passagemaking@lists.trawlering.com

Passagemaking Under Power List

View all threads

AIS pitfalls

T
Truelove39@aol.com
Mon, Jun 4, 2007 9:53 AM

Hi John-

Yes, normally we would see that, but with a slow speed on a small-scale
chart, the predictor is very short; thus it was missed. In thinking about  this,
our eyes tend to give precedence to the triangle unless the  predictor is
sufficiently long. My point is that complacency with only a cursory  look (pun
intended), and then seeing  what you expect to see, can be  dangerous.

Some forty years ago while working as engineer on a ferryboat, I had  the
pleasure of serving under a captain whose landings were so consistent I  never
had to look at the telegraph, although I usually did, as he always rang  the
same exact sequence of orders. One day, he rang up something different, and  I
gave him "the usual" instead. Fortunately, my oiler was on the ball and  noticed
the difference in time to avoid an accident.

An aside - this captain had served 35 years on a CG buoy tender and
possessed pilotage from Calais, ME to Boston - over 1500 miles of  coastline.

Regards,

John

I'm used to seeing a projected course track that extends outward  from

the target, the distance proportional to the ship's speed. At  least
that's how Furuno displays show it when using the Furuno AIS.  Very
handy, as you can graphically see where the target is going to  cross
your course line.

Not sure if all units work that way or  if that would also have been
confused by the tug.

John  Marshall
N5520-Serendipity

On Jun 3, 2007, at 5:39 PM,  Truelove39@aol.com wrote:

As we proceeded up the Hudson River today,  a tow hove into view
ahead.
Penny, at the helm,  noted that he was upbound, too. After a few
minutes, I  looked
up and observed that the tug was not only closer but behind  the
barge; he was
in fact, downbound. A glance at the AIS  display (on CE)  showed the
triangle
symbol facing  the wrong way! Further investigation showed  that all
the  data
was correct, including course, but his heading was fixed at  17
degrees! So we
learned something today,  fortunately not the hard way: a  simple
glance at
that elongated triangle may not always tell the  truth!

Regards,

John
"Seahorse"

************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.

Hi John- Yes, normally we would see that, but with a slow speed on a small-scale chart, the predictor is very short; thus it was missed. In thinking about this, our eyes tend to give precedence to the triangle unless the predictor is sufficiently long. My point is that complacency with only a cursory look (pun intended), and then seeing what you expect to see, can be dangerous. Some forty years ago while working as engineer on a ferryboat, I had the pleasure of serving under a captain whose landings were so consistent I never had to look at the telegraph, although I usually did, as he always rang the same exact sequence of orders. One day, he rang up something different, and I gave him "the usual" instead. Fortunately, my oiler was on the ball and noticed the difference in time to avoid an accident. An aside - this captain had served 35 years on a CG buoy tender and possessed pilotage from Calais, ME to Boston - over 1500 miles of coastline. Regards, John > I'm used to seeing a projected course track that extends outward from the target, the distance proportional to the ship's speed. At least that's how Furuno displays show it when using the Furuno AIS. Very handy, as you can graphically see where the target is going to cross your course line. Not sure if all units work that way or if that would also have been confused by the tug. John Marshall N5520-Serendipity On Jun 3, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Truelove39@aol.com wrote: > As we proceeded up the Hudson River today, a tow hove into view > ahead. > Penny, at the helm, noted that he was upbound, too. After a few > minutes, I looked > up and observed that the tug was not only closer but behind the > barge; he was > in fact, downbound. A glance at the AIS display (on CE) showed the > triangle > symbol facing the wrong way! Further investigation showed that all > the data > was correct, including course, but his heading was fixed at 17 > degrees! So we > learned something today, fortunately not the hard way: a simple > glance at > that elongated triangle may not always tell the truth! > > Regards, > > John > "Seahorse" > ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.