Welcome to the short, practical Lelamed Weekly Dvar. I hope you enjoy it
enough to forward it to someone else...
As the nation transforms into a giving people, the materials needed to
complete the Mishkan are donated so generously that Moshe must tell the
people to stop contributing (36:6). The tribal leaders commit to supplying
whatever materials are not supplied by the children of Israel, but once
everything has been donated for the Mishkan, the leaders are stuck not
having contributed. This subsequently prompts the priests to contribute the
shoham stones for the ephod and choshen before anyone else is given the
opportunity (35:27). Generally, וְהַנְשִׂיאִים is the word used in the
Torah to denote leaders but here, when referenced, their name seems to be
missing a yud, וְהַנְשִׂאִם. Is there a plausible explanation for this?
The priests’ offer to supply all that was missing from the donations could
have amounted to a more generous donation than that of anyone else. Rav
Chaim Shmulevitz highlights Rashi’s assertion that however generous the
priests’ proposal may have been, their underlying motivation for that offer
stemmed from laziness. Their seemingly magnanimous offer to cover the
balance of what was needed was simply a way to excuse them from donating
initially.
Our mind has an uncanny ability to justify and rationalize our actions, to
the point where we can sometimes fool ourselves into believing the
justification. This inclination to rationalize poor decisions is the reason
why we are urged to be “zrizim,” jumping at opportunities when they present
themselves.
Quotation of the week:
"Rationalization is defined as self-deception by reasoning."
Welcome to the short, practical Lelamed Weekly Dvar. I hope you enjoy it
enough to forward it to someone else...
_______________________________________________
As the nation transforms into a giving people, the materials needed to
complete the Mishkan are donated so generously that Moshe must tell the
people to stop contributing (36:6). The tribal leaders commit to supplying
whatever materials are not supplied by the children of Israel, but once
everything has been donated for the Mishkan, the leaders are stuck not
having contributed. This subsequently prompts the priests to contribute the
shoham stones for the ephod and choshen before anyone else is given the
opportunity (35:27). Generally, וְהַנְשִׂיאִים is the word used in the
Torah to denote leaders but here, when referenced, their name seems to be
missing a yud, וְהַנְשִׂאִם. Is there a plausible explanation for this?
The priests’ offer to supply all that was missing from the donations could
have amounted to a more generous donation than that of anyone else. Rav
Chaim Shmulevitz highlights Rashi’s assertion that however generous the
priests’ proposal may have been, their underlying motivation for that offer
stemmed from laziness. Their seemingly magnanimous offer to cover the
balance of what was needed was simply a way to excuse them from donating
initially.
Our mind has an uncanny ability to justify and rationalize our actions, to
the point where we can sometimes fool ourselves into believing the
justification. This inclination to rationalize poor decisions is the reason
why we are urged to be “zrizim,” jumping at opportunities when they present
themselves.
_______________________________________________
Quotation of the week:
"Rationalization is defined as self-deception by reasoning."