Discussion and technical support related to USRP, UHD, RFNoC
View all threads I'm doing this on a naked hardware machine, not VM. In single antenna mode (using gigabit ethernet port), we can set the sample rate up to 20MHz. but when we try to use MIMO, we can see the "L" & "S" even when we set the sample rate under 1MHz.
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "usrp-users";usrp-users@lists.ettus.com;
Date: Tue, Dec 2, 2014 02:42 PM
To: "usrp-users"usrp-users@lists.ettus.com;
Subject: Re: [USRP-users] Can USRP X300 support 2*2 MIMO
On 12/02/2014 01:35 AM, WuHaoyang via USRP-users wrote:
Hello, thanks for your comments!
1. I'm very sure I've saved the correct complex data in a .txt file. the complex data use "float32" format, each complex data has 64bits. I did a lot of similar experiment with single antenna mode, so I'm sure the file data is correct.
2. How can I specify the subdev spec accordingly (A:0 B:0), just add "(A:0 B:0)" following the "Mb0: Subdev Spec"?
Just use:
A:0 B:0
In the subdev spec.
3. What does "L" & "S" mean exactly?
L = Late packet. The packet arrived with a time-spec on it, but that time had already come-and-gone when the packet arrived at the USRP
S = Sequence error. usually because the network interface is dropping packets
Are you doing this on a VM, rather than a naked hardware machine?
------------------
Wu Haoyang
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "usrp-users";<usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>;
Date: Thu, Nov 27, 2014 06:46 PM
To: "usrp-users"<usrp-users@lists.ettus.com>;
Subject: Re: [USRP-users]回复: Can USRP X300 support 2*2 MIMO
A couple of comments:
- Are you truly saving complex data in a .txt file? Usually .txt
indicates something else. The same file->throttle->Freq Sink will show
the correct spectrum, right?
On 11/27/2014 04:05 AM, WuHaoyang via USRP-users wrote:
version information:
UHD version: 003.007.000
- For X300 in particular, we have fixed a lot of things since 3.7.0. I
recommend an update.
This is our flowgraph, Two "File Sources" include different time domain
waveforms that generated by ourselves. We try to send different signal
with two TX antennas simultaneously.
To reiterate, please make sure the file data is correct.
Following picture is the configuration of USRP Sink module.
- You shouldn't need to, but you might want to specify the subdev spec
accordingly (A:0 B:0).
when this test case is executed, we can not see the correct wave in RX
end. It seems that only the signal in Channel0 has been send out.(we use
single RX antenna, not MIMO mode, to receive and save the TX wave, and
print the waveform using MATLAB).
The following picture shows the front panel of X300,
We can see the LED behave like this:
TX/RX: Red
- Red means 'TX', so according to your pic, you *are* tx'ing on both
channels.
REF: Green
PPS: Green, twinkle
LINK: sometimes Red, sometimes Green
These are fine.
Also we can see a lot of characters "L" and "S" in GNU Radio control panel.
These are not good. I wonder if the MIMO setup is too fast... Is there a
chance you could try running GNU Radio master branch?
Cheers,
M
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
_______________________________________________ USRP-users mailing list USRP-users@lists.ettus.com http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
On 12/02/2014 02:03 AM, WuHaoyang wrote:
I'm doing this on a naked hardware machine, not VM. In single
antenna mode (using gigabit ethernet port), we can set the sample rate
up to 20MHz. but when we try to use MIMO, we can see the "L" & "S"
even when we set the sample rate under 1MHz.
That absolute maximum aggregate sample-rate that can be supported over a
single 1GiGe link is 25Msps, so if you're trying to stream two channels
at those rates, it won't work. This is just straight 1GiGe link
occupancy.
------------------ Original ------------------
*From: * "usrp-users";usrp-users@lists.ettus.com;
*Date: * Tue, Dec 2, 2014 02:42 PM
*To: * "usrp-users"usrp-users@lists.ettus.com;
Subject: * Re: [USRP-users] Can USRP X300 support 22 MIMO
On 12/02/2014 01:35 AM, WuHaoyang via USRP-users wrote:
Hello, thanks for your comments!
I'm very sure I've saved the correct complex data in a .txt file.
the complex data use "float32" format, each complex data has 64bits.
I did a lot of similar experiment with single antenna mode, so I'm
sure the file data is correct.
How can I specify the subdev spec accordingly (A:0 B:0), just add
"(A:0 B:0)" following the "Mb0: Subdev Spec"?
Just use:
A:0 B:0
In the subdev spec.
L = Late packet. The packet arrived with a time-spec on it, but that
time had already come-and-gone when the packet arrived at the USRP
S = Sequence error. usually because the network interface is dropping
packets
Are you doing this on a VM, rather than a naked hardware machine?
Wu Haoyang
------------------ Original ------------------
*From: * "usrp-users";usrp-users@lists.ettus.com;
*Date: * Thu, Nov 27, 2014 06:46 PM
*To: * "usrp-users"usrp-users@lists.ettus.com;
Subject: * Re: [USRP-users]回复: Can USRP X300 support 22 MIMO
A couple of comments:
On 11/27/2014 04:05 AM, WuHaoyang via USRP-users wrote:
version information:
UHD version: 003.007.000
This is our flowgraph, Two "File Sources" include different time domain
waveforms that generated by ourselves. We try to send different signal
with two TX antennas simultaneously.
To reiterate, please make sure the file data is correct.
Following picture is the configuration of USRP Sink module.
when this test case is executed, we can not see the correct wave in RX
end. It seems that only the signal in Channel0 has been send
out.(we use
single RX antenna, not MIMO mode, to receive and save the TX wave, and
print the waveform using MATLAB).
The following picture shows the front panel of X300,
We can see the LED behave like this:
TX/RX: Red
REF: Green
PPS: Green, twinkle
LINK: sometimes Red, sometimes Green
These are fine.
Also we can see a lot of characters "L" and "S" in GNU Radio
control panel.
These are not good. I wonder if the MIMO setup is too fast... Is there a
chance you could try running GNU Radio master branch?
Cheers,
M
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com
USRP-users mailing list
USRP-users@lists.ettus.com
http://lists.ettus.com/mailman/listinfo/usrp-users_lists.ettus.com