

Hi

It is interesting as you go through the various student and home versions, just how
hard it is to figure out what you are (and are not) buying in each case. One example
would be the inclusion (or not) of GPIB capability. One would assume it’s in there and
fully functional. At lest for me it’s a “must have” item on the check list.

If anybody comes across a deep dive on what is / is not in each package, I’d
certainly like to see it.

Bob

On Jun 19, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Eric Garner garnere@gmail.com wrote:

National Instruments (and may other vendors of software) has apparently
cottoned on to the fact that if they don't start catering to the "Maker"
market (I hate that term) that they will get left behind. In that spirit
they have released a non-commercial licence of labview.

you can learn more about it here:

https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/

I mention it on this list since many of us would like to use labview in our
home labs but haven't been willing to shell out for the exorbitant price.
I'm currently using one of the  spare licences from work to to labview
stuff at home, but i'd be willing to shell out the $49 to see what it got
me. I'm sending this out in the spirit of information, I'd rather not have
this devolve into the "labview sucks" sort of discussion that often comes
up with it's mention.

I haven't explored it much, but wanted to send it out.

--
--Eric


Eric Garner


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi It is interesting as you go through the various student and home versions, just how hard it is to figure out what you are (and are not) buying in each case. One example would be the inclusion (or not) of GPIB capability. One would *assume* it’s in there and fully functional. At lest for me it’s a “must have” item on the check list. If anybody comes across a deep dive on what is / is not in each package, I’d certainly like to see it. Bob > On Jun 19, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Eric Garner <garnere@gmail.com> wrote: > > National Instruments (and may other vendors of software) has apparently > cottoned on to the fact that if they don't start catering to the "Maker" > market (I hate that term) that they will get left behind. In that spirit > they have released a non-commercial licence of labview. > > you can learn more about it here: > > https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/ > > I mention it on this list since many of us would like to use labview in our > home labs but haven't been willing to shell out for the exorbitant price. > I'm currently using one of the spare licences from work to to labview > stuff at home, but i'd be willing to shell out the $49 to see what it got > me. I'm sending this out in the spirit of information, I'd rather not have > this devolve into the "labview sucks" sort of discussion that often comes > up with it's mention. > > I haven't explored it much, but wanted to send it out. > > > > -- > --Eric > _________________________________________ > Eric Garner > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
BE
brent evers
Sat, Jun 20, 2015 3:26 PM

Interesting in your take on it if you check it out.  Please report back
your findings.

Brent

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Eric Garner garnere@gmail.com wrote:

National Instruments (and may other vendors of software) has apparently
cottoned on to the fact that if they don't start catering to the "Maker"
market (I hate that term) that they will get left behind. In that spirit
they have released a non-commercial licence of labview.

you can learn more about it here:

https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/

I mention it on this list since many of us would like to use labview in our
home labs but haven't been willing to shell out for the exorbitant price.
I'm currently using one of the  spare licences from work to to labview
stuff at home, but i'd be willing to shell out the $49 to see what it got
me. I'm sending this out in the spirit of information, I'd rather not have
this devolve into the "labview sucks" sort of discussion that often comes
up with it's mention.

I haven't explored it much, but wanted to send it out.

--
--Eric


Eric Garner


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Interesting in your take on it if you check it out. Please report back your findings. Brent On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Eric Garner <garnere@gmail.com> wrote: > National Instruments (and may other vendors of software) has apparently > cottoned on to the fact that if they don't start catering to the "Maker" > market (I hate that term) that they will get left behind. In that spirit > they have released a non-commercial licence of labview. > > you can learn more about it here: > > https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/ > > I mention it on this list since many of us would like to use labview in our > home labs but haven't been willing to shell out for the exorbitant price. > I'm currently using one of the spare licences from work to to labview > stuff at home, but i'd be willing to shell out the $49 to see what it got > me. I'm sending this out in the spirit of information, I'd rather not have > this devolve into the "labview sucks" sort of discussion that often comes > up with it's mention. > > I haven't explored it much, but wanted to send it out. > > > > -- > --Eric > _________________________________________ > Eric Garner > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
BC
Brooke Clarke
Sat, Jun 20, 2015 6:01 PM

Hi Bob:

That's exactly the question I had yesterday.  I was a certified LabView programmer and yesterday was thinking about
having a local computer store making me a WIN 3.1 computer so I could run my old LV code and write some new code.  I may
still do that, but for now I have the $50 LV Home Bundle on order.  Yes IEEE-488 is supported. For details and links
see: http://www.prc68.com/I/LabVIEW.html

PS the student bundle is about $30.
Mail_Attachment --
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html
Bob kb8tq wrote:

Hi

It is interesting as you go through the various student and home versions, just how
hard it is to figure out what you are (and are not) buying in each case. One example
would be the inclusion (or not) of GPIB capability. One would assume it’s in there and
fully functional. At lest for me it’s a “must have” item on the check list.

If anybody comes across a deep dive on what is / is not in each package, I’d
certainly like to see it.

Bob

On Jun 19, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Eric Garner garnere@gmail.com wrote:

National Instruments (and may other vendors of software) has apparently
cottoned on to the fact that if they don't start catering to the "Maker"
market (I hate that term) that they will get left behind. In that spirit
they have released a non-commercial licence of labview.

you can learn more about it here:

https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/

I mention it on this list since many of us would like to use labview in our
home labs but haven't been willing to shell out for the exorbitant price.
I'm currently using one of the  spare licences from work to to labview
stuff at home, but i'd be willing to shell out the $49 to see what it got
me. I'm sending this out in the spirit of information, I'd rather not have
this devolve into the "labview sucks" sort of discussion that often comes
up with it's mention.

I haven't explored it much, but wanted to send it out.

--
--Eric


Eric Garner


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Bob: That's exactly the question I had yesterday. I was a certified LabView programmer and yesterday was thinking about having a local computer store making me a WIN 3.1 computer so I could run my old LV code and write some new code. I may still do that, but for now I have the $50 LV Home Bundle on order. Yes IEEE-488 is supported. For details and links see: http://www.prc68.com/I/LabVIEW.html PS the student bundle is about $30. Mail_Attachment -- Have Fun, Brooke Clarke http://www.PRC68.com http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html Bob kb8tq wrote: > Hi > > It is interesting as you go through the various student and home versions, just how > hard it is to figure out what you are (and are not) buying in each case. One example > would be the inclusion (or not) of GPIB capability. One would *assume* it’s in there and > fully functional. At lest for me it’s a “must have” item on the check list. > > If anybody comes across a deep dive on what is / is not in each package, I’d > certainly like to see it. > > Bob > >> On Jun 19, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Eric Garner <garnere@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> National Instruments (and may other vendors of software) has apparently >> cottoned on to the fact that if they don't start catering to the "Maker" >> market (I hate that term) that they will get left behind. In that spirit >> they have released a non-commercial licence of labview. >> >> you can learn more about it here: >> >> https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/ >> >> I mention it on this list since many of us would like to use labview in our >> home labs but haven't been willing to shell out for the exorbitant price. >> I'm currently using one of the spare licences from work to to labview >> stuff at home, but i'd be willing to shell out the $49 to see what it got >> me. I'm sending this out in the spirit of information, I'd rather not have >> this devolve into the "labview sucks" sort of discussion that often comes >> up with it's mention. >> >> I haven't explored it much, but wanted to send it out. >> >> >> >> -- >> --Eric >> _________________________________________ >> Eric Garner >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
G
Gav
Sat, Jun 20, 2015 8:45 PM

They provide an evaluation version that lasts for 45 days, and if you like
it you can buy the 'LabView Home Bundle' for $49.

Apparently the home version is Windows-only, which I sadly didn't realise
till after a 1.4GB download. I can't complain too much, though, given the
price and the feature set of LabView. I might see if I can commandeer
another laptop just to use with it.

On 21 June 2015 at 01:26, brent evers brent.evers@gmail.com wrote:

Interesting in your take on it if you check it out.  Please report back
your findings.

Brent

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Eric Garner garnere@gmail.com wrote:

National Instruments (and may other vendors of software) has apparently
cottoned on to the fact that if they don't start catering to the "Maker"
market (I hate that term) that they will get left behind. In that spirit
they have released a non-commercial licence of labview.

you can learn more about it here:

https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/

I mention it on this list since many of us would like to use labview in

our

home labs but haven't been willing to shell out for the exorbitant price.
I'm currently using one of the  spare licences from work to to labview
stuff at home, but i'd be willing to shell out the $49 to see what it got
me. I'm sending this out in the spirit of information, I'd rather not

have

this devolve into the "labview sucks" sort of discussion that often comes
up with it's mention.

I haven't explored it much, but wanted to send it out.

--
--Eric


Eric Garner


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

They provide an evaluation version that lasts for 45 days, and if you like it you can buy the 'LabView Home Bundle' for $49. Apparently the home version is Windows-only, which I sadly didn't realise till after a 1.4GB download. I can't complain too much, though, given the price and the feature set of LabView. I might see if I can commandeer another laptop just to use with it. On 21 June 2015 at 01:26, brent evers <brent.evers@gmail.com> wrote: > Interesting in your take on it if you check it out. Please report back > your findings. > > Brent > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Eric Garner <garnere@gmail.com> wrote: > > > National Instruments (and may other vendors of software) has apparently > > cottoned on to the fact that if they don't start catering to the "Maker" > > market (I hate that term) that they will get left behind. In that spirit > > they have released a non-commercial licence of labview. > > > > you can learn more about it here: > > > > https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/ > > > > I mention it on this list since many of us would like to use labview in > our > > home labs but haven't been willing to shell out for the exorbitant price. > > I'm currently using one of the spare licences from work to to labview > > stuff at home, but i'd be willing to shell out the $49 to see what it got > > me. I'm sending this out in the spirit of information, I'd rather not > have > > this devolve into the "labview sucks" sort of discussion that often comes > > up with it's mention. > > > > I haven't explored it much, but wanted to send it out. > > > > > > > > -- > > --Eric > > _________________________________________ > > Eric Garner > > _______________________________________________ > > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > > To unsubscribe, go to > > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > and follow the instructions there. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
DD
Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
Sat, Jun 20, 2015 8:45 PM

On 20 June 2015 at 04:18, Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

Hi

It is interesting as you go through the various student and home versions,
just how
hard it is to figure out what you are (and are not) buying in each case.
One example
would be the inclusion (or not) of GPIB capability. One would assume
it’s in there and
fully functional. At lest for me it’s a “must have” item on the check list.

If anybody comes across a deep dive on what is / is not in each package,
I’d
certainly like to see it.

Be aware, a lot of older kit is not supported in Labview with the
instrument drivers. I was thinking of buying a copy, and had a labview rep
come around here. I'd sent him in advance of equipment I had that I was
interested in collecting data from. He had nothing that could talk to my HP
70000 series spectrum analyzer. He had a driver written for an 8753 VNA
which was expected to work on an 8720D, but had never been tested. Needless
to say, it could not talk to my 8720D.

Just about anything GPIB in my lab, with the exception of the Agilent power
supplies, they had no instrument drivers for, as it was all too old.

A quick check on time-interval counters, I found there's nothing for the HP
5370B, although there is the Stanford Research SR620.  (At the the the NI
guy came, I never had the SR620).

So if its a hobby, chances are you have older equipment, and support is
probably lacking. Of course you can write your own drivers, but it takes
away a lot of the convenience of Labview.

Somewhat related, there is a GPIB plugin for Octave (open-source MATLAB
clone). I have never used it myself, but might be another cheap (free) way
to get test equipment in a GUI environment.

Dave

On 20 June 2015 at 04:18, Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: > Hi > > It is interesting as you go through the various student and home versions, > just how > hard it is to figure out what you are (and are not) buying in each case. > One example > would be the inclusion (or not) of GPIB capability. One would *assume* > it’s in there and > fully functional. At lest for me it’s a “must have” item on the check list. > > If anybody comes across a deep dive on what is / is not in each package, > I’d > certainly like to see it. > Be aware, a lot of older kit is not supported in Labview with the instrument drivers. I was thinking of buying a copy, and had a labview rep come around here. I'd sent him in advance of equipment I had that I was interested in collecting data from. He had nothing that could talk to my HP 70000 series spectrum analyzer. He had a driver written for an 8753 VNA which was expected to work on an 8720D, but had never been tested. Needless to say, it could not talk to my 8720D. Just about anything GPIB in my lab, with the exception of the Agilent power supplies, they had no instrument drivers for, as it was all too old. A quick check on time-interval counters, I found there's nothing for the HP 5370B, although there is the Stanford Research SR620. (At the the the NI guy came, I never had the SR620). So if its a hobby, chances are you have older equipment, and support is probably lacking. Of course you can write your own drivers, but it takes away a lot of the convenience of Labview. Somewhat related, there is a GPIB plugin for Octave (open-source MATLAB clone). I have never used it myself, but might be another cheap (free) way to get test equipment in a GUI environment. Dave
BG
Brent Gordon
Sat, Jun 20, 2015 8:51 PM

Here's the National Instruments web page about the "Maker" (I also hate
that term) version. http://sine.ni.com/nips/cds/view/p/lang/en/nid/213095

It is the same as the $2999 Full version
http://sine.ni.com/nips/cds/view/p/lang/en/nid/212666 with the
addition of the $2119 Control and Simulation Module and the $520
MathScript RT module.

Other than the licensing terms, the only real difference is that it puts
a watermark on the front panel and block diagram of every VI.

Every version of LabVIEW supports GPIB, you just have to download the
driver disk.

Even though I've got the Full Developer suite, I'll probably buy this
version just to play with Control and Simulation Module.

It's not really clear from the labviewmakerhub.com site or the ni.com
site that you download LabVIEW from either of those two sites but pay
for a license key at
https://www.digilentinc.com/Products/Detail.cfm?NavPath=2,1301,1450&Prod=LABVIEW-HE

Brent Gordon
Certified LabVIEW Developer

On 6/19/2015 9:18 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote:

Hi

It is interesting as you go through the various student and home versions, just how
hard it is to figure out what you are (and are not) buying in each case. One example
would be the inclusion (or not) of GPIB capability. One would assume it’s in there and
fully functional. At lest for me it’s a “must have” item on the check list.

If anybody comes across a deep dive on what is / is not in each package, I’d
certainly like to see it.

Bob

On Jun 19, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Eric Garner garnere@gmail.com wrote:

National Instruments (and may other vendors of software) has apparently
cottoned on to the fact that if they don't start catering to the "Maker"
market (I hate that term) that they will get left behind. In that spirit
they have released a non-commercial licence of labview.

you can learn more about it here:

https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/

I mention it on this list since many of us would like to use labview in our
home labs but haven't been willing to shell out for the exorbitant price.
I'm currently using one of the  spare licences from work to to labview
stuff at home, but i'd be willing to shell out the $49 to see what it got
me. I'm sending this out in the spirit of information, I'd rather not have
this devolve into the "labview sucks" sort of discussion that often comes
up with it's mention.

I haven't explored it much, but wanted to send it out.

--
--Eric


Eric Garner

Here's the National Instruments web page about the "Maker" (I also hate that term) version. <http://sine.ni.com/nips/cds/view/p/lang/en/nid/213095> It is the same as the $2999 Full version <http://sine.ni.com/nips/cds/view/p/lang/en/nid/212666> with the addition of the $2119 Control and Simulation Module and the $520 MathScript RT module. Other than the licensing terms, the only real difference is that it puts a watermark on the front panel and block diagram of every VI. Every version of LabVIEW supports GPIB, you just have to download the driver disk. Even though I've got the Full Developer suite, I'll probably buy this version just to play with Control and Simulation Module. It's not really clear from the labviewmakerhub.com site or the ni.com site that you download LabVIEW from either of those two sites but pay for a license key at <https://www.digilentinc.com/Products/Detail.cfm?NavPath=2,1301,1450&Prod=LABVIEW-HE> Brent Gordon Certified LabVIEW Developer On 6/19/2015 9:18 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote: > Hi > > It is interesting as you go through the various student and home versions, just how > hard it is to figure out what you are (and are not) buying in each case. One example > would be the inclusion (or not) of GPIB capability. One would *assume* it’s in there and > fully functional. At lest for me it’s a “must have” item on the check list. > > If anybody comes across a deep dive on what is / is not in each package, I’d > certainly like to see it. > > Bob > >> On Jun 19, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Eric Garner <garnere@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> National Instruments (and may other vendors of software) has apparently >> cottoned on to the fact that if they don't start catering to the "Maker" >> market (I hate that term) that they will get left behind. In that spirit >> they have released a non-commercial licence of labview. >> >> you can learn more about it here: >> >> https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/ >> >> I mention it on this list since many of us would like to use labview in our >> home labs but haven't been willing to shell out for the exorbitant price. >> I'm currently using one of the spare licences from work to to labview >> stuff at home, but i'd be willing to shell out the $49 to see what it got >> me. I'm sending this out in the spirit of information, I'd rather not have >> this devolve into the "labview sucks" sort of discussion that often comes >> up with it's mention. >> >> I haven't explored it much, but wanted to send it out. >> >> >> >> -- >> --Eric >> _________________________________________ >> Eric Garner
DD
Dave Daniel
Sat, Jun 20, 2015 10:03 PM

I wish the MathWorks would resume that practice. Back in the late 90s
they would sell one licenses for MatLab and SimuLink for an affordable
price if one singed an agreement that restricted one to personal
(specifically, non-commercial) use. My copy from back then is so old
that it won't run on Windows 7.

DaveD

On 6/19/2015 9:18 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote:

Hi

It is interesting as you go through the various student and home versions, just how
hard it is to figure out what you are (and are not) buying in each case. One example
would be the inclusion (or not) of GPIB capability. One would assume it’s in there and
fully functional. At lest for me it’s a “must have” item on the check list.

If anybody comes across a deep dive on what is / is not in each package, I’d
certainly like to see it.

Bob

On Jun 19, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Eric Garner garnere@gmail.com wrote:

National Instruments (and may other vendors of software) has apparently
cottoned on to the fact that if they don't start catering to the "Maker"
market (I hate that term) that they will get left behind. In that spirit
they have released a non-commercial licence of labview.

you can learn more about it here:

https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/

I mention it on this list since many of us would like to use labview in our
home labs but haven't been willing to shell out for the exorbitant price.
I'm currently using one of the  spare licences from work to to labview
stuff at home, but i'd be willing to shell out the $49 to see what it got
me. I'm sending this out in the spirit of information, I'd rather not have
this devolve into the "labview sucks" sort of discussion that often comes
up with it's mention.

I haven't explored it much, but wanted to send it out.

--
--Eric


Eric Garner


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

I wish the MathWorks would resume that practice. Back in the late 90s they would sell one licenses for MatLab and SimuLink for an affordable price if one singed an agreement that restricted one to personal (specifically, non-commercial) use. My copy from back then is so old that it won't run on Windows 7. DaveD On 6/19/2015 9:18 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote: > Hi > > It is interesting as you go through the various student and home versions, just how > hard it is to figure out what you are (and are not) buying in each case. One example > would be the inclusion (or not) of GPIB capability. One would *assume* it’s in there and > fully functional. At lest for me it’s a “must have” item on the check list. > > If anybody comes across a deep dive on what is / is not in each package, I’d > certainly like to see it. > > Bob > >> On Jun 19, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Eric Garner <garnere@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> National Instruments (and may other vendors of software) has apparently >> cottoned on to the fact that if they don't start catering to the "Maker" >> market (I hate that term) that they will get left behind. In that spirit >> they have released a non-commercial licence of labview. >> >> you can learn more about it here: >> >> https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/ >> >> I mention it on this list since many of us would like to use labview in our >> home labs but haven't been willing to shell out for the exorbitant price. >> I'm currently using one of the spare licences from work to to labview >> stuff at home, but i'd be willing to shell out the $49 to see what it got >> me. I'm sending this out in the spirit of information, I'd rather not have >> this devolve into the "labview sucks" sort of discussion that often comes >> up with it's mention. >> >> I haven't explored it much, but wanted to send it out. >> >> >> >> -- >> --Eric >> _________________________________________ >> Eric Garner >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there.
PS
paul swed
Sun, Jun 21, 2015 12:34 AM

Well this looks interesting. You can download what appears to be the same
bundle for a free 45 day trial. Doing that at the moment.
Then there is the NI-Visa download and it has gpib.
Not sure what much of this means in reality. What drivers do they have to
get to the old clasical fat GPIB used on a hp5370 as an example.
I have messed with labview a few times and always seem to get tangled in
old operating systems and ISA cards and such. I do have the ethernet GPIB
controllers they had made but they stopped supporting those 10 years ago.

XXXX Note. The FAQ suggests running the 32 bit version even on a 64 bit
machine as many drivers are only 32 bits XXXX

Regards
Paul.
WB8TSL

On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Brooke Clarke brooke@pacific.net wrote:

Hi Bob:

That's exactly the question I had yesterday.  I was a certified LabView
programmer and yesterday was thinking about having a local computer store
making me a WIN 3.1 computer so I could run my old LV code and write some
new code.  I may still do that, but for now I have the $50 LV Home Bundle
on order.  Yes IEEE-488 is supported. For details and links see:
http://www.prc68.com/I/LabVIEW.html

PS the student bundle is about $30.
Mail_Attachment --
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html

Bob kb8tq wrote:

Hi

It is interesting as you go through the various student and home
versions, just how
hard it is to figure out what you are (and are not) buying in each case.
One example
would be the inclusion (or not) of GPIB capability. One would assume
it’s in there and
fully functional. At lest for me it’s a “must have” item on the check
list.

If anybody comes across a deep dive on what is / is not in each package,
I’d
certainly like to see it.

Bob

On Jun 19, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Eric Garner garnere@gmail.com wrote:

National Instruments (and may other vendors of software) has apparently
cottoned on to the fact that if they don't start catering to the "Maker"
market (I hate that term) that they will get left behind. In that spirit
they have released a non-commercial licence of labview.

you can learn more about it here:

https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/

I mention it on this list since many of us would like to use labview in
our
home labs but haven't been willing to shell out for the exorbitant price.
I'm currently using one of the  spare licences from work to to labview
stuff at home, but i'd be willing to shell out the $49 to see what it got
me. I'm sending this out in the spirit of information, I'd rather not
have
this devolve into the "labview sucks" sort of discussion that often comes
up with it's mention.

I haven't explored it much, but wanted to send it out.

--
--Eric


Eric Garner


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Well this looks interesting. You can download what appears to be the same bundle for a free 45 day trial. Doing that at the moment. Then there is the NI-Visa download and it has gpib. Not sure what much of this means in reality. What drivers do they have to get to the old clasical fat GPIB used on a hp5370 as an example. I have messed with labview a few times and always seem to get tangled in old operating systems and ISA cards and such. I do have the ethernet GPIB controllers they had made but they stopped supporting those 10 years ago. XXXX Note. The FAQ suggests running the 32 bit version even on a 64 bit machine as many drivers are only 32 bits XXXX Regards Paul. WB8TSL On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Brooke Clarke <brooke@pacific.net> wrote: > Hi Bob: > > That's exactly the question I had yesterday. I was a certified LabView > programmer and yesterday was thinking about having a local computer store > making me a WIN 3.1 computer so I could run my old LV code and write some > new code. I may still do that, but for now I have the $50 LV Home Bundle > on order. Yes IEEE-488 is supported. For details and links see: > http://www.prc68.com/I/LabVIEW.html > > PS the student bundle is about $30. > Mail_Attachment -- > Have Fun, > > Brooke Clarke > http://www.PRC68.com > http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html > http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html > > Bob kb8tq wrote: > >> Hi >> >> It is interesting as you go through the various student and home >> versions, just how >> hard it is to figure out what you are (and are not) buying in each case. >> One example >> would be the inclusion (or not) of GPIB capability. One would *assume* >> it’s in there and >> fully functional. At lest for me it’s a “must have” item on the check >> list. >> >> If anybody comes across a deep dive on what is / is not in each package, >> I’d >> certainly like to see it. >> >> Bob >> >> On Jun 19, 2015, at 1:40 PM, Eric Garner <garnere@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> National Instruments (and may other vendors of software) has apparently >>> cottoned on to the fact that if they don't start catering to the "Maker" >>> market (I hate that term) that they will get left behind. In that spirit >>> they have released a non-commercial licence of labview. >>> >>> you can learn more about it here: >>> >>> https://www.labviewmakerhub.com/ >>> >>> I mention it on this list since many of us would like to use labview in >>> our >>> home labs but haven't been willing to shell out for the exorbitant price. >>> I'm currently using one of the spare licences from work to to labview >>> stuff at home, but i'd be willing to shell out the $49 to see what it got >>> me. I'm sending this out in the spirit of information, I'd rather not >>> have >>> this devolve into the "labview sucks" sort of discussion that often comes >>> up with it's mention. >>> >>> I haven't explored it much, but wanted to send it out. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> --Eric >>> _________________________________________ >>> Eric Garner >>> _______________________________________________ >>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >>> To unsubscribe, go to >>> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >>> and follow the instructions there. >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >> To unsubscribe, go to >> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >> and follow the instructions there. >> >> > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >
BC
Brooke Clarke
Sun, Jun 21, 2015 12:48 AM

Hi Dave:

When I was working with LV you could run the program on a Mac, Windows or Unix without any changes.
It's my understanding that's still true.

Note the instruments that accept SCPI commands are pretty much interchangeable.  It's the "R2D2" commands that are model
number specific.

The software is coming via Fedex ground from Washington state so should be here in a few days, more then.

Mail_Attachment --
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html
Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote:

On 20 June 2015 at 04:18, Bob kb8tq kb8tq@n1k.org wrote:

Hi

It is interesting as you go through the various student and home versions,
just how
hard it is to figure out what you are (and are not) buying in each case.
One example
would be the inclusion (or not) of GPIB capability. One would assume
it’s in there and
fully functional. At lest for me it’s a “must have” item on the check list.

If anybody comes across a deep dive on what is / is not in each package,
I’d
certainly like to see it.

Be aware, a lot of older kit is not supported in Labview with the
instrument drivers. I was thinking of buying a copy, and had a labview rep
come around here. I'd sent him in advance of equipment I had that I was
interested in collecting data from. He had nothing that could talk to my HP
70000 series spectrum analyzer. He had a driver written for an 8753 VNA
which was expected to work on an 8720D, but had never been tested. Needless
to say, it could not talk to my 8720D.

Just about anything GPIB in my lab, with the exception of the Agilent power
supplies, they had no instrument drivers for, as it was all too old.

A quick check on time-interval counters, I found there's nothing for the HP
5370B, although there is the Stanford Research SR620.  (At the the the NI
guy came, I never had the SR620).

So if its a hobby, chances are you have older equipment, and support is
probably lacking. Of course you can write your own drivers, but it takes
away a lot of the convenience of Labview.

Somewhat related, there is a GPIB plugin for Octave (open-source MATLAB
clone). I have never used it myself, but might be another cheap (free) way
to get test equipment in a GUI environment.

Dave


time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Hi Dave: When I was working with LV you could run the program on a Mac, Windows or Unix without any changes. It's my understanding that's still true. Note the instruments that accept SCPI commands are pretty much interchangeable. It's the "R2D2" commands that are model number specific. The software is coming via Fedex ground from Washington state so should be here in a few days, more then. Mail_Attachment -- Have Fun, Brooke Clarke http://www.PRC68.com http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html http://www.prc68.com/I/DietNutrition.html Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote: > On 20 June 2015 at 04:18, Bob kb8tq <kb8tq@n1k.org> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> It is interesting as you go through the various student and home versions, >> just how >> hard it is to figure out what you are (and are not) buying in each case. >> One example >> would be the inclusion (or not) of GPIB capability. One would *assume* >> it’s in there and >> fully functional. At lest for me it’s a “must have” item on the check list. >> >> If anybody comes across a deep dive on what is / is not in each package, >> I’d >> certainly like to see it. >> > Be aware, a lot of older kit is not supported in Labview with the > instrument drivers. I was thinking of buying a copy, and had a labview rep > come around here. I'd sent him in advance of equipment I had that I was > interested in collecting data from. He had nothing that could talk to my HP > 70000 series spectrum analyzer. He had a driver written for an 8753 VNA > which was expected to work on an 8720D, but had never been tested. Needless > to say, it could not talk to my 8720D. > > Just about anything GPIB in my lab, with the exception of the Agilent power > supplies, they had no instrument drivers for, as it was all too old. > > A quick check on time-interval counters, I found there's nothing for the HP > 5370B, although there is the Stanford Research SR620. (At the the the NI > guy came, I never had the SR620). > > So if its a hobby, chances are you have older equipment, and support is > probably lacking. Of course you can write your own drivers, but it takes > away a lot of the convenience of Labview. > > Somewhat related, there is a GPIB plugin for Octave (open-source MATLAB > clone). I have never used it myself, but might be another cheap (free) way > to get test equipment in a GUI environment. > > Dave > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. >