websecurity@lists.webappsec.org

The Web Security Mailing List

View all threads

[Web Security] Can a PADSS certified system be hacked

SS
sarvesh shete
Tue, May 21, 2013 3:16 AM

Hi,

Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked?
Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with
AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting vertical
privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application.
Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding
techniques and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and
is PADSS certified but still can it be hacked?

Regards,
Sarvesh
India

Hi, Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked? Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting vertical privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application. Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding techniques and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and is PADSS certified but still can it be hacked? Regards, Sarvesh India
RD
Ryan Dewhurst
Wed, May 22, 2013 10:19 PM

Quoting Michael Howard of Microsoft:

"You'll Never Reach Zero Security Vulnerabilities

It's sad but true, but you'll never get to zero security vulnerabilities. I
remember when we issued one of the first security updates for Windows
Vista. Some users were surprised because they thought Microsoft claimed to
have solved the security problem with Windows Vista. First, I don't know of
anyone who made the claim and second, zero security vulnerabilities just
isn't achievable.
While zero security vulnerabilities would be nice, thinking you can reach
such a state is folly. The fact is the technology landscape is always in
flux, threats are a moving target, and security research is ongoing. I said
earlier security is an arms race. We add defenses to our products and the
attackers adapt.
Your code might seem utterly vulnerability-free today, but that could all
change tomorrow when a new type of vulnerability is discovered. For
instance, on October 15, 2003, Microsoft issued a security bulletin that
fixed a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Outlook® Web Access
included with Microsoft Exchange 5.5. On March 4th the following year,
Sanctum (since purchased by Watchfire and now IBM) released a paper that
outlined a new vulnerability akin to cross-site scripting called HTTP
response splitting. Six months later, Microsoft issued another security
update for Outlook Web Access in Microsoft Exchange 5.5 to fix an HTTP
response splitting vulnerability. So what happened? Simply put, at the time
the first bulletin was issued, response splitting issues were unheard of,
but the landscape changed."

The rest of the article is also worth a read -
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163310.aspx

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:16 AM, sarvesh shete sarvesh.sse@gmail.comwrote:

Hi,

Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked?
Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with
AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting vertical
privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application.
Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding
techniques and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and
is PADSS certified but still can it be hacked?

Regards,
Sarvesh
India


The Web Security Mailing List

WebSecurity RSS Feed
http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss

Join WASC on LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/83336/4B20E4374DBA

WASC on Twitter
http://twitter.com/wascupdates

websecurity@lists.webappsec.org
http://lists.webappsec.org/mailman/listinfo/websecurity_lists.webappsec.org

Quoting Michael Howard of Microsoft: "You'll Never Reach Zero Security Vulnerabilities It's sad but true, but you'll never get to zero security vulnerabilities. I remember when we issued one of the first security updates for Windows Vista. Some users were surprised because they thought Microsoft claimed to have solved the security problem with Windows Vista. First, I don't know of anyone who made the claim and second, zero security vulnerabilities just isn't achievable. While zero security vulnerabilities would be nice, thinking you can reach such a state is folly. The fact is the technology landscape is always in flux, threats are a moving target, and security research is ongoing. I said earlier security is an arms race. We add defenses to our products and the attackers adapt. Your code might seem utterly vulnerability-free today, but that could all change tomorrow when a new type of vulnerability is discovered. For instance, on October 15, 2003, Microsoft issued a security bulletin that fixed a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Outlook® Web Access included with Microsoft Exchange 5.5. On March 4th the following year, Sanctum (since purchased by Watchfire and now IBM) released a paper that outlined a new vulnerability akin to cross-site scripting called HTTP response splitting. Six months later, Microsoft issued another security update for Outlook Web Access in Microsoft Exchange 5.5 to fix an HTTP response splitting vulnerability. So what happened? Simply put, at the time the first bulletin was issued, response splitting issues were unheard of, but the landscape changed." The rest of the article is also worth a read - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163310.aspx On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:16 AM, sarvesh shete <sarvesh.sse@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi, > > Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked? > Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with > AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting vertical > privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application. > Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding > techniques and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and > is PADSS certified but still can it be hacked? > > Regards, > Sarvesh > India > > _______________________________________________ > The Web Security Mailing List > > WebSecurity RSS Feed > http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss > > Join WASC on LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/83336/4B20E4374DBA > > WASC on Twitter > http://twitter.com/wascupdates > > websecurity@lists.webappsec.org > http://lists.webappsec.org/mailman/listinfo/websecurity_lists.webappsec.org > >
M
maanav
Thu, May 23, 2013 6:53 PM

My 2 cents:-

Any system of processes (like PCI / PA DSS) has a set of activities that are
certified based on checks done at a point in time. However, as it is a
system of processes executed by humans, there is every chance of an error
creeping in because of some step either getting missed out or not being
followed to the letter (e.g., maybe because of a not-an-expert hand behind
it) ..

Hence, any system can be hacked, it is just a matter of time. A certificate
is not a guarantee.

Regards

Maanav

From: websecurity [mailto:websecurity-bounces@lists.webappsec.org] On Behalf
Of Ryan Dewhurst
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 3:50 AM
To: sarvesh shete
Cc:
Subject: Re: [WEB SECURITY] [Web Security] Can a PADSS certified system be
hacked

Quoting Michael Howard of Microsoft:

"You'll Never Reach Zero Security Vulnerabilities

It's sad but true, but you'll never get to zero security vulnerabilities. I
remember when we issued one of the first security updates for Windows Vista.
Some users were surprised because they thought Microsoft claimed to have
solved the security problem with Windows Vista. First, I don't know of
anyone who made the claim and second, zero security vulnerabilities just
isn't achievable.

While zero security vulnerabilities would be nice, thinking you can reach
such a state is folly. The fact is the technology landscape is always in
flux, threats are a moving target, and security research is ongoing. I said
earlier security is an arms race. We add defenses to our products and the
attackers adapt.

Your code might seem utterly vulnerability-free today, but that could all
change tomorrow when a new type of vulnerability is discovered. For
instance, on October 15, 2003, Microsoft issued a security bulletin that
fixed a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in OutlookR Web Access
included with Microsoft Exchange 5.5. On March 4th the following year,
Sanctum (since purchased by Watchfire and now IBM) released a paper that
outlined a new vulnerability akin to cross-site scripting called HTTP
response splitting. Six months later, Microsoft issued another security
update for Outlook Web Access in Microsoft Exchange 5.5 to fix an HTTP
response splitting vulnerability. So what happened? Simply put, at the time
the first bulletin was issued, response splitting issues were unheard of,
but the landscape changed."

The rest of the article is also worth a read -
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163310.aspx

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:16 AM, sarvesh shete <sarvesh.sse@gmail.com
mailto:sarvesh.sse@gmail.com > wrote:

Hi,

Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked?
Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with
AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting vertical
privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application.
Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding techniques
and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and is PADSS
certified but still can it be hacked?

Regards,
Sarvesh
India


The Web Security Mailing List

WebSecurity RSS Feed
http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss

Join WASC on LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/83336/4B20E4374DBA

WASC on Twitter
http://twitter.com/wascupdates

websecurity@lists.webappsec.org mailto:websecurity@lists.webappsec.org
http://lists.webappsec.org/mailman/listinfo/websecurity_lists.webappsec.org

My 2 cents:- Any system of processes (like PCI / PA DSS) has a set of activities that are certified based on checks done at a point in time. However, as it is a system of processes executed by humans, there is every chance of an error creeping in because of some step either getting missed out or not being followed to the letter (e.g., maybe because of a not-an-expert hand behind it) .. Hence, any system can be hacked, it is just a matter of time. A certificate is not a guarantee. Regards Maanav From: websecurity [mailto:websecurity-bounces@lists.webappsec.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Dewhurst Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 3:50 AM To: sarvesh shete Cc: Subject: Re: [WEB SECURITY] [Web Security] Can a PADSS certified system be hacked Quoting Michael Howard of Microsoft: "You'll Never Reach Zero Security Vulnerabilities It's sad but true, but you'll never get to zero security vulnerabilities. I remember when we issued one of the first security updates for Windows Vista. Some users were surprised because they thought Microsoft claimed to have solved the security problem with Windows Vista. First, I don't know of anyone who made the claim and second, zero security vulnerabilities just isn't achievable. While zero security vulnerabilities would be nice, thinking you can reach such a state is folly. The fact is the technology landscape is always in flux, threats are a moving target, and security research is ongoing. I said earlier security is an arms race. We add defenses to our products and the attackers adapt. Your code might seem utterly vulnerability-free today, but that could all change tomorrow when a new type of vulnerability is discovered. For instance, on October 15, 2003, Microsoft issued a security bulletin that fixed a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in OutlookR Web Access included with Microsoft Exchange 5.5. On March 4th the following year, Sanctum (since purchased by Watchfire and now IBM) released a paper that outlined a new vulnerability akin to cross-site scripting called HTTP response splitting. Six months later, Microsoft issued another security update for Outlook Web Access in Microsoft Exchange 5.5 to fix an HTTP response splitting vulnerability. So what happened? Simply put, at the time the first bulletin was issued, response splitting issues were unheard of, but the landscape changed." The rest of the article is also worth a read - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163310.aspx On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 5:16 AM, sarvesh shete <sarvesh.sse@gmail.com <mailto:sarvesh.sse@gmail.com> > wrote: Hi, Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked? Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting vertical privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application. Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding techniques and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and is PADSS certified but still can it be hacked? Regards, Sarvesh India _______________________________________________ The Web Security Mailing List WebSecurity RSS Feed http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss Join WASC on LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/83336/4B20E4374DBA WASC on Twitter http://twitter.com/wascupdates websecurity@lists.webappsec.org <mailto:websecurity@lists.webappsec.org> http://lists.webappsec.org/mailman/listinfo/websecurity_lists.webappsec.org
CH
Christian Heinrich
Fri, May 24, 2013 3:26 AM

Sarvesh,

I provided an overview of the political and technical deficiencies
within http://www.slideshare.net/cmlh/padss back in 2010.

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:16 PM, sarvesh shete sarvesh.sse@gmail.com wrote:

Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked?
Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with
AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting vertical
privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application.
Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding techniques
and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and is PADSS
certified but still can it be hacked?

--
Regards,
Christian Heinrich

http://cmlh.id.au/contact

Sarvesh, I provided an overview of the political and technical deficiencies within http://www.slideshare.net/cmlh/padss back in 2010. On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:16 PM, sarvesh shete <sarvesh.sse@gmail.com> wrote: > Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked? > Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with > AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting vertical > privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application. > Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding techniques > and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and is PADSS > certified but still can it be hacked? -- Regards, Christian Heinrich http://cmlh.id.au/contact
SS
sarvesh shete
Fri, May 24, 2013 6:24 AM

Thanx Maanav, Thanx Christian!

Actually why I asked this question is because same case happened in my
organization.
I work for a company who develops banking products. We have a product PADSS
certified and while delivering it to a bank who is our new client; the
product 'go live' has been put on hold because bank carried out penetration
testing from other company who is specialized in penetration testing based
on pure hacking stuff. Though the pen testers could not break encryption or
hashing done on stored card numbers but were able to find flaws in few
screens of application like XSS, SQL injection etc because in some screens
developers missed out server side validations. Now the client bank says if
your product is PADSS certified then why such issues? It must be completely
secure. We have no answer! Surely we can fix the same but we have got no
explanation why such issues still exist even though product is PADSS
certified.
On May 24, 2013 8:56 AM, "Christian Heinrich" christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au
wrote:

Sarvesh,

I provided an overview of the political and technical deficiencies
within http://www.slideshare.net/cmlh/padss back in 2010.

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:16 PM, sarvesh shete sarvesh.sse@gmail.com
wrote:

Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked?
Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with
AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting

vertical

privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application.
Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding

techniques

and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and is PADSS
certified but still can it be hacked?

--
Regards,
Christian Heinrich

http://cmlh.id.au/contact

Thanx Maanav, Thanx Christian! Actually why I asked this question is because same case happened in my organization. I work for a company who develops banking products. We have a product PADSS certified and while delivering it to a bank who is our new client; the product 'go live' has been put on hold because bank carried out penetration testing from other company who is specialized in penetration testing based on pure hacking stuff. Though the pen testers could not break encryption or hashing done on stored card numbers but were able to find flaws in few screens of application like XSS, SQL injection etc because in some screens developers missed out server side validations. Now the client bank says if your product is PADSS certified then why such issues? It must be completely secure. We have no answer! Surely we can fix the same but we have got no explanation why such issues still exist even though product is PADSS certified. On May 24, 2013 8:56 AM, "Christian Heinrich" <christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au> wrote: > Sarvesh, > > I provided an overview of the political and technical deficiencies > within http://www.slideshare.net/cmlh/padss back in 2010. > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:16 PM, sarvesh shete <sarvesh.sse@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked? > > Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with > > AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting > vertical > > privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application. > > Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding > techniques > > and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and is PADSS > > certified but still can it be hacked? > > > > -- > Regards, > Christian Heinrich > > http://cmlh.id.au/contact >
CG
Christoph Gruber
Fri, May 24, 2013 11:21 AM

On 21.05.2013 um 05:16 sarvesh shete sarvesh.sse@gmail.com wrote:

Hi,

Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked?
Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with
AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism)

Even when you store data with AES256 or any other secure encryption, the data still has to accessed. on every transition, the data has to be loaded, decrypted and modified.
So EVERY data can be accessed bay attackers.
All other things about zero vulns and so are already said by the others in this thread.

[snip]

Regards,
Sarvesh
India

--
Christoph Gruber

On 21.05.2013 um 05:16 sarvesh shete <sarvesh.sse@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked? > Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with > AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) Even when you store data with AES256 or any other secure encryption, the data still has to accessed. on every transition, the data has to be loaded, decrypted and modified. So EVERY data can be accessed bay attackers. All other things about zero vulns and so are already said by the others in this thread. [snip] > Regards, > Sarvesh > India -- Christoph Gruber
AL
Albert Lunde
Fri, May 24, 2013 12:11 PM

At a more abstract level, there are proofs relating malware detection to
the Turing halting problem, saying in effect that one can't look at code
with a perfect algorithm to say "this is a virus" or "this is not a
virus".

So the state of the art in that area isn't going to rise too far above
imperfect heuristics, and signatures based on a known virus "zoo".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malware_research

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Cohen

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Adleman

The same ideas are probably applicable to other general questions about
the properties of computer software. "Does this program work?" may be
answered in specific cases, but not in the general unconstrained case.

At a more abstract level, there are proofs relating malware detection to the Turing halting problem, saying in effect that one can't look at code with a perfect algorithm to say "this is a virus" or "this is not a virus". So the state of the art in that area isn't going to rise too far above imperfect heuristics, and signatures based on a known virus "zoo". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malware_research http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Cohen http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Adleman The same ideas are probably applicable to other general questions about the properties of computer software. "Does this program work?" may be answered in specific cases, but not in the general unconstrained case.
LK
Lal kumar
Fri, May 24, 2013 4:36 PM

Hi Sarvesh,

Your organization is not following secure SDLC while developing
applications.
Choose testers wisely.

Regards,
Lal kumar
On 24 May 2013 21:54, "sarvesh shete" sarvesh.sse@gmail.com wrote:

Thanx Maanav, Thanx Christian!

Actually why I asked this question is because same case happened in my
organization.
I work for a company who develops banking products. We have a product
PADSS certified and while delivering it to a bank who is our new client;
the product 'go live' has been put on hold because bank carried out
penetration testing from other company who is specialized in penetration
testing based on pure hacking stuff. Though the pen testers could not break
encryption or hashing done on stored card numbers but were able to find
flaws in few screens of application like XSS, SQL injection etc because in
some screens developers missed out server side validations. Now the client
bank says if your product is PADSS certified then why such issues? It must
be completely secure. We have no answer! Surely we can fix the same but we
have got no explanation why such issues still exist even though product is
PADSS certified.
On May 24, 2013 8:56 AM, "Christian Heinrich" <
christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au> wrote:

Sarvesh,

I provided an overview of the political and technical deficiencies
within http://www.slideshare.net/cmlh/padss back in 2010.

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:16 PM, sarvesh shete sarvesh.sse@gmail.com
wrote:

Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked?
Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with
AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting

vertical

privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application.
Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding

techniques

and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and is PADSS
certified but still can it be hacked?

--
Regards,
Christian Heinrich

http://cmlh.id.au/contact

Hi Sarvesh, Your organization is not following secure SDLC while developing applications. Choose testers wisely. Regards, Lal kumar On 24 May 2013 21:54, "sarvesh shete" <sarvesh.sse@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanx Maanav, Thanx Christian! > > Actually why I asked this question is because same case happened in my > organization. > I work for a company who develops banking products. We have a product > PADSS certified and while delivering it to a bank who is our new client; > the product 'go live' has been put on hold because bank carried out > penetration testing from other company who is specialized in penetration > testing based on pure hacking stuff. Though the pen testers could not break > encryption or hashing done on stored card numbers but were able to find > flaws in few screens of application like XSS, SQL injection etc because in > some screens developers missed out server side validations. Now the client > bank says if your product is PADSS certified then why such issues? It must > be completely secure. We have no answer! Surely we can fix the same but we > have got no explanation why such issues still exist even though product is > PADSS certified. > On May 24, 2013 8:56 AM, "Christian Heinrich" < > christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au> wrote: > >> Sarvesh, >> >> I provided an overview of the political and technical deficiencies >> within http://www.slideshare.net/cmlh/padss back in 2010. >> >> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:16 PM, sarvesh shete <sarvesh.sse@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked? >> > Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with >> > AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting >> vertical >> > privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application. >> > Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding >> techniques >> > and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and is PADSS >> > certified but still can it be hacked? >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Christian Heinrich >> >> http://cmlh.id.au/contact >> > > _______________________________________________ > The Web Security Mailing List > > WebSecurity RSS Feed > http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss > > Join WASC on LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/83336/4B20E4374DBA > > WASC on Twitter > http://twitter.com/wascupdates > > websecurity@lists.webappsec.org > http://lists.webappsec.org/mailman/listinfo/websecurity_lists.webappsec.org > >
CW
Colin Watson
Fri, May 24, 2013 6:22 PM

Sarvesh

It perhaps sounds like you ought to be discussing this with your PA-QSA, and the PCISSC who certify PA-QSA companies and assessors:

https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/payment_application_qsas.php

https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/pa-qsaclientfeedbackform.php

Merchants using the product might be at risk.

Colin

----- Original Message -----
From: sarvesh shete
[mailto:sarvesh.sse@gmail.com]
To: Christian Heinrich
[mailto:christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au]
Cc:
websecurity@lists.webappsec.org
Sent: Fri, 24 May 2013 07:24:38
+0100
Subject: Re: [WEB SECURITY] [Web Security] Can a PADSS certified
system be hacked

Thanx Maanav, Thanx Christian!

Actually why I asked this question is because same case happened in my
organization.
I work for a company who develops banking products. We have a product PADSS
certified and while delivering it to a bank who is our new client; the
product 'go live' has been put on hold because bank carried out penetration
testing from other company who is specialized in penetration testing based
on pure hacking stuff. Though the pen testers could not break encryption or
hashing done on stored card numbers but were able to find flaws in few
screens of application like XSS, SQL injection etc because in some screens
developers missed out server side validations. Now the client bank says if
your product is PADSS certified then why such issues? It must be completely
secure. We have no answer! Surely we can fix the same but we have got no
explanation why such issues still exist even though product is PADSS
certified.
On May 24, 2013 8:56 AM, "Christian Heinrich"
christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au
wrote:

Sarvesh,

I provided an overview of the political and technical deficiencies
within http://www.slideshare.net/cmlh/padss back in 2010.

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:16 PM, sarvesh shete sarvesh.sse@gmail.com
wrote:

Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked?
Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with
AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting

vertical

privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application.
Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding

techniques

and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and is PADSS
certified but still can it be hacked?

--
Regards,
Christian Heinrich

http://cmlh.id.au/contact

Sarvesh It perhaps sounds like you ought to be discussing this with your PA-QSA, and the PCISSC who certify PA-QSA companies and assessors: https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/payment_application_qsas.php https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/pa-qsaclientfeedbackform.php Merchants using the product might be at risk. Colin ----- Original Message ----- From: sarvesh shete [mailto:sarvesh.sse@gmail.com] To: Christian Heinrich [mailto:christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au] Cc: websecurity@lists.webappsec.org Sent: Fri, 24 May 2013 07:24:38 +0100 Subject: Re: [WEB SECURITY] [Web Security] Can a PADSS certified system be hacked > Thanx Maanav, Thanx Christian! > > Actually why I asked this question is because same case happened in my > organization. > I work for a company who develops banking products. We have a product PADSS > certified and while delivering it to a bank who is our new client; the > product 'go live' has been put on hold because bank carried out penetration > testing from other company who is specialized in penetration testing based > on pure hacking stuff. Though the pen testers could not break encryption or > hashing done on stored card numbers but were able to find flaws in few > screens of application like XSS, SQL injection etc because in some screens > developers missed out server side validations. Now the client bank says if > your product is PADSS certified then why such issues? It must be completely > secure. We have no answer! Surely we can fix the same but we have got no > explanation why such issues still exist even though product is PADSS > certified. > On May 24, 2013 8:56 AM, "Christian Heinrich" > <christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au> > wrote: > > > Sarvesh, > > > > I provided an overview of the political and technical deficiencies > > within http://www.slideshare.net/cmlh/padss back in 2010. > > > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:16 PM, sarvesh shete <sarvesh.sse@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked? > > > Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with > > > AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting > > vertical > > > privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application. > > > Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding > > techniques > > > and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and is PADSS > > > certified but still can it be hacked? > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Christian Heinrich > > > > http://cmlh.id.au/contact > > >
SK
Steve Kerns
Tue, May 28, 2013 2:18 PM

Can an application be hacked even if it is PA-DSS validated? The answer is yes? Have you made any changes to the application since the validation? If so, are you performing code reviews and your penetration testing against the application? Are you doing these internally or do you have them performed by a third party?

These should have been caught before the validation process during your testing/QA phase. The auditor should have also caught them, but depending on their skills, they may have not performed the right tests or used the right tools.

I am curious, what company did the PA-DSS validation?

Steve Kerns

From: websecurity [mailto:websecurity-bounces@lists.webappsec.org] On Behalf Of sarvesh shete
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 1:25 AM
To: Christian Heinrich
Cc: websecurity@lists.webappsec.org
Subject: Re: [WEB SECURITY] [Web Security] Can a PADSS certified system be hacked

Thanx Maanav, Thanx Christian!

Actually why I asked this question is because same case happened in my organization.
I work for a company who develops banking products. We have a product PADSS certified and while delivering it to a bank who is our new client; the product 'go live' has been put on hold because bank carried out penetration testing from other company who is specialized in penetration testing based on pure hacking stuff. Though the pen testers could not break encryption or hashing done on stored card numbers but were able to find flaws in few screens of application like XSS, SQL injection etc because in some screens developers missed out server side validations. Now the client bank says if your product is PADSS certified then why such issues? It must be completely secure. We have no answer! Surely we can fix the same but we have got no explanation why such issues still exist even though product is PADSS certified.
On May 24, 2013 8:56 AM, "Christian Heinrich" <christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.aumailto:christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au> wrote:
Sarvesh,

I provided an overview of the political and technical deficiencies
within http://www.slideshare.net/cmlh/padss back in 2010.

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:16 PM, sarvesh shete <sarvesh.sse@gmail.commailto:sarvesh.sse@gmail.com> wrote:

Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked?
Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with
AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting vertical
privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application.
Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding techniques
and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and is PADSS
certified but still can it be hacked?

--
Regards,
Christian Heinrich

http://cmlh.id.au/contact

Can an application be hacked even if it is PA-DSS validated? The answer is yes? Have you made any changes to the application since the validation? If so, are you performing code reviews and your penetration testing against the application? Are you doing these internally or do you have them performed by a third party? These should have been caught before the validation process during your testing/QA phase. The auditor should have also caught them, but depending on their skills, they may have not performed the right tests or used the right tools. I am curious, what company did the PA-DSS validation? Steve Kerns From: websecurity [mailto:websecurity-bounces@lists.webappsec.org] On Behalf Of sarvesh shete Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 1:25 AM To: Christian Heinrich Cc: websecurity@lists.webappsec.org Subject: Re: [WEB SECURITY] [Web Security] Can a PADSS certified system be hacked Thanx Maanav, Thanx Christian! Actually why I asked this question is because same case happened in my organization. I work for a company who develops banking products. We have a product PADSS certified and while delivering it to a bank who is our new client; the product 'go live' has been put on hold because bank carried out penetration testing from other company who is specialized in penetration testing based on pure hacking stuff. Though the pen testers could not break encryption or hashing done on stored card numbers but were able to find flaws in few screens of application like XSS, SQL injection etc because in some screens developers missed out server side validations. Now the client bank says if your product is PADSS certified then why such issues? It must be completely secure. We have no answer! Surely we can fix the same but we have got no explanation why such issues still exist even though product is PADSS certified. On May 24, 2013 8:56 AM, "Christian Heinrich" <christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au<mailto:christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au>> wrote: Sarvesh, I provided an overview of the political and technical deficiencies within http://www.slideshare.net/cmlh/padss back in 2010. On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:16 PM, sarvesh shete <sarvesh.sse@gmail.com<mailto:sarvesh.sse@gmail.com>> wrote: > Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked? > Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with > AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting vertical > privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application. > Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding techniques > and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and is PADSS > certified but still can it be hacked? -- Regards, Christian Heinrich http://cmlh.id.au/contact
PS
Prasad Shenoy
Tue, May 28, 2013 2:44 PM

PA-DSS is not a security panacea as the other stated as well. I read someone mentioned about looking into your SDLC. That's a good starting point.

Don't look at security as a check box to meet the PA-DSS or any other compliance needs. That's when you fail. It should be an integral part of your thought process when designing and developing software, not a bolt on.

Lastly, the QSA is not to be blamed completely not knowing what environment and circumstances were available to the QSA when the engagement was performed and if those parameters changed when the product was delivered to the client (eg, your WAS might filter out reflected XSS while they do not have such filtering in their test environment. Another example, the QSA tested on chrome or IE with XSS Auditor enabled while the client tested with all bets off).

The reality is there are vulnerabilities in the application. Your answer (since you said you have no answer) should be to assure the client that you would go back to the drawing boards and take reasonable measures to fix the flaws before re-delivering the app.

If you don't have a good SSDL in place, this might be a good opportunity to start thinking about it and getting your management involved :)

Hope this helps!

Cheers,
Prasad

On May 28, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Steve Kerns Steve.Kerns@netspi.com wrote:

Can an application be hacked even if it is PA-DSS validated? The answer is yes? Have you made any changes to the application since the validation? If so, are you performing code reviews and your penetration testing against the application? Are you doing these internally or do you have them performed by a third party?

These should have been caught before the validation process during your testing/QA phase. The auditor should have also caught them, but depending on their skills, they may have not performed the right tests or used the right tools.

I am curious, what company did the PA-DSS validation?

Steve Kerns

From: websecurity [mailto:websecurity-bounces@lists.webappsec.org] On Behalf Of sarvesh shete
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 1:25 AM
To: Christian Heinrich
Cc: websecurity@lists.webappsec.org
Subject: Re: [WEB SECURITY] [Web Security] Can a PADSS certified system be hacked

Thanx Maanav, Thanx Christian!

Actually why I asked this question is because same case happened in my organization.
I work for a company who develops banking products. We have a product PADSS certified and while delivering it to a bank who is our new client; the product 'go live' has been put on hold because bank carried out penetration testing from other company who is specialized in penetration testing based on pure hacking stuff. Though the pen testers could not break encryption or hashing done on stored card numbers but were able to find flaws in few screens of application like XSS, SQL injection etc because in some screens developers missed out server side validations. Now the client bank says if your product is PADSS certified then why such issues? It must be completely secure. We have no answer! Surely we can fix the same but we have got no explanation why such issues still exist even though product is PADSS certified.

On May 24, 2013 8:56 AM, "Christian Heinrich" christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au wrote:
Sarvesh,

I provided an overview of the political and technical deficiencies
within http://www.slideshare.net/cmlh/padss back in 2010.

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:16 PM, sarvesh shete sarvesh.sse@gmail.com wrote:

Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked?
Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with
AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting vertical
privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application.
Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding techniques
and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and is PADSS
certified but still can it be hacked?

PA-DSS is not a security panacea as the other stated as well. I read someone mentioned about looking into your SDLC. That's a good starting point. Don't look at security as a check box to meet the PA-DSS or any other compliance needs. That's when you fail. It should be an integral part of your thought process when designing and developing software, not a bolt on. Lastly, the QSA is not to be blamed completely not knowing what environment and circumstances were available to the QSA when the engagement was performed and if those parameters changed when the product was delivered to the client (eg, your WAS might filter out reflected XSS while they do not have such filtering in their test environment. Another example, the QSA tested on chrome or IE with XSS Auditor enabled while the client tested with all bets off). The reality is there are vulnerabilities in the application. Your answer (since you said you have no answer) should be to assure the client that you would go back to the drawing boards and take reasonable measures to fix the flaws before re-delivering the app. If you don't have a good SSDL in place, this might be a good opportunity to start thinking about it and getting your management involved :) Hope this helps! Cheers, Prasad On May 28, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Steve Kerns <Steve.Kerns@netspi.com> wrote: > Can an application be hacked even if it is PA-DSS validated? The answer is yes? Have you made any changes to the application since the validation? If so, are you performing code reviews and your penetration testing against the application? Are you doing these internally or do you have them performed by a third party? > > These should have been caught before the validation process during your testing/QA phase. The auditor should have also caught them, but depending on their skills, they may have not performed the right tests or used the right tools. > > I am curious, what company did the PA-DSS validation? > > Steve Kerns > > From: websecurity [mailto:websecurity-bounces@lists.webappsec.org] On Behalf Of sarvesh shete > Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 1:25 AM > To: Christian Heinrich > Cc: websecurity@lists.webappsec.org > Subject: Re: [WEB SECURITY] [Web Security] Can a PADSS certified system be hacked > > Thanx Maanav, Thanx Christian! > > Actually why I asked this question is because same case happened in my organization. > I work for a company who develops banking products. We have a product PADSS certified and while delivering it to a bank who is our new client; the product 'go live' has been put on hold because bank carried out penetration testing from other company who is specialized in penetration testing based on pure hacking stuff. Though the pen testers could not break encryption or hashing done on stored card numbers but were able to find flaws in few screens of application like XSS, SQL injection etc because in some screens developers missed out server side validations. Now the client bank says if your product is PADSS certified then why such issues? It must be completely secure. We have no answer! Surely we can fix the same but we have got no explanation why such issues still exist even though product is PADSS certified. > > On May 24, 2013 8:56 AM, "Christian Heinrich" <christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au> wrote: > Sarvesh, > > I provided an overview of the political and technical deficiencies > within http://www.slideshare.net/cmlh/padss back in 2010. > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:16 PM, sarvesh shete <sarvesh.sse@gmail.com> wrote: > > Can a system which is PA DSS certified be hacked? > > Hacked means not in case of getting sensitive data(data is stored with > > AES256 and strong cryptography mechanism) but hacked means getting vertical > > privilege escalation, XSS, Sql injection in the application. > > Is it possible that the application is developed by secure coding techniques > > and includes the code for handling XSS, sql injections etc and is PADSS > > certified but still can it be hacked? > > > > -- > Regards, > Christian Heinrich > > http://cmlh.id.au/contact > _______________________________________________ > The Web Security Mailing List > > WebSecurity RSS Feed > http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss > > Join WASC on LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/83336/4B20E4374DBA > > WASC on Twitter > http://twitter.com/wascupdates > > websecurity@lists.webappsec.org > http://lists.webappsec.org/mailman/listinfo/websecurity_lists.webappsec.org
CH
Christian Heinrich
Wed, May 29, 2013 12:33 AM

Prasad,

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Prasad Shenoy prasad.shenoy@gmail.com wrote:

Lastly, the QSA is not to be blamed completely not knowing what environment
and circumstances were available to the QSA when the engagement was
performed and if those parameters changed when the product was delivered to
the client (eg, your WAS might filter out reflected XSS while they do not
have such filtering in their test environment. Another example, the QSA
tested on chrome or IE with XSS Auditor enabled while the client tested with
all bets off).

This would be addressed within the "PA-DSS Implementation Guide" which
is a requirement to be listed on
https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/vpa_agreement.php

--
Regards,
Christian Heinrich

http://cmlh.id.au/contact

Prasad, On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Prasad Shenoy <prasad.shenoy@gmail.com> wrote: > Lastly, the QSA is not to be blamed completely not knowing what environment > and circumstances were available to the QSA when the engagement was > performed and if those parameters changed when the product was delivered to > the client (eg, your WAS might filter out reflected XSS while they do not > have such filtering in their test environment. Another example, the QSA > tested on chrome or IE with XSS Auditor enabled while the client tested with > all bets off). This would be addressed within the "PA-DSS Implementation Guide" which is a requirement to be listed on https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/vpa_agreement.php -- Regards, Christian Heinrich http://cmlh.id.au/contact
CH
Christian Heinrich
Wed, May 29, 2013 12:43 AM

Sarvesh,

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Steve Kerns Steve.Kerns@netspi.com wrote:

I am curious, what company did the PA-DSS validation?

I have to agree with Steve (and others) here that we need to know if
the person and or company was qualified to do so i.e.
https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/payment_application_qsas.php
?

Also, if you could indicate which application(s) you are referring to
that are listed on
https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/vpa_agreement.php
would be helpful too?

--
Regards,
Christian Heinrich

http://cmlh.id.au/contact

Sarvesh, On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Steve Kerns <Steve.Kerns@netspi.com> wrote: > I am curious, what company did the PA-DSS validation? I have to agree with Steve (and others) here that we need to know if the person and or company was qualified to do so i.e. https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/payment_application_qsas.php ? Also, if you could indicate which application(s) you are referring to that are listed on https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/vpa_agreement.php would be helpful too? -- Regards, Christian Heinrich http://cmlh.id.au/contact
PS
Prasad Shenoy
Wed, May 29, 2013 12:52 AM

Well that is exactly why the client is puzzled as well :).....

Cheers,
Prasad

On May 28, 2013, at 8:33 PM, Christian Heinrich christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au wrote:

Prasad,

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Prasad Shenoy prasad.shenoy@gmail.com wrote:

Lastly, the QSA is not to be blamed completely not knowing what environment
and circumstances were available to the QSA when the engagement was
performed and if those parameters changed when the product was delivered to
the client (eg, your WAS might filter out reflected XSS while they do not
have such filtering in their test environment. Another example, the QSA
tested on chrome or IE with XSS Auditor enabled while the client tested with
all bets off).

This would be addressed within the "PA-DSS Implementation Guide" which
is a requirement to be listed on
https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/vpa_agreement.php

--
Regards,
Christian Heinrich

http://cmlh.id.au/contact

Well that is exactly why the client is puzzled as well :)..... Cheers, Prasad On May 28, 2013, at 8:33 PM, Christian Heinrich <christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au> wrote: > Prasad, > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Prasad Shenoy <prasad.shenoy@gmail.com> wrote: >> Lastly, the QSA is not to be blamed completely not knowing what environment >> and circumstances were available to the QSA when the engagement was >> performed and if those parameters changed when the product was delivered to >> the client (eg, your WAS might filter out reflected XSS while they do not >> have such filtering in their test environment. Another example, the QSA >> tested on chrome or IE with XSS Auditor enabled while the client tested with >> all bets off). > > This would be addressed within the "PA-DSS Implementation Guide" which > is a requirement to be listed on > https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/vpa_agreement.php > > > -- > Regards, > Christian Heinrich > > http://cmlh.id.au/contact
RS
rajat swarup
Fri, Jun 14, 2013 8:23 PM

Not all PA-QSAs are created equal.  Penetration tests are mostly black-box
(unless you choose a white/gray box test specifically). In such tests, some
vulnerabilities are sure to be missed.  But the keyword here is some.
Seems like the PA-QSA company did not do the assessment properly and went
ahead with whatever would fly.
So the answer is you need to change your PA-QSA vendor.

Thanks,
Rajat.

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Christian Heinrich <
christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au> wrote:

Sarvesh,

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Steve Kerns Steve.Kerns@netspi.com
wrote:

I am curious, what company did the PA-DSS validation?

I have to agree with Steve (and others) here that we need to know if
the person and or company was qualified to do so i.e.

https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/payment_application_qsas.php
?

Also, if you could indicate which application(s) you are referring to
that are listed on

https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/vpa_agreement.php
would be helpful too?

--
Regards,
Christian Heinrich

http://cmlh.id.au/contact


The Web Security Mailing List

WebSecurity RSS Feed
http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss

Join WASC on LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/83336/4B20E4374DBA

WASC on Twitter
http://twitter.com/wascupdates

websecurity@lists.webappsec.org
http://lists.webappsec.org/mailman/listinfo/websecurity_lists.webappsec.org

--
Rajat Swarup
www.rajatswarup.com

Not all PA-QSAs are created equal. Penetration tests are mostly black-box (unless you choose a white/gray box test specifically). In such tests, some vulnerabilities are sure to be missed. But the keyword here is *some*. Seems like the PA-QSA company did not do the assessment properly and went ahead with whatever would fly. So the answer is you need to change your PA-QSA vendor. Thanks, Rajat. On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Christian Heinrich < christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au> wrote: > Sarvesh, > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Steve Kerns <Steve.Kerns@netspi.com> > wrote: > > I am curious, what company did the PA-DSS validation? > > I have to agree with Steve (and others) here that we need to know if > the person and or company was qualified to do so i.e. > > https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/payment_application_qsas.php > ? > > Also, if you could indicate which application(s) you are referring to > that are listed on > > https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/vpa_agreement.php > would be helpful too? > > > -- > Regards, > Christian Heinrich > > http://cmlh.id.au/contact > > _______________________________________________ > The Web Security Mailing List > > WebSecurity RSS Feed > http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss > > Join WASC on LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/83336/4B20E4374DBA > > WASC on Twitter > http://twitter.com/wascupdates > > websecurity@lists.webappsec.org > http://lists.webappsec.org/mailman/listinfo/websecurity_lists.webappsec.org > -- Rajat Swarup www.rajatswarup.com
SS
sarvesh shete
Sat, Jun 15, 2013 4:00 AM

Yes, now I got all my doubts clear. Thanx everyone!
On Jun 15, 2013 1:53 AM, "rajat swarup" rajats@gmail.com wrote:

Not all PA-QSAs are created equal.  Penetration tests are mostly black-box
(unless you choose a white/gray box test specifically). In such tests, some
vulnerabilities are sure to be missed.  But the keyword here is some.
Seems like the PA-QSA company did not do the assessment properly and went
ahead with whatever would fly.
So the answer is you need to change your PA-QSA vendor.

Thanks,
Rajat.

On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Christian Heinrich <
christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au> wrote:

Sarvesh,

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Steve Kerns Steve.Kerns@netspi.com
wrote:

I am curious, what company did the PA-DSS validation?

I have to agree with Steve (and others) here that we need to know if
the person and or company was qualified to do so i.e.

https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/payment_application_qsas.php
?

Also, if you could indicate which application(s) you are referring to
that are listed on

https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/vpa_agreement.php
would be helpful too?

--
Regards,
Christian Heinrich

http://cmlh.id.au/contact


The Web Security Mailing List

WebSecurity RSS Feed
http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss

Join WASC on LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/83336/4B20E4374DBA

WASC on Twitter
http://twitter.com/wascupdates

websecurity@lists.webappsec.org

http://lists.webappsec.org/mailman/listinfo/websecurity_lists.webappsec.org

--
Rajat Swarup
www.rajatswarup.com

Yes, now I got all my doubts clear. Thanx everyone! On Jun 15, 2013 1:53 AM, "rajat swarup" <rajats@gmail.com> wrote: > Not all PA-QSAs are created equal. Penetration tests are mostly black-box > (unless you choose a white/gray box test specifically). In such tests, some > vulnerabilities are sure to be missed. But the keyword here is *some*. > Seems like the PA-QSA company did not do the assessment properly and went > ahead with whatever would fly. > So the answer is you need to change your PA-QSA vendor. > > Thanks, > Rajat. > > > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Christian Heinrich < > christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au> wrote: > >> Sarvesh, >> >> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Steve Kerns <Steve.Kerns@netspi.com> >> wrote: >> > I am curious, what company did the PA-DSS validation? >> >> I have to agree with Steve (and others) here that we need to know if >> the person and or company was qualified to do so i.e. >> >> https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/payment_application_qsas.php >> ? >> >> Also, if you could indicate which application(s) you are referring to >> that are listed on >> >> https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/approved_companies_providers/vpa_agreement.php >> would be helpful too? >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Christian Heinrich >> >> http://cmlh.id.au/contact >> >> _______________________________________________ >> The Web Security Mailing List >> >> WebSecurity RSS Feed >> http://www.webappsec.org/rss/websecurity.rss >> >> Join WASC on LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/83336/4B20E4374DBA >> >> WASC on Twitter >> http://twitter.com/wascupdates >> >> websecurity@lists.webappsec.org >> >> http://lists.webappsec.org/mailman/listinfo/websecurity_lists.webappsec.org >> > > > > -- > Rajat Swarup > www.rajatswarup.com >