trawlers@lists.trawlering.com

TRAWLERS & TRAWLERING LIST

View all threads

The Coast Guard and Probable Cause

SD
Steven Dubnoff
Sat, Jun 25, 2005 6:58 PM

There was a recent thread on this on rec.boats.cruising which included a
link to the following article:

     http://www.jcrobbins.com/documents/boarding.htm

which, I think, is an interesting and informed discussion of the subject.

Best,

Steve

Steve Dubnoff
1966 Willard Pilothouse
www.mvnereid.com
sdubnoff@circlesys.com

There was a recent thread on this on rec.boats.cruising which included a link to the following article: http://www.jcrobbins.com/documents/boarding.htm which, I think, is an interesting and informed discussion of the subject. Best, Steve Steve Dubnoff 1966 Willard Pilothouse www.mvnereid.com sdubnoff@circlesys.com
HW
Henry Wing
Sat, Jun 25, 2005 7:35 PM

Being a retired police detective, I can give you the view from the other
side of the coin. When you come in contact with the U. S. Coast Guard, or
any toher law wnforcement authority. you know exactly who you're dealing
with. You can prety well determine what they may do and you can pretty much
be not afraid.(Unless you've something to hide.) They, however, don't know
you. They don't know where you came from or where you're going or what
you're doing. They don't know if you have some reason to harm or resist them
or something to hide and therefore they have to maintain a certain level of
defensive posture because they really never know what to expect.
They can and have boarded me, having been a small offshore boat operator in
southwest Florida. Not only them, but several branches of state law
enforcement and three local agencies in the Ft.Myers area. I have never had
a bad experience with any of them. They have the right to board, in spite of
any lay person's interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. They can board my
vessel every day if they want to, if it means they may possibly put some
creep bent on destruction or distribution of illegal drugs or material out
of business or better yet, in jail. Also, their safety checks protect not
only the people on the vessel being checked but anyone who may become
involved in coming to the rescue of those people. Safety checks can save
your life.
Next time you see any form of law enforcement authority approaching you,
try to remember, they don't know you.
Henry
"Wilhelmina"

On 6/25/05, Steven Dubnoff sdubnoff@circlesys.com wrote:

There was a recent thread on this on rec.boats.cruising which included a
link to the following article:

http://www.jcrobbins.com/documents/boarding.htm

which, I think, is an interesting and informed discussion of the subject.

Best,

Steve

Steve Dubnoff
1966 Willard Pilothouse
www.mvnereid.com http://www.mvnereid.com
sdubnoff@circlesys.com


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering

To unsubscribe send email to
trawlers-and-trawlering-request@lists.samurai.com with the word
UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message.

Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World
Productions. Unauthorized use is prohibited.

Being a retired police detective, I can give you the view from the other side of the coin. When you come in contact with the U. S. Coast Guard, or any toher law wnforcement authority. you know exactly who you're dealing with. You can prety well determine what they may do and you can pretty much be not afraid.(Unless you've something to hide.) They, however, don't know you. They don't know where you came from or where you're going or what you're doing. They don't know if you have some reason to harm or resist them or something to hide and therefore they have to maintain a certain level of defensive posture because they really never know what to expect. They can and have boarded me, having been a small offshore boat operator in southwest Florida. Not only them, but several branches of state law enforcement and three local agencies in the Ft.Myers area. I have never had a bad experience with any of them. They have the right to board, in spite of any lay person's interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. They can board my vessel every day if they want to, if it means they may possibly put some creep bent on destruction or distribution of illegal drugs or material out of business or better yet, in jail. Also, their safety checks protect not only the people on the vessel being checked but anyone who may become involved in coming to the rescue of those people. Safety checks can save your life. Next time you see any form of law enforcement authority approaching you, try to remember, they don't know you. Henry "Wilhelmina" On 6/25/05, Steven Dubnoff <sdubnoff@circlesys.com> wrote: > > There was a recent thread on this on rec.boats.cruising which included a > link to the following article: > > http://www.jcrobbins.com/documents/boarding.htm > > which, I think, is an interesting and informed discussion of the subject. > > Best, > > Steve > > > > Steve Dubnoff > 1966 Willard Pilothouse > www.mvnereid.com <http://www.mvnereid.com> > sdubnoff@circlesys.com > _______________________________________________ > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering > > To unsubscribe send email to > trawlers-and-trawlering-request@lists.samurai.com with the word > UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message. > > Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World > Productions. Unauthorized use is prohibited.
RR
Ron Rogers
Sat, Jun 25, 2005 8:39 PM

Post 9/11, forget about it. The USCG has had this authority since "rum
runner" days and like so many things human, allot depends upon your attitude
and that of the boarding officer.

Larger cutters may have a Border/Customs agent aboard whose authority
exceeds that of the USCG. So this is no time to split hairs as an amateur
constitutional lawyer. I assure you that any admiralty lawyer whose boat was
boarded would fully comply with all instructions. Henry could probably tell
us about people who kindle his interest by instinct. By the same token, it
is in our interest to make official boarders feel welcome and to put out the
right feramones. Thank Heavens I have two Golden Retrievers who do this
automatically.

At the present time, it's "not about you," it's about the situation we find
this nation in. Unfortunately, the war on terror is unlike WWII with
well-defined, heinous enemies. Unlike WWII, we are not all mentally,
emotionally, and physically committed to the effort. Besides, this "war"
will be going on for far longer than Americans have displayed a tolerance
for - we Americans like quick results and we are not going to get them.
Superfically, Afghanistan was a good, American, TV war. However, it is not
over there either - not by a long shot.

So settle back and work on being welcoming and cooperative because that's
what works for all involved in this effort.

Ron Rogers

Post 9/11, forget about it. The USCG has had this authority since "rum runner" days and like so many things human, allot depends upon your attitude and that of the boarding officer. Larger cutters may have a Border/Customs agent aboard whose authority exceeds that of the USCG. So this is no time to split hairs as an amateur constitutional lawyer. I assure you that any admiralty lawyer whose boat was boarded would fully comply with all instructions. Henry could probably tell us about people who kindle his interest by instinct. By the same token, it is in our interest to make official boarders feel welcome and to put out the right feramones. Thank Heavens I have two Golden Retrievers who do this automatically. At the present time, it's "not about you," it's about the situation we find this nation in. Unfortunately, the war on terror is unlike WWII with well-defined, heinous enemies. Unlike WWII, we are not all mentally, emotionally, and physically committed to the effort. Besides, this "war" will be going on for far longer than Americans have displayed a tolerance for - we Americans like quick results and we are not going to get them. Superfically, Afghanistan was a good, American, TV war. However, it is not over there either - not by a long shot. So settle back and work on being welcoming and cooperative because that's what works for all involved in this effort. Ron Rogers
PM
patrick moran
Sat, Jun 25, 2005 9:42 PM

As commented before, USCG regulations are largely based on UK 18thC Maritime
Law.  HM Customs and excise can enter any premises, including private boats,
without warrents or any authority other than they are the governments excise
gatherers.  You will probably find USCG have they same powers particularly
if they have an authorised Customs officer with them.  Since the start of
the latest IRA troubles, ie., 35 years, HM Customs and Excise have led the
war against terrorism in British waters, any and every small craft making a
coastal transit could expect to be boarded, at sea or in the first port of
call and later ports.  They are always very polite and professional and I am
glad they are on our side.  One early benefit was the Drug trade was nearly
halted untill the runners found new routes, mainly by air and throught he
big containor ships.  When being questioned by HM Customs it is frightening
just how much they know about us.

From: "Ron Rogers" rcrogers6@kennett.net
To: trawlers-and-trawlering@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: T&T: The Coast Guard and Probable Cause
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:39:50 -0400

Post 9/11, forget about it. The USCG has had this authority since "rum
runner" days and like so many things human, allot depends upon your
attitude
and that of the boarding officer.

Larger cutters may have a Border/Customs agent aboard whose authority
exceeds that of the USCG. So this is no time to split hairs as an amateur
constitutional lawyer. I assure you that any admiralty lawyer whose boat
was
boarded would fully comply with all instructions. Henry could probably tell
us about people who kindle his interest by instinct. By the same token, it
is in our interest to make official boarders feel welcome and to put out
the
right feramones. Thank Heavens I have two Golden Retrievers who do this
automatically.

At the present time, it's "not about you," it's about the situation we find
this nation in. Unfortunately, the war on terror is unlike WWII with
well-defined, heinous enemies. Unlike WWII, we are not all mentally,
emotionally, and physically committed to the effort. Besides, this "war"
will be going on for far longer than Americans have displayed a tolerance
for - we Americans like quick results and we are not going to get them.
Superfically, Afghanistan was a good, American, TV war. However, it is not
over there either - not by a long shot.

So settle back and work on being welcoming and cooperative because that's
what works for all involved in this effort.

Ron Rogers


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering

To unsubscribe send email to
trawlers-and-trawlering-request@lists.samurai.com with the word
UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message.

Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World
Productions. Unauthorized use is prohibited.


It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger 7.0 today!
http://messenger.msn.co.uk

As commented before, USCG regulations are largely based on UK 18thC Maritime Law. HM Customs and excise can enter any premises, including private boats, without warrents or any authority other than they are the governments excise gatherers. You will probably find USCG have they same powers particularly if they have an authorised Customs officer with them. Since the start of the latest IRA troubles, ie., 35 years, HM Customs and Excise have led the war against terrorism in British waters, any and every small craft making a coastal transit could expect to be boarded, at sea or in the first port of call and later ports. They are always very polite and professional and I am glad they are on our side. One early benefit was the Drug trade was nearly halted untill the runners found new routes, mainly by air and throught he big containor ships. When being questioned by HM Customs it is frightening just how much they know about us. >From: "Ron Rogers" <rcrogers6@kennett.net> >To: <trawlers-and-trawlering@lists.samurai.com> >Subject: Re: T&T: The Coast Guard and Probable Cause >Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:39:50 -0400 > >Post 9/11, forget about it. The USCG has had this authority since "rum >runner" days and like so many things human, allot depends upon your >attitude >and that of the boarding officer. > >Larger cutters may have a Border/Customs agent aboard whose authority >exceeds that of the USCG. So this is no time to split hairs as an amateur >constitutional lawyer. I assure you that any admiralty lawyer whose boat >was >boarded would fully comply with all instructions. Henry could probably tell >us about people who kindle his interest by instinct. By the same token, it >is in our interest to make official boarders feel welcome and to put out >the >right feramones. Thank Heavens I have two Golden Retrievers who do this >automatically. > >At the present time, it's "not about you," it's about the situation we find >this nation in. Unfortunately, the war on terror is unlike WWII with >well-defined, heinous enemies. Unlike WWII, we are not all mentally, >emotionally, and physically committed to the effort. Besides, this "war" >will be going on for far longer than Americans have displayed a tolerance >for - we Americans like quick results and we are not going to get them. >Superfically, Afghanistan was a good, American, TV war. However, it is not >over there either - not by a long shot. > >So settle back and work on being welcoming and cooperative because that's >what works for all involved in this effort. > >Ron Rogers >_______________________________________________ >http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering > >To unsubscribe send email to >trawlers-and-trawlering-request@lists.samurai.com with the word >UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message. > >Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World >Productions. Unauthorized use is prohibited. _________________________________________________________________ It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger 7.0 today! http://messenger.msn.co.uk
PM
patrick moran
Sat, Jun 25, 2005 9:55 PM

As commented before, USCG regulations are largely based on UK 18thC Maritime
Law.  HM Customs and excise can enter any premises, including private boats,
without warrents or any authority other than they are the governments excise
gatherers.  You will probably find USCG have they same powers particularly
if they have an authorised Customs officer with them. Your coastal
protection people will have had these powers since pre War of Independence
days and will have carried them on.  Since the start of the latest IRA
troubles, ie., 35 years, HM Customs and Excise have led the
war against terrorism in British waters, any and every small craft making a
coastal transit could expect to be boarded, at sea or in the first port of
call and later ports.  They are always very polite and professional and I am
glad they are on our side.  One early benefit was the Drug trade was nearly
halted untill the runners found new routes, mainly by air and throught he
big containor ships.  When being questioned by HM Customs it is frightening
just how much they know about us.

From: "Ron Rogers" rcrogers6@kennett.net
To: trawlers-and-trawlering@lists.samurai.com
Subject: Re: T&T: The Coast Guard and Probable Cause
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:39:50 -0400

Post 9/11, forget about it. The USCG has had this authority since "rum
runner" days and like so many things human, allot depends upon your
attitude
and that of the boarding officer.

Larger cutters may have a Border/Customs agent aboard whose authority
exceeds that of the USCG. So this is no time to split hairs as an amateur
constitutional lawyer. I assure you that any admiralty lawyer whose boat
was
boarded would fully comply with all instructions. Henry could probably tell
us about people who kindle his interest by instinct. By the same token, it
is in our interest to make official boarders feel welcome and to put out
the
right feramones. Thank Heavens I have two Golden Retrievers who do this
automatically.

At the present time, it's "not about you," it's about the situation we find
this nation in. Unfortunately, the war on terror is unlike WWII with
well-defined, heinous enemies. Unlike WWII, we are not all mentally,
emotionally, and physically committed to the effort. Besides, this "war"
will be going on for far longer than Americans have displayed a tolerance
for - we Americans like quick results and we are not going to get them.
Superfically, Afghanistan was a good, American, TV war. However, it is not
over there either - not by a long shot.

So settle back and work on being welcoming and cooperative because that's
what works for all involved in this effort.

Ron Rogers


http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering

To unsubscribe send email to
trawlers-and-trawlering-request@lists.samurai.com with the word
UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message.

Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World
Productions. Unauthorized use is prohibited.

As commented before, USCG regulations are largely based on UK 18thC Maritime Law. HM Customs and excise can enter any premises, including private boats, without warrents or any authority other than they are the governments excise gatherers. You will probably find USCG have they same powers particularly if they have an authorised Customs officer with them. Your coastal protection people will have had these powers since pre War of Independence days and will have carried them on. Since the start of the latest IRA troubles, ie., 35 years, HM Customs and Excise have led the war against terrorism in British waters, any and every small craft making a coastal transit could expect to be boarded, at sea or in the first port of call and later ports. They are always very polite and professional and I am glad they are on our side. One early benefit was the Drug trade was nearly halted untill the runners found new routes, mainly by air and throught he big containor ships. When being questioned by HM Customs it is frightening just how much they know about us. >From: "Ron Rogers" <rcrogers6@kennett.net> >To: <trawlers-and-trawlering@lists.samurai.com> >Subject: Re: T&T: The Coast Guard and Probable Cause >Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:39:50 -0400 > >Post 9/11, forget about it. The USCG has had this authority since "rum >runner" days and like so many things human, allot depends upon your >attitude >and that of the boarding officer. > >Larger cutters may have a Border/Customs agent aboard whose authority >exceeds that of the USCG. So this is no time to split hairs as an amateur >constitutional lawyer. I assure you that any admiralty lawyer whose boat >was >boarded would fully comply with all instructions. Henry could probably tell >us about people who kindle his interest by instinct. By the same token, it >is in our interest to make official boarders feel welcome and to put out >the >right feramones. Thank Heavens I have two Golden Retrievers who do this >automatically. > >At the present time, it's "not about you," it's about the situation we find >this nation in. Unfortunately, the war on terror is unlike WWII with >well-defined, heinous enemies. Unlike WWII, we are not all mentally, >emotionally, and physically committed to the effort. Besides, this "war" >will be going on for far longer than Americans have displayed a tolerance >for - we Americans like quick results and we are not going to get them. >Superfically, Afghanistan was a good, American, TV war. However, it is not >over there either - not by a long shot. > >So settle back and work on being welcoming and cooperative because that's >what works for all involved in this effort. > >Ron Rogers >_______________________________________________ >http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/trawlers-and-trawlering > >To unsubscribe send email to >trawlers-and-trawlering-request@lists.samurai.com with the word >UNSUBSCRIBE and nothing else in the subject or body of the message. > >Trawlers & Trawlering and T&T are trademarks of Water World >Productions. Unauthorized use is prohibited. http://messenger.msn.co.uk