PK
Poul-Henning Kamp
Sat, Mar 3, 2012 8:05 PM
Does anybody have any info on the 2100C receiver. I have one that somebody
gave away, mistaking the listing for a 2100F.
Speaking of 2100's:
If anybody already have, or wouldn't mind reading out the EPROMS of
their 2100's, I would appreciate it.
My aim is to disassemble them and find out more about how these
receivers actually work.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
In message <2033.12.6.201.127.1330803962.squirrel@popaccts.quikus.com>, "J. Forster" writes:
>Does anybody have any info on the 2100C receiver. I have one that somebody
>gave away, mistaking the listing for a 2100F.
Speaking of 2100's:
If anybody already have, or wouldn't mind reading out the EPROMS of
their 2100's, I would appreciate it.
My aim is to disassemble them and find out more about how these
receivers actually work.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
S
Stanley
Sat, Mar 3, 2012 8:27 PM
Will do. Give me a few days.
Stanley
----- Original Message -----
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" phk@phk.freebsd.dk
To: jfor@quikus.com; "Discussion of precise time and frequency
measurement" time-nuts@febo.com
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Questions about Austron 5000 Loran C receiver
Does anybody have any info on the 2100C receiver. I have one that somebody
gave away, mistaking the listing for a 2100F.
Speaking of 2100's:
If anybody already have, or wouldn't mind reading out the EPROMS of
their 2100's, I would appreciate it.
My aim is to disassemble them and find out more about how these
receivers actually work.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by
incompetence.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Will do. Give me a few days.
Stanley
----- Original Message -----
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
To: <jfor@quikus.com>; "Discussion of precise time and frequency
measurement" <time-nuts@febo.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Questions about Austron 5000 Loran C receiver
> In message <2033.12.6.201.127.1330803962.squirrel@popaccts.quikus.com>,
> "J. Forster" writes:
>
>>Does anybody have any info on the 2100C receiver. I have one that somebody
>>gave away, mistaking the listing for a 2100F.
>
> Speaking of 2100's:
>
> If anybody already have, or wouldn't mind reading out the EPROMS of
> their 2100's, I would appreciate it.
>
> My aim is to disassemble them and find out more about how these
> receivers actually work.
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by
> incompetence.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
RK
Rob Kimberley
Sat, Mar 3, 2012 8:29 PM
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the link.
Wow, I've never seen one of those before. Looks like 60's design with those
nixie tubes.
Hope you manage to get it going.
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Andy Lokken
Sent: 03 March 2012 19:44
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Questions about Austron 5000 Loran C receiver
Hi again: Thanks for all of the replies so far.
I took a few photos of the unit for Mr. Kimberely. They are a front view, a
rear view and one of the label on the side. Not the greatest shots, but you
can view them here:
https://plus.google.com/photos/110810019489830210559/albums/5715752440279697
361?authkey=CM2uhYmH7PnfmgE
As you'll see, interfacing it to something doesn't appear to be simple.
However, I'll look into the emulator links. I appreciate them.
I do not have the full set- only the receiver part. Every online image I
have found looks like it's sitting on the PDP-8
-Andy
--
Andy Lokken
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the link.
Wow, I've never seen one of those before. Looks like 60's design with those
nixie tubes.
Hope you manage to get it going.
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Andy Lokken
Sent: 03 March 2012 19:44
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Questions about Austron 5000 Loran C receiver
Hi again: Thanks for all of the replies so far.
I took a few photos of the unit for Mr. Kimberely. They are a front view, a
rear view and one of the label on the side. Not the greatest shots, but you
can view them here:
https://plus.google.com/photos/110810019489830210559/albums/5715752440279697
361?authkey=CM2uhYmH7PnfmgE
As you'll see, interfacing it to something doesn't appear to be simple.
However, I'll look into the emulator links. I appreciate them.
I do not have the full set- only the receiver part. Every online image I
have found looks like it's sitting on the PDP-8
-Andy
--
_______________________________________
Andy Lokken
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
S
Stanley
Sat, Mar 3, 2012 10:05 PM
Will do. Give me a few days.
Stanley
Ok wasn't as hard to-do as I imagined, CPU boards come out the front without
removing the receivers from the bottom of the stack. They are 2732A a set of
three f0-f2, I have a Rev G and Rev 107 I don't know why they are different
name scheme both receivers are 2100F and look the same.
files here : http://www.n4iqt.com/firmware/2100f/
Stanley
> Will do. Give me a few days.
>
> Stanley
>
Ok wasn't as hard to-do as I imagined, CPU boards come out the front without
removing the receivers from the bottom of the stack. They are 2732A a set of
three f0-f2, I have a Rev G and Rev 107 I don't know why they are different
name scheme both receivers are 2100F and look the same.
files here : http://www.n4iqt.com/firmware/2100f/
Stanley
PK
Poul-Henning Kamp
Sat, Mar 3, 2012 10:19 PM
Ok wasn't as hard to-do as I imagined, CPU boards come out the front without
removing the receivers from the bottom of the stack. They are 2732A a set of
three f0-f2, I have a Rev G and Rev 107 I don't know why they are different
name scheme both receivers are 2100F and look the same.
Hmm, interesting. Youre r.G and r.107 look a lot like each other,
and nothing much like my r.107
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
In message <D1D2D82D39DD43F3A1D7AC5934BD6326@StanleyPC>, "Stanley" writes:
>Ok wasn't as hard to-do as I imagined, CPU boards come out the front without
>removing the receivers from the bottom of the stack. They are 2732A a set of
>three f0-f2, I have a Rev G and Rev 107 I don't know why they are different
>name scheme both receivers are 2100F and look the same.
Hmm, interesting. Youre r.G and r.107 look a lot like each other,
and nothing much like my r.107
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
AB
Azelio Boriani
Sun, Mar 4, 2012 12:13 AM
Geez, I have read and I don't think it is possible to replicate the CALOC
PDP-8/E software nor it is useful to use the Austron 5000 Loran receiver,
my understanding is that it was used to control and steer the system. It
seems they were in use until the year 2000! Maybe that using MATLAB it is
possible to exploit the Austron 5000 functionality nowadays, provided that,
someway, the 12bit samples from the Austron are transferred to the PC.
Anyway to start with, at least the receiver connectors pinout is
mandatory...
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp phk@phk.freebsd.dkwrote:
Ok wasn't as hard to-do as I imagined, CPU boards come out the front
removing the receivers from the bottom of the stack. They are 2732A a set
three f0-f2, I have a Rev G and Rev 107 I don't know why they are
name scheme both receivers are 2100F and look the same.
Hmm, interesting. Youre r.G and r.107 look a lot like each other,
and nothing much like my r.107
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Geez, I have read and I don't think it is possible to replicate the CALOC
PDP-8/E software nor it is useful to use the Austron 5000 Loran receiver,
my understanding is that it was used to control and steer the system. It
seems they were in use until the year 2000! Maybe that using MATLAB it is
possible to exploit the Austron 5000 functionality nowadays, provided that,
someway, the 12bit samples from the Austron are transferred to the PC.
Anyway to start with, at least the receiver connectors pinout is
mandatory...
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>wrote:
> In message <D1D2D82D39DD43F3A1D7AC5934BD6326@StanleyPC>, "Stanley" writes:
>
> >Ok wasn't as hard to-do as I imagined, CPU boards come out the front
> without
> >removing the receivers from the bottom of the stack. They are 2732A a set
> of
> >three f0-f2, I have a Rev G and Rev 107 I don't know why they are
> different
> >name scheme both receivers are 2100F and look the same.
>
> Hmm, interesting. Youre r.G and r.107 look a lot like each other,
> and nothing much like my r.107
>
> --
> Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
JL
Jim Lux
Sun, Mar 4, 2012 12:45 AM
On 3/3/12 4:13 PM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
Geez, I have read and I don't think it is possible to replicate the CALOC
PDP-8/E software nor it is useful to use the Austron 5000 Loran receiver,
my understanding is that it was used to control and steer the system. It
seems they were in use until the year 2000! Maybe that using MATLAB it is
possible to exploit the Austron 5000 functionality nowadays, provided that,
someway, the 12bit samples from the Austron are transferred to the PC.
Anyway to start with, at least the receiver connectors pinout is
mandatory...
There are PDP8 emulators out there. Not to mention actual
microcontrollers that implement the PDP8 instruction set (aside from the
no-doubt out of production Intersil part).
And a fair number of FPGA implementations in your choice of language.
While it might not be as scenic as that nice plastic see through housing
with all those discrete DTL circuit cards in the original straight 8. I
used a 8/i way back in the early 70s and I was bummed that it was just a
single box in the rack.
On 3/3/12 4:13 PM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
> Geez, I have read and I don't think it is possible to replicate the CALOC
> PDP-8/E software nor it is useful to use the Austron 5000 Loran receiver,
> my understanding is that it was used to control and steer the system. It
> seems they were in use until the year 2000! Maybe that using MATLAB it is
> possible to exploit the Austron 5000 functionality nowadays, provided that,
> someway, the 12bit samples from the Austron are transferred to the PC.
> Anyway to start with, at least the receiver connectors pinout is
> mandatory...
>
There are PDP8 emulators out there. Not to mention actual
microcontrollers that implement the PDP8 instruction set (aside from the
no-doubt out of production Intersil part).
And a fair number of FPGA implementations in your choice of language.
While it might not be as scenic as that nice plastic see through housing
with all those discrete DTL circuit cards in the original straight 8. I
used a 8/i way back in the early 70s and I was bummed that it was just a
single box in the rack.
BC
Bob Camp
Sun, Mar 4, 2012 12:54 AM
Hi
Ahhh... The days of toggling the boot loader in with the front panel switches. So much fin.
Bob
On Mar 3, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Jim Lux jimlux@earthlink.net wrote:
On 3/3/12 4:13 PM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
Geez, I have read and I don't think it is possible to replicate the CALOC
PDP-8/E software nor it is useful to use the Austron 5000 Loran receiver,
my understanding is that it was used to control and steer the system. It
seems they were in use until the year 2000! Maybe that using MATLAB it is
possible to exploit the Austron 5000 functionality nowadays, provided that,
someway, the 12bit samples from the Austron are transferred to the PC.
Anyway to start with, at least the receiver connectors pinout is
mandatory...
There are PDP8 emulators out there. Not to mention actual microcontrollers that implement the PDP8 instruction set (aside from the no-doubt out of production Intersil part).
And a fair number of FPGA implementations in your choice of language.
While it might not be as scenic as that nice plastic see through housing with all those discrete DTL circuit cards in the original straight 8. I used a 8/i way back in the early 70s and I was bummed that it was just a single box in the rack.
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
Hi
Ahhh... The days of toggling the boot loader in with the front panel switches. So much fin.
Bob
On Mar 3, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote:
> On 3/3/12 4:13 PM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
>> Geez, I have read and I don't think it is possible to replicate the CALOC
>> PDP-8/E software nor it is useful to use the Austron 5000 Loran receiver,
>> my understanding is that it was used to control and steer the system. It
>> seems they were in use until the year 2000! Maybe that using MATLAB it is
>> possible to exploit the Austron 5000 functionality nowadays, provided that,
>> someway, the 12bit samples from the Austron are transferred to the PC.
>> Anyway to start with, at least the receiver connectors pinout is
>> mandatory...
>>
>
> There are PDP8 emulators out there. Not to mention actual microcontrollers that implement the PDP8 instruction set (aside from the no-doubt out of production Intersil part).
>
> And a fair number of FPGA implementations in your choice of language.
>
> While it might not be as scenic as that nice plastic see through housing with all those discrete DTL circuit cards in the original straight 8. I used a 8/i way back in the early 70s and I was bummed that it was just a single box in the rack.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
DL
Don Lewis
Sun, Mar 4, 2012 1:19 AM
I still have a PDP/8 with 4k core memory out in the garage. (a jillion RTL
cards in it). It was free to e then, broken, ...I had to find t\all the bad
transistors....
During college, ..I would sit in the floor with that thing and toggle in
small programs in machine language to count up and down, seemingly
impressing everyone with the binary lights dancing on the front panel.
...this all makes me want to pull it out and 'toggle' some more, again....
-Don
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Bob Camp
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 6:55 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Questions about Austron 5000 Loran C receiver
Hi
Ahhh... The days of toggling the boot loader in with the front panel
switches. So much fin.
Bob
On Mar 3, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Jim Lux jimlux@earthlink.net wrote:
On 3/3/12 4:13 PM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
Geez, I have read and I don't think it is possible to replicate the CALOC
PDP-8/E software nor it is useful to use the Austron 5000 Loran receiver,
my understanding is that it was used to control and steer the system. It
seems they were in use until the year 2000! Maybe that using MATLAB it is
possible to exploit the Austron 5000 functionality nowadays, provided
someway, the 12bit samples from the Austron are transferred to the PC.
Anyway to start with, at least the receiver connectors pinout is
mandatory...
There are PDP8 emulators out there. Not to mention actual
microcontrollers that implement the PDP8 instruction set (aside from the
no-doubt out of production Intersil part).
And a fair number of FPGA implementations in your choice of language.
While it might not be as scenic as that nice plastic see through housing
with all those discrete DTL circuit cards in the original straight 8. I
used a 8/i way back in the early 70s and I was bummed that it was just a
single box in the rack.
and follow the instructions there.
I still have a PDP/8 with 4k core memory out in the garage. (a jillion RTL
cards in it). It was free to e then, broken, ...I had to find t\all the bad
transistors....
During college, ..I would sit in the floor with that thing and toggle in
small programs in machine language to count up and down, seemingly
impressing everyone with the binary lights dancing on the front panel.
...this all makes me want to pull it out and 'toggle' some more, again....
-Don
----------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Bob Camp
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 6:55 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Questions about Austron 5000 Loran C receiver
Hi
Ahhh... The days of toggling the boot loader in with the front panel
switches. So much fin.
Bob
On Mar 3, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote:
> On 3/3/12 4:13 PM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
>> Geez, I have read and I don't think it is possible to replicate the CALOC
>> PDP-8/E software nor it is useful to use the Austron 5000 Loran receiver,
>> my understanding is that it was used to control and steer the system. It
>> seems they were in use until the year 2000! Maybe that using MATLAB it is
>> possible to exploit the Austron 5000 functionality nowadays, provided
that,
>> someway, the 12bit samples from the Austron are transferred to the PC.
>> Anyway to start with, at least the receiver connectors pinout is
>> mandatory...
>>
>
> There are PDP8 emulators out there. Not to mention actual
microcontrollers that implement the PDP8 instruction set (aside from the
no-doubt out of production Intersil part).
>
> And a fair number of FPGA implementations in your choice of language.
>
> While it might not be as scenic as that nice plastic see through housing
with all those discrete DTL circuit cards in the original straight 8. I
used a 8/i way back in the early 70s and I was bummed that it was just a
single box in the rack.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
BC
Bob Camp
Sun, Mar 4, 2012 1:55 AM
Hi
Time to get out the paper tape for 4K Focal and do some code...
Bob
On Mar 3, 2012, at 8:19 PM, "Don Lewis" dlewis6767@austin.rr.com wrote:
I still have a PDP/8 with 4k core memory out in the garage. (a jillion RTL
cards in it). It was free to e then, broken, ...I had to find t\all the bad
transistors....
During college, ..I would sit in the floor with that thing and toggle in
small programs in machine language to count up and down, seemingly
impressing everyone with the binary lights dancing on the front panel.
...this all makes me want to pull it out and 'toggle' some more, again....
-Don
-----Original Message-----
From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Bob Camp
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 6:55 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Questions about Austron 5000 Loran C receiver
Hi
Ahhh... The days of toggling the boot loader in with the front panel
switches. So much fin.
Bob
On Mar 3, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Jim Lux jimlux@earthlink.net wrote:
On 3/3/12 4:13 PM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
Geez, I have read and I don't think it is possible to replicate the CALOC
PDP-8/E software nor it is useful to use the Austron 5000 Loran receiver,
my understanding is that it was used to control and steer the system. It
seems they were in use until the year 2000! Maybe that using MATLAB it is
possible to exploit the Austron 5000 functionality nowadays, provided
someway, the 12bit samples from the Austron are transferred to the PC.
Anyway to start with, at least the receiver connectors pinout is
mandatory...
There are PDP8 emulators out there. Not to mention actual
microcontrollers that implement the PDP8 instruction set (aside from the
no-doubt out of production Intersil part).
And a fair number of FPGA implementations in your choice of language.
While it might not be as scenic as that nice plastic see through housing
with all those discrete DTL circuit cards in the original straight 8. I
used a 8/i way back in the early 70s and I was bummed that it was just a
single box in the rack.
and follow the instructions there.
Hi
Time to get out the paper tape for 4K Focal and do some code...
Bob
On Mar 3, 2012, at 8:19 PM, "Don Lewis" <dlewis6767@austin.rr.com> wrote:
> I still have a PDP/8 with 4k core memory out in the garage. (a jillion RTL
> cards in it). It was free to e then, broken, ...I had to find t\all the bad
> transistors....
>
> During college, ..I would sit in the floor with that thing and toggle in
> small programs in machine language to count up and down, seemingly
> impressing everyone with the binary lights dancing on the front panel.
>
> ...this all makes me want to pull it out and 'toggle' some more, again....
>
> -Don
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: time-nuts-bounces@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-bounces@febo.com] On
> Behalf Of Bob Camp
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 6:55 PM
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Questions about Austron 5000 Loran C receiver
>
> Hi
>
> Ahhh... The days of toggling the boot loader in with the front panel
> switches. So much fin.
>
> Bob
>
>
>
> On Mar 3, 2012, at 7:45 PM, Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> On 3/3/12 4:13 PM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
>>> Geez, I have read and I don't think it is possible to replicate the CALOC
>>> PDP-8/E software nor it is useful to use the Austron 5000 Loran receiver,
>>> my understanding is that it was used to control and steer the system. It
>>> seems they were in use until the year 2000! Maybe that using MATLAB it is
>>> possible to exploit the Austron 5000 functionality nowadays, provided
> that,
>>> someway, the 12bit samples from the Austron are transferred to the PC.
>>> Anyway to start with, at least the receiver connectors pinout is
>>> mandatory...
>>>
>>
>> There are PDP8 emulators out there. Not to mention actual
> microcontrollers that implement the PDP8 instruction set (aside from the
> no-doubt out of production Intersil part).
>>
>> And a fair number of FPGA implementations in your choice of language.
>>
>> While it might not be as scenic as that nice plastic see through housing
> with all those discrete DTL circuit cards in the original straight 8. I
> used a 8/i way back in the early 70s and I was bummed that it was just a
> single box in the rack.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
>> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>> and follow the instructions there.
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to
> https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.