GL
Gang Liu
Thu, Feb 5, 2009 10:25 AM
I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle preloaded route
set.
But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same route. But
PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration – to always
pass through the proxy?
For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same configuration.
Regards,
Noga
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
Hi,
I found a problem when using Pjsua with –use-100rel and –outbound.
When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent directly to
the user and bypass the proxy.
Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known bug?
I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view it.
Thanks,
Noga
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle preloaded route
set.
But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same route. But
PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
> Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration – to always
> pass through the proxy?
>
> For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same configuration.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Noga
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
> pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
> *To:* pjsip list
> *Subject:* Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
>
>
>
> Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
>
> 180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
>
> regards,
>
> Gang
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I found a problem when using Pjsua with –use-100rel and –outbound.
>
> When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent directly to
> the user and bypass the proxy.
>
> Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known bug?
>
> I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view it.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Noga
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
>
NY
Noga Yehudai
Thu, Feb 5, 2009 10:42 AM
New requests within the dialog will usually go where stated in contact
header of the previous response or as you said using the record route
URI.
The outbound proxy configuration claims that any request will pass
through the proxy, regardless of the contact/RR URIs.
I use SBC instead of proxy, and I can't make it add record route,
therefore there will be no record route at all. But it does put its own
URI in the contact header - and this was ignored by pjsip as well.
Regards,
Noga
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:26 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle preloaded
route set.
But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same route.
But PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration - to always
pass through the proxy?
For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same configuration.
Regards,
Noga
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
Hi,
I found a problem when using Pjsua with -use-100rel and -outbound.
When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent directly to
the user and bypass the proxy.
Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known bug?
I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view it.
Thanks,
Noga
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
New requests within the dialog will usually go where stated in contact
header of the previous response or as you said using the record route
URI.
The outbound proxy configuration claims that any request will pass
through the proxy, regardless of the contact/RR URIs.
I use SBC instead of proxy, and I can't make it add record route,
therefore there will be no record route at all. But it does put its own
URI in the contact header - and this was ignored by pjsip as well.
Regards,
Noga
________________________________
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:26 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle preloaded
route set.
But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same route.
But PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration - to always
pass through the proxy?
For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same configuration.
Regards,
Noga
________________________________
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
Hi,
I found a problem when using Pjsua with -use-100rel and -outbound.
When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent directly to
the user and bypass the proxy.
Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known bug?
I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view it.
Thanks,
Noga
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
GL
Gang Liu
Thu, Feb 5, 2009 10:48 AM
from RFC 3261
8.1.1.1 Request-URI
A pre-existing route
set is an ordered set of URIs that identify a chain of servers, to
which a UAC will send outgoing requests that are outside of a dialog.
When a provider
wishes to configure a UA with an outbound proxy, it is RECOMMENDED
that this be done by providing it with a pre-existing route set with
a single URI, that of the outbound proxy.
12.1.2 UAC Behavior
If no Record-Route header field is present in
the response, the route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route
set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route set for future
requests in this dialog. The remote target MUST be set to the URI
from the Contact header field of the response.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Gang Liu gangban.lau@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle preloaded route
set.
But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same route. But
PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration – to always
pass through the proxy?
For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same configuration.
Regards,
Noga
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
Hi,
I found a problem when using Pjsua with –use-100rel and –outbound.
When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent directly to
the user and bypass the proxy.
Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known bug?
I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view it.
Thanks,
Noga
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
from RFC 3261
8.1.1.1 Request-URI
A pre-existing route
set is an ordered set of URIs that identify a chain of servers, to
which a UAC will send outgoing requests that are outside of a dialog.
When a provider
wishes to configure a UA with an outbound proxy, it is RECOMMENDED
that this be done by providing it with a pre-existing route set with
a single URI, that of the outbound proxy.
12.1.2 UAC Behavior
If no Record-Route header field is present in
the response, the route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route
set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route set for future
requests in this dialog. The remote target MUST be set to the URI
from the Contact header field of the response.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Gang Liu <gangban.lau@gmail.com> wrote:
> I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle preloaded route
> set.
> But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same route. But
> PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
> Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
>
> BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
>
> regards,
> Gang
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
>
>> Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration – to always
>> pass through the proxy?
>>
>> For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same configuration.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Noga
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
>> pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
>> *To:* pjsip list
>> *Subject:* Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
>>
>>
>>
>> Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
>>
>> 180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> Gang
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I found a problem when using Pjsua with –use-100rel and –outbound.
>>
>> When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent directly to
>> the user and bypass the proxy.
>>
>> Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known bug?
>>
>> I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Noga
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>>
>> pjsip mailing list
>> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>>
>> pjsip mailing list
>> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
>> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>>
>>
>
NY
Noga Yehudai
Thu, Feb 5, 2009 10:52 AM
I think that is about what I said in the last e-mail, is it a bug then?
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:48 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
from RFC 3261
8.1.1.1 Request-URI
A pre-existing route
set is an ordered set of URIs that identify a chain of servers, to
which a UAC will send outgoing requests that are outside of a dialog.
When a provider
wishes to configure a UA with an outbound proxy, it is RECOMMENDED
that this be done by providing it with a pre-existing route set with
a single URI, that of the outbound proxy.
12.1.2 UAC Behavior
If no Record-Route header field is present in
the response, the route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route
set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route set for future
requests in this dialog. The remote target MUST be set to the URI
from the Contact header field of the response.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Gang Liu gangban.lau@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle preloaded
route set.
But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same route.
But PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration - to always
pass through the proxy?
For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same configuration.
Regards,
Noga
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
Hi,
I found a problem when using Pjsua with -use-100rel and -outbound.
When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent directly to
the user and bypass the proxy.
Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known bug?
I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view it.
Thanks,
Noga
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
I think that is about what I said in the last e-mail, is it a bug then?
________________________________
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:48 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
from RFC 3261
8.1.1.1 Request-URI
A pre-existing route
set is an ordered set of URIs that identify a chain of servers, to
which a UAC will send outgoing requests that are outside of a dialog.
When a provider
wishes to configure a UA with an outbound proxy, it is RECOMMENDED
that this be done by providing it with a pre-existing route set with
a single URI, that of the outbound proxy.
12.1.2 UAC Behavior
If no Record-Route header field is present in
the response, the route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route
set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route set for future
requests in this dialog. The remote target MUST be set to the URI
from the Contact header field of the response.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Gang Liu <gangban.lau@gmail.com> wrote:
I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle preloaded
route set.
But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same route.
But PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration - to always
pass through the proxy?
For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same configuration.
Regards,
Noga
________________________________
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
Hi,
I found a problem when using Pjsua with -use-100rel and -outbound.
When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent directly to
the user and bypass the proxy.
Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known bug?
I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view it.
Thanks,
Noga
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
GL
Gang Liu
Thu, Feb 5, 2009 10:57 AM
New requests within the dialog will usually go where stated in contact
header of the previous response or as you said using the record route URI.
The outbound proxy configuration claims that any request will pass through
the proxy, regardless of the contact/RR URIs.
This isn't true for RFC 3261.
I use SBC instead of proxy, and I can't make it add record route,
therefore there will be no record route at all. But it does put its own URI
in the contact header – and this was ignored by pjsip as well.
I don't think it is SBC. It didn't change contact of 180 respond.
Regards,
Noga
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:26 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle preloaded route
set.
But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same route. But
PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration – to always pass
through the proxy?
For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same configuration.
Regards,
Noga
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
Hi,
I found a problem when using Pjsua with –use-100rel and –outbound.
When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent directly to
the user and bypass the proxy.
Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known bug?
I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view it.
Thanks,
Noga
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
inline.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
> New requests within the dialog will usually go where stated in contact
> header of the previous response or as you said using the record route URI.
>
> The outbound proxy configuration claims that any request will pass through
> the proxy, regardless of the contact/RR URIs.
>
This isn't true for RFC 3261.
> I use SBC instead of proxy, and I can't make it add record route,
> therefore there will be no record route at all. But it does put its own URI
> in the contact header – and this was ignored by pjsip as well.
>
>
>
I don't think it is SBC. It didn't change contact of 180 respond.
> Regards,
>
> Noga
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
> pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:26 PM
> *To:* pjsip list
> *Subject:* Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
>
>
>
> I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle preloaded route
> set.
> But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same route. But
> PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
> Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
>
> BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
>
> regards,
> Gang
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
>
> Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration – to always pass
> through the proxy?
>
> For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same configuration.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Noga
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
> pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
> *To:* pjsip list
> *Subject:* Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
>
>
>
> Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
>
> 180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
>
> regards,
>
> Gang
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I found a problem when using Pjsua with –use-100rel and –outbound.
>
> When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent directly to
> the user and bypass the proxy.
>
> Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known bug?
>
> I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view it.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Noga
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
>
GL
Gang Liu
Thu, Feb 5, 2009 10:58 AM
not a bug. Pls read it carefully.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
I think that is about what I said in the last e-mail, is it a bug then?
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:48 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
from RFC 3261
8.1.1.1 Request-URI
A pre-existing route
set is an ordered set of URIs that identify a chain of servers, to
which a UAC will send outgoing requests that are outside of a dialog.
When a provider
wishes to configure a UA with an outbound proxy, it is RECOMMENDED
that this be done by providing it with a pre-existing route set with
a single URI, that of the outbound proxy.
12.1.2 UAC Behavior
If no Record-Route header field is present in
the response, the route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route
set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route set for future
requests in this dialog. The remote target MUST be set to the URI
from the Contact header field of the response.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Gang Liu gangban.lau@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle preloaded route
set.
But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same route. But
PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration – to always pass
through the proxy?
For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same configuration.
Regards,
Noga
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
Hi,
I found a problem when using Pjsua with –use-100rel and –outbound.
When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent directly to
the user and bypass the proxy.
Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known bug?
I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view it.
Thanks,
Noga
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
not a bug. Pls read it carefully.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
> I think that is about what I said in the last e-mail, is it a bug then?
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
> pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:48 PM
> *To:* pjsip list
> *Subject:* Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
>
>
>
> from RFC 3261
>
> 8.1.1.1 Request-URI
>
>
>
> A pre-existing route
>
> set is an ordered set of URIs that identify a chain of servers, to
>
> which a UAC will send outgoing requests that are outside of a dialog.
>
>
>
> When a provider
>
> wishes to configure a UA with an outbound proxy, it is RECOMMENDED
>
> that this be done by providing it with a pre-existing route set with
>
> a single URI, that of the outbound proxy.
>
> 12.1.2 UAC Behavior
>
>
> If no Record-Route header field is present in
>
> the response, the route set MUST be set to the empty set. This route
>
> set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route set for future
>
> requests in this dialog. The remote target MUST be set to the URI
>
> from the Contact header field of the response.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Gang Liu <gangban.lau@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle preloaded route
> set.
> But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same route. But
> PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
> Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
>
> BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
>
> regards,
> Gang
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
>
> Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration – to always pass
> through the proxy?
>
> For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same configuration.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Noga
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
> pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
> *To:* pjsip list
> *Subject:* Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
>
>
>
> Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
>
> 180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
>
> regards,
>
> Gang
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I found a problem when using Pjsua with –use-100rel and –outbound.
>
> When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent directly to
> the user and bypass the proxy.
>
> Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known bug?
>
> I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view it.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Noga
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
>
NY
Noga Yehudai
Thu, Feb 5, 2009 12:47 PM
Inline
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:58 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
inline.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
New requests within the dialog will usually go where stated in contact
header of the previous response or as you said using the record route
URI.
The outbound proxy configuration claims that any request will pass
through the proxy, regardless of the contact/RR URIs.
This isn't true for RFC 3261.
[Noga] you are right, only apply to req' uri.
I use SBC instead of proxy, and I can't make it add record
route, therefore there will be no record route at all. But it does put
its own URI in the contact header - and this was ignored by pjsip as
well.
I don't think it is SBC. It didn't change contact of 180 respond.
[Noga] it does change the contact; please see line 5 in cap file as
opposed to line 4.
Regards,
Noga
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:26 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle
preloaded route set.
But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same
route. But PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net>
wrote:
Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration - to
always pass through the proxy?
For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same
configuration.
Regards,
Noga
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net>
wrote:
Hi,
I found a problem when using Pjsua with -use-100rel and
-outbound.
When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent
directly to the user and bypass the proxy.
Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known
bug?
I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view
it.
Thanks,
Noga
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
Inline
________________________________
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:58 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
inline.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
New requests within the dialog will usually go where stated in contact
header of the previous response or as you said using the record route
URI.
The outbound proxy configuration claims that any request will pass
through the proxy, regardless of the contact/RR URIs.
This isn't true for RFC 3261.
[Noga] you are right, only apply to req' uri.
I use SBC instead of proxy, and I can't make it add record
route, therefore there will be no record route at all. But it does put
its own URI in the contact header - and this was ignored by pjsip as
well.
I don't think it is SBC. It didn't change contact of 180 respond.
[Noga] it does change the contact; please see line 5 in cap file as
opposed to line 4.
Regards,
Noga
________________________________
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:26 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle
preloaded route set.
But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same
route. But PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net>
wrote:
Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration - to
always pass through the proxy?
For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same
configuration.
Regards,
Noga
________________________________
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net>
wrote:
Hi,
I found a problem when using Pjsua with -use-100rel and
-outbound.
When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent
directly to the user and bypass the proxy.
Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known
bug?
I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view
it.
Thanks,
Noga
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
GL
Gang Liu
Thu, Feb 5, 2009 1:29 PM
Pls consider, how can pjsua know where callee is if your SBC hide the callee
contact.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
Inline
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:58 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
inline.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
New requests within the dialog will usually go where stated in contact
header of the previous response or as you said using the record route URI.
The outbound proxy configuration claims that any request will pass through
the proxy, regardless of the contact/RR URIs.
This isn't true for RFC 3261.
[Noga] you are right, only apply to req' uri.
I use SBC instead of proxy, and I can't make it add record route,
therefore there will be no record route at all. But it does put its own URI
in the contact header – and this was ignored by pjsip as well.
I don't think it is SBC. It didn't change contact of 180 respond.
[Noga] it does change the contact; please see line 5 in cap file as opposed
to line 4.
Regards,
Noga
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:26 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle preloaded route
set.
But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same route. But
PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration – to always pass
through the proxy?
For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same configuration.
Regards,
Noga
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
Hi,
I found a problem when using Pjsua with –use-100rel and –outbound.
When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent directly to
the user and bypass the proxy.
Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known bug?
I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view it.
Thanks,
Noga
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
Pls consider, how can pjsua know where callee is if your SBC hide the callee
contact.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
> Inline
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
> pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:58 PM
> *To:* pjsip list
> *Subject:* Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
>
>
>
> inline.
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
>
> New requests within the dialog will usually go where stated in contact
> header of the previous response or as you said using the record route URI.
>
> The outbound proxy configuration claims that any request will pass through
> the proxy, regardless of the contact/RR URIs.
>
> This isn't true for RFC 3261.
>
> [Noga] you are right, only apply to req' uri.
>
> I use SBC instead of proxy, and I can't make it add record route,
> therefore there will be no record route at all. But it does put its own URI
> in the contact header – and this was ignored by pjsip as well.
>
>
>
> I don't think it is SBC. It didn't change contact of 180 respond.
>
> [Noga] it does change the contact; please see line 5 in cap file as opposed
> to line 4.
>
> Regards,
>
> Noga
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
> pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:26 PM
> *To:* pjsip list
> *Subject:* Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
>
>
>
> I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle preloaded route
> set.
> But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same route. But
> PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
> Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
>
> BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
>
> regards,
> Gang
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
>
> Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration – to always pass
> through the proxy?
>
> For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same configuration.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Noga
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org [mailto:
> pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] *On Behalf Of *Gang Liu
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
> *To:* pjsip list
> *Subject:* Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
>
>
>
> Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
>
> 180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
>
> regards,
>
> Gang
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I found a problem when using Pjsua with –use-100rel and –outbound.
>
> When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent directly to
> the user and bypass the proxy.
>
> Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known bug?
>
> I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view it.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Noga
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org
>
> pjsip mailing list
> pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
> http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
>
>
EA
Elias AC
Fri, Feb 6, 2009 6:50 AM
Hi,
That's what I'm trying to find out as well.
In the meantime check http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/2008-August/004513.html and http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/2009-February/006203.html
Good luck, and please let us know if you manage to successfuly build it for Windows mobile.
Regards,
Elias.
From: manoj@ascenttelecom.comTo: pjsip@lists.pjsip.orgDate: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:25:55 +0530Subject: [pjsip] IPP Codecs
Hello,
Are IPP codec libs from Intel supposed to work on Windows mobile phones also?...I mean can pjsip work with IPP libs and be installed on windows mobile phones?
Regards,
Manoj
Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_AE_Faster_022009
Hi,
That's what I'm trying to find out as well.
In the meantime check http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/2008-August/004513.html and http://lists.pjsip.org/pipermail/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org/2009-February/006203.html
Good luck, and please let us know if you manage to successfuly build it for Windows mobile.
Regards,
Elias.
From: manoj@ascenttelecom.comTo: pjsip@lists.pjsip.orgDate: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:25:55 +0530Subject: [pjsip] IPP Codecs
Hello,
Are IPP codec libs from Intel supposed to work on Windows mobile phones also?...I mean can pjsip work with IPP libs and be installed on windows mobile phones?
Regards,
Manoj
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_AE_Faster_022009
NY
Noga Yehudai
Wed, Feb 11, 2009 1:14 PM
It should deliver the next request to the URI from the contact - which
is the sbc uri.
Noga.
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 3:29 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
Pls consider, how can pjsua know where callee is if your SBC hide the
callee contact.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
Inline
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:58 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
inline.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Noga Yehudai nogab@juniper.net wrote:
New requests within the dialog will usually go where stated in contact
header of the previous response or as you said using the record route
URI.
The outbound proxy configuration claims that any request will pass
through the proxy, regardless of the contact/RR URIs.
This isn't true for RFC 3261.
[Noga] you are right, only apply to req' uri.
I use SBC instead of proxy, and I can't make it add record
route, therefore there will be no record route at all. But it does put
its own URI in the contact header - and this was ignored by pjsip as
well.
I don't think it is SBC. It didn't change contact of 180 respond.
[Noga] it does change the contact; please see line 5 in cap file as
opposed to line 4.
Regards,
Noga
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:26 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle
preloaded route set.
But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same
route. But PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net>
wrote:
Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration - to
always pass through the proxy?
For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same
configuration.
Regards,
Noga
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net>
wrote:
Hi,
I found a problem when using Pjsua with -use-100rel and
-outbound.
When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent
directly to the user and bypass the proxy.
Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known
bug?
I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view
it.
Thanks,
Noga
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org <http://blog.pjsip.org/>
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org <http://blog.pjsip.org/>
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org <http://blog.pjsip.org/>
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org http://blog.pjsip.org/
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
It should deliver the next request to the URI from the contact - which
is the sbc uri.
Noga.
________________________________
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 3:29 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
Pls consider, how can pjsua know where callee is if your SBC hide the
callee contact.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
Inline
________________________________
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:58 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
inline.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net> wrote:
New requests within the dialog will usually go where stated in contact
header of the previous response or as you said using the record route
URI.
The outbound proxy configuration claims that any request will pass
through the proxy, regardless of the contact/RR URIs.
This isn't true for RFC 3261.
[Noga] you are right, only apply to req' uri.
I use SBC instead of proxy, and I can't make it add record
route, therefore there will be no record route at all. But it does put
its own URI in the contact header - and this was ignored by pjsip as
well.
I don't think it is SBC. It didn't change contact of 180 respond.
[Noga] it does change the contact; please see line 5 in cap file as
opposed to line 4.
Regards,
Noga
________________________________
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 12:26 PM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
I didn't check pjsip source code to check how PRACK handle
preloaded route set.
But I think CANCEL goes wherever the INVITE went, using the same
route. But PRACK, UPDATE, INFO not this way.
Correct me if my understanding is wrong.
BTW, any Record-Route Header added into 200 OK respond?
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net>
wrote:
Isn't that the point of local outbound proxy configuration - to
always pass through the proxy?
For example re-inv passes through the proxy with the same
configuration.
Regards,
Noga
________________________________
From: pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org
[mailto:pjsip-bounces@lists.pjsip.org] On Behalf Of Gang Liu
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:58 AM
To: pjsip list
Subject: Re: [pjsip] PRACK and local outbound proxy
Enable record route at your proxy and try again.
180 ring from proxy don't include Record-Route Header.
regards,
Gang
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Noga Yehudai <nogab@juniper.net>
wrote:
Hi,
I found a problem when using Pjsua with -use-100rel and
-outbound.
When using outbound proxy with PRACK, the PRACK will be sent
directly to the user and bypass the proxy.
Do you have any idea how to overcome this issue? Is it a known
bug?
I attached the capture of the call you can use Wireshark to view
it.
Thanks,
Noga
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org <http://blog.pjsip.org/>
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org <http://blog.pjsip.org/>
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org <http://blog.pjsip.org/>
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
_______________________________________________
Visit our blog: http://blog.pjsip.org <http://blog.pjsip.org/>
pjsip mailing list
pjsip@lists.pjsip.org
http://lists.pjsip.org/mailman/listinfo/pjsip_lists.pjsip.org
