Hi All; I need some idea (although I have some) about making the connection reliable between peers. There are some open source libraries out there like enet rrunning on UDP. But the libraries in general, opens a server and client on UDP and sends the data reliably through the UDP channel. But ICE transport or STUN (which are very useful for traversing NATs) gives us a pair of callbacks as you know, not sockets. So what would your suggestion to integrate UDP based implementation to callback ones as it is in ICE, STUN or TURN. Thanks in advance. -- Kabil Akpınar

I am looking for such solution too. I think we maybe need to port enet or other rudp libs. 2010/11/14 Kabil Akpınar <kabilakpinar@gmail.com>: > Hi All; > I need some idea (although I have some) about making the connection reliable > between peers. There are some open source libraries out there like enet > rrunning on UDP. But the libraries in general, opens a server and client on > UDP and sends the data reliably through the UDP channel. But ICE transport > or STUN (which are very useful for traversing NATs) gives us a pair of > callbacks as you know, not sockets. > So what would your suggestion to integrate UDP based implementation to > callback ones as it is in ICE, STUN or TURN. > Thanks in advance. > > -- > Kabil Akpınar > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > >

in fact, I have already started porting enet with callbacks... I will let you know when I am finished, probably tomorrow, if everything goes well. And I will suggest you to port RUDP if you can, by the way, which rudp lib do you mean? 2010/11/24 bo shi <cnshibo@gmail.com> > I am looking for such solution too. > I think we maybe need to port enet or other rudp libs. > > 2010/11/14 Kabil Akpınar <kabilakpinar@gmail.com>: > > Hi All; > > I need some idea (although I have some) about making the > connection reliable > > between peers. There are some open source libraries out there like enet > > rrunning on UDP. But the libraries in general, opens a server and client > on > > UDP and sends the data reliably through the UDP channel. But ICE > transport > > or STUN (which are very useful for traversing NATs) gives us a pair of > > callbacks as you know, not sockets. > > So what would your suggestion to integrate UDP based implementation to > > callback ones as it is in ICE, STUN or TURN. > > Thanks in advance. > > > > -- > > Kabil Akpınar > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > > > pjsip mailing list > > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > -- Kabil Akpınar

I only know libnice implement rudp in c, but based on glib. udt maybe another selection, but the interface is not very fit for pjlib. waiting good news from you. 2010/11/25 Kabil Akpınar <kabilakpinar@gmail.com>: > in fact, I have already started porting enet with callbacks... I will let > you know when I am finished, probably tomorrow, if everything goes well. > And I will suggest you to port RUDP if you can, by the way, which rudp lib > do you mean? > > 2010/11/24 bo shi <cnshibo@gmail.com> >> >> I am looking for such solution too. >> I think we maybe need to port enet or other rudp libs. >> >> 2010/11/14 Kabil Akpınar <kabilakpinar@gmail.com>: >> > Hi All; >> > I need some idea (although I have some) about making the >> > connection reliable >> > between peers. There are some open source libraries out there like enet >> > rrunning on UDP. But the libraries in general, opens a server and client >> > on >> > UDP and sends the data reliably through the UDP channel. But ICE >> > transport >> > or STUN (which are very useful for traversing NATs) gives us a pair of >> > callbacks as you know, not sockets. >> > So what would your suggestion to integrate UDP based implementation to >> > callback ones as it is in ICE, STUN or TURN. >> > Thanks in advance. >> > >> > -- >> > Kabil Akpınar >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> > >> > pjsip mailing list >> > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> pjsip mailing list >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > > > -- > Kabil Akpınar > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > >

2010/11/25 bo shi <cnshibo@gmail.com> > I only know libnice implement rudp in c, but based on glib. > udt maybe another selection, but the interface is not very fit for pjlib. > Where exactly is rudp in libnice, can you point it? > waiting good news from you. Once I am finished I will send you the integrated code also. So we can together evaluate the behaviour. > 2010/11/25 Kabil Akpınar <kabilakpinar@gmail.com>: > > in fact, I have already started porting enet with callbacks... I will let > > you know when I am finished, probably tomorrow, if everything goes well. > > And I will suggest you to port RUDP if you can, by the way, which rudp > lib > > do you mean? > > > > 2010/11/24 bo shi <cnshibo@gmail.com> > >> > >> I am looking for such solution too. > >> I think we maybe need to port enet or other rudp libs. > >> > >> 2010/11/14 Kabil Akpınar <kabilakpinar@gmail.com>: > >> > Hi All; > >> > I need some idea (although I have some) about making the > >> > connection reliable > >> > between peers. There are some open source libraries out there like > enet > >> > rrunning on UDP. But the libraries in general, opens a server and > client > >> > on > >> > UDP and sends the data reliably through the UDP channel. But ICE > >> > transport > >> > or STUN (which are very useful for traversing NATs) gives us a pair of > >> > callbacks as you know, not sockets. > >> > So what would your suggestion to integrate UDP based implementation to > >> > callback ones as it is in ICE, STUN or TURN. > >> > Thanks in advance. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Kabil Akpınar > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > >> > > >> > pjsip mailing list > >> > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > >> > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > >> > > >> > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > >> > >> pjsip mailing list > >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > > > > > > > -- > > Kabil Akpınar > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > > > pjsip mailing list > > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > -- Kabil Akpınar

25 Kasım 2010 11:10 tarihinde Kabil Akpınar <kabilakpinar@gmail.com> yazdı: > 2010/11/25 bo shi <cnshibo@gmail.com> > > I only know libnice implement rudp in c, but based on glib. >> udt maybe another selection, but the interface is not very fit for pjlib. >> > Where exactly is rudp in libnice, can you point it? > Ok, I found it PseudoTcpSocket<http://nice.freedesktop.org/libnice/libnice-Pseudo-TCP-Socket.html>, but how about implementation, still don't know. Do you know how it implements TCP behaviour? Directly socket usage or rx,tx callbacks? > > >> waiting good news from you. > > Once I am finished I will send you the integrated code also. So we can > together evaluate the behaviour. > >> > > 2010/11/25 Kabil Akpınar <kabilakpinar@gmail.com>: >> > in fact, I have already started porting enet with callbacks... I will >> let >> > you know when I am finished, probably tomorrow, if everything goes well. >> > And I will suggest you to port RUDP if you can, by the way, which rudp >> lib >> > do you mean? >> > >> > 2010/11/24 bo shi <cnshibo@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> I am looking for such solution too. >> >> I think we maybe need to port enet or other rudp libs. >> >> >> >> 2010/11/14 Kabil Akpınar <kabilakpinar@gmail.com>: >> >> > Hi All; >> >> > I need some idea (although I have some) about making the >> >> > connection reliable >> >> > between peers. There are some open source libraries out there like >> enet >> >> > rrunning on UDP. But the libraries in general, opens a server and >> client >> >> > on >> >> > UDP and sends the data reliably through the UDP channel. But ICE >> >> > transport >> >> > or STUN (which are very useful for traversing NATs) gives us a pair >> of >> >> > callbacks as you know, not sockets. >> >> > So what would your suggestion to integrate UDP based implementation >> to >> >> > callback ones as it is in ICE, STUN or TURN. >> >> > Thanks in advance. >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Kabil Akpınar >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> > >> >> > pjsip mailing list >> >> > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> >> > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> >> >> pjsip mailing list >> >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Kabil Akpınar >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> > >> > pjsip mailing list >> > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> pjsip mailing list >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> > > > > -- > Kabil Akpınar > > -- Kabil Akpınar

sorry, I am wrong, libnice just implement pseudo tcp as libjingle, not rudp. 2010/11/25 Kabil Akpınar <kabilakpinar@gmail.com>: > 2010/11/25 bo shi <cnshibo@gmail.com> >> >> I only know libnice implement rudp in c, but based on glib. >> udt maybe another selection, but the interface is not very fit for pjlib. > > Where exactly is rudp in libnice, can you point it? > >> >> waiting good news from you. > > Once I am finished I will send you the integrated code also. So we can > together evaluate the behaviour. >> >> >> >> 2010/11/25 Kabil Akpınar <kabilakpinar@gmail.com>: >> > in fact, I have already started porting enet with callbacks... I will >> > let >> > you know when I am finished, probably tomorrow, if everything goes well. >> > And I will suggest you to port RUDP if you can, by the way, which rudp >> > lib >> > do you mean? >> > >> > 2010/11/24 bo shi <cnshibo@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> I am looking for such solution too. >> >> I think we maybe need to port enet or other rudp libs. >> >> >> >> 2010/11/14 Kabil Akpınar <kabilakpinar@gmail.com>: >> >> > Hi All; >> >> > I need some idea (although I have some) about making the >> >> > connection reliable >> >> > between peers. There are some open source libraries out there like >> >> > enet >> >> > rrunning on UDP. But the libraries in general, opens a server and >> >> > client >> >> > on >> >> > UDP and sends the data reliably through the UDP channel. But ICE >> >> > transport >> >> > or STUN (which are very useful for traversing NATs) gives us a pair >> >> > of >> >> > callbacks as you know, not sockets. >> >> > So what would your suggestion to integrate UDP based implementation >> >> > to >> >> > callback ones as it is in ICE, STUN or TURN. >> >> > Thanks in advance. >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Kabil Akpınar >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> > >> >> > pjsip mailing list >> >> > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> >> > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> >> >> pjsip mailing list >> >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Kabil Akpınar >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> > >> > pjsip mailing list >> > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org >> > >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org >> >> pjsip mailing list >> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org >> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > > > > -- > Kabil Akpınar > > _______________________________________________ > Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org > > pjsip mailing list > pjsip@lists.pjsip.org > http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org > >