On Oct 29, 2010, at 12:19, Serge Stinckwich wrote: > But comparing to Ruby, there is no standard UI in Ruby and this not > really annoying for the people, because they deploy their application > on the web. Yes, but Ruby has really nice bindings to at least GTK and Cocoa. Applications developed using that look just like their C / ObjC counterparts, they do not pop an image window, etc -- Damien Pollet type less, do more [ | ] http://people.untyped.org/damien.pollet

On 10/29/2010 03:27 PM, Damien Pollet wrote: >>> But comparing to Ruby, there is no standard UI in Ruby and this >>> not really annoying for the people, because they deploy their >>> application on the web. > > Yes, but Ruby has really nice bindings to at least GTK and Cocoa. > Applications developed using that look just like their C / ObjC > counterparts, they do not pop an image window, etc They're not used very much though. I see more Shoes than GTK with Ruby I think. There's also a price to pay---GNU Smalltalk has nice GTK+ bindings, but when they crash in the bowels of GtkTreeModel you're left alone in gdb. :) Paolo