passagemaking@lists.trawlering.com

Passagemaking Under Power List

View all threads

sue 16

T
thataway4@cox.net
Mon, Dec 24, 2007 11:09 PM

Send Passagemaking-Under-Power mailing list submissions to
passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
passagemaking-under-power-owner@lists.samurai.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Passagemaking-Under-Power digest..."

Today's Topics:

1. chart lists (Truelove39@aol.com)
2. Territorial waters and innocent passage (Scott E. Bulger)
3. Admirality Law links (Scott E. Bulger)
4. Re: Territorial waters and innocent passage (Dave Cooper)

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 07:57:38 EST
From: Truelove39@aol.com
Subject: [PUP] chart lists
To: scottebulger@gmail.com
Cc: passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com
Message-ID: bbe.1dfe20c0.349fb542@aol.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hi  Scott:

Greetings  from rainy Trinidad!

To  Dave's and Bob's excellent posts, I might add:

Sailing  Directions and Coast Pilots are usually more up-to-date than most
charts and I  would certainly have them aboard, as well as a Reeds Caribbean
Almanac.

I  would look into NIMA (DMA) charts, too.

I  don't recall what your plans are exactly, but if you venture east of a
line from  the west end of PR to the Columbia/Venezuela border, get the
Imray-Iolaire  charts which have the benefit of Don Street's years of experience on
them.

If  you haven't already done so, I suggest you join the SSCA. There are
hundreds of members cruising and their reports are up-to-date and are  published
in the Bulletin; you can ask specific questions on the web site  boards; they
have  cruising stations in most foreign countries and can provide local info
via email  before you get there.

Are  you set up to receive Inmarsat-C SafeNet warnings and other info? We
have a TT-3022D Capsat Fisheries unit on Seahorse that  automatically receives,
worldwide (you select the area), distress  messages,  navigational warnings
(Research vessels towing long arrays,  pirate activity, recent wrecks, navaids
extinguished, missing, etc.) as well  as NAVTEX. It also tracks your boat and
has a feature to write and  send a customized distress message. These services
are free - all you need  is the unit. See  this page for more info on SafeNet:
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/gmdss/snet.htm
(http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/gmdss/snet.htm)

And when you get to the Caribbean, remember Don Street's famous words:  "If
you can see an island in the Bahamas, you're too close!"

No connection.

Happy cruising and Happy Holidays!

Regards,

John & Penny
aboard "Truelove" in Trinidad

Dave provides sage advice, all of which I will follow to a  T.

I visited a boat here in LP and looked at charts that Maptech had  provided
in the last year or two and as Dave has suggested they are the  same.  So
I've ordered a set of charts for the E side of CA and will  stay with what I
have for the W.

Regarding all of Daves advice, I  assure you, even though Ive invested in a
fair amount of technology to aid my  navigation, I take everything he says as
golden.  I don't want these  charts so I can set my autopilot on a course and
go to sleep.  I want  them so I have as much information at my disposal as I
could possibly  use.  I also have the paper charts, which I even made sure
were stacked  in order of ports passed along the way.

**************************************See AOL's top rated recipes
(http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004)


Message: 2
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 07:12:56 -0800
From: "Scott E. Bulger" scottebulger@gmail.com
Subject: [PUP] Territorial waters and innocent passage
To: "'Passagemaking Under Power List'"
passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com
Message-ID: 000b01c84576$4e889310$eb99b930$@com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Researching our trip North from the Panama Canal I came across a restriction
in my insurance.  The countries of Columbia (except offshore islands),
Nicaragua and Cuba are restricted from coverage.  I can neither sail through
or to them or my policy is in breech (until 24hours after leaving).  I found
the internationally recognized territorial limit is 12 miles.  I also found
language in a reference to Admiralty Law that exempted the enforcement of
restrictions against territorial limits for "Innocent Passage"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innocent_passage

I may not quite have phrased the above correctly, but the net of this (to my
understanding) is I can transit the international waters of a country as
long as I don't impeded the countries peace, security or good order.  I also
believe I can anchor if necessary to maintain safety and security of the
vessel.

I don't think this would allow me to go to Cuba, but it would allow me to
worry less about standing off the country as we go by on the way to Key
West.  I still need to verify this with Al Golden, but I thought the
research and especially the wiki pages on innocent passage and admiralty law
might be of interest to others.

An idea I had for a great book (and encourage Capt. Mike Maurice to write)
is a treatment of what it means to be the Captain of a private yacht
involved in international travel.  I asked Mike if I could marry someone on
my boat and he pondered the question for some time.  I wonder how many other
"technicalities" there are out there that are not obvious to a guy like me
that's too busy worrying about keeping his boat running to be fully informed
of the law (law evolved over centuries of boats plying the oceans of the
world).  I do think there is a book in there somewhere!

Best wishes to all of you for a joyous holiday (in my case Christmas) and a
healthy and safe New Year!

Scott and Marian Bulger, Alanui, N40II, Seattle WA

Currently in Puerto Vallarta (not La Paz!) Mexico


Message: 3
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 07:28:17 -0800
From: "Scott E. Bulger" scottebulger@gmail.com
Subject: [PUP] Admirality Law links
To: "'Passagemaking Under Power List'"
passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com
Message-ID: 001001c84578$73556ef0$5a004cd0$@com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Wow!

http://www.admiraltylawguide.com/

FYI

Scott Bulger, Alanui, N40II, Seattle WA


Message: 4
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:09:33 -0400
From: "Dave Cooper" swansong@gmn-usa.com
Subject: Re: [PUP] Territorial waters and innocent passage
To: "'Passagemaking Under Power List'"
passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com
Message-ID: 000901c84597$5b865e50$3401a8c0@Dell
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

<Scott wrote in part: The countries of Columbia (except offshore islands),
Nicaragua and Cuba are restricted from coverage.>

The insurance companies are in general using outdated info to cover their
exposure, IMHO. Columbia for at least the past year hasn't had any instance
of armed aggression against yachts or the "pirating" of them. Wish we could
say that of the rest of the Caribbean.

Passing thru territorial waters may or may not be considered OK by a
particular country. It is up to them to define what they consider "innocent
passage". Those run by more authoritarian types can be a problem. Quite
often a new election, a new Port Commandant(Captain in some areas) or muscle
flexing can lead to easier or tighter restrictions.

As John said earlier the SSB cruising nets, the SCCA books and in some cases
the VHF nets can offer the most up to date information re a specific place
or action. OTOH, often this information needs to be carefully filtered by
the listener.

I would ask Al to specifically define what your insurance says/means for any
passage that you feel might have a grey area re your coverage.

This is but one more of the reasons we choose self insurance. Our
destinations are not limited by some underwriter sitting at a map of the
world wondering where he can reduce or eliminate coverage without cutting
into the revenue stream of writing policies.

We have been to both Cuba and Columbia and will be back cruising in Columbia
next fall/winter if all goes well. Perhaps Cuba too after Jan 09 depending
on the US election results.

We do have liability insurance and thru Al.

As always YMMV......

Dave & Nancy
Swan Song
Roughwater 58



Passagemaking-Under-Power Mailing List

End of Passagemaking-Under-Power Digest, Vol 37, Issue 16


---- passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com wrote: > Send Passagemaking-Under-Power mailing list submissions to > passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.samurai.com/mailman/listinfo/passagemaking-under-power > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > passagemaking-under-power-request@lists.samurai.com > > You can reach the person managing the list at > passagemaking-under-power-owner@lists.samurai.com > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Passagemaking-Under-Power digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. chart lists (Truelove39@aol.com) > 2. Territorial waters and innocent passage (Scott E. Bulger) > 3. Admirality Law links (Scott E. Bulger) > 4. Re: Territorial waters and innocent passage (Dave Cooper) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 07:57:38 EST > From: Truelove39@aol.com > Subject: [PUP] chart lists > To: scottebulger@gmail.com > Cc: passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com > Message-ID: <bbe.1dfe20c0.349fb542@aol.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hi Scott: > > Greetings from rainy Trinidad! > > To Dave's and Bob's excellent posts, I might add: > > Sailing Directions and Coast Pilots are usually more up-to-date than most > charts and I would certainly have them aboard, as well as a Reeds Caribbean > Almanac. > > I would look into NIMA (DMA) charts, too. > > I don't recall what your plans are exactly, but if you venture east of a > line from the west end of PR to the Columbia/Venezuela border, get the > Imray-Iolaire charts which have the benefit of Don Street's years of experience on > them. > > If you haven't already done so, I suggest you join the SSCA. There are > hundreds of members cruising and their reports are up-to-date and are published > in the Bulletin; you can ask specific questions on the web site boards; they > have cruising stations in most foreign countries and can provide local info > via email before you get there. > > Are you set up to receive Inmarsat-C SafeNet warnings and other info? We > have a TT-3022D Capsat Fisheries unit on Seahorse that automatically receives, > worldwide (you select the area), distress messages, navigational warnings > (Research vessels towing long arrays, pirate activity, recent wrecks, navaids > extinguished, missing, etc.) as well as NAVTEX. It also tracks your boat and > has a feature to write and send a customized distress message. These services > are free - all you need is the unit. See this page for more info on SafeNet: > _http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/gmdss/snet.htm_ > (http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/gmdss/snet.htm) > > And when you get to the Caribbean, remember Don Street's famous words: "If > you can see an island in the Bahamas, you're too close!" > > No connection. > > Happy cruising and Happy Holidays! > > Regards, > > John & Penny > aboard "Truelove" in Trinidad > > > > Dave provides sage advice, all of which I will follow to a T. > > I visited a boat here in LP and looked at charts that Maptech had provided > in the last year or two and as Dave has suggested they are the same. So > I've ordered a set of charts for the E side of CA and will stay with what I > have for the W. > > Regarding all of Daves advice, I assure you, even though Ive invested in a > fair amount of technology to aid my navigation, I take everything he says as > golden. I don't want these charts so I can set my autopilot on a course and > go to sleep. I want them so I have as much information at my disposal as I > could possibly use. I also have the paper charts, which I even made sure > were stacked in order of ports passed along the way. > > > > > > > > **************************************See AOL's top rated recipes > (http://food.aol.com/top-rated-recipes?NCID=aoltop00030000000004) > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 07:12:56 -0800 > From: "Scott E. Bulger" <scottebulger@gmail.com> > Subject: [PUP] Territorial waters and innocent passage > To: "'Passagemaking Under Power List'" > <passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com> > Message-ID: <000b01c84576$4e889310$eb99b930$@com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Researching our trip North from the Panama Canal I came across a restriction > in my insurance. The countries of Columbia (except offshore islands), > Nicaragua and Cuba are restricted from coverage. I can neither sail through > or to them or my policy is in breech (until 24hours after leaving). I found > the internationally recognized territorial limit is 12 miles. I also found > language in a reference to Admiralty Law that exempted the enforcement of > restrictions against territorial limits for "Innocent Passage" > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Innocent_passage > > > > I may not quite have phrased the above correctly, but the net of this (to my > understanding) is I can transit the international waters of a country as > long as I don't impeded the countries peace, security or good order. I also > believe I can anchor if necessary to maintain safety and security of the > vessel. > > > > I don't think this would allow me to go to Cuba, but it would allow me to > worry less about standing off the country as we go by on the way to Key > West. I still need to verify this with Al Golden, but I thought the > research and especially the wiki pages on innocent passage and admiralty law > might be of interest to others. > > > > An idea I had for a great book (and encourage Capt. Mike Maurice to write) > is a treatment of what it means to be the Captain of a private yacht > involved in international travel. I asked Mike if I could marry someone on > my boat and he pondered the question for some time. I wonder how many other > "technicalities" there are out there that are not obvious to a guy like me > that's too busy worrying about keeping his boat running to be fully informed > of the law (law evolved over centuries of boats plying the oceans of the > world). I do think there is a book in there somewhere! > > > > Best wishes to all of you for a joyous holiday (in my case Christmas) and a > healthy and safe New Year! > > > > Scott and Marian Bulger, Alanui, N40II, Seattle WA > > Currently in Puerto Vallarta (not La Paz!) Mexico > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 07:28:17 -0800 > From: "Scott E. Bulger" <scottebulger@gmail.com> > Subject: [PUP] Admirality Law links > To: "'Passagemaking Under Power List'" > <passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com> > Message-ID: <001001c84578$73556ef0$5a004cd0$@com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Wow! > > > > http://www.admiraltylawguide.com/ > > > > FYI > > > > Scott Bulger, Alanui, N40II, Seattle WA > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:09:33 -0400 > From: "Dave Cooper" <swansong@gmn-usa.com> > Subject: Re: [PUP] Territorial waters and innocent passage > To: "'Passagemaking Under Power List'" > <passagemaking-under-power@lists.samurai.com> > Message-ID: <000901c84597$5b865e50$3401a8c0@Dell> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > <Scott wrote in part: The countries of Columbia (except offshore islands), > Nicaragua and Cuba are restricted from coverage.> > > The insurance companies are in general using outdated info to cover their > exposure, IMHO. Columbia for at least the past year hasn't had any instance > of armed aggression against yachts or the "pirating" of them. Wish we could > say that of the rest of the Caribbean. > > Passing thru territorial waters may or may not be considered OK by a > particular country. It is up to them to define what they consider "innocent > passage". Those run by more authoritarian types can be a problem. Quite > often a new election, a new Port Commandant(Captain in some areas) or muscle > flexing can lead to easier or tighter restrictions. > > As John said earlier the SSB cruising nets, the SCCA books and in some cases > the VHF nets can offer the most up to date information re a specific place > or action. OTOH, often this information needs to be carefully filtered by > the listener. > > I would ask Al to specifically define what your insurance says/means for any > passage that you feel might have a grey area re your coverage. > > This is but one more of the reasons we choose self insurance. Our > destinations are not limited by some underwriter sitting at a map of the > world wondering where he can reduce or eliminate coverage without cutting > into the revenue stream of writing policies. > > We have been to both Cuba and Columbia and will be back cruising in Columbia > next fall/winter if all goes well. Perhaps Cuba too after Jan 09 depending > on the US election results. > > We do have liability insurance and thru Al. > > As always YMMV...... > > > Dave & Nancy > Swan Song > Roughwater 58 > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Passagemaking-Under-Power Mailing List > > End of Passagemaking-Under-Power Digest, Vol 37, Issue 16 > *********************************************************