Empathy List Archives

CL

Christopher Leidigh

Tue, Sep 3, 2019 4:01 AM

Jorg

I agree about the new extensions Q, the updates is gone along pretty well.

if I remember correctly, Andrei did a cleanup pass on update sometime
ago, getting rid of stale stuff. Am I remembering this correctly?

Perhaps that's what we need to do for extensions lacking communication
or those supporting non- Thunderbird platforms only.

Toss anything pre- 60 ?

Anyway, more importantly we gets more reviewers - should have one more soon.

Christopher

On 9/2/2019 12:00 PM, maildev-request@lists.thunderbird.net wrote:

Thunderbird Extension Reviewers - (Public adulation
, invitation)

Jorg I agree about the new extensions Q, the updates is gone along pretty well. if I remember correctly, Andrei did a cleanup pass on update sometime ago, getting rid of stale stuff. Am I remembering this correctly? Perhaps that's what we need to do for extensions lacking communication or those supporting non- Thunderbird platforms only. Toss anything pre- 60 ? Anyway, more importantly we gets more reviewers - should have one more soon. Christopher On 9/2/2019 12:00 PM, maildev-request@lists.thunderbird.net wrote: > Thunderbird Extension Reviewers - (Public adulation > , invitation)

JK

Jörg Knobloch

Tue, Sep 3, 2019 2:04 PM

On 03/09/2019 06:01, Christopher Leidigh wrote:

Toss anything pre- 60 ?

Yes, that was my aim.

And hey, hey, hooray, that is not part of the policy thanks to Ryan!!
Wow, \o/

https://github.com/thundernest/atn-review-policy/blob/master/README.md#reasons-your-add-on-might-be-rejected

Reasons Your Add-on Might Be Rejected

Add-on does not work with a supported version of Thunderbird.
You do not respond to a reviewers request or comment within 10 days.

Jörg.

On 03/09/2019 06:01, Christopher Leidigh wrote: > > Toss anything pre- 60 ? Yes, that was my aim. And hey, hey, hooray, that is not part of the policy thanks to Ryan!! Wow, \o/ https://github.com/thundernest/atn-review-policy/blob/master/README.md#reasons-your-add-on-might-be-rejected Reasons Your Add-on Might Be Rejected Add-on does not work with a supported version of Thunderbird. You do not respond to a reviewers request or comment within 10 days. Jörg.

RS

Ryan Sipes

Tue, Sep 3, 2019 2:11 PM

Do you mean "it is" part of the policy?Ryan SipesCommunity Manager Thunderbird
-------- Original message --------From: Jörg Knobloch jorgk@jorgk.com Date: 9/3/19 8:04 AM (GMT-07:00) To: maildev@lists.thunderbird.net, Ryan Sipes ryan@thunderbird.net Subject: Re: [Maildev] Thunderbird Extension Reviewers - (Public adulation, , invitation) On 03/09/2019 06:01, Christopher Leidigh wrote:>> Toss anything pre- 60 ? Yes, that was my aim.And hey, hey, hooray, that is not part of the policy thanks to Ryan!! Wow, \o/https://github.com/thundernest/atn-review-policy/blob/master/README.md#reasons-your-add-on-might-be-rejectedReasons Your Add-on Might Be RejectedAdd-on does not work with a supported version of Thunderbird.You do not respond to a reviewers request or comment within 10 days.Jörg.

Do you mean "it is" part of the policy?Ryan SipesCommunity Manager Thunderbird -------- Original message --------From: Jörg Knobloch <jorgk@jorgk.com> Date: 9/3/19 8:04 AM (GMT-07:00) To: maildev@lists.thunderbird.net, Ryan Sipes <ryan@thunderbird.net> Subject: Re: [Maildev] Thunderbird Extension Reviewers - (Public adulation, , invitation) On 03/09/2019 06:01, Christopher Leidigh wrote:>> Toss anything pre- 60 ? Yes, that was my aim.And hey, hey, hooray, that is not part of the policy thanks to Ryan!! Wow, \o/https://github.com/thundernest/atn-review-policy/blob/master/README.md#reasons-your-add-on-might-be-rejectedReasons Your Add-on Might Be RejectedAdd-on does not work with a supported version of Thunderbird.You do not respond to a reviewers request or comment within 10 days.Jörg.

JK

Jörg Knobloch

Tue, Sep 3, 2019 2:36 PM

On 03/09/2019 16:11, Ryan Sipes wrote:

Do you mean "it is" part of the policy?

Common typo:

Wrong: And hey, hey, hooray, that is not part of the policy thanks to Ryan!!

Right: And hey, hey, hooray, that is NOW part of the policy thanks to Ryan!!

BTW, I went through and knocked back about 10 add-ons based on a)
missing author reply (1), b) only compatible to TB 52 (1) and the rest
for wrong compatibility information, either claiming maxVersion *
without a manifest.json, or something like 60-68 also without such a
file. We know that doesn't work.

But there's still 15 new add-ons waiting for more than 100 days.

Jörg.

On 03/09/2019 16:11, Ryan Sipes wrote: > Do you mean "it is" part of the policy? Common typo: Wrong: And hey, hey, hooray, that is not part of the policy thanks to Ryan!! Right: And hey, hey, hooray, that is NOW part of the policy thanks to Ryan!! BTW, I went through and knocked back about 10 add-ons based on a) missing author reply (1), b) only compatible to TB 52 (1) and the rest for wrong compatibility information, either claiming maxVersion * without a manifest.json, or something like 60-68 also without such a file. We know that doesn't work. But there's still 15 new add-ons waiting for more than 100 days. Jörg.

RS

Ryan Sipes

Tue, Sep 3, 2019 4:41 PM

As a reminder, that policy is open for discussion if folks have ideas
for how it might be approved. Just open an issue on the repository or
send me a pull request.

But there's still 15 new add-ons waiting for more than 100 days.

We are having an add-ons meeting today at 18:00 UTC. I am hoping that we
can discuss this type of thing and determine how to move forward to
address this stuff.

Ryan Sipes
Community and Business Development Manager
Thunderbird https://thunderbird.net

On 9/3/19 8:36 AM, Jörg Knobloch wrote:

On 03/09/2019 16:11, Ryan Sipes wrote:

Do you mean "it is" part of the policy?

Common typo:

Wrong: And hey, hey, hooray, that is not part of the policy thanks to
Ryan!!

Right: And hey, hey, hooray, that is NOW part of the policy thanks to
Ryan!!

BTW, I went through and knocked back about 10 add-ons based on a)
missing author reply (1), b) only compatible to TB 52 (1) and the rest
for wrong compatibility information, either claiming maxVersion *
without a manifest.json, or something like 60-68 also without such a
file. We know that doesn't work.

But there's still 15 new add-ons waiting for more than 100 days.

Jörg.

As a reminder, that policy is open for discussion if folks have ideas for how it might be approved. Just open an issue on the repository or send me a pull request. > But there's still 15 new add-ons waiting for more than 100 days. We are having an add-ons meeting today at 18:00 UTC. I am hoping that we can discuss this type of thing and determine how to move forward to address this stuff. Ryan Sipes Community and Business Development Manager Thunderbird <https://thunderbird.net> On 9/3/19 8:36 AM, Jörg Knobloch wrote: > On 03/09/2019 16:11, Ryan Sipes wrote: >> Do you mean "it is" part of the policy? > > Common typo: > > Wrong: And hey, hey, hooray, that is not part of the policy thanks to > Ryan!! > > Right: And hey, hey, hooray, that is NOW part of the policy thanks to > Ryan!! > > BTW, I went through and knocked back about 10 add-ons based on a) > missing author reply (1), b) only compatible to TB 52 (1) and the rest > for wrong compatibility information, either claiming maxVersion * > without a manifest.json, or something like 60-68 also without such a > file. We know that doesn't work. > > But there's still 15 new add-ons waiting for more than 100 days. > > Jörg. >