I just saw this article from a couple of weeks ago which describes how
the first highly accurate clocks imported to America did not run at the
correct rate, and left the clockmakers scratching their heads at the
time.
[1]https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/physics-first-clock-america-
failed/
It is a pop-sci type article, no citations provided, so I wouldn't be
surprised if it turned out that the experienced clock makers of the
time actually did know that "of course you have to recalibrate your
pendulum if you move to the Alps or move to Cairo" but apparently the
customers in Boston didn't know that and were mad their clock was
seemingly broken on the journey from Holland to the colonies, but
worked perfectly fine when they sent it back to the clock maker for
repair.
-- Chris Caudle
References
Hi Chris,
Thanks for posting. That article has been making the rounds on the 'net
recently although it was written in 2018. Like you say it has a bit of a
pop-sci or even clickbait feel. It's an interesting story and contains
valid bits of horology and physics but given the tone and content we did
some fact checking before your posting went out to time-nuts.
Sure enough, the author (Ethan Siegel) confirmed by email he never found
historical evidence but had simply heard the anecdote as an undergrad
and spun it into the well-written article that you linked to. I'd say it
falls into a similar category as the watchmaker & noon cannon story:
https://febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts_lists.febo.com/2014-February/064958.html
/tvb
On 9/15/2023 2:36 PM, chris--- via time-nuts wrote:
I just saw this article from a couple of weeks ago which describes how
the first highly accurate clocks imported to America did not run at the
correct rate, and left the clockmakers scratching their heads at the
time.
[1]https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/physics-first-clock-america-
failed/
It is a pop-sci type article, no citations provided, so I wouldn't be
surprised if it turned out that the experienced clock makers of the
time actually did know that "of course you have to recalibrate your
pendulum if you move to the Alps or move to Cairo" but apparently the
customers in Boston didn't know that and were mad their clock was
seemingly broken on the journey from Holland to the colonies, but
worked perfectly fine when they sent it back to the clock maker for
repair.
-- Chris Caudle
References
1. https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/physics-first-clock-america-failed/
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
On Sep 19 2023, at 10:30 am, Tom Van Baak via time-nuts
time-nuts@lists.febo.com wrote:
Thanks for posting. That article has been making the rounds on the 'net
recently although it was written in 2018. Like you say it has a bit of a
pop-sci or even clickbait feel. It's an interesting story and contains
valid bits of horology and physics but given the tone and content we did
some fact checking before your posting went out to time-nuts.
I found the article interesting even if the basis story is a bit
post-apocryphal because the author explained the background of the
dependence of pendulum behavior on both length and gravitation, and
worked out the performance differences you can expect for different
gravitational acceleration values. It is kind of a gentle introduction
to time-nuttiness for casual observers, or young students who are still
at the "assume gravity is 9.8m/s/s" stage of their physics education.
If not for that I would have just blown it off as "seems unlikely they
wouldn't just adjust the pendulum bob based on astronomical
observations." The one thing which would make the article better is
actual confirmed gravitational values at Amsterdam and Boston to add
into the table of how fast or slow a 0.994m pendulum would swing at
various gravitational acceleration values to show what actual magnitude
of difference would be expected.
-- Chris C
On Sep 19 2023, at 10:30 am, Tom Van Baak via time-nuts
time-nuts@lists.febo.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
Thanks for posting. That article has been making the rounds on the 'net
recently although it was written in 2018. Like you say it has a bit of a
pop-sci or even clickbait feel. It's an interesting story and contains
valid bits of horology and physics but given the tone and content we did
some fact checking before your posting went out to time-nuts.
Sure enough, the author (Ethan Siegel) confirmed by email he never found
historical evidence but had simply heard the anecdote as an undergrad
and spun it into the well-written article that you linked to. I'd say it
falls into a similar category as the watchmaker & noon cannon story:
https://febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts_lists.febo.com/2014-February/064958.html
/tvb
On 9/15/2023 2:36 PM, chris--- via time-nuts wrote:
I just saw this article from a couple of weeks ago which describes how
the first highly accurate clocks imported to America did not run at the
correct rate, and left the clockmakers scratching their heads at the
time.
[1]https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/physics-first-clock-america-
failed/
It is a pop-sci type article, no citations provided, so I wouldn't be
surprised if it turned out that the experienced clock makers of the
time actually did know that "of course you have to recalibrate your
pendulum if you move to the Alps or move to Cairo" but apparently the
customers in Boston didn't know that and were mad their clock was
seemingly broken on the journey from Holland to the colonies, but
worked perfectly fine when they sent it back to the clock maker for
repair.
-- Chris Caudle
References
1. https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/physics-first-clock-america-fai
led/
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com
To unsubscribe send an email to time-nuts-leave@lists.febo.com